Understanding Sovereign Immunity and Contracts in Legal Context
Explore the intricacies of sovereign immunity and contracts in legal settings, including waivers, elements of immunity waiver, contractual implications, and the distinction between proprietary and governmental functions of local governmental entities. Delve into the key aspects that govern these legal principles and the implications for local government contracts.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Sovereign Immunity and Contracts Eric C. Farrar Olson & Olson LLP
Waiver of Immunity Waiver is usually left to the Legislature. Must be clear and unequivocal. Sue and be sued or plead and be impleaded, alone, are insufficient. Tooke v. City of Mexia, 197 S.W.3d 325, 331 (Tex. 2006).
Waiver by Contract General rule when the State contracts with private citizens, the State waives only immunity from liability but does not waive [its] immunity from suit. Fed. Sign v. Tex. S. Univ., 951 S.W.2d 401, 408 (Tex. 1997).
Chapter 271, Subchapter I A local governmental entity that enters into a contract subject to this subchapter waives sovereign immunity to suit for the purpose of adjudicating a claim for breach of the contract, subject to the terms and conditions of this subchapter. Tex. Loc. Gov t Code Ann. 271.152
Elements of Waiver of Immunity (1) The party against whom waiver is asserted must be a local governmental entity. (2) The entity must be authorized by law to enter into contracts. (3) The claim must be for a contract and for damages specified in Subchapter I. See City of Houston v. Williams, 335 S.W.3d 128 (Tex. 2011).
Proprietary vs. Governmental City has no immunity when it engages in proprietary function as opposed to governmental function. This includes a breach of contract claim. Supreme Court has stated its is appropriate to defer to list in Tort Claims Act.
Local Governmental Entity Political subdivision of this state, other than a county or a unit of state government Unit of state government is, essentially, the state or a state agency, including a university system or institution of higher education. Does not include a county, municipality, special purpose district, or other political subdivision of this state.
Contracts Covered (1) In writing, stating the essential terms of the agreement. (2) Agreement to provide goods or services to the local governmental entity (3) Properly governmental entity executed on behalf of the local Tex. Loc. Gov t Code Ann. 271.151(2)(A)
Waiver for Specific Damages Money awarded limited to: (1) The balance due and owed under the contract. (2) The amount owed for change orders or additional work ordered by the local governmental entity. (3) Attorney s fees and interest allowed by law. Tex. Loc. Gov t Code Ann. 271.153(a)
Balance Due and Owed [S]imply the amount of damages for breach of contract payable and unpaid Direct Damages: the necessary and usual result of the defendant s wrongful conduct NOT Consequential Damages: damages that result naturally, but not necessarily from defendant s wrongful conduct See, e.g., Zachry Const. Corp. v. Port of Houston Auth. of Harris County, 449 S.W.3d 98, 111 (Tex. 2014)
Goods or Services Services not defined in Ch. 271. [T]he term is broad enough to encompass a wide array of activities. [N]eed not be the primary purpose of the agreement. Kirby Lake Dev., Ltd. v. Clear Lake City Water Auth., 320 S.W.3d 829, 839 (Tex. 2010).
Services Examples Self-insurance fund agreement Contract for the construction of a middle school ISD s health insurance contract with employee (i.e., employee received insurance in exchange for work he did). Performing services for a third-party that government was otherwise obligated to perform.
Not Services No indirect or attenuated benefits. Leasing land from Water district for purpose of operating a marina. Agreement to provide water and sewer at no charge if property was used as a home for children who are wards of the State
Contact Info Eric C. Farrar efarrar@olsonllp.com Olson & Olson LLP 713.533.3800 http://www.olsonllp.com/