The content outlines amendments introduced in the FY23 NDAA regarding appeals by accused individuals in court-martial cases and modifications to court-martial findings and sentences. It details the expansion of jurisdiction for Court of Criminal Appeals, the powers granted to the Judge Advocate Gene

2 views • 12 slides

Landmark judgments of the Supreme Court regarding direct tax laws are discussed in detail, emphasizing the binding nature of Supreme Court judgments on all courts in India. The concept of precedence, acceptance or rejection of petitions for special leave to appeal, and the significance of Supreme Co

0 views • 36 slides

Supreme Court Rejects Petitions Against EVM Use In Elections\\nNew Delhi: \\nThe Supreme Court on Friday dismissed two writ petitions: namely, apprehensions over 19 lakhs missing EVMs and another petition to use ballot paper to conduct elections while reposing its faith in the EVMs.\\nAdjudicating t

1 views • 4 slides

Supreme Court Raps SBI For Not Sharing \"Complete Data\" On Electoral Bonds\n\nThe Supreme Court today came down hard on the State Bank of India for not sharing the complete data on electoral bonds, a scheme that allowed individuals and businesses to donate anonymously to political parties. The cour

2 views • 4 slides

Discover the Delhi High Court's crucial ruling on Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of possessing unearthed material for tax assessments on non-searched individuals. Stay informed on the legal intricacies of tax law interpretations.

5 views • 3 slides

The Supreme Court criticized Tamil Nadu district collectors for not attending the meeting with the Enforcement Directorate (ED) as ordered. The court emphasized the importance of obeying orders and respecting the law and the Constitution. The collectors have been given another opportunity to meet wi

5 views • 4 slides

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board oversees attorney misconduct cases in Iowa, with 4 prosecutors, a Director of Attorney Discipline, staff, and volunteer board members. Complaints can be made by anyone, commonly related to family law and criminal matters, with no statute of limitati

0 views • 34 slides

Kerala High Court Upholds Divorce by Mutual Consent Ruling\nBackground of the Case\nKerala High Court ruled that the Family Court was justified in granting a divorce by mutual consent, even though the wife later withdrew her consent. The case involved an appeal by the wife challenging the Family Cou

0 views • 4 slides

The Supreme Court of India plays a crucial role in the government by resolving disputes, interpreting the Constitution, and safeguarding individual liberties. It exercises various functions including original jurisdiction, appellate jurisdiction, advisory jurisdiction, acting as a Court of Records,

1 views • 25 slides

Most countries grant their apex courts original and appellate jurisdiction, but the Indian Constitution includes advisory jurisdiction for the Supreme Court. Article 143 allows the President to seek the Court's opinion on important public matters. The Court advises the President, although it's non-b

2 views • 31 slides

This analysis delves into the implications of the Constitutional Court judgment on the Electoral Amendment Act, focusing on two court challenges, three judgments rendered, and the effects on contestants and candidate nominations. The background, court challenges, judgments, and their implications ar

0 views • 17 slides

The progress report outlines the implementation of the Constitutional Court ruling regarding the settlement of labour tenants' claims, focusing on the appointment of a Special Master, the establishment of the office, an implementation plan, and the background of the case. It describes the court orde

0 views • 12 slides

The Civil Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of The Bahamas, 2022 detail the application of CPR to civil proceedings, highlighting exceptions, the Woolf Reforms, and key provisions such as active case management and the overriding objective. The rules also address proceedings commenced before the

2 views • 30 slides

Marbury v. Madison (1803) and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) are two pivotal cases in Supreme Court history. Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, giving the Court the power to declare laws unconstitutional. McCulloch v. Maryland upheld federal supremacy over state laws. These cases exemplif

1 views • 14 slides

The Commonwealth of The Bahamas Supreme Court has proposed rules regarding interlocutory applications, which involve applications for court orders made at various stages of legal proceedings. These rules outline the process for making such applications, including the grounds required, drafting of or

3 views • 22 slides

Part 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Bahamas 2022 focuses on the acknowledgment of service, outlining the procedures for defendants disputing a claim or the court's jurisdiction. It details the contents of the acknowledgment, including admission of claims, financial detail

2 views • 17 slides

Explore the appellate authorities involved in the GST appeal process, from the First Appellate Authority to the Supreme Court. Learn about the power of revisional authority, appeals to the High Court, and appeals to the Supreme Court. Discover the process by which aggrieved parties can seek redressa

1 views • 6 slides

The Modern Civil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s was marked by pivotal events that challenged segregation and discrimination in the United States. Key moments such as the Brown v. Board of Education ruling in 1954, the tragic murder of Emmett Till in 1955, Rosa Parks' defiant act sparking the

0 views • 17 slides

In December 2000, the Bush v. Gore case unfolded as a legal battle over the contested Florida presidential election results. The Florida Supreme Court's recount orders, US Supreme Court intervention, and eventual termination of the recount process led to George W. Bush being awarded Florida's electo

0 views • 6 slides

This collection covers selected appellate decisions impacting law enforcement officers from June 1, 2017, to June 1, 2018. It includes insights from the U.S. Supreme Court, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Virginia Supreme Court, and Virginia Court of Appeals. Topics include Fourth Amendment, Fifth

1 views • 111 slides

Explore significant appellate decisions affecting law enforcement officers between June 1, 2015, and June 1, 2016, including key rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court, Virginia Supreme Court, and Virginia Court of Appeals. Dive into topics such as the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, crimes against persons

0 views • 201 slides

The Marshall Kapp, J.D., M.P.H. review of Supreme Court health law cases in 2014 focuses on Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood. The cases involved challenges to the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive requirement based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. The court ruled i

0 views • 19 slides

Review recent California Supreme Court decisions, including discussions by legal professionals and statistics on filings, opinions, petitions, and voting disagreement rates. Insights on court workload trends are also provided.

0 views • 46 slides

The research and documentation units of the Supreme Court in the Kingdom of Spain play a crucial role in supporting decision-making, ensuring equal protection under the law, coordinating judgments, and selecting appeals based on cassational interest. The division includes a technical cabinet, legal

1 views • 14 slides

The Alaska Supreme Court ruled against a hospital in a case involving a physician's failure to report a state board order and evaluation results, leading to termination. The court found that the physician had a constitutional property interest in his medical staff membership, requiring a pre-termina

0 views • 54 slides

This collection highlights key appellate decisions relevant to law enforcement officers, focusing on cases from the U.S. Supreme Court, Virginia Supreme Court, and Virginia Court of Appeals. The cases discussed include rulings on search warrants related to cell phones, magnetic media, marijuana odor

0 views • 61 slides

Landmark Supreme Court cases, including Marbury vs. Madison, McCullough vs. Maryland, and Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia, played pivotal roles in shaping the authority and jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court, particularly regarding issues of sovereignty, federalism, and native rights. These

0 views • 6 slides

This summary covers two significant cases from the 2020-2021 term of the United States Supreme Court. The first case, Edwards v. Vannoy, discusses the retroactive application of the Ramos jury-unanimity rule on federal collateral review. The second case, Jones v. Mississippi, addresses the sentencin

0 views • 23 slides

This analysis delves into the legal case of FCA v ARCH and Others [2021] UKSC 1, focusing on key clauses at issue such as disease clauses and prevention of access clauses. It explores the procedural history of the case, including judgments from the Commercial Court and the Supreme Court. The Supreme

0 views • 25 slides

The cases of Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections and Burson v. Freeman presented challenges to voting rights laws. In Harper v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled the poll tax as unconstitutional, stating it unfairly restricted voting access based on financial means. On the other hand, in Burson v.

0 views • 10 slides

The content discusses contrasting perspectives on the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018, both inside and outside the institution. It explores the Court's resiliency amid political challenges and highlights the importance of institutional norms like civility and professionalism. The duties and functions of

0 views • 37 slides

The recent decision by the Arizona Supreme Court to uphold an 1864 abortion ban has reignited the debate over reproductive rights in the state. This move has drawn sharp criticism from Democratic leaders, further polarizing the political landscape. The ruling's implications on abortion rights, state

0 views • 5 slides

The Buy American Final USDA Ruling for Hawaii 2017 introduces regulations specific to Hawaii, requiring School Food Authorities (SFAs) to purchase food products produced in Hawaii to meet school meal program needs. The ruling outlines limited exemptions when Hawaii-produced goods are not available o

0 views • 16 slides

The Judicial Branch, often overlooked, plays a crucial role in interpreting and applying laws fairly. It was established under Article 3 of the Constitution with the dual system separating state and federal courts. The Judiciary Act of 1789 proposed a three-tiered court system, including District Co

0 views • 31 slides

Detailed exploration of the Georgia court system, including the dual court system in the U.S., Supreme Court of Georgia jurisdiction, Court of Appeals jurisdiction, Chatham County Courthouse, and various courts within Chatham County. It covers civil and criminal cases handled by different courts, ju

0 views • 20 slides

The American judicial system consists of District Courts, Appellate Courts, and the Supreme Court. District Courts handle initial cases, Appellate Courts hear appeals, and the Supreme Court is the highest authority. Justices are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Judicial review

0 views • 12 slides

In this Supreme Court case, Mahoney Area School District was sued by a student, B.L., for violating her First Amendment right to free speech. The case involved B.L.'s suspension from the cheer team due to her off-campus social media posts. The court ruled 8-1 in favor of B.L., stating that the schoo

0 views • 22 slides

Explore the process of granting certiorari by the Supreme Court, including the meaning of writ of certiorari and how cases reach the highest court. Learn about the primary role of the court, the parties involved in certiorari, and the factors considered when deciding to accept or decline a petition.

0 views • 8 slides

The evolution of attorney licensing in Kentucky spans from the General Assembly's oversight in the 18th century to the Supreme Court's exclusive authority granted by the state constitution in 1976. This transition saw the Supreme Court overseeing admission to the Bar and disciplinary actions, render

0 views • 11 slides

Explore the case of Kelvey v. Coughlin, a medical negligence matter, which sheds light on deposition ethics in the U.S. District Court of Rhode Island. The case involves guidelines on conducting depositions, proper behavior for attorneys, and the consequences of discovery abuse. Learn about the dos

0 views • 29 slides