Understanding Plagiarism and Its Consequences

Plagiarism is presenting others' work as your own, intentional or not. It breaches integrity and can lead to severe penalties like termination or expulsion. Avoiding plagiarism is crucial for developing your voice and credibility.

• Plagiarism
• Academic Integrity
• Consequences
• Ethics
• Avoidance

dra_kre Follow

Uploaded on Sep 07, 2024 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Presentation Transcript

1. Plagiarism DR. EMIL VELINOV ITC-PRAGUE 2016

2. Plagiarism DEFINITIONS: PLAGIARISM IS PRESENTING SOMEONE ELSE S WORK OR IDEAS AS YOUR OWN, WITH OR WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT, BY INCORPORATING IT INTO YOUR WORK WITHOUT FULL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. ALL PUBLISHED AND UNPUBLISHED MATERIAL, WHETHER IN MANUSCRIPT, PRINTED OR ELECTRONIC FORM, IS COVERED UNDER THIS DEFINITION. PLAGIARISM MAY BE INTENTIONAL OR RECKLESS, OR UNINTENTIONAL. UNDER THE REGULATIONS FOR EXAMINATIONS, INTENTIONAL OR RECKLESS PLAGIARISM IS A DISCIPLINARY OFFENCE (OXFORD, 2015)

3. Why does Plagiarism matter? BREACH OF INTEGRITY PRINCIPLE OF INTELLECTUAL HONESTY UNETHICAL CONSEQUENCES CAREER AND CAN FOR HAVE YOUR SERIOUS FUTURE REPRESENTS YOUR ORGANIZATION OTHERS???

4. Why we should avoid Plagiarism? TO STATE OUR OWN MIND NOT TO REPRODUCE SOMEBODY ELSE THOUGHT OR MIND TO LEARN HOW TO DEVELOP OUR OWN VOICE TO LEARN HOW TO BE INDEPENDENT IN OUR OWN STATE-OF-ART TO BUILD UP CREDIBILITY AND AUTHORITY

5. Sanctions against Plagiarism WARNING TERMINATING PENALTIZING OTHER DISCIPLINARY STEPS TAKEN EXPULSION OTHERS

6. Unintentional Plagiarism HANDBOOKS GUIDELINES RESPONSIBILITIES OTHERS

7. Examples of Plagiarism S O U R C E T E X T F R O M A C L A S S P E R S P E C T I V E T H I S P U T T H E M [ H I G H W A Y M E N ] I N A N A M B I V A L E N T P O S I T I O N . I N A S P I R I N G T O T H A T P R O U D , I F T E M P O R A R Y , S T A T U S O F G E N T L E M A N O F T H E R O A D , T H E Y D I D N O T Q U E S T I O N T H E I N E G A L I T A R I A N H I E R A R C H Y O F T H E I R S O C I E T Y . Y E T T H E I R B O L D N E S S O F A C T A N D D E E D , I N P U T T I N G T H E M O U T S I D E T H E L A W A S R E B E L L I O U S F U G I T I V E S , R E V I V I F I E D T H E A N I M A L S P I R I T S O F C A P I T A L I S M A N D B E C A M E A N E S S E N T I A L P A R T O F T H E O P P O S I T I O N A L C U L T U R E O F W O R K I N G - C L A S S L O N D O N , A S E R I O U S O B S T A C L E T O T H E F O R M A T I O N O F A T R A C T A B L E , O B E D I E N T L A B O U R F O R C E . T H E R E F O R E , I T W A S N O T E N O U G H T O H A N G T H E M T H E V A L U E S T H E Y E S P O U S E D O R R E P R E S E N T E D H A D T O B E C H A L L E N G E D . ( L I N E B A U G H , P . , T H E L O N D O N H A N G E D : C R I M E A N D C I V I L S O C I E T Y I N T H E E I G H T E E N T H C E N T U R Y ( L O N D O N , 1 9 9 1 ) , P . 2 1 3 . [ Y O U S H O U L D G I V E T H E R E F E R E N C E I N F U L L T H E F I R S T T I M E Y O U U S E I T I N A F O O T N O T E ; T H E R E A F T E R I T I S A C C E P T A B L E T O U S E A N A B B R E V I A T E D V E R S I O N , E . G . L I N E B A U G H , T H E L O N D O N H A N G E D , P . 2 1 3 . ]

8. Plagiarism PLAGIARISED: ALTHOUGH THEY DID NOT QUESTION THE INEGALITARIAN HIERARCHY OF THEIR SOCIETY, HIGHWAYMEN EXERCISED A POWERFUL ATTRACTION FOR THE WORKING CLASSES. SOME HISTORIANS BELIEVE THAT THIS HINDERED THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SUBMISSIVE WORKFORCE. (THIS IS A MIXTURE OF VERBATIM COPYING AND ACCEPTABLE PARAPHRASE. ALTHOUGH ONLY ONE PHRASE HAS BEEN COPIED FROM THE SOURCE, THIS WOULD STILL COUNT AS PLAGIARISM. THE IDEA EXPRESSED IN THE FIRST SENTENCE HAS NOT BEEN ATTRIBUTED AT ALL, AND THE REFERENCE TO SOME HISTORIANS IN THE SECOND IS INSUFFICIENT. THE WRITER SHOULD USE CLEAR REFERENCING TO ACKNOWLEDGE ALL IDEAS TAKEN FROM OTHER PEOPLE S WORK.)

9. Plagiarism PLAGIARISED: ALTHOUGH THEY DID NOT QUESTION THE INEGALITARIAN HIERARCHY OF THEIR SOCIETY, HIGHWAYMEN BECAME AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THE OPPOSITIONAL CULTURE OF WORKING-CLASS LONDON [AND] A SERIOUS OBSTACLE TO THE FORMATION OF A TRACTABLE, OBEDIENT LABOUR FORCE .1 (THIS CONTAINS A MIXTURE OF ATTRIBUTED AND UNATTRIBUTED QUOTATION, WHICH SUGGESTS TO THE READER THAT THE FIRST LINE IS ORIGINAL TO THIS WRITER. ALL QUOTED MATERIAL MUST BE ENCLOSED IN QUOTATION MARKS AND ADEQUATELY REFERENCED.)

10. Plagiarism NON-PLAGIARISED PETER HIGHWAYMEN POSED NO OVERT CHALLENGE TO SOCIAL ORTHODOXY KNOWN AS GENTLEMEN OF WERE OFTEN SEEN AS ANTI-HERO ROLE MODELS BY THE UNRULY WORKING CONCLUDES THAT THEY ONLY FOR THEIR CRIMINAL ACTS, BUT IN ORDER TO STAMP OUT INSUBORDINACY.1 (THIS PASSAGE IS ACCEPTABLE AS THE WORDING AND STRUCTURE DEMONSTRATE INTERPRETATION OF THE PASSAGE AND DO NOT FOLLOW THE ORIGINAL SOURCE OF THE IDEAS UNDER DISCUSSION HAS BEEN PROPERLY ATTRIBUTED IN BOTH TEXTUAL AND FOOTNOTE REFERENCES.) LINEBAUGH ARGUES THAT ALTHOUGH THEY ASPIRED THE ROAD THEY TO BE CLASSES. EXECUTED HE NOT WERE THE PARAPHRASE THREAT OF OF THE THE READER S TOO CLOSELY. THE

11. Plagiarism PETER LINEBAUGH ARGUES THAT HIGHWAYMEN REPRESENTED A POWERFUL CHALLENGE TO THE MORES OF CAPITALIST SOCIETY AND INSPIRED THE REBELLIOUSNESS OF LONDON S WORKING CLASS.1 (THIS IS A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT WITH APPROPRIATE ATTRIBUTION.) 1 LINEBAUGH, P., THE LONDON HANGED: CRIME AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY (LONDON, 1991), P. 213.

12. Cyber bullying USE OF COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE INTENTION OF HARMING ANOTHER PERSON USE OF INTERNET SERVICE AND MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES SUCH AS WEB PAGES AND DISCUSSION GROUPS AS WELL AS INSTANT MESSAGING OR SMS TEXT MESSAGING WITH THE INTENTION OF HARMING ANOTHER PERSON

13. Cyber stalking REJECTED STALKER INTIMACY SEEKER RESENTFUL STALKER OTHERS

14. Case Studies on cyber bullying O N E M I N O R S E N D I N G C R U E L O R T H R E A T E N I N G E M A I L S , T E X T M E S S A G E S , O R I N S T A N T M E S S A G E S T O A N O T H E R M I N O R . C R E A T I N G A W E B S I T E T O M O C K S O M E O N E . W R I T I N G D E R O G A T O R Y O R I N F L A M M A T O R Y B L O G P O S T S A B O U T A N O T H E R P E R S O N . M A K I N G U P F A K E A C C O U N T S O N A S O C I A L N E T W O R K I N G S I T E , L I K E F A C E B O O K O R T W I T T E R P O S T I N G P R I V A T E O R E M B A R R A S S I N G P H O T O S O F S O M E O N E W I T H O U T A S K I N G . H A C K I N G I N T O S O M E O N E ' S E M A I L R A T I N G P E O P L E I N O N L I N E P O L L S . F L A M I N G O T H E R P L A Y E R S I N O N L I N E V I D E O G A M E S . S P R E A D I N G S E C R E T S A B O U T P E O P L E O N L I N E

15. Case Studies on Cyber Stalking T H R E A T E N I N G E M A I L S O B S C E N E E M A I L S S E N D I N G U N S O L I C I T E D E M A I L S M A S S E M A I L S P A M M I N G L E A V I N G I N A P P R O P R I A T E M E S S A G E S O N M E S S A G E B O A R D S O R O N B L O G S . S E N D I N G C O M P U T E R V I R U S E S L I V E C H A T F L A M I N G O R H A R A S S M E N T T R A C I N G A N O T H E R P E R S O N ' S C O M P U T E R A C T I V I T Y E L E C T R O N I C I D E N T I T Y T H E F T

16. Q&A