Challenges and Upgrades in Electron-Ion Collider Interaction Regions

 
V
a
c
u
u
m
 
I
s
s
u
e
s
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
I
R
 
o
f
a
n
 
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
-
I
o
n
 
C
o
l
l
i
d
e
r
 
Christoph Montag
BNL
 
 
E
I
C
 
I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
 
R
e
g
i
o
n
 
D
e
s
i
g
n
 
C
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
 
Very 
asymmetric
 beam energies
High luminosity requires 
early beam
separation
 to allow focusing close to the IP
 Hard, intense 
synchrotron radiation
generated 
near or even inside the detector
must be passed safely through the IR
Short electron bunches excite 
HOMs
 that
lead to 
gas desorption
p-A (proton beam-gas) 
cross sections
typically 100-1000 times larger
 than e-p
“Physics” cross sections
 
T
h
e
 
H
E
R
A
 
E
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
 
 
Only electron-ion
collider ever built
920GeV protons,
27.5GeV electrons (or
positrons)
Comparatively low
beam currents, ~100mA
protons, ~50mA
electrons
180 bunches per ring
96nsec bunch spacing
250m long straight
sections for low-
β
focusing, beam
separation, and spin
rotators
 
H
E
R
A
-
I
 
I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
 
R
e
g
i
o
n
 
(
Z
E
U
S
 
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
)
 
S
y
n
c
h
r
o
t
r
o
n
 
R
a
d
i
a
t
i
o
n
 
i
n
 
H
E
R
A
-
I
 
6kW total SR power,
critical energy 34keV
Half of SR power
absorbed upstream of
detector by 3 movable
collimators (C1-C3)
Two fixed collimators
(C4, C5) near IP
against back-scattering
SR absorbers at
24m/25m downstream
of IP
 
 
Very good
background
conditions
 
H
E
R
A
-
I
I
 
 
T
h
e
 
L
u
m
i
n
o
s
i
t
y
 
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
 
New interaction regions, with smaller beam cross sections at the IP,
achieved by stronger focusing
Low-
β
 quadrupoles close to the IP for sufficient aperture
Beam separation and electron beam focusing by superconducting
combined-function magnets inside the detectors
Based on novel, exotic IR magnets
Factor 3 luminosity improvement over HERA-I
 
H
E
R
A
-
I
I
 
I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
 
R
e
g
i
o
n
 
Superconducting combined-function quadrupoles 1.7m from the IP inside
the detector, providing electron beam focusing and beam separation
Normal-conducting mirror-plate quadrupoles to focus proton beam and
pass electron beam and synchrotron radiation fan
 
Z
E
U
S
 
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
 
a
f
t
e
r
 
t
h
e
 
L
u
m
i
n
o
s
i
t
y
 
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
 
S
y
n
c
h
r
o
t
r
o
n
 
R
a
d
i
a
t
i
o
n
 
F
a
n
 
i
n
 
H
E
R
A
-
I
I
 
18kW
 of synchrotron
radiation power, with up
to 
115keV
 critical energy
produced by separator
magnets inside the
detector
No upstream SR
collimators
; entire
radiation fan must pass
through the detector
Synchrotron radiation
absorbers at 11m
septum, and at 27m –
main source of
background
 
V
a
c
u
u
m
 
S
y
s
t
e
m
 
Vacuum pipes for electrons, protons and SR separate 11m
downstream of IP
Flat cross section of common stainless steel chamber
requires special flanges, and protection by emergency
absorbers
Lots of pumping installed:
NEG strips in all stainless steel chambers
Ion getter and Ti sublimation pumps in-between magnets
Integrated ion getter pump inside the detector, at 1.3m from
the IP
Superconducting magnet beam pipes at 40-80K
Needed to be warmed up for regeneration of NEG pumps
No valves between warm and cold magnets due to space
constraints
 
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
 
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
 
i
n
 
H
E
R
A
-
I
I
 
Very severe background conditions after luminosity upgrade, limiting beam
currents and therefore luminosity to avoid radiation damage to detectors
 
Extensive background studies leading to modifications during several
months of shutdown:
Proton beam-gas interactions
Larger pumps at critical locations
Increased pumping port conductance
Improved mask shapes to reduce HOM losses
Synchrotron radiation background
Added synchrotron radiation collimator far upstream
Improved masks in IR
Improved magnet alignment, beam steering, and control
Electron beam-gas (off-momentum positrons)
Additional vacuum pumps 30m upstream
 
I
R
 
V
a
c
u
u
m
 
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
 
d
u
r
i
n
g
 
H
E
R
A
-
I
I
 
L
u
m
i
n
o
s
i
t
y
 
S
t
o
r
e
s
 
I
R
 
V
a
c
u
u
m
 
E
v
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gradual improvement due to beam conditioning, interrupted by a few
vacuum failures (leaks)
 
B
e
a
m
-
G
a
s
 
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
 
i
n
 
H
E
R
A
-
I
I
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Two time constants for vacuum conditioning:
Short term after leaks, 20-30 days
Long term, ~2 years
 
R
H
I
C
 
E
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
 
Two superconducting storage rings
Energy range 10 – 100GeV/n Au, 25 – 250GeV protons
111 bunches/ring, 106nsec bunch spacing
All ions other than protons cross transition
 
R
H
I
C
 
b
u
n
c
h
 
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
 
e
v
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
 
Steady bunch intensity increases achieved by:
NEG coating of warm beam pipes (2004-2008)
Pre-pumping before cool-down (from 2006)
Keeping machine at liquid nitrogen temperature over the shutdown
Intentional scrubbing at injection, using short, high-intensity bunches
“Parasitic” scrubbing by long physics runs, and no vacuum breaks in-between
 
R
H
I
C
 
V
a
c
u
u
m
 
i
n
 
S
T
A
R
 
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
 
A
f
t
e
r
 
S
o
l
e
n
o
i
d
 
P
o
w
e
r
S
u
p
p
l
y
 
 
F
a
i
l
u
r
e
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
STAR detector solenoid prevents electron cloud instability in detector
beampipe
 
e
R
H
I
C
 
High beam currents
330 bunches per ring in initial phase, up to 1320 in final
configuration
Large crossing angle (22mrad) to avoid dipoles near IP
 Large electron beam-beam parameter (up to 0.1) requires
near-integer tunes for dynamic focusing to compensate
emittance blow-up
Strong dynamic focusing effects increase beam divergence
at the IP, and beam sizes in the low-beta quadrupoles
Increased beam size results in more electrons experiencing
large magnetic fields in those magnets, increasing
synchrotron radiation power and critical energies
Dynamic focusing effects have to be taken into account
when determining required apertures in IR design
 
D
e
s
i
g
n
 
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
 
I
n
-
s
i
t
u
 
R
H
I
C
 
b
e
a
m
 
p
i
p
e
 
c
o
a
t
i
n
g
 
Large number of short, intense proton bunches requires in-situ copper
coating of stainless steel RHIC beam pipes to reduce resistive wall heat
load on cryo system
May need additional layer of amorphous carbon to reduce SEY for
electron cloud reduction
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interleaved arrangement of electron and hadron quadrupoles
22mrad total crossing angle, using crab cavities
Beam size in crab cavity region independent of energy – 
crab cavity
apertures can be rather small, thus allowing for higher frequency
Forward spectrometer (B0) and Roman Pots (R1-R4) for full acceptance
 
I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
 
R
e
g
i
o
n
 
L
a
y
o
u
t
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actively shielded electron beam pipe through superferric hadron
spectrometer B0
 
I
R
 
D
e
t
a
i
l
 
S
y
n
c
h
r
o
t
r
o
n
 
r
a
d
i
a
t
i
o
n
 
i
n
 
e
R
H
I
C
 
I
R
 
Synchrotron radiation from quadrupoles only; no dipoles due to crossing
angle
Few electrons in transverse tails experience high magnetic fields
 
S
R
 
P
o
w
e
r
 
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
 
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
 
1
m
m
 
B
e
 
P
i
p
e
 
W
a
l
l
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effects on detector background still under study
 
Multiple sources contribute to background conditions in
electron-ion collider detectors – synchrotron radiation and
beam-gas scattering
Measures to reduce one source may increase another –
HOMs from synchrotron radiation masks may lead to thermal
desorption of gas molecules, resulting in increased beam-
gas background
Close interaction between machine and detector during the
design process as well as during commissioning and
operations is necessary for success
 
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The article discusses vacuum issues, design challenges, and experiences in the interaction regions of Electron-Ion Colliders. It explores the unique characteristics of the HERA collider, including beam currents, bunch spacing, and straight sections. Additionally, it covers the upgrades and improvements implemented in HERA-II, such as stronger focusing and superconducting magnets for enhanced luminosity.

  • Collider
  • Interaction Regions
  • HERA
  • Upgrades
  • Vacuum

Uploaded on Sep 16, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1 Vacuum Issues in the IR of an Electron-Ion Collider Christoph Montag BNL

  2. 2 EIC Interaction Region Design Challenges Very asymmetric beam energies High luminosity requires early beam separation to allow focusing close to the IP Hard, intense synchrotron radiation generated near or even inside the detector must be passed safely through the IR Short electron bunches excite HOMs that lead to gas desorption p-A (proton beam-gas) cross sections typically 100-1000 times larger than e-p Physics cross sections 1 10 10

  3. 3 The HERA Experience Only electron-ion collider ever built 920GeV protons, 27.5GeV electrons (or positrons) Comparatively low beam currents, ~100mA protons, ~50mA electrons 180 bunches per ring 96nsec bunch spacing 250m long straight sections for low- focusing, beam separation, and spin rotators

  4. 4 HERA-I Interaction Region (ZEUS Detector)

  5. 5 Synchrotron Radiation in HERA-I 6kW total SR power, critical energy 34keV Half of SR power absorbed upstream of detector by 3 movable collimators (C1-C3) Two fixed collimators (C4, C5) near IP against back-scattering SR absorbers at 24m/25m downstream of IP Very good background conditions

  6. 6 HERA-II The Luminosity Upgrade New interaction regions, with smaller beam cross sections at the IP, achieved by stronger focusing Low- quadrupoles close to the IP for sufficient aperture Beam separation and electron beam focusing by superconducting combined-function magnets inside the detectors Based on novel, exotic IR magnets Factor 3 luminosity improvement over HERA-I

  7. 7 HERA-II Interaction Region Superconducting combined-function quadrupoles 1.7m from the IP inside the detector, providing electron beam focusing and beam separation Normal-conducting mirror-plate quadrupoles to focus proton beam and pass electron beam and synchrotron radiation fan

  8. 8 ZEUS Detector after the Luminosity Upgrade

  9. 9 Synchrotron Radiation Fan in HERA-II 18kW of synchrotron radiation power, with up to 115keV critical energy produced by separator magnets inside the detector No upstream SR collimators; entire radiation fan must pass through the detector Synchrotron radiation absorbers at 11m septum, and at 27m main source of background

  10. 10 Vacuum System Vacuum pipes for electrons, protons and SR separate 11m downstream of IP Flat cross section of common stainless steel chamber requires special flanges, and protection by emergency absorbers Lots of pumping installed: NEG strips in all stainless steel chambers Ion getter and Ti sublimation pumps in-between magnets Integrated ion getter pump inside the detector, at 1.3m from the IP Superconducting magnet beam pipes at 40-80K Needed to be warmed up for regeneration of NEG pumps No valves between warm and cold magnets due to space constraints

  11. 11 Background Conditions in HERA-II Very severe background conditions after luminosity upgrade, limiting beam currents and therefore luminosity to avoid radiation damage to detectors Extensive background studies leading to modifications during several months of shutdown: Proton beam-gas interactions Larger pumps at critical locations Increased pumping port conductance Improved mask shapes to reduce HOM losses Synchrotron radiation background Added synchrotron radiation collimator far upstream Improved masks in IR Improved magnet alignment, beam steering, and control Electron beam-gas (off-momentum positrons) Additional vacuum pumps 30m upstream

  12. 12 IR Vacuum Pressure during HERA-II Luminosity Stores

  13. 13 IR Vacuum Evolution Gradual improvement due to beam conditioning, interrupted by a few vacuum failures (leaks)

  14. 14 Beam-Gas Background in HERA-II Two time constants for vacuum conditioning: Short term after leaks, 20-30 days Long term, ~2 years

  15. 15 RHIC Experience Two superconducting storage rings Energy range 10 100GeV/n Au, 25 250GeV protons 111 bunches/ring, 106nsec bunch spacing All ions other than protons cross transition

  16. 16 RHIC bunch intensity evolution Steady bunch intensity increases achieved by: NEG coating of warm beam pipes (2004-2008) Pre-pumping before cool-down (from 2006) Keeping machine at liquid nitrogen temperature over the shutdown Intentional scrubbing at injection, using short, high-intensity bunches Parasitic scrubbing by long physics runs, and no vacuum breaks in-between

  17. 17 RHIC Vacuum in STAR Detector After Solenoid Power Supply Failure STAR detector solenoid prevents electron cloud instability in detector beampipe

  18. 18 eRHIC High beam currents 330 bunches per ring in initial phase, up to 1320 in final configuration Large crossing angle (22mrad) to avoid dipoles near IP Large electron beam-beam parameter (up to 0.1) requires near-integer tunes for dynamic focusing to compensate emittance blow-up Strong dynamic focusing effects increase beam divergence at the IP, and beam sizes in the low-beta quadrupoles Increased beam size results in more electrons experiencing large magnetic fields in those magnets, increasing synchrotron radiation power and critical energies Dynamic focusing effects have to be taken into account when determining required apertures in IR design

  19. 19 Design Concept Based on RHIC with 275GeV polarized protons Electron storage ring with 5 18GeV 1320 bunches per ring Up to 2.7A electron current similar to B-Factories 10MW maximum RF power Very flat normalized proton emittances: 2.4um horizontal, 0.1um vertical achieved by strong hadron cooling Low proton bunch intensities: 0.75*10^11 Full energy polarized electron injector Peak luminosity1.2 1034?? 2??? 1 Initially, 330 bunches and no hadron cooling - 2.6 1033?? 2??? 1

  20. 20 In-situ RHIC beam pipe coating Large number of short, intense proton bunches requires in-situ copper coating of stainless steel RHIC beam pipes to reduce resistive wall heat load on cryo system May need additional layer of amorphous carbon to reduce SEY for electron cloud reduction

  21. 21 Interaction Region Layout Interleaved arrangement of electron and hadron quadrupoles 22mrad total crossing angle, using crab cavities Beam size in crab cavity region independent of energy crab cavity apertures can be rather small, thus allowing for higher frequency Forward spectrometer (B0) and Roman Pots (R1-R4) for full acceptance

  22. 22 IR Detail Actively shielded electron beam pipe through superferric hadron spectrometer B0

  23. 23 Synchrotron radiation in eRHIC IR Synchrotron radiation from quadrupoles only; no dipoles due to crossing angle Few electrons in transverse tails experience high magnetic fields

  24. 24 SR Power Density outside 1mm Be Pipe Wall Effects on detector background still under study

  25. 25 Summary Multiple sources contribute to background conditions in electron-ion collider detectors synchrotron radiation and beam-gas scattering Measures to reduce one source may increase another HOMs from synchrotron radiation masks may lead to thermal desorption of gas molecules, resulting in increased beam- gas background Close interaction between machine and detector during the design process as well as during commissioning and operations is necessary for success

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#