Analyzing Lady Macbeth's Character: A Study in Manipulation and Guilt
Explore the complexities of Lady Macbeth's character, delving into her role as a manipulative figure who grapples with guilt. By examining her actions, relationships, and moral dilemmas, this essay aims to shed light on her portrayal as a fiend-like queen and how a modern audience might perceive her differently.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Planning an essay: Macbeth Coursework 2016 Wednesday, 18 September 2024 Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
A coursework essay needs Accuracy Precision Concise language and explanation Clarity of purpose or argument This does not happen by accident and time must be taken to organise and clarify your thought processes Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
Where do we start? I make a long plan usually bullets in which I lay out the spine of the essay: In the essay: Is Malcolm justified in calling Lady Macbeth a Fiend Like Queen ? Would a modern audience feel the same? this will involve stating not just the key topic of each paragraph but also the relevant areas of the play. It will not yet have detailed quotation or discussion. Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
Idea A fiend is Devilish which needs to be linked to her character and the context At the time the trails of the Catholic conspirators meant that equivocators were being portrayed as devilish figures. Establish LM as an equivocator and link to the idea of fair is foul Move to her relationship with M equivocation is the link Sees him as feminine and fears it seeks to remove her femininity embraces evil and darkness Manipulates M to commit the murder and supports him NB does not KILL anyone! 17C requires modest women, not leaders and thinkers LM at banquet for Quick thinking BUT: 5.1 shows guilt and a conscience. Readings: 17C confirms guilt and cannot be cleansed Fiend. 21C conscience suggests a good side feel sympathy for her. She supports M in 3.2 almost mothering him 21 C bring out sympathy. 17C see her as manipulative and without any consicence Conclude with own answer to the question. Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
OK, now to develop my thinking We need to add the evidence and the analysis to this frame. Try to plan each paragraph each bullet may have several paragraphs I will show you my format which can be printed and stuck on a wall to help with the writing process Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
Based on PEARL technique Relating/linki ng analysis evidence POINT, topic Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
Paragraph 1 possibilities Her use of repetition and assonance of double suggest the witches incantations hubbl;e bubble and so on The serpent recalls Satan in Eden and the idea is developed in her pursuit of darkness Hide your true intentions the evil actions you intend- under an appearance of false kindness to deceive Duncan LM is deceiving Duncan with an outward show of exaggerated welcome echoed by the repetition in the language All our service In every point twice done and then done double Look like th innocent flower, But be the serpent under t LM is an equivocato r Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
Further thinking Many of us like to begin writing before our thoughts have gelled Try to avoid leaping in and planning on the hoof You could draft a paragraph on a separate sheet if you wish, but don t get tricked into starting before you know where your argument is going to lead. The better the detail of your work at this stage the easier it will be to write a coherent essay. Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
Introductions and conclusions Use the introduction to clarify the meaning of Fiend-like and establish contextual knowledge around Equivocation and 17C attitudes to women (briefly). The conclusion might simply give your evaluation of the question and answer it what do you actually believe? The argument draft from the long plan will help here. There is little obvious danger in waiting until the end to write both these elements. Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
LINKING effectively JANUS: Roman God of beginnings and transitions He had two faces and looked both forward and back Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
We can use this idea in our writing When linking paragraphs, try to refer in both directions whenever possible. Your plan should have established clear links between material. Help the reader by referencing both what has gone before as well as what you are moving on to say. Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
Example In this essay: After a section on equivocation, as a link to another idea Not only is she an equivocator (looks backwards), but a contemporary audience would also be horrified by her relationship to gender attributes (looks forward to the next section). Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
Antithesis These antithetical pairs will help to link your essays effectively and continue a clear train of thought across paragraph breaks. Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
Draft and improve I will be asking for a first draft to be submitted. This will receive formative marking. NB just because I call it a first draft, this should not be your first version! Too many first drafts are ruined by careless SPAG and paragraphs which do not make sense. It should always have been proofread and improved prior to the first submission. If you are not familiar with Austin s Butterfly, watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqh1MRWZjms This is the best possible example of how drafting and grit can produce the best possible work. GOOD LUCK! Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
An intro idea Written in 1606 at the height of the Guy Fawkes trial, the action of Macbeth regicide and civil war echoes the fears of the nation in the months following the uncovering of the plot in 1605. At this time, in a highly religious society, the action of seeking to murder a King, the temporal head of the Great Chain of Being was a sinful action and the idea that the guilty parties might be encouraged to equivocate or lie under oath ensured that a contemporary audience would view any who sought to act in this way as evil. The idea of Lady Macbeth as Fiend-like an evil figure is utterly plausible if her actions and words are considered closely. As early as Act 1.5 she can be found encouraging Macbeth to equivocate in order to attract Duncan to his death. Telling him to Look like th innocent flower, But be the serpent under t she ensures that his evil intentions here suggested by the motif of the Serpent in Eden should go unnoticed because of his apparently guileless actions. Later in the act, when she greets the King at her gates, she gives exaggerated greeting and it is not until later in the play -in 4.1 tha the audience hears the echo of her words All our service In every point twice done and then done double in the assonance and repetition of the witches hubble bubble toil and trouble . It is fair to say that she embodies the idea of fair is foul and foul is fair in this behaviour. (NOW LINK WITH A JANUS SENTENCE) Not only is she an equivocator, but a contemporary audience would also be horrified by her relationship to gender attributes Jonathan Peel JLS 2016
