Criticisms of Savigny's Theory of Law and Its Impact on Legal Development

 
CRITICISMS ON SAVIGNY’S
THEORY OF LAW
 
Presented by:
Rinkey Sharma
Assistant Professor of Law
IILS
 
CRITICISMS
 
Volksgeist not always law:
Dias says that many institutions like slavery
have originated not in Volkgeist but in the
convenience of a ruling oligarchy.
Not clear who the Volk are and whose geist
determines the law
It is also not clear, who the volk are and whose
geist is said to determine the law.
 
Volksgeist is not an exclusive source of law:
According to Savigny, volksgeist is the only
source of law in society, but it is not correct. Lord
Llyod also said that Savigny underrated the
significance of legislation for modern society. As
far as society is developed the law is also to be
developed in the society by legislation also.
Other law influencing factors ignored:
Savigny in his theory ignored other factors that
helped to originate the law. He totally ignored the
judge’s function to create the law. Paton states
that the creative work of the judges and jurists
were treated rather too lightly by Savigny.
 
He was against the codification of law which is
one of the most accepted forms of modern
progressive legislation. This anti – codification
attitude of Savigny thwarted the growth of
German law for several decades.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Savigny's theory of law, centered around Volksgeist as the sole source of law, has faced criticisms for overlooking other factors influencing legal development. Critics argue that institutions like slavery were not shaped by Volksgeist but by ruling oligarchies, and Savigny's disregard for legislation and codification hindered the modernization of German law. The exclusion of judges' role in law creation and an overemphasis on Volksgeist are highlighted as limitations in his legal philosophy.


Uploaded on Aug 04, 2024 | 7 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CRITICISMS ON SAVIGNYS THEORY OF LAW Presented by: Rinkey Sharma Assistant Professor of Law IILS

  2. CRITICISMS Volksgeist not always law: Dias says that many institutions like slavery have originated not in Volkgeist but in the convenience of a ruling oligarchy. Not clear who the Volk are and whose geist determines the law It is also not clear, who the volk are and whose geist is said to determine the law.

  3. Volksgeist is not an exclusive source of law: According to Savigny, volksgeist is the only source of law in society, but it is not correct. Lord Llyod also said that Savigny underrated the significance of legislation for modern society. As far as society is developed the law is also to be developed in the society by legislation also. Other law influencing factors ignored: Savigny in his theory ignored other factors that helped to originate the law. He totally ignored the judge s function to create the law. Paton states that the creative work of the judges and jurists were treated rather too lightly by Savigny.

  4. He was against the codification of law which is one of the most accepted forms of modern progressive legislation. This anti codification attitude of Savigny thwarted the growth of German law for several decades.

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#