Judicial review under CPR 54 provides a mechanism for superior courts to examine actions of public authorities for legality and fairness. It encompasses orders like certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, declarations, injunctions, and damages claims, ensuring accountability and justice in administrative

1 views • 57 slides

Judicial review in civil procedure involves the review of acts, decisions, and omissions of public authorities by superior courts to ensure legality, jurisdiction, and fairness of the decision-making process. Key aspects include the types of relief available, such as certiorari, prohibition, mandamu

0 views • 57 slides

Explore essential vocabulary related to the landmark court case Marbury v. Madison, including terms like Judicial, Commission, Jurisdiction, Landmark Case, Precedent, and Writ of Mandamus. Test your knowledge with fill-in-the-blank exercises that relate to legal concepts and historical rulings by th

7 views • 8 slides

Judicial review is the inherent right of courts to review decision-making processes of public bodies. It allows for challenging and analyzing decisions, granting public law remedies like declaration, certiorari, mandamus, prohibition, and quo warranto. Those adversely affected by public duty actions

0 views • 13 slides

Explore the legal concept of mandamus, a writ issued to compel the performance of a duty by an inferior court, discussing its limitations, requirements, and instances where it may be appropriate. Learn about remedies, legal issues pertinent to mandamus, when and how to file a petition, and the neces

0 views • 10 slides

The legal cases of Wooley v. Bonvillian involve disputes over the renewal of a bail bond agent's license and the use of mandamus to compel action in Louisiana. The first case details the refusal to renew a license and subsequent legal actions. The second case explores the limitations of mandamus in

0 views • 15 slides