Committee Selection Process Overview for National At-Large Berths
CHAMPIOSHIP
COMMITTEE REPORT
APPENDIX A
Committee Selection for at-large berths
May 30, 2020
Selection Process Overview
2
Step 1: Unanimous
Consent for at-large teams
Step 2: Selection of
remaining at-large teams
in an iterative process
Selection Process Overview
3
Step 1: Unanimous
Consent for at-large teams
Step 2: Selection of
remaining at-large teams
in an iterative process
At-large national’s field
Selection Process Overview
4
At-large national’s field
Step 1: Unanimous
Consent for at-large teams
Step 2: Selection of
remaining at-large teams
in an iterative process
Selection Process Overview
5
Not selected for national’s
Step 1: Unanimous
Consent for at-large teams
Step 2: Selection of
remaining at-large teams
in an iterative process
At-large national’s field
Selection Process Overview
6
At-large national’s field
Not selected for national’s
Step 1: Unanimous
Consent for at-large teams
Step 2: Selection of
remaining at-large teams
in an iterative process
Step 1: Initial Ballot
Each committee member fills out an initial ballot
This step can be done prior to conference championships
•
Expedites announcement of national’s field
Will require extreme secrecy of all committee members
Ballot will be divided into two columns
•
Column 1: clear national’s contenders based on previous year’s performance
•
Column 2: potential national’s contenders that require further comparison
7
Step 1: Initial Ballot
Column 1:
Teams that definitely should be in the national’s field
•
Each committee member may select a maximum of 2/3 of available AL berths
for this columns
•
Exemplary performance over the year regardless of conference championship
•
Can be done prior to conference championships
Column 2:
Teams that merit a national’s berth but need further evaluation
•
No limit on selection into this group
•
Can be formed prior to championships but evaluated after
8
Step 1: Unanimous Consent Teams
9
Column 1 Teams:
Definitive Selection
(Attendance regardless of AQ)
Column 2 Teams:
Under Consideration
(Needs comparison)
Step 1: Unanimous Consent Teams
10
“locked” into a national’s berth regardless of AQ or
Conference championship standings
(can be determined prior to conference championships)
Receives >80% of
column 1 votes
Column 1 Teams:
Definitive Selection
(Attendance regardless of AQ)
Column 2 Teams:
Under Consideration
(Needs comparison)
Step 1: Under Consideration Teams
11
Column 1 Teams:
Definitive Selection
(Attendance regardless of AQ)
Column 2 Teams:
Under Consideration
(Needs comparison)
“locked” into national’s berth
Under consideration teams that will be
evaluated in Step 2
Receives >20%
of column 1 votes
Step 1: Under Consideration Teams
12
Column 1 Teams:
Definitive Selection
(Attendance regardless of AQ)
Column 2 Teams:
Under Consideration
(Needs comparison)
“locked” into national’s berth
Under consideration teams that will be
evaluated in Step 2
Receives >20% of
column 1/2 votes
Step 1: Under Consideration Teams
13
Nomination at
any time by 3
committee
members
Column 1 Teams:
Definitive Selection
(Attendance regardless of AQ)
Column 2 Teams:
Under Consideration
(Needs comparison)
“locked” into national’s berth
Under consideration teams that will be
evaluated in Step 2
Step 1: Initial Ballot
14
Receives >80% of
column 1 votes
Receives >20%
of column 1 votes
Receives >20% of
column 1/2 votes
Nomination at
any time by 3
committee
members
Column 1 Teams:
Definitive Selection
(Attendance regardless of AQ)
Column 2 Teams:
Under Consideration
(Needs comparison)
“locked” into national’s berth
Under consideration teams that will be
evaluated in Step 2
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams
15
Committee members vote for
teams to move into AL field
(# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths)
Teams with most votes moved
into ranking field
(field size = 2x remaining berths)
Lowest ranked teams advance
to AL berth
(# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths)
Three step, iterative process, to
comparatively analyze all teams against
each other in an expeditious manner
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams
16
Committee members vote for
teams to move into AL field
(# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths)
Teams with most votes moved
into ranking field
(field size = 2x remaining berths)
Lowest ranked teams advance
to AL berth
(# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths)
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams
17
Committee members vote for
teams to move into AL field
(# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths)
Teams with most votes moved
into ranking field
(field size = 2x remaining berths)
Lowest ranked teams advance
to AL berth
(# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths)
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams
18
Committee members vote for
teams to move into AL field
(# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths)
Teams with most votes moved
into ranking field
(field size = 2x remaining berths)
Lowest ranked teams advance
to AL berth
(# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths)
Teams are ranked by each
committee member and
ordered by average rank
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams
19
Teams not selected return
to consideration unbiased
Committee members vote for
teams to move into AL field
(# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths)
Teams with most votes moved
into ranking field
(field size = 2x remaining berths)
Lowest ranked teams advance
to AL berth
(# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths)
At-large national’s field
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams
20
Teams not selected return
to consideration unbiased
Committee members vote for
teams to move into AL field
(# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths)
Teams with most votes moved
into ranking field
(field size = 2x remaining berths)
Lowest ranked teams advance
to AL berth
(# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths)
At-large national’s field
The committee report outlines the Selection Process for at-large teams for the national championship. It involves an iterative process, starting with unanimous consent for at-large teams. The members fill out an initial ballot to select teams for the national field based on past performance and potential contenders that require further evaluation.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
CHAMPIOSHIP COMMITTEE REPORT APPENDIX A Committee Selection for at-large berths May 30, 2020
Selection Process Overview Step 2: Selection of remaining at-large teams in an iterative process Step 1: Unanimous Consent for at-large teams 2
Selection Process Overview At-large national s field Step 2: Selection of remaining at-large teams in an iterative process Step 1: Unanimous Consent for at-large teams 3
Selection Process Overview At-large national s field Step 2: Selection of remaining at-large teams in an iterative process Step 1: Unanimous Consent for at-large teams 4
Selection Process Overview At-large national s field Step 2: Selection of remaining at-large teams in an iterative process Step 1: Unanimous Consent for at-large teams Not selected for national s 5
Selection Process Overview At-large national s field Step 2: Selection of remaining at-large teams in an iterative process Step 1: Unanimous Consent for at-large teams Not selected for national s 6
Step 1: Initial Ballot Each committee member fills out an initial ballot This step can be done prior to conference championships Expedites announcement of national s field Will require extreme secrecy of all committee members Ballot will be divided into two columns Column 1: clear national s contenders based on previous year s performance Column 2: potential national s contenders that require further comparison 7
Step 1: Initial Ballot Column 1: Teams that definitely should be in the national s field Each committee member may select a maximum of 2/3 of available AL berths for this columns Exemplary performance over the year regardless of conference championship Can be done prior to conference championships Column 2:Teams that merit a national s berth but need further evaluation No limit on selection into this group Can be formed prior to championships but evaluated after 8
Step 1: Unanimous Consent Teams Column 1 Teams: Definitive Selection (Attendance regardless of AQ) Column 2 Teams: Under Consideration (Needs comparison) 9
Step 1: Unanimous Consent Teams locked into a national s berth regardless of AQ or Conference championship standings (can be determined prior to conference championships) Receives >80% of column 1 votes Column 1 Teams: Definitive Selection (Attendance regardless of AQ) Column 2 Teams: Under Consideration (Needs comparison) 10
Step 1: Under Consideration Teams locked into national s berth Column 1 Teams: Definitive Selection (Attendance regardless of AQ) Column 2 Teams: Under Consideration (Needs comparison) Receives >20% of column 1 votes Under consideration teams that will be evaluated in Step 2 11
Step 1: Under Consideration Teams locked into national s berth Column 1 Teams: Definitive Selection (Attendance regardless of AQ) Column 2 Teams: Under Consideration (Needs comparison) Receives >20% of column 1/2 votes Under consideration teams that will be evaluated in Step 2 12
Step 1: Under Consideration Teams locked into national s berth Column 1 Teams: Definitive Selection (Attendance regardless of AQ) Column 2 Teams: Under Consideration (Needs comparison) Nomination at any time by 3 committee members Under consideration teams that will be evaluated in Step 2 13
Step 1: Initial Ballot Receives >80% of column 1 votes locked into national s berth Column 1 Teams: Definitive Selection (Attendance regardless of AQ) Column 2 Teams: Under Consideration (Needs comparison) Receives >20% of column 1/2 votes Receives >20% of column 1 votes Nomination at any time by 3 committee members Under consideration teams that will be evaluated in Step 2 14
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams Committee members vote for teams to move into AL field (# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths) Three step, iterative process, to comparatively analyze all teams against each other in an expeditious manner Teams with most votes moved into ranking field (field size = 2x remaining berths) Lowest ranked teams advance to AL berth (# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths) 15
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams Committee members vote for teams to move into AL field (# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths) Teams with most votes moved into ranking field (field size = 2x remaining berths) Lowest ranked teams advance to AL berth (# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths) 16
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams Committee members vote for teams to move into AL field (# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths) Teams with most votes moved into ranking field (field size = 2x remaining berths) Lowest ranked teams advance to AL berth (# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths) 17
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams Committee members vote for teams to move into AL field (# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths) Teams are ranked by each committee member and ordered by average rank Teams with most votes moved into ranking field (field size = 2x remaining berths) Lowest ranked teams advance to AL berth (# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths) 18
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams Committee members vote for teams to move into AL field (# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths) At-large national s field Teams with most votes moved into ranking field (field size = 2x remaining berths) Lowest ranked teams advance to AL berth (# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths) Teams not selected return to consideration unbiased 19
Step 2: Under Consideration Teams Committee members vote for teams to move into AL field (# votes = 2/3 of remaining berths) At-large national s field Teams with most votes moved into ranking field (field size = 2x remaining berths) Lowest ranked teams advance to AL berth (# teams advanced = 2/3 of remaining berths) Teams not selected return to consideration unbiased 20
