Understanding Asset Recovery: Importance, Processes, Tools, and Global Impact

 
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
 
 
A - the importance of asset recovery
 
B - processes of asset recovery
 
C - tools for asset recovery
 
D - asset recovery and EPPO
 
2
 
A
 
-
 
T
h
e
 
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
 
o
f
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
 
Asset recovery is the task of recovery of assets that have been
wrongfully taken: either stolen, fraudulently misappropriated or
otherwise disposed of in a criminal intent to remove them from
their rightful owner.
 
Other terms to describe the process of recovering the proceeds or
instrumentalities of crime are “
asset confiscation“ or “asset
forfeiture“.
 
 
3
 
A
 
-
 
T
h
e
 
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
 
o
f
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
Differences in domestic legislations and improvements in finance,
transportation and communications technologies in the 20th and
21st centuries have made it easier for criminals to conceal
massive amounts of stolen wealth in different places, such as
offshore financial centres.
 
Criminals profit from differences in legal systems, the high costs in
coordinating investigations, lack of international cooperation and
different regimes of bank secrecy.
 
 
 
 
4
 
A
 
-
 
T
h
e
 
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
 
o
f
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
background and figures
:
 
According to the World Bank, the cross-border flow of proceeds from
criminal activity, corruption and tax evasion is estimated between US$1–1.6
trillion per year. US $20–40 billion of this flow originated in bribes to public
officials from developing and transition countries.
 
Global money laundering transactions are estimated (by UNODC) at 2 to 5%
of global GDP, or roughly $1-2 trillion annually 
or between EUR 615 billion
and EUR 1.54 trillion each year
 
5
 
A
 
-
 
T
h
e
 
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
 
o
f
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
s
ocial impact:
As stated by the World Bank in 2004, "corruption is... the single
greatest obstacle to economic and social development. Corruption
undermines development by distorting the rule of law and
weakening the institutional foundation on which economic
growth depends. The harmful effects of corruption are especially
severe on the world's poorest, who are most reliant on the
provision of public services, and are least capable of paying the
extra costs associated with fraud and corruption".
 
 
 
6
 
A
 
-
 
T
h
e
 
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
 
o
f
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
s
ocial and legal impact:
Illicit transactions are a strategic threat to the economy of countries and their
reputation, yet - according to the United Nations Office of Drug Crime
(UNODC) -, less than 1% of global illicit financial flows are currently seized by
authorities.
Money laundering facilitates economic crimes and illegal activities such as
corruption, terrorism and drug and human trafficking.
 
The use of the internet and the increase in cybercrime is not only causing
new types of money laundering to evolve, it is also making it harder and
harder to combat.
 
 
 
7
 
A
 
-
 
T
h
e
 
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
 
o
f
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
Although there are different views on exactly what a successful and just
confiscation regime should look like, confiscation is nonetheless widely
recognised and promoted as a powerful weapon in the fight against serious
crime and corruption. When successfully implemented, it has the potential:
to protect the legitimate economy from corruption and the infiltration of
illegal assets
to bolster tax revenues in the legitimate economy
to generate assets that can be used for the public good
to assist in upholding the rule of law
to undermine criminal incentives and deter illicit activities
 
8
 
A
 
-
 
T
h
e
 
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
 
o
f
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
Recovering stolen assets is important for a variety of reasons
 
Money as the incentive for criminal acts
Loss for the victim to be protected: the EU as victim = all of us
Deterrence for criminals
 
 
 
9
 
B
 
-
 
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
 
o
f
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
Asset recovery includes numerous processes such as the tracing,
freezing, confiscation, and repatriation/ allocation of proceeds
stored in foreign jurisdictions.
 
 
 
 
 
10
 
B
 
-
 
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
 
o
f
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
 
 
• Pre-Investigative/ intelligence gathering phase
 
(time to collect data)
 
• Investigative Stage: proceeds are located and identified
 
(time for: - requests for mutual assistance – information on bank
               
accounts - temporary measures –seizure/freezing
)
 
• Judicial phase – criminal conviction and decision on confiscation
 
(time to put things on a final legal basis)
 
• Disposal phase - property (or value) is confiscated
 
(time for - asset sharing agreements - compensation of victims)
 
11
 
B
 
-
 
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
 
o
f
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
Tracing
  
>
  
Find
 
it
 
Freezing
  
>
  
Hold it
 
Confiscation
 
>
  
Keep it
 
Allocation
  
>
  
Use it
 
 
 
 
12
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
 
International cooperation: the UNCAC
 
EU tools for asset recovery
 
D
omestic tools for asset recovery
 
13
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
International cooperation: the UNCAC
 
Example
 of
 an international tool: the United Nations Convention against
Corruption (UNCAC)
The UNCAC is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument.
As defined under the UNCAC, asset recovery refers to recovering the
proceeds of corruption.
The legitimate interests of countries wishing to recover illicit assets had to be
reconciled with the legal and procedural safeguards of the countries from
which assistance will be sought.
 
14
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
International cooperation: the UNCAC
 
The agreement on asset recovery is considered a major breakthrough and
many observers claim that it is one of the reasons why so many developing
countries have signed the UNCAC.
In the course of the negotiations, countries seeking to recover assets sought
to establish presumptions that would make clear their ownership of the
assets and give priority for return over other means of disposal. Countries
from which the return was likely to be sought had some concerns about the
language that might have compromised basic human rights and procedural
protections associated with criminal liability and the freezing, seizure,
forfeiture and return of such assets.
 
 
15
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
International cooperation: the UNCAC
 
Asset recovery is covered by Chapter V of the Convention
(Articles 51–59)
Chapter V of the UNCAC establishes asset recovery as a
"fundamental principle" of the Convention. The provisions on
asset recovery lay a framework, in both civil and criminal law, for
tracing, freezing, forfeiting and returning funds obtained through
corrupt activities. The requesting state will in most cases receive
the recovered funds as long as it can prove ownership. In some
cases, the funds may be returned directly to individual victims.
 
 
16
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
International cooperation: the UNCAC
 
If no other arrangement is in place, States Parties may use the
Convention itself as a legal basis.
Article 54(1)(a) of UNCAC provides that: "Each State Party (shall)...
take such measures as may be necessary to permit its competent
authorities to give effect to an order of confiscation issued by a
court of another state party"
Article 54(2)(a) of UNCAC also provides for the provisional freezing
or seizing of property where there are sufficient grounds for
taking such actions in advance of a formal request being received.
 
17
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
International cooperation: the UNCAC
 
Recognising that recovering assets once transferred and concealed
is an exceedingly costly, complex and an all-too-often unsuccessful
process,  Chapter V of UNCAC also incorporates elements
intended to prevent illicit transfers and generate records that can
be used where illicit transfers eventually have to be traced, frozen,
seized and confiscated (Article 52).
The identification of experts who can assist developing countries
in this process is also included as a form of technical assistance
(Article 60(5)).
 
 
18
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
E
U
-
t
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
1.
 
Directive 2014/41/EU: 
European Investigation Order (EIO)
 
2. 
Directive 2014/42/EU: 
Freezing and Confiscation
 
3. 
Regulation 2018/1805: 
Mutual recognition of
    
Freezing Orders and Confiscation Orders
 
4.
 
Directive 2019/1153:
 Use of financial and other information
 
19
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
1. Directive 2014/41/EU
 
Purpose: Investigations to obtain information/ evidence
 
• Tools:
- Searches
- Interception of telecommunication
- 
Hearing
- 
Request for data
- 
Covert operations
 
20
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
2
. Directive 2014/42/
EU (“Confiscation Directive”):
 
Value confiscation (art. 4)
 
Extended confiscation (art.5)
 
Third-party-confiscation (art.6)
 
Pre-trial seizure (art.7) 
> freezing property
 
Pre-trial selling/ surety (art.10) > 
management of frozen and
       
confiscated property
 
 
 
21
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
3
. Regulation 2018/1805/EU
on the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation
orders
 
entry into force on 19 December 2020
 
22
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU
 
Article 1: Subject matter
1. This Regulation lays down the rules under which a Member State recognises and executes
in its territory freezing orders and confiscation orders issued by another Member State
within the framework of proceedings in criminal matters.
2. This Regulation shall not have the effect of modifying the obligation to respect the
fundamental rights and legal principles enshrined in Article 6 TEU.
3. When issuing freezing orders or confiscation orders, issuing authorities shall ensure that
the principles of necessity and proportionality are respected.
4. This Regulation does not apply to freezing orders and confiscation orders issued within the
framework of proceedings in civil or administrative matters.
 
23
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
 
3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU
 
Double criminality: dual system, already known from EAW and EIO
 
Listed criminal offences (art 3.1)
Other criminal offences (art 3.2)
 
24
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU
 
non-recognition and non-execution (especially: art. 8 and art. 19):
Ne bis in idem
Privilege/ immunity
Freedom of press/ expression
• Freezing certificate is m
anifestly incorrect / incomplete
Not a criminal offence under the law of the executing State
Manifest breach of fundamental rights
Rights of affected persons
Trial in absentia
 
25
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU
 
Management and disposal of frozen and confiscated property: art.
28
Law of the executing state (art. 28.1)
Prevention of depreciation in value (art. 28.2)
• Frozen property and money obtained after selling such property
  
r
emain in the executing state (art. 28.3)
• handling of c
ultural objects (art. 28.4)
 
26
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU
 
Disposal of confiscated property: art. 30
 Priority is given to the victims
 < EUR 10.000: 100% for the executing state
 > EUR 10.000: 50/50 between executing state and issuing state
 
Costs: art. 31
• generally: 
MS bear their own costs (art. 31.1)
• proposal in the case of l
arge or exeptional costs (art. 31.2)
 
27
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU
 
Liability and Reimbursement: art. 34
 
• rule: e
xecuting state is liable to an affected person
 
• internally: the i
ssuing state shall reimburse the executing state
 
BUT: if damage (or part of) is exclusively due to the executing
state, 
 
then the s
tates agree on amount reimbursed
 
28
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
4. Directive (EU) 2019/1153...
 
...on the use of financial and other information to combat serious
crimes grants law enforcement authorities and Asset Recovery
Offices with direct access to bank account information for the
purposes of fighting serious crime and aims to improve the
cooperation between law enforcement authorities and Financial
Intelligence Units and facilitate the exchange of information
between Financial Intelligence Units.
 
29
 
C
 
-
 
T
o
o
l
s
 
f
o
r
 
a
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
 
domestic tools for asset recovery
 
 
(statements of the MS experts)
 
30
 
D
 
-
 
A
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
a
n
d
 
E
P
P
O
 
[
I
]
 
w
a
n
t
 
t
h
e
 
E
P
P
O
 
t
o
 
b
e
 
a
 
f
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
,
 
r
e
s
u
l
t
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
 
i
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
,
 
w
h
o
s
e
 
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
 
o
f
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
s
 
w
i
l
l
 
b
e
 
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
i
e
d
 
b
y
 
s
t
r
i
c
t
 
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
 
w
i
t
h
 
t
h
e
 
f
u
n
d
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
g
u
a
r
a
n
t
e
e
s
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
p
e
r
s
o
n
s
 
w
h
o
 
a
r
e
 
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
 
t
o
 
t
h
e
 
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
 
I
n
 
o
r
d
e
r
 
t
o
 
p
r
o
p
e
r
l
y
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
 
i
t
s
 
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
,
 
t
h
e
 
E
P
P
O
 
w
i
l
l
 
h
a
v
e
 
t
o
 
b
e
 
f
u
l
l
y
 
i
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
,
 
a
c
t
i
n
g
 
o
n
l
y
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
s
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
E
U
,
 
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
 
t
a
k
i
n
g
 
a
n
y
 
i
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
 
f
r
o
m
 
e
i
t
h
e
r
 
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
 
o
r
 
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
.
 
I
 
a
l
s
o
 
w
a
n
t
 
i
t
 
t
o
 
b
e
c
o
m
e
 
a
 
c
e
n
t
e
r
 
o
f
 
e
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
a
r
e
a
 
o
f
 
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
 
a
n
d
 
s
e
i
z
u
r
e
 
o
f
 
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
 
a
s
s
e
t
s
,
 
b
y
 
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
g
 
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
d
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
 
i
n
 
f
o
r
e
n
s
i
c
 
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
 
a
n
d
 
d
a
t
a
 
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
 
M
y
 
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
 
e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
 
a
s
t
h
e
 
C
h
i
e
f
 
P
r
o
s
e
c
u
t
o
r
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
R
o
m
a
n
i
a
n
 
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
 
A
n
t
i
c
o
r
r
u
p
t
i
o
n
 
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
a
t
e
 
m
a
k
e
s
 
m
e
a
l
s
o
 
a
c
u
t
e
l
y
 
a
w
a
r
e
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
 
w
e
 
a
r
e
 
f
a
c
i
n
g
.
(Laura Codruța Kövesi in 2019/ Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) 20th
General Activity Report)
 
31
 
D
 
-
 
A
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
a
n
d
 
E
P
P
O
 
 
Regulation 2017/ 1939
 
Domestic laws in relation to EPPO
 
 
 
32
 
D
 
-
 
A
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
a
n
d
 
E
P
P
O
 
Regulation 2017/ 1939
Article 38: Disposition of confiscated assets
Where, in accordance with the requirements and procedures under national
law including the national law transposing Directive 2014/42/EU of the
European Parliament and of the Council, the competent national court has
decided by a final ruling to confiscate any property related to, or proceeds
derived from, an offence within the competence of the EPPO, such assets or
proceeds shall be disposed of in accordance with applicable national law. This
disposition shall not negatively affect the rights of the Union or other victims
to be compensated for damage that they have incurred.
 
 
33
 
D
 
-
 
A
s
s
e
t
 
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
 
a
n
d
 
E
P
P
O
 
 
Domestic laws in relation to EPPO
 
 
(statements of the MS experts)
 
 
34
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Asset recovery involves the retrieval of assets wrongfully taken through theft, fraud, or criminal acts. This process is crucial in combating financial crimes, such as money laundering and corruption. The content discusses the significance of asset recovery, various processes involved, tools used, and the global implications of recovering illicitly obtained wealth. It highlights the challenges posed by differences in legal systems, advancements in technology aiding criminals in concealing stolen assets, and the staggering financial figures associated with cross-border criminal activities. Asset recovery plays a vital role in promoting economic development and combating corruption, which poses a significant obstacle to worldwide progress.


Uploaded on Jul 17, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Asset recovery

  2. Content Content A - the importance of asset recovery B - processes of asset recovery C - tools for asset recovery D - asset recovery and EPPO 2

  3. A A - - The The importance importance of of asset asset recovery recovery Asset recovery is the task of recovery of assets that have been wrongfully taken: either stolen, fraudulently misappropriated or otherwise disposed of in a criminal intent to remove them from their rightful owner. Other terms to describe the process of recovering the proceeds or instrumentalities of crime are asset confiscation or asset forfeiture . 3

  4. A A - - The The importance importance of of asset asset recovery recovery Differences in domestic legislations and improvements in finance, transportation and communications technologies in the 20th and 21st centuries have made it easier for criminals to conceal massive amounts of stolen wealth in different places, such as offshore financial centres. Criminals profit from differences in legal systems, the high costs in coordinating investigations, lack of international cooperation and different regimes of bank secrecy. 4

  5. A A - - The The importance importance of of asset asset recovery recovery background and figures: According to the World Bank, the cross-border flow of proceeds from criminal activity, corruption and tax evasion is estimated between US$1 1.6 trillion per year. US $20 40 billion of this flow originated in bribes to public officials from developing and transition countries. Global money laundering transactions are estimated (by UNODC) at 2 to 5% of global GDP, or roughly $1-2 trillion annually or between EUR 615 billion and EUR 1.54 trillion each year 5

  6. A A - - The The importance importance of of asset asset recovery recovery social impact: As stated by the World Bank in 2004, "corruption is... the single greatest obstacle to economic and social development. Corruption undermines development by distorting the rule of law and weakening the institutional foundation on which economic growth depends. The harmful effects of corruption are especially severe on the world's poorest, who are most reliant on the provision of public services, and are least capable of paying the extra costs associated with fraud and corruption". 6

  7. A A - - The The importance importance of of asset asset recovery recovery social and legal impact: Illicit transactions are a strategic threat to the economy of countries and their reputation, yet - according to the United Nations Office of Drug Crime (UNODC) -, less than 1% of global illicit financial flows are currently seized by authorities. Money laundering facilitates economic crimes and illegal activities such as corruption, terrorism and drug and human trafficking. The use of the internet and the increase in cybercrime is not only causing new types of money laundering to evolve, it is also making it harder and harder to combat. 7

  8. A A - - The The importance importance of of asset asset recovery recovery Although there are different views on exactly what a successful and just confiscation regime should look like, confiscation is nonetheless widely recognised and promoted as a powerful weapon in the fight against serious crime and corruption. When successfully implemented, it has the potential: to protect the legitimate economy from corruption and the infiltration of illegal assets to bolster tax revenues in the legitimate economy to generate assets that can be used for the public good to assist in upholding the rule of law to undermine criminal incentives and deter illicit activities 8

  9. A A - - The The importance importance of of asset asset recovery recovery Recovering stolen assets is important for a variety of reasons Money as the incentive for criminal acts Loss for the victim to be protected: the EU as victim = all of us Deterrence for criminals 9

  10. B B - - Processes Processes of of asset asset recovery recovery Asset recovery includes numerous processes such as the tracing, freezing, confiscation, and repatriation/ allocation of proceeds stored in foreign jurisdictions. 10

  11. B B - - P Processes rocesses of of asset asset recovery recovery Pre-Investigative/ intelligence gathering phase (time to collect data) Investigative Stage: proceeds are located and identified (time for: - requests for mutual assistance information on bank accounts - temporary measures seizure/freezing) Judicial phase criminal conviction and decision on confiscation (time to put things on a final legal basis) Disposal phase - property (or value) is confiscated (time for - asset sharing agreements - compensation of victims) 11

  12. B B - - Processes Processes of of asset asset recovery recovery Tracing > Find it Freezing > Hold it Confiscation > Keep it Allocation > Use it 12

  13. C C - - Tools Tools for for asset asset recovery recovery International cooperation: the UNCAC EU tools for asset recovery Domestic tools for asset recovery 13

  14. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery International cooperation: the UNCAC Example of an international tool: the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) The UNCAC is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument. As defined under the UNCAC, asset recovery refers to recovering the proceeds of corruption. The legitimate interests of countries wishing to recover illicit assets had to be reconciled with the legal and procedural safeguards of the countries from which assistance will be sought. 14

  15. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery International cooperation: the UNCAC The agreement on asset recovery is considered a major breakthrough and many observers claim that it is one of the reasons why so many developing countries have signed the UNCAC. In the course of the negotiations, countries seeking to recover assets sought to establish presumptions that would make clear their ownership of the assets and give priority for return over other means of disposal. Countries from which the return was likely to be sought had some concerns about the language that might have compromised basic human rights and procedural protections associated with criminal liability and the freezing, seizure, forfeiture and return of such assets. 15

  16. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery International cooperation: the UNCAC Asset recovery is covered by Chapter V of the Convention (Articles 51 59) Chapter V of the UNCAC establishes asset recovery as a "fundamental principle" of the Convention. The provisions on asset recovery lay a framework, in both civil and criminal law, for tracing, freezing, forfeiting and returning funds obtained through corrupt activities. The requesting state will in most cases receive the recovered funds as long as it can prove ownership. In some cases, the funds may be returned directly to individual victims. 16

  17. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery International cooperation: the UNCAC If no other arrangement is in place, States Parties may use the Convention itself as a legal basis. Article 54(1)(a) of UNCAC provides that: "Each State Party (shall)... take such measures as may be necessary to permit its competent authorities to give effect to an order of confiscation issued by a court of another state party" Article 54(2)(a) of UNCAC also provides for the provisional freezing or seizing of property where there are sufficient grounds for taking such actions in advance of a formal request being received. 17

  18. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery International cooperation: the UNCAC Recognising that recovering assets once transferred and concealed is an exceedingly costly, complex and an all-too-often unsuccessful process, Chapter V of UNCAC also incorporates elements intended to prevent illicit transfers and generate records that can be used where illicit transfers eventually have to be traced, frozen, seized and confiscated (Article 52). The identification of experts who can assist developing countries in this process is also included as a form of technical assistance (Article 60(5)). 18

  19. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery EU-tools for asset recovery 1. Directive 2014/41/EU: European Investigation Order (EIO) 2. Directive 2014/42/EU: Freezing and Confiscation 3. Regulation 2018/1805: Mutual recognition of Freezing Orders and Confiscation Orders 4. Directive 2019/1153: Use of financial and other information 19

  20. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery 1. Directive 2014/41/EU Purpose: Investigations to obtain information/ evidence Tools: - Searches - Interception of telecommunication - Hearing - Request for data - Covert operations 20

  21. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery 2. Directive 2014/42/EU ( Confiscation Directive ): Value confiscation (art. 4) Extended confiscation (art.5) Third-party-confiscation (art.6) Pre-trial seizure (art.7) > freezing property Pre-trial selling/ surety (art.10) > management of frozen and confiscated property 21

  22. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery 3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU on the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders entry into force on 19 December 2020 22

  23. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery 3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU Article 1: Subject matter 1. This Regulation lays down the rules under which a Member State recognises and executes in its territory freezing orders and confiscation orders issued by another Member State within the framework of proceedings in criminal matters. 2. This Regulation shall not have the effect of modifying the obligation to respect the fundamental rights and legal principles enshrined in Article 6 TEU. 3. When issuing freezing orders or confiscation orders, issuing authorities shall ensure that the principles of necessity and proportionality are respected. 4. This Regulation does not apply to freezing orders and confiscation orders issued within the framework of proceedings in civil or administrative matters. 23

  24. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery 3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU Double criminality: dual system, already known from EAW and EIO Listed criminal offences (art 3.1) Other criminal offences (art 3.2) 24

  25. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery 3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU non-recognition and non-execution (especially: art. 8 and art. 19): Ne bis in idem Privilege/ immunity Freedom of press/ expression Freezing certificate is manifestly incorrect / incomplete Not a criminal offence under the law of the executing State Manifest breach of fundamental rights Rights of affected persons Trial in absentia 25

  26. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery 3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU Management and disposal of frozen and confiscated property: art. 28 Law of the executing state (art. 28.1) Prevention of depreciation in value (art. 28.2) Frozen property and money obtained after selling such property remain in the executing state (art. 28.3) handling of cultural objects (art. 28.4) 26

  27. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery 3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU Disposal of confiscated property: art. 30 Priority is given to the victims < EUR 10.000: 100% for the executing state > EUR 10.000: 50/50 between executing state and issuing state Costs: art. 31 generally: MS bear their own costs (art. 31.1) proposal in the case of large or exeptional costs (art. 31.2) 27

  28. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery 3. Regulation 2018/1805/EU Liability and Reimbursement: art. 34 rule: executing state is liable to an affected person internally: the issuing state shall reimburse the executing state BUT: if damage (or part of) is exclusively due to the executing state, then the states agree on amount reimbursed 28

  29. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery 4. Directive (EU) 2019/1153... ...on the use of financial and other information to combat serious crimes grants law enforcement authorities and Asset Recovery Offices with direct access to bank account information for the purposes of fighting serious crime and aims to improve the cooperation between law enforcement authorities and Financial Intelligence Units and facilitate the exchange of information between Financial Intelligence Units. 29

  30. C C - - T Tools ools for for asset asset recovery recovery domestic tools for asset recovery (statements of the MS experts) 30

  31. D D - - A Asset sset recovery recovery and EPPO and EPPO [I] want the EPPO to be a flexible, result-oriented institution, whose effectiveness of proceedings will be accompanied by strict compliance with the fundamental guarantees of the persons who are subject to the investigations. In order to properly achieve its mission, the EPPO will have to be fully independent, acting only in the interests of the EU, without taking any instructions from either European or national authorities. I also want it to become a center of excellence in the area of financial investigations and seizure of criminal assets, by implementing advanced standards in forensic accounting and data analysis. My previous experience as the Chief Prosecutor of the Romanian National Anticorruption Directorate makes me also acutely aware of the challenges we are facing. (Laura Codru a K vesi in 2019/ Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) 20th General Activity Report) 31

  32. D D - - A Asset sset recovery recovery and EPPO and EPPO Regulation 2017/ 1939 Domestic laws in relation to EPPO 32

  33. D D - - A Asset sset recovery recovery and EPPO and EPPO Regulation 2017/ 1939 Article 38: Disposition of confiscated assets Where, in accordance with the requirements and procedures under national law including the national law transposing Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, the competent national court has decided by a final ruling to confiscate any property related to, or proceeds derived from, an offence within the competence of the EPPO, such assets or proceeds shall be disposed of in accordance with applicable national law. This disposition shall not negatively affect the rights of the Union or other victims to be compensated for damage that they have incurred. 33

  34. D D - - A Asset sset recovery recovery and EPPO and EPPO Domestic laws in relation to EPPO (statements of the MS experts) 34

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#