Asphalt Binder Fatigue Characterization

 
Fatigue Characterization of Asphalt Binders
with the Linear Amplitude Sweep (LAS)
 
 
Cassie Hintz, Raul Velasquez, Hassan
Tabatabaee, Hussain Bahia
 
Content
 
Part 1: 
Binder Fatigue Testing
Part 2: 
LAS: Theoretical Base
Part 3: 
Performing the LAS test
Anton Paar Rheometers
TA Rheometers
Bohlin Rheometers
Part 4: 
Analysis of LAS results
 
BINDER FATIGUE  TESTING
 
PART 1:
Superpave Bitumen Tests
 
Related to Performance
!
 Climate -- PG HT-LT
 Traffic Speed – DSR
 Traffic Volume – PG shift
 Traffic loading – NA
 Pavement Structure – NA
 Assumption:
    Bitumen in Linear VE
    range
 
Binder
 Fatigue: Superpave Specification
(|G*|
·
sin
δ
)
 
Data from NCHRP 9-10
 
Binder Fatigue: Time Sweep (NCHRP
9-10)
 
Background – Asphalt Mixture
Fatigue
 
Asphalt mixture fatigue characterization relies on following fatigue
law:
Number of Cycles to Failure = 
A
 × (Applied Load)
B
MEPDG Model:
 
 
 
where: h
ac
 = Total thickness of the asphalt layers
 
structure
 
traffic
 
stiffness /
temperature
 
Background – Asphalt Fatigue
 
Background – VECD
 
Viscoelastic Continuum Damage (
VECD
) analysis has been
used for asphalt mixtures since the late 1980’s.
Relies on 
constitutive modeling
 to determine the deviation of
damaged
 test results from 
undamaged
 properties.
Deviation from 
initial
 undamaged properties with respect to
number of cycles
 used to calculate damage.
Characteristic plot used to 
back-calculate
 fatigue
performance under different testing conditions.
 
Background – VECD
 
Background – Summary
 
Asphalt concrete has been shown to have a well-
defined relationship between 
loading input
 and
fatigue life
.
VECD analysis can be an effective tool to determine
damage
 characteristics.
Conventional binder fatigue procedure (
time
sweep
) is problematic.
Binder fatigue testing needs an 
efficient
 procedure
that can do 
more
 than rank relative performance for
a single condition.
 
LINEAR AMPLITUDE SWEEP:
THEORETICAL BASE
 
PART 2:
 
NewTest Method
 
Linear Amplitude Sweep
Employs the DSR and standard geometry
Systematically increases applied load to
accelerate damage
Strain-controlled to avoid accumulated
deformation
Use of VECD allows for calculation of fatigue life at
any strain level
 
New Test Method
 
Frequency Sweep
 
+
 
Background – Asphalt Fatigue
 
Fatigue Law Parameter “B”
 
B = -2
α
α
 
obtained from frequency sweep
α
 
can be 
calculated using the slope of log-log
G’(
ω
) 
plot
where 
G’(
ω
)=|G*|
·
cos 
δ
(
ω
)
α
 = 1 + 1 / 
m
where 
m
 is slope of the log-log 
G’(
ω
) 
plot
 
Fatigue Law Parameter “A”
 
Where
D
f
  = (0.35)(
C
0
 / 
C
1
)^(1 / 
C
2
)
Damage at failure: Failure corresponds to a 35% reduction in G*
·
sin
δ
f
  = 
Loading frequency (10 Hz).
k = 
 1 + (1 – 
C
2
)
α
I
D
 
=
 
undamaged complex modulus
C
1
 and 
C
2
 come from curve fit:
 
Where 
D = 
damage
 
 
 
Damage Curve
 
Parameters 
C
1
 
and 
C
2
 
Model can be  
linearized
 
to determine curve coefficients:
 
Y
 
       =   µ   +  
β
·
x
 
C
0 
 
is  average 
|G*|·sin
δ 
from the 0.1% strain step
log(
C
1
) 
is intercept and 
log(
C
2
) 
is slope of
log(
C
0 
- |G*|·sin
δ
) 
versus
 log(
D(t)
)
**IGNORE DATA CORRESPONDING TO D(t) less than 100
 
Linearized Damage Curve
 
Summary
 
The LAS test is a DSR procedure consisting of a 
frequency
sweep 
and 
strain amplitude sweep
Goal: derive 
fatigue law
Parameters 
“A” 
and 
“B” 
are
 
binder properties
A” 
from amplitude sweep
Higher 
A
 increases fatigue life
“B” 
from frequency sweep
Higher 
magnitude
 of 
B 
decreases fatigue life (at a constant A)
 
Traffic
 
Structure
 
PERFORMING THE LAS TEST:
(
a
)
 
ANTON-PAAR RHEOMETERS
 
PART 3:
 
Anton-Paar Rheometers
 
The test has been successfully tested on the
following Anton-Paar Rheometers:
MCR 300 (Smartpave)
MCR 301
Direct Strain Oscillation (DSO) module
recommended but not required
 
Anton-Paar Rheometers
 
Anton-Paar Rheometers
 
Video
 
PERFORMING THE LAS TEST:
(
b
)
 
TA RHEOMETERS
 
PART 3:
 
TA Rheometers
 
Procedure can be run as specified in AR2000 EX
AR2000 at UW does not have capability to conduct
procedure exactly as specified but results are not
substantially affected
Cannot allow for 100 cycles of loading per strain exactly
(typically includes 120-140 cycles per strain step)
Cannot generate one point per second (able to obtain
approximately one point every three seconds)
 
TA Rheometers
 
Video
 
PERFORMING THE LAS TEST:
(
b
)
 
BOHLIN RHEOMETERS
 
PART 3:
 
Bohlin
 
Unable to successfully conduct LAS test in UW’s Bohlin C VOR-200
rheometer
DSR stops oscillating between strain steps
Malvern support stated their Kinexus rheometers are capable of
running procedure
Contact with Malvern support revealed there was no solution
UW’s rheometer requires several seconds to process data between each
strain step
Faster computer will reduce “rest” between strain steps but will not
eliminate the problem
 
ANALYSIS OF LAS RESULTS
 
PART 4:
 
Analysis of LAS Results
 
Analysis is easily carried out using prepared
MS Excel spreadsheets
 
Analysis of LAS Results
 
Video
 
Summary
 
Linear Amplitude Sweep is being proposed to
address concerns over current specification
Efficient and practical, uses existing equipment
and testing geometry
VECD analysis can be employed to account for
traffic and pavement structure
 
Thank You!
 
 
UWMARC.org
 
Questions?
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This comprehensive study delves into the fatigue characterization of asphalt binders using Linear Amplitude Sweep (LAS) testing. It covers various aspects such as theoretical foundations, testing methods, equipment used, and analysis of results. Additionally, it explores Superpave specifications, binder fatigue laws, and the application of Viscoelastic Continuum Damage (VECD) analysis in assessing asphalt mixture fatigue. The research provides valuable insights into the performance evaluation of asphalt materials under different conditions.

  • Asphalt Binder
  • Fatigue Characterization
  • LAS Testing
  • Superpave Specifications
  • VECD Analysis

Uploaded on Sep 25, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fatigue Characterization of Asphalt Binders with the Linear Amplitude Sweep (LAS) Cassie Hintz, Raul Velasquez, Hassan Tabatabaee, Hussain Bahia

  2. Content Part 1: Binder Fatigue Testing Part 2: LAS: Theoretical Base Part 3: Performing the LAS test Anton Paar Rheometers TA Rheometers Bohlin Rheometers Part 4: Analysis of LAS results

  3. PART 1: BINDER FATIGUE TESTING BINDER FATIGUE TESTING

  4. Superpave Bitumen Tests Related to Performance Related to Performance! Climate -- PG HT-LT Traffic Speed DSR Traffic Volume PG shift Traffic loading NA Pavement Structure NA Assumption: Bitumen in Linear VE range DSR DT Dynamic Shear Rheometer Direct Tension Test RV BBR Rotational Viscometer Bending Beam Rheometer

  5. Binder Fatigue: Superpave Specification (|G*| sin ) Data from NCHRP 9-10

  6. Binder Fatigue: Time Sweep (NCHRP 9-10)

  7. Background Asphalt Mixture Fatigue Asphalt mixture fatigue characterization relies on following fatigue law: Number of Cycles to Failure = A (Applied Load)B MEPDG Model: 3.9492 1.281 1 1 E 00432 . 0 = * ' * N k C stiffness / temperature 1 f traffic t 1 = ' k structure 1 003602 . 0 + + 0.000398 (11.02 - 3.49 hac) * 1 e where: hac = Total thickness of the asphalt layers

  8. Background Asphalt Fatigue = B ( ) N A max f

  9. Background VECD Viscoelastic Continuum Damage (VECD) analysis has been used for asphalt mixtures since the late 1980 s. Relies on constitutive modeling to determine the deviation of damaged test results from undamaged properties. Deviation from initial undamaged properties with respect to number of cycles used to calculate damage. Characteristic plot used to back-calculate fatigue performance under different testing conditions.

  10. Background VECD

  11. Background Summary Asphalt concrete has been shown to have a well- defined relationship between loading input and fatigue life. VECD analysis can be an effective tool to determine damage characteristics. Conventional binder fatigue procedure (time sweep) is problematic. Binder fatigue testing needs an efficient procedure that can do more than rank relative performance for a single condition.

  12. PART 2: LINEAR AMPLITUDE SWEEP: LINEAR AMPLITUDE SWEEP: THEORETICAL BASE

  13. NewTest Method Linear Amplitude Sweep Employs the DSR and standard geometry Systematically increases applied load to accelerate damage Strain-controlled to avoid accumulated deformation Use of VECD allows for calculation of fatigue life at any strain level

  14. New Test Method Frequency Sweep+

  15. Background Asphalt Fatigue = B ( ) N A max f

  16. Fatigue Law Parameter B B = -2 obtained from frequency sweep can be calculated using the slope of log-log G ( ) plot where G ( )=|G*| cos ( ) = 1 + 1 / m where m is slope of the log-log G ( ) plot

  17. Fatigue Law Parameter A Where Df = (0.35)(C0 / C1)^(1 / C2) Damage at failure: Failure corresponds to a 35% reduction in G* sin f = Loading frequency (10 Hz). k = 1 + (1 C2) ID=undamaged complex modulus C1 and C2 come from curve fit: Where D = damage

  18. Damage Curve VECD Damage Curve from Amplitude Sweep 14.0 12.0 |G*| sin [Pa] 10.0 8.0 Amplitude Sweep 6.0 Fit 4.0 2.0 0.0 0 2,000 4,000 D(t) 1 i 6,000 8,000 N ( ) 1 ( ) 2 0 ( ) * sin * sin D t I G G t t + 1 + 1 1 D i i i = 1 i

  19. Parameters C1 and C2 Model can be linearized to determine curve coefficients: Y = + x C0 is average |G*| sin from the 0.1% strain step log(C1) is intercept and log(C2) is slope of log(C0 - |G*| sin ) versus log(D(t)) **IGNORE DATA CORRESPONDING TO D(t) less than 100

  20. Linearized Damage Curve y = 1.0905 + 0.4989x 0.80 0.70 R = 0.9983 0.60 sin |G*| sin 0.50 log(C0 0- -|G*| 0.40 0.30 log(C 0.20 0.10 0.00 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 log(Damage) log(Damage)

  21. Summary The LAS test is a DSR procedure consisting of a frequency sweep and strain amplitude sweep Goal: derive fatigue law Parameters A and B are binder properties A from amplitude sweep Higher A increases fatigue life B from frequency sweep Higher magnitude of B decreases fatigue life (at a constant A) ( )B = N A max f Traffic Structure

  22. PART 3: PERFORMING THE LAS TEST: PERFORMING THE LAS TEST: (a) ANTON-PAAR RHEOMETERS

  23. Anton-Paar Rheometers The test has been successfully tested on the following Anton-Paar Rheometers: MCR 300 (Smartpave) MCR 301 Direct Strain Oscillation (DSO) module recommended but not required

  24. Anton-Paar Rheometers 16 A % Difference 14 With DSO Without DSO 8.04E+06 8.75E+06 8.47% 12 Strain (%) Strain (%) 10 8 Without DSO 6 4 With DSO 2 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Time (sec) Time (sec)

  25. Anton-Paar Rheometers Video

  26. PART 3: PERFORMING THE LAS TEST: PERFORMING THE LAS TEST: (b) TA RHEOMETERS

  27. TA Rheometers Procedure can be run as specified in AR2000 EX AR2000 at UW does not have capability to conduct procedure exactly as specified but results are not substantially affected Cannot allow for 100 cycles of loading per strain exactly (typically includes 120-140 cycles per strain step) Cannot generate one point per second (able to obtain approximately one point every three seconds)

  28. TA Rheometers Video

  29. PART 3: PERFORMING THE LAS TEST: PERFORMING THE LAS TEST: (b) BOHLIN RHEOMETERS

  30. Bohlin Unable to successfully conduct LAS test in UW s Bohlin C VOR-200 rheometer DSR stops oscillating between strain steps Malvern support stated their Kinexus rheometers are capable of running procedure Contact with Malvern support revealed there was no solution UW s rheometer requires several seconds to process data between each strain step Faster computer will reduce rest between strain steps but will not eliminate the problem

  31. PART 4: ANALYSIS OF LAS RESULTS

  32. Analysis of LAS Results Analysis is easily carried out using prepared MS Excel spreadsheets

  33. Analysis of LAS Results Video

  34. Summary Linear Amplitude Sweep is being proposed to address concerns over current specification Efficient and practical, uses existing equipment and testing geometry VECD analysis can be employed to account for traffic and pavement structure

  35. Thank You! Questions? Questions? UWMARC.org UWMARC.org

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#