The Social Construction of Crime and Deviance

 
The social construction of
crime and deviance
 
What are the questions about?
 
How social reality is constructed in our minds and does not
exist externally
 
How society defines certain acts as deviant and acts on
these
 
How society can make deviance greater rather than reduce it
 
How deviance is not caused by external social forces,
ie)culture/poverty etc
 
Areas of focus:
 
The origins of labelling theory
 
How society defines what is deviant? (Deviance as a
relative concept)
 
Rule creation
 
The Process of labelling (how it happens)
 
The effects of labelling
 
The role of the media (deviance amplification)
 
Methodological issues
 
Evaluation
 
 
 
 
 
 
Concepts you need to know…
 
Selective policing
Master status
Societal reaction
Primary/secondary deviance
Labels
Self concept
Self fulfilling prophecy
 
Stigma
Sensitisation
Deviance amplification
Relative deviance
Folk devils & moral panics
 
The origins of this theory
 
Howard Becker
 – and
others within the
CHICAGO SCHOOL
Ethnographic
 approach
How people make sense
of 
social reality
The police,courts,media
adopt stereotypes and
generate 
societal reaction
 
Becker had his fingers in a lot of social
constructionist pies…
 
Most famous book 
‘OUTSIDERS’
 (1955)
Issues he discusses…
Rule creation
Moral entrepreneurs and crusades
Relative deviance
Societal reaction
Selective policing
Deviant careers
Master status
 
Symbolic Interactionism – so much to
answer for…
 
George Herbert Mead
 
Max Weber
 
Deviance is Relative
 
Not absolute
What is deviant depends on the
definitions held in that society
It is not the act!!!
Its all about society’s reaction
 
Deviant
behaviour…is
behaviour so
labelled
 
 
Howie B
 
 
Its not the act that’s
important but how we
perceive (define) the
act..this is 
relative
 
Deviance is relative
 
Time
 
Place
 
Who doing
the act?
 
Who
witnessing
the act?
 
Culture
 
These change over time….NOT ABSOLUTE!
 
How 
positivist/structural
 and
interpretivist/action
 ideas differ
 
Positivist approach
Man is shaped by social forces
Reality is external and
objective
We can measure the causes of
crime
A minority are driven to
deviance
 
Interpretivistic approach
Man is shaped by ideas
and meanings
Reality is internal and
subjective
We cannot measure the
causes of crime
Most people engage in
deviance
 
Laws are social constructs
 
Moral entrepreneurs
Moral panics
Moral crusades
 
BECKER on Rule Creation
 
Examples of relative deviance/rule creation
 
Marijuana Tax Act 1930s
Prohibition 1920s
Decriminalisation of homosexuality USA (1974)
Decriminalisation of suicide 1960s
Children outside marriage (moral imbecility)
 
Reefer Madness
 
 
The process of labelling
 
Stereotypical criminal/deviant
Sensitisation
 
Selective policing
 – Lambert/Sutherland/Becker/
Cicourel/Kalven and Zaesel
 
Homeworks in chase!
 
Erving Goffman
 
Presentation of the self
Self-concept
How others see us affects
how we act
Stigmatisation – attach a
negative label
Deviant career once
labelled
Mental illness
Career of a marijuana user
 
‘ASYLUMS’
 
‘STIGMA’
 
Looking-glass self
 
 
 
Edwin M Lemert
 
Primary deviance
 
 
 
 
Secondary deviance
 
Societal reaction
 
sensitisation
 
 
amplification
 
The self concept transforms
 
We absorb the label once labelled
The deviance is amplified
 
Jock Young
 
Notting Hill
Hippies
 
The effects of labelling
 
Influences the self-concept
‘looking glass self’ (Charles Cooley)
Self fulfilling prophecy
The master status and SFP
Primary/secondary deviance
 
Deviance Amplification
 
How deviance is
increased (amplified)
through societal
reaction
Main focus is on role
of the MASS MEDIA
Can refer to general
idea of interaction and
increased deviance
 
The implications of the deviance
amplification idea
 
Society creates greater levels of deviance
The mass media are a problem
The mass media are not neutral and they sensationalise
The mass media influences public opinion, the role of police, courts
and politicians
The mass media affects an individual’s self concept
The individual deviant is not to blame – there are no single causes
like poverty, socialisation etc
 
Folk Devils & Moral Panics
 
Media and youth subcultures
The media is a vehicle for
re-establishing social order
The media exaggerates a
social problem (moral panic)
It identifies a source of the
problem (folk devil)
It tries to help eliminate the
problem
 
Stan Cohen
 
Deviance amplification cycle
 
 
Deviant act
 
 
Media
exaggerates
 
Societal reaction
 
 
Social problem
 
Group identified
as cause
 
(Folk devil)
 
(moral panic)
 
Police/courts
(sensitised)
 
Find more
cases
 
Proof
 
Stan Cohen
 
Mods and rockers 1964
Newspaper report fights
Selective policing
More arrests/harsher punishments
More young people attracted to it
 
Other moral panics
 
Black muggings
Single parent families
Asylum seekers
Joy riding
ACID and ‘rave culture’
HIV and AIDS
Travellers/Gypsies
Jews in Nazi Germany
 
Consolidation
 
Using material from the previous ppt slides show your
understanding of the deviance amplification process.
 
Focus on:
Societal reaction/sensitisation
Stereotyping/expectations
Effects on self-concept of young people
How the media ‘amplified’ deviance
The effect of the media on the public, police, politicians
and courts
The way that ‘subcultures’ are created and reinforced
Use examples from the modern day as well as the Mods
and Rockers
 
 
 
 
Further studies
 
Armstrong and Fishman – Glasgow election
 
Fishman – New York Muggings
 
Stuart Hall – Policing the Crisis
 
Stuart Hall – Policing the Crisis
 
Neo Marxist CCCS
Crisis in hegemony
 
Targeted black youth –
mugging moral panic
 
Sensitisation – selective
policing – Suss laws
 
Advantages of Labelling Theory
 
It does not treat official statistics as fact
It rejects the idea that deviants are different to
‘normal’ people
It questions the effectiveness of policing, the
courts and punishment
It raises the issue of power
It considers the impact of the mass media
It highlights the bias in law enforcement
It considers societal reaction and the effects on
individuals
 
Disadvantages of Labelling Theory
 
Its over-romantic
Too much focus on exotic deviance
Ignores the origins of deviant acts
There is absolute deviance
It uses labelling in a deterministic way
More attention needed on the behaviour that
produced the label
Deviants can adopt identity without being labelled
Not explore fully capitalism and economic power
 
What other theories say…
 
Functionalism etc
 
Challenge the idea
Absolute deviance – set normal standards
Media must dramatise and make public deviance to reinforce
common values
Police and courts are neutral
Law making is neutral – reflects shared values
There are causes of deviance that can be measured
 
Marxism
 
Share idea of biased laws and selective
policing
Much overlap in Neo-marxism (New
Criminology/CCCS)
Traditional Marxism is though more
structural and deterministic
More attention on the economy (capitalism)
needed
 
Synoptic – education
 
 
 
Labelling in the classroom – SFP
 
Stereotypes in resources – affects on self
concept
 
Whose curriculum? Who shapes it?
 
 
Synoptic links - family
 
Gender socialisation
Politics of the family                             (Laing and mental
health)
Single parent families
Gay households
Social construction of
    childhood and old age
 
Question….
 
“ Evaluate the claim that both the nature and extent
of deviance is socially constructed”
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Exploring the concept of deviance as a social construct, this content dives into how society labels certain behaviors, the origins of labeling theory, and the role of media in amplifying deviance. Key concepts include societal reaction, symbolic interactionism, and the work of Howard Becker in shaping our understanding of deviant behavior.

  • Social construction
  • Deviance
  • Labeling theory
  • Howard Becker
  • Symbolic interactionism

Uploaded on Jul 20, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The social construction of crime and deviance

  2. What are the questions about? How social reality is constructed in our minds and does not exist externally How society defines certain acts as deviant and acts on these How society can make deviance greater rather than reduce it How deviance is not caused by external social forces, ie)culture/poverty etc

  3. Areas of focus: The origins of labelling theory How society defines what is deviant? (Deviance as a relative concept) Rule creation The Process of labelling (how it happens) The effects of labelling The role of the media (deviance amplification) Methodological issues Evaluation

  4. Concepts you need to know Selective policing Master status Societal reaction Primary/secondary deviance Labels Self concept Self fulfilling prophecy Stigma Sensitisation Deviance amplification Relative deviance Folk devils & moral panics

  5. The origins of this theory Howard Becker and others within the CHICAGO SCHOOL Ethnographic approach How people make sense of social reality The police,courts,media adopt stereotypes and generate societal reaction

  6. Becker had his fingers in a lot of social constructionist pies Most famous book OUTSIDERS (1955) Issues he discusses Rule creation Moral entrepreneurs and crusades Relative deviance Societal reaction Selective policing Deviant careers Master status

  7. Symbolic Interactionism so much to answer for George Herbert Mead Max Weber

  8. Deviance is Relative Not absolute What is deviant depends on the definitions held in that society It is not the act!!! Its all about society s reaction starwarskidlegend

  9. Deviant behaviour is behaviour so labelled Its not the act that s important but how we perceive (define) the act..this is relative Howie B

  10. Who doing the act? Who witnessing the act? Place Deviance is relative Time Culture These change over time .NOT ABSOLUTE!

  11. How positivist/structural and interpretivist/action ideas differ Positivist approach Man is shaped by social forces Reality is external and objective We can measure the causes of crime A minority are driven to deviance Interpretivistic approach Man is shaped by ideas and meanings Reality is internal and subjective We cannot measure the causes of crime Most people engage in deviance

  12. Laws are social constructs Moral entrepreneurs Moral panics Moral crusades squiggle_m BECKER on Rule Creation

  13. Examples of relative deviance/rule creation Marijuana Tax Act 1930s Prohibition 1920s Decriminalisation of homosexuality USA (1974) Decriminalisation of suicide 1960s Children outside marriage (moral imbecility)

  14. Reefer Madness

  15. The process of labelling Stereotypical criminal/deviant Sensitisation Selective policing Lambert/Sutherland/Becker/ Cicourel/Kalven and Zaesel

  16. Homeworks in chase! Name Subcultural essay Received Received X X X New right essay Saba Linda Lilly Josh Holly S X X X X X

  17. Erving Goffman goffman Presentation of the self Self-concept How others see us affects how we act Stigmatisation attach a negative label Deviant career once labelled Mental illness Career of a marijuana user ASYLUMS STIGMA

  18. Looking-glass self

  19. Edwin M Lemert Primary deviance sensitisation Societal reaction amplification Secondary deviance

  20. The self concept transforms We absorb the label once labelled The deviance is amplified Notting Hill Hippies Jock Young

  21. The effects of labelling Influences the self-concept looking glass self (Charles Cooley) Self fulfilling prophecy The master status and SFP Primary/secondary deviance

  22. Deviance Amplification How deviance is increased (amplified) through societal reaction Main focus is on role of the MASS MEDIA Can refer to general idea of interaction and increased deviance med003

  23. The implications of the deviance amplification idea Society creates greater levels of deviance The mass media are a problem The mass media are not neutral and they sensationalise The mass media influences public opinion, the role of police, courts and politicians The mass media affects an individual s self concept The individual deviant is not to blame there are no single causes like poverty, socialisation etc

  24. Folk Devils & Moral Panics Media and youth subcultures The media is a vehicle for re-establishing social order The media exaggerates a social problem (moral panic) It identifies a source of the problem (folk devil) It tries to help eliminate the problem Stanley_Cohen Stan Cohen

  25. Deviance amplification cycle Social problem Deviant act Group identified as cause (Folk devil) Proof Media exaggerates (moral panic) Find more cases Police/courts (sensitised) Societal reaction

  26. Stan Cohen Mods and rockers 1964 Newspaper report fights Selective policing More arrests/harsher punishments More young people attracted to it

  27. Other moral panics Black muggings Single parent families Asylum seekers Joy riding ACID and rave culture HIV and AIDS Travellers/Gypsies Jews in Nazi Germany

  28. Consolidation Using material from the previous ppt slides show your understanding of the deviance amplification process. Focus on: Societal reaction/sensitisation Stereotyping/expectations Effects on self-concept of young people How the media amplified deviance The effect of the media on the public, police, politicians and courts The way that subcultures are created and reinforced Use examples from the modern day as well as the Mods and Rockers

  29. Further studies Armstrong and Fishman Glasgow election Fishman New York Muggings Stuart Hall Policing the Crisis

  30. Stuart Hall Policing the Crisis Neo Marxist CCCS Crisis in hegemony Targeted black youth mugging moral panic Sensitisation selective policing Suss laws

  31. Advantages of Labelling Theory It does not treat official statistics as fact It rejects the idea that deviants are different to normal people It questions the effectiveness of policing, the courts and punishment It raises the issue of power It considers the impact of the mass media It highlights the bias in law enforcement It considers societal reaction and the effects on individuals

  32. Disadvantages of Labelling Theory Its over-romantic Too much focus on exotic deviance Ignores the origins of deviant acts There is absolute deviance It uses labelling in a deterministic way More attention needed on the behaviour that produced the label Deviants can adopt identity without being labelled Not explore fully capitalism and economic power

  33. What other theories say Functionalism etc Challenge the idea Absolute deviance set normal standards Media must dramatise and make public deviance to reinforce common values Police and courts are neutral Law making is neutral reflects shared values There are causes of deviance that can be measured

  34. Marxism Share idea of biased laws and selective policing Much overlap in Neo-marxism (New Criminology/CCCS) Traditional Marxism is though more structural and deterministic More attention on the economy (capitalism) needed

  35. Synoptic education Labelling in the classroom SFP Stereotypes in resources affects on self concept Whose curriculum? Who shapes it?

  36. Synoptic links - family Gender socialisation Politics of the family (Laing and mental health) Single parent families Gay households Social construction of childhood and old age

  37. Question. Evaluate the claim that both the nature and extent of deviance is socially constructed

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#