3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #98-e Electronic Meeting Summary

 
WF on R16 NR RRM enhancements -
BWP switching on multiple CCs, UL
spatial info switch
 
 
Intel Corporation, Apple
 
3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #98-e                            
 
            
        
              
R4-21####
Electronic Meeting, 25, Jan-05, Feb. , 2021
 
B
W
P
 
s
w
i
t
c
h
i
n
g
 
o
n
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
 
C
C
s
 
i
n
 
c
o
r
e
 
p
a
r
t
 
Issue 1-1-1: Scenario for RRC based BWP switch on multiple CCs
Wait for the feedback from RAN2.
 
Issue 1-1-2: Clarification for N for DCI-based simultaneous BWP switch on multiple CCs
Note: may be updated later based on 
corresponding CR discussion.
Option 1:
A clarification is added to the description of N where it is hinted that the maximum value of N that
can be supported is depending on T
BWPswitchDelay
 (
bwp-SwitchingDelay-r16
), incremental switching
delay D, and whichever applies of 
minimum scheduling offset on DL (
k0
), HARQ ACK-timing (
k1
),
and minimum scheduling offset on UL (
k2
).
Option 2:
Further discuss how to refine.
A clarification and editor note are added to the description of N
:
The number of carriers N that UE can switch BWPs on while still meeting deadlines, if any, related to allocations
on downlink, uplink, or 
transmission of HARQ-ACK
, may depend on network configuration, triggering option,
and reported UE capabilities.
Editor’s Note: The requirements are defined in 
DCI-agnostic manner, if RAN1 defines something that makes
Dormant switching time/interruption to always be absorbed into WUS gap, RAN4 can revise the specification
text accordingly.
 
 
 
B
W
P
 
s
w
i
t
c
h
i
n
g
 
o
n
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
 
C
C
s
 
i
n
 
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
p
a
r
t
(
1
)
 
Issue 3-1-1: Whether to define DCI/Timer based FR1+FR2 simultaneous
BWP switch test case
Note: may be updated later based on 
2
nd
 round discussion.
Option 1 : Yes
Option 2: 
No
Do not define DCI/Timer based FR1+FR2 simultaneous BWP switch test case
 
Issue 3-1-2: Whether to define DCI/Timer based non-simultaneous BWP
switch test case
Not to define DCI/Timer based non-simultaneous BWP switch test case.
 
B
W
P
 
s
w
i
t
c
h
i
n
g
 
o
n
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
 
C
C
s
 
i
n
 
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
p
a
r
t
(
2
)
 
Issue 3-1-3: whether to define RRC based BWP switch on multiple CCs test
case
To be discussed after receiving RAN2 response
 
Issue 3-1-4:  TC4: DCI-based and Timer-based simultaneous Active BWP
Switch on multiple CCs on FR2 in SA
Cell configuration: NR FR2 PCell + NR FR2 SCell + NR FR2 SCell
 
UL Spatial Relation Info Switch in core part(1)
 
Background
PUCCH Spatial Relation Info IE also has Pathloss Reference RS
Spatial relation info switch for PUCCH may also change Pathloss
Reference RS
Existing known condition is based on associated DL-RS
Existing delay requirements for spatial relation info switch for
PUCCH do not consider change to PL-RS
 
UL Spatial Relation Info Switch in core part(2)
 
Known condition definition update to include PL-RS
Option 1: Update known condition based on whether DL-RS and PL-RS are in
same TCI chain
If DL-RS and PL-RS are in same TCI chain known condition is based on DL-RS
If DL-RS and PL-RS are not in same TCI chain known condition is based on DL-RS and PL-
RS
Option 2: Do not update known condition
Do not update known condition
 
UL Spatial Relation Info Switch in core part(3)
 
Delay requirements for MAC–CE based UL spatial relation switch for
PUCCH
Option 1:  Define additional delay for PL-RS activation in UL spatial relation
switch
Option 1: Refer to section 8.14 for additional delay due to PL-RS switch in UL
spatial relation switch
Option 3: no extra delay is added.
Option 2: Longer delay is expected when PL-RS and DL-RS in the UL spatial
relation are changed simultaneously
Slide Note
Embed
Share

In the 3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #98-e Electronic Meeting, discussions were held on various topics such as NR RRM enhancements, BWP switching on multiple CCs, UL spatial info switch, and more. Issues regarding BWP switching in core and performance parts were addressed, along with considerations for scenarios, test cases, and network configurations. The meeting aimed to refine specifications and clarify requirements for efficient BWP switching on multiple carriers while meeting deadlines and UE capabilities.

  • 3GPP
  • TSG-RAN
  • WG4
  • Meeting
  • NR RRM Enhancements

Uploaded on Sep 18, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #98-e Electronic Meeting, 25, Jan-05, Feb. , 2021 R4-21#### WF on R16 NR RRM enhancements - BWP switching on multiple CCs, UL spatial info switch Intel Corporation, Apple

  2. BWP switching on multiple CCs in core part BWP switching on multiple CCs in core part Issue 1-1-1: Scenario for RRC based BWP switch on multiple CCs Wait for the feedback from RAN2. Issue 1-1-2: Clarification for N for DCI-based simultaneous BWP switch on multiple CCs Note: may be updated later based on corresponding CR discussion. Option 1: A clarification is added to the description of N where it is hinted that the maximum value of N that can be supported is depending on TBWPswitchDelay (bwp-SwitchingDelay-r16), incremental switching delay D, and whichever applies of minimum scheduling offset on DL (k0), HARQ ACK-timing (k1), and minimum scheduling offset on UL (k2). Option 2: Further discuss how to refine. A clarification and editor note are added to the description of N: The number of carriers N that UE can switch BWPs on while still meeting deadlines, if any, related to allocations on downlink, uplink, or transmission of HARQ-ACK, may depend on network configuration, triggering option, and reported UE capabilities. Editor s Note: The requirements are defined in DCI-agnostic manner, if RAN1 defines something that makes Dormant switching time/interruption to always be absorbed into WUS gap, RAN4 can revise the specification text accordingly.

  3. BWP switching on multiple CCs in performance BWP switching on multiple CCs in performance part(1) part(1) Issue 3-1-1: Whether to define DCI/Timer based FR1+FR2 simultaneous BWP switch test case Note: may be updated later based on 2nd round discussion. Option 1 : Yes Option 2: No Do not define DCI/Timer based FR1+FR2 simultaneous BWP switch test case Issue 3-1-2: Whether to define DCI/Timer based non-simultaneous BWP switch test case Not to define DCI/Timer based non-simultaneous BWP switch test case.

  4. BWP switching on multiple CCs in performance BWP switching on multiple CCs in performance part(2) part(2) Issue 3-1-3: whether to define RRC based BWP switch on multiple CCs test case To be discussed after receiving RAN2 response Issue 3-1-4: TC4: DCI-based and Timer-based simultaneous Active BWP Switch on multiple CCs on FR2 in SA Cell configuration: NR FR2 PCell + NR FR2 SCell + NR FR2 SCell

  5. UL Spatial Relation Info Switch in core part(1) Background PUCCH Spatial Relation Info IE also has Pathloss Reference RS Spatial relation info switch for PUCCH may also change Pathloss Reference RS Existing known condition is based on associated DL-RS Existing delay requirements for spatial relation info switch for PUCCH do not consider change to PL-RS

  6. UL Spatial Relation Info Switch in core part(2) Known condition definition update to include PL-RS Option 1: Update known condition based on whether DL-RS and PL-RS are in same TCI chain If DL-RS and PL-RS are in same TCI chain known condition is based on DL-RS If DL-RS and PL-RS are not in same TCI chain known condition is based on DL-RS and PL- RS Option 2: Do not update known condition Do not update known condition

  7. UL Spatial Relation Info Switch in core part(3) Delay requirements for MAC CE based UL spatial relation switch for PUCCH Option 1: Define additional delay for PL-RS activation in UL spatial relation switch Option 1: Refer to section 8.14 for additional delay due to PL-RS switch in UL spatial relation switch Option 3: no extra delay is added. Option 2: Longer delay is expected when PL-RS and DL-RS in the UL spatial relation are changed simultaneously

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#