Breastfeeding Advocacy Gear Meeting 3 Findings
The presentation highlights key findings from the Breastfeeding Advocacy Gear Meeting 3, discussing major events drawing media attention to breastfeeding issues, high-level advocates promoting breastfeeding, a national advocacy strategy based on research, and the existence of cohesive networks to increase support for breastfeeding. The total gear score benchmarks are presented, along with gaps and recommendations for further action.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Advocacy Gear Meeting 3 presentation Name of the presenter Gear Team Members: XX 2018
AG1: There have been major events that have drawn media attention to breastfeeding issues. **Copy and paste information from Gear Packages or insert Pathway and table Date Scoring Justification Primary Score X Final Score Data Source Gaps identified xx.xx.18 xx.xx.18 X Appendix 2
AG 2: There are high-level advocates or influential individuals who have taken on breastfeeding as a cause that they are promoting **Copy and paste information from Gear Packages or insert Pathway and table Date Scoring Justification Primary Score X Final Score Data Source Gaps identified xx.xx.18 xx.xx.18 X Appendix 2
AG 3: There is a national advocacy strategy based on sound formative research. **Copy and paste information from Gear Packages or insert Pathway and table Date Scoring Justification Primary Score X Final Score Data Source Gaps identified xx.xx.18 xx.xx.18 X Appendix 2
AG 4: A national cohesive network(s) of advocates exists to increase political and financial commitments to breastfeeding. **Copy and paste information from Gear Packages or insert Pathway and table Date Scoring Justification Primary Score x Final Score Data Source Gaps identified xx.xx.18 xx.xx.18 x Appendix 2
Advocacy- GEAR TOTAL SCORE BENCHMARKS FINAL SCORES Benchmark AG 1 X Benchmark AG 2 X Benchmark AG 3 Benchmark AG 4 X X Gear Total Score GTS- Advocacy x.xx Interpretation: (Range x.x-x.x) XX Gear Strength Appendix 2
PG: Gaps and Recommendations Recommendations Gaps Extracted from tables on previous slides Appendix 2
Recommendation 1 Initial Recommendation WHAT do we want to happen? WHY is it important for this activity to be accomplished? WHEN should this activity be completed by? HOW will these activities get done? HAVE similar actions been effective in enabling the breastfeeding environment in other contexts? (Provide examples and use EBBs.) Revisions proposed in meeting 3 discussion Appendix 2
Recommendation 2 Initial Recommendation WHAT do we want to happen? WHY is it important for this activity to be accomplished? WHEN should this activity be completed by? HOW will these activities get done? HAVE similar actions been effective in enabling the breastfeeding environment in other contexts? (Provide examples and use EBBs.) Revisions proposed in meeting 3 discussion Appendix 2
Recommendation 3 Initial Recommendation WHAT do we want to happen? WHY is it important for this activity to be accomplished? WHEN should this activity be completed by? HOW will these activities get done? HAVE similar actions been effective in enabling the breastfeeding environment in other contexts? (Provide examples and use EBBs.) Revisions proposed in meeting 3 discussion Appendix 2
Recommendation 4 Initial Recommendation WHAT do we want to happen? WHY is it important for this activity to be accomplished? WHEN should this activity be completed by? HOW will these activities get done? HAVE similar actions been effective in enabling the breastfeeding environment in other contexts? (Provide examples and use EBBs.) Revisions proposed in meeting 3 discussion Appendix 2
Criteria and Questions for Grading Recommendations These top 3 criteria were chosen via a survey of BBF TAG members and country representatives from an original list of 8. Questions to assess each criteria developed by Yale BBF Team. Criteria Explanation Effectiveness Will this recommendation positively effect or impact breastfeeding outcomes? This is primarily assessed through understanding the existing evidence of the effect/impact of this recommendation elsewhere. Affordability Is this recommendation financially viable? This is based on available information on costs of implementing and the likely means to pay for it. Feasibility Are the necessary resources to implement the recommendation present? 13
References Appendix 2
