The Impact of Open Source Library Automation Systems

undefined
 
Open Source Perspectives
 
Marshall Breeding
Independent Consultant, Author, and
Founder and Publisher, Library Technology Guides
 
October 215 2019
 
 
Internet Librarian International 2019
 
Abstract
 
In this session, Breeding will give an overview of the
impact open source library automation systems are
making on the global library automation scene and how
they fare compared to proprietary alternatives.  Using
data from 
, Breeding will illustrate the
adoption of open source products in the United
States.  Breeding will also discuss how open source
products are covered in the 
International Library
Automation Perceptions
 survey and report he conducts
annually and in the annual 
Library Systems Report
.
libraries.org
undefined
 
Expanding access to technology
 
Open Source Software
 
Open Source vs Proprietary Software
 
Library
 software available under both models
Proprietary software tends to be adopted in
libraries with more robust budgets
…but many libraries in wealthy countries also use open
source ILS products
Open source software widely implemented in
developing nations
Commercial support of open source represents a
growing portion of ILS  implementations in the US
 
Open Source Software
 
The source code to the software must be made available
Can be modified and shared
No fees can be charged for the software itself
Fees can be charged for services for open source software
products:
Support
Hosting
Migration
Customizations
OSS licenses specify different terms for sharing, re-use,
commercial use, etc. (GPL, Apache)
 
Open Source
 
Considered a routine part of the library technology industry
14 percent of ILS  installations in US  Public Libraries
6 percent of ILS  installations of US Academic Libraries
ByWater Solutions dominant provider  of Koha services in
the US
2018: 43 new contracts spanning 225 libraries
Interleaf Technologies is a major Koha support provider in
Ireland
PTFS Europe is the major Koha support provider in the UK
Evergreen: Open Source ILS for public library consortia
Equinox Open Software Initiative: services for Evergreen
and Koha
 
General observations
 
Wealthy regions primarily use proprietary products
Sophisticated systems, but with substantial costs for libraries
Proprietary products not affordable by most libraries in
developing world
Open source ILS products have comparable capabilities
and can be implemented at lower costs
Gaps in functionality between open source and
proprietary ILS products continue to narrow
Open source options for electronic resource
management are available, but have less capabilities
Lack of open access knowledgebase and discovery index
 
Open source Library Tech Products
 
Integrated library systems:
Koha
Evergreen
Invenio (commercial support from TIND)
ABCD
ILS based on CDS/ISIS components
Library Services Platforms
FOLIO
Still in development phase
Discovery interfaces
VuFind (PHP + SOLR)
Blacklight (Ruby + SOLR)
 
Open Source Library Systems
 
This issue of Library Technology Reports provides
an outline of the major open source integrated
library systems and library services platforms and
their influence on the broader library technology
industry. The advantages and disadvantages of
both open source and proprietary software will be
explored in the report. It includes an overview of
open source resource management solutions and
introduces the current landscape of these products
in the industry. The chapters following closely
examine the open source resource management
systems Koha, Evergreen, TIND, and FOLIO. The
report concludes by exploring the impact of open
source products on the library automation
environment.
 
 
Library Technology Reports
. Vol 53 No 6, Aug / Sep 2017
 
Library Technology Industry Reports
 
2014: 
Strategic Competition and
Cooperation
2015: Operationalizing Innovation
2016: Power Plays
2017: Competing visions for
Technology, openness, workflows
2018: New Technologies enable
an expended vision of library
services
2019: Cycles of Innovation
 
2013: Rush to Innovate
2012: Agents of Change
2011: New Frontier
2010: New Models, Core Systems
2009: Investing in the Future
2008: Opportunity out of turmoil
2007: An industry redefined
2006: Reshuffling the deck
2005: Gradual evolution
2004: Migration down, innovation up
2003: The competition heats up
2002: Capturing the migrating customer
American Libraries
Library Journal
 
Library System Report 2019
 
2019 Report Theme
 
 
“Cycles of Innovation
 
 
2019: Cycles of Innovation
 
Product innovation and development cycles differ
for each library sector
Academic: mid-way into a 15-year cycle of transition
from ILS products to Library Services Platforms
Publics: Mired in ongoing evolution of ILS products to
add new web interfaces and patron engagement
capabilities. Low level of churn of ILS trade-offs
Schools: District-oriented ILS products, supplemented by
content discovery and delivery services
 
Open Source Trends
 
Library systems based on open source software rather
than proprietary licenses continue to grow. In the US
and other economically advantaged regions, most
adoptions of open source ILS products are based on
commercial support arrangements, which provide
comprehensive services for hosting, migration,
implementation, and product support. 
Open source
ILS implementations currently represent about 14%
of ILS installations in the US and 6% of academic
libraries
.
 
Koha in 2019 Systems Report
 
Koha, launched in 1999, has received continual
development, with version 18.05.09 released in
February 2019. Koha has been implemented in
every global region and is dominant in many
countries, including India, Malaysia, Turkey, and
most Latin American countries. In the developed
world, Koha participates in the general mix of
the ILS arena, usually through commercial
support firms.
 
Library Technology Guides
 
https://librarytechnology.org
 
Koha Worldwide
 
Open Source ILS in US Public Libraries
 
Open Source in US Academic Libraries
 
 
Selections / Deselections
 
Koha Migration  Report
 
Koha Satisfaction Scores
 
Satisfaction: Koha - ByWater
 
Satisfaction scores for  Evergreen
 
Satisfaction Scores: Sierra
 
FOLIO
 
“The Future of Libraries is Open”
Launched by EBSCO Information Services in 2016 to
create open source library services platform
Initially for Academic Libraries
Index Data engaged to create initial microservices
framework
Intellectual property assigned to Open Library
Foundation
Alliance with the Open Library Foundation
Previously associated with the Kuali OLE project
 
FOLIO
 
An open source library services platform able to manage
print, electronic, and digital resources
Based on a microservices architecture, including the OKAPI
api gateway and Stripes user interface toolkit (verify
wording)
An underlying Codex metadata model able to describe and
manage multiple types of content
A modular design with a suite of apps that can be
optionally implemented and replaced as needed without the
need for wholesale changes to the overall environment.
A multi-tenant design, though some libraries or support
organizations may opt to deploy their own instances of the
software.
 
FOLIO Technology
 
Microservices architecture
based on OKAPI framework and API Gatweay
Modular app-based deployment
Pluggable modules
Apps can be added or replaced without disrupting
entire implementation
Multi-tenant 
capable, with option for locally
deployed instances, or multiple vendor instances
Contrasts with Alma as a single global deployment with
shared codebase
 
User
Interfaces
 
Scripts/
Third Party Systems
 
API endpoints
 
Microservices-based Application
Persistence / System
 Layer
Presentation Layer / UI Toolkit
API Gateway
Web service
Enterprise Service Bus
Application software Business Logic
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
 
Database Engine
Presentation Layer
 
User
Interfaces
 
Scripts/
Third Party Systems
 
API endpoints
 
Monolithic Application: Enterprise SOA Model
 
Reusable
Composable
Services
 
}
 
FOLIO Discovery
 
Enables choice for discovery
Scope of functionality does not include Discovery
Strategic alternative to Ex Libris bundling of Alma
with Primo or Summon
Current implementations plan for Blacklight, VuFind
Most will use EDS for interface or article discovery
Duke University will use Blacklight, ProQuest 360
knowledgebase
 
FOLIO – First Live Implementation
 
Chalmers University of Technology
Gothenburg, Sweden
Switched core operations from Sierra to FOLIO on
September 30, 2019
Circulation
Electronic Resource Management
EBSCO Knowledgebase
Cataloging and  Acquisitions underway
Partner with EBSCO Information Services for support
and hosting
Already using EBSCO Discovery Services
 
Planned Implementations
 
Duke University
Lehigh University
Texas A&M University
5 Colleges Consortium
University of Alabama
Fenway Library Organization
University of Chicago
Cornell University
North Carolina State University
North Rhine-Westphalian Library Service Center (hbz)
Common Library Network (GBV)
 
 
Selections through Tender Process
 
Missouri State University
National Széchényi Library in Hungary
Tender awarded to HerMészSoft with EBSCO
Information Services and Index Data as service
providers
 
Current Status of Open Source
 
A routine option in the current marketplace
Slow and steady adoption rates so far
Koha and Evergreen compete among traditional ILS
products and mostly have achieved functional
parity
FOLIO enters the competitive arena for academic
libraries
Proprietary products dominate in most product
sectors
 
Future possibilities
 
Unlikely to see a spike in open source adoption
given previous patterns in library technology sphere
…though unexpected events could disrupt existing
trends
Adds a competitive option that provides additional
competition for improved features, support, and
strategic vision
 
Strategic perspective
 
Select technology options best suited to advance
the library in its strategic mission:
Scope of functionality
Alignment with operational priorities
Flexibility to adapt to changing priorities
Differing perceptions regarding whether
proprietary or open source software models can
best serve library interests
undefined
 
 
Questions
 and discussion
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Marshall Breeding discusses the rise of open source library automation systems globally, comparing them to proprietary alternatives. He explores the adoption of open source products in the US and their coverage in international library reports, highlighting how libraries of different budgets utilize open source vs. proprietary software.

  • Open Source
  • Library Automation
  • Marshall Breeding
  • Proprietary Software
  • Technology

Uploaded on Sep 25, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Open Source Perspectives Marshall Breeding Independent Consultant, Author, and Founder and Publisher, Library Technology Guides https://librarytechnology.org/ https://twitter.com/mbreeding Internet Librarian International 2019 October 215 2019

  2. Abstract In this session, Breeding will give an overview of the impact open source library automation systems are making on the global library automation scene and how they fare compared to proprietary alternatives. Using data from libraries.org, Breeding will illustrate the adoption of open source products in the United States. Breeding will also discuss how open source products are covered in the International Library Automation Perceptions survey and report he conducts annually and in the annual Library Systems Report.

  3. Open Source Software Expanding access to technology

  4. Open Source vs Proprietary Software Library software available under both models Proprietary software tends to be adopted in libraries with more robust budgets but many libraries in wealthy countries also use open source ILS products Open source software widely implemented in developing nations Commercial support of open source represents a growing portion of ILS implementations in the US

  5. Open Source Software The source code to the software must be made available Can be modified and shared No fees can be charged for the software itself Fees can be charged for services for open source software products: Support Hosting Migration Customizations OSS licenses specify different terms for sharing, re-use, commercial use, etc. (GPL, Apache)

  6. Open Source Considered a routine part of the library technology industry 14 percent of ILS installations in US Public Libraries 6 percent of ILS installations of US Academic Libraries ByWater Solutions dominant provider of Koha services in the US 2018: 43 new contracts spanning 225 libraries Interleaf Technologies is a major Koha support provider in Ireland PTFS Europe is the major Koha support provider in the UK Evergreen: Open Source ILS for public library consortia Equinox Open Software Initiative: services for Evergreen and Koha

  7. General observations Wealthy regions primarily use proprietary products Sophisticated systems, but with substantial costs for libraries Proprietary products not affordable by most libraries in developing world Open source ILS products have comparable capabilities and can be implemented at lower costs Gaps in functionality between open source and proprietary ILS products continue to narrow Open source options for electronic resource management are available, but have less capabilities Lack of open access knowledgebase and discovery index

  8. Open source Library Tech Products Integrated library systems: Koha Evergreen Invenio (commercial support from TIND) ABCD ILS based on CDS/ISIS components Library Services Platforms FOLIO Still in development phase Discovery interfaces VuFind (PHP + SOLR) Blacklight (Ruby + SOLR)

  9. Open Source Library Systems Library Technology Reports. Vol 53 No 6, Aug / Sep 2017 This issue of Library Technology Reports provides an outline of the major open source integrated library systems and library services platforms and their influence on the broader library technology industry. The advantages and disadvantages of both open source and proprietary software will be explored in the report. It includes an overview of open source resource management solutions and introduces the current landscape of these products in the industry. The chapters following closely examine the open source resource management systems Koha, Evergreen, TIND, and FOLIO. The report concludes by exploring the impact of open source products on the library automation environment.

  10. Library Technology Industry Reports American Libraries Library Journal 2013: Rush to Innovate 2014: Strategic Competition and Cooperation 2015: Operationalizing Innovation 2016: Power Plays 2017: Competing visions for Technology, openness, workflows 2018: New Technologies enable an expended vision of library services 2019: Cycles of Innovation 2012: Agents of Change 2011: New Frontier 2010: New Models, Core Systems 2009: Investing in the Future 2008: Opportunity out of turmoil 2007: An industry redefined 2006: Reshuffling the deck 2005: Gradual evolution 2004: Migration down, innovation up 2003: The competition heats up 2002: Capturing the migrating customer

  11. Library System Report 2019 2019 Report Theme Cycles of Innovation

  12. 2019: Cycles of Innovation Product innovation and development cycles differ for each library sector Academic: mid-way into a 15-year cycle of transition from ILS products to Library Services Platforms Publics: Mired in ongoing evolution of ILS products to add new web interfaces and patron engagement capabilities. Low level of churn of ILS trade-offs Schools: District-oriented ILS products, supplemented by content discovery and delivery services

  13. Open Source Trends Library systems based on open source software rather than proprietary licenses continue to grow. In the US and other economically advantaged regions, most adoptions of open source ILS products are based on commercial support arrangements, which provide comprehensive services for hosting, migration, implementation, and product support. Open source ILS implementations currently represent about 14% of ILS installations in the US and 6% of academic libraries.

  14. Koha in 2019 Systems Report Koha, launched in 1999, has received continual development, with version 18.05.09 released in February 2019. Koha has been implemented in every global region and is dominant in many countries, including India, Malaysia, Turkey, and most Latin American countries. In the developed world, Koha participates in the general mix of the ILS arena, usually through commercial support firms.

  15. Library Technology Guides

  16. Koha Worldwide

  17. Open Source ILS in US Public Libraries

  18. Open Source in US Academic Libraries

  19. Selections / Deselections

  20. Koha Migration Report

  21. Koha Satisfaction Scores

  22. Satisfaction: Koha - ByWater

  23. Satisfaction scores for Evergreen

  24. Satisfaction Scores: Sierra

  25. FOLIO The Future of Libraries is Open Launched by EBSCO Information Services in 2016 to create open source library services platform Initially for Academic Libraries Index Data engaged to create initial microservices framework Intellectual property assigned to Open Library Foundation Alliance with the Open Library Foundation Previously associated with the Kuali OLE project

  26. FOLIO An open source library services platform able to manage print, electronic, and digital resources Based on a microservices architecture, including the OKAPI api gateway and Stripes user interface toolkit (verify wording) An underlying Codex metadata model able to describe and manage multiple types of content A modular design with a suite of apps that can be optionally implemented and replaced as needed without the need for wholesale changes to the overall environment. A multi-tenant design, though some libraries or support organizations may opt to deploy their own instances of the software.

  27. FOLIO Technology Microservices architecture based on OKAPI framework and API Gatweay Modular app-based deployment Pluggable modules Apps can be added or replaced without disrupting entire implementation Multi-tenant capable, with option for locally deployed instances, or multiple vendor instances Contrasts with Alma as a single global deployment with shared codebase

  28. Microservices-based Application Scripts/ Third Party Systems User Interfaces API endpoints Presentation Layer / UI Toolkit API Gateway Web service Service compone nts Web service Web service Web service Web service Service compone nts Service compone nts Service compone nts Microservice Service compone nts Web service Applicati on software Web service Web service Web service Microservice Microservice Web service Service compone nts Microservice Service compone nts Service compone nts Service compone nts Microservice Service compone nts Applicati on software Applicati on software Run time libraries Applicati on software Applicati on software Microservice Microservice Microservice Microservice Run time libraries Run time libraries Microservice Run time libraries Applicati on software Applicati on software Data Store Applicati on software Run time libraries Applicati on software Applicati on software Run time libraries Data Store Data Store Run time libraries Run time libraries Data Store Run time libraries Data Store Run time libraries Data Store Data Store Data Store Data Store Data Store Persistence / System Layer

  29. Monolithic Application: Enterprise SOA Model Scripts/ Third Party Systems User Interfaces API endpoints Web service Presentation Layer Application software Business Logic Reusable Composable Services } Enterprise Service Bus Database Engine Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table

  30. FOLIO Discovery Enables choice for discovery Scope of functionality does not include Discovery Strategic alternative to Ex Libris bundling of Alma with Primo or Summon Current implementations plan for Blacklight, VuFind Most will use EDS for interface or article discovery Duke University will use Blacklight, ProQuest 360 knowledgebase

  31. FOLIO First Live Implementation Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden Switched core operations from Sierra to FOLIO on September 30, 2019 Circulation Electronic Resource Management EBSCO Knowledgebase Cataloging and Acquisitions underway Partner with EBSCO Information Services for support and hosting Already using EBSCO Discovery Services

  32. Planned Implementations Duke University Lehigh University Texas A&M University 5 Colleges Consortium University of Alabama Fenway Library Organization University of Chicago Cornell University North Carolina State University North Rhine-Westphalian Library Service Center (hbz) Common Library Network (GBV)

  33. Selections through Tender Process Missouri State University National Sz ch nyi Library in Hungary Tender awarded to HerM szSoft with EBSCO Information Services and Index Data as service providers

  34. Current Status of Open Source A routine option in the current marketplace Slow and steady adoption rates so far Koha and Evergreen compete among traditional ILS products and mostly have achieved functional parity FOLIO enters the competitive arena for academic libraries Proprietary products dominate in most product sectors

  35. Future possibilities Unlikely to see a spike in open source adoption given previous patterns in library technology sphere though unexpected events could disrupt existing trends Adds a competitive option that provides additional competition for improved features, support, and strategic vision

  36. Strategic perspective Select technology options best suited to advance the library in its strategic mission: Scope of functionality Alignment with operational priorities Flexibility to adapt to changing priorities Differing perceptions regarding whether proprietary or open source software models can best serve library interests

  37. Questions and discussion

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#