Texas Tort Claims Act for State Agencies
A
n
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
T
e
x
a
s
T
o
r
t
C
l
a
i
m
s
A
c
t
f
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
A
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
Michael J. Patterson
Deputy Division Chief
Tort Litigation Division
Views expressed are those of the presenters, do not constitute legal advice,
and are not official opinions of the Office of the Texas Attorney General.
Chapter 101, Civil Practice and Remedies Code
Sets out the scope of tort liability for State entities and
employees in course and scope of their state employment.
If the tort isn’t provided for under the TTCA, then there is not
a waiver of the State’s sovereign immunity.
Provisions applying to State entities are separate from those
applying to Municipalities.
State entities are represented by the Office of the Attorney
General.
T
e
x
a
s
T
o
r
t
C
l
a
i
m
s
A
c
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
“Suit under this chapter
shall
be brought
in state court
in the
county in which the cause of action arose or a part of the
cause of action arises.”
•
Unless the State entity has a venue provision providing
otherwise, suit can only be brought where the tort
arises.
•
Unless the State entity consents, suit
cannot
be brought
in federal court, even if there are also federal claims
(i.e.,
§
1983)
Key case
: Sherwinski v. Peterson
, 98 F.3d 849, 851
(5th Cir. 1996)
B
r
i
n
g
i
n
g
S
u
i
t
U
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
T
T
C
A
Notice requirement: Tex. CRPC
§
101.101(a)
•
Claimants must generally give written notice of their
claim within six months of the date that incident giving
rise to claim occurs.
•
TTCA’s written notice requirement does not apply when
the governmental unit has “actual notice”:
knowledge of death or injury;
its alleged or possible fault in producing or
contributing to death or injury; and
identity of the parties involved.
B
r
i
n
g
i
n
g
S
u
i
t
U
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
T
T
C
A
Personal injuries award: $250,000.00 per person
•
$500,000.00 per occurrence.
Property damages award:
•
$100,000.00 per occurrence
Tex. CPRC 101.023(a)
D
a
m
a
g
e
s
C
a
p
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
T
T
C
A
Tex. CPRC
§
101.106: Precludes suit against officials for
any tort claims that occur while they are paid and acting
within the course and scope of their authority.
These claims will be dismissed against the official as they
are truly claims against the State agency, who is the true
defendant under the TTCA.
•
Key case:
Franka v. Velasquez
, 332 S.W.3d 367, 381
(Tex. 2011)
Texas Supreme Court interpreted CPRC
§
101.106
to find that tort claim may not be maintained against
government employee in his/her individual capacity
for acts taken within the scope of employment.
Even if there is no waiver of State’s immunity,
dismissal of employee is required.
P
r
o
p
e
r
P
a
r
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
e
m
e
d
i
e
s
There are only three kinds of tort claims that a party may
bring against the State:
•
Motor vehicle accidents
•
Use of tangible personal property
•
Premises liability
No waiver of immunity for any other kind of tort claim
Intentional tort claims are expressly disallowed by the TTCA
T
y
p
e
o
f
C
l
a
i
m
s
t
h
e
T
T
C
A
W
a
i
v
e
s
I
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
A governmental unit is liable when (1) property damage,
personal injury, or death arises from the operation or use of
a motor-driven vehicle or motor-driven equipment; and (2)
the employee would be personally liable to the claimant
according to Texas law.
If employee’s negligence resulted in collision with another
person or their property, there is exposure under the TTCA.
“Operation or use” is typically, but not always, the driving of
the vehicle.
•
Key case:
PHI, Inc. v. Texas Juvenile Justice Dep't
, 18-
0099, 2019 WL 1873431, at *2 (Tex. Apr. 26, 2019)
The failure to set an emergency brake, causing
unoccupied van to collide with helicopter, constitutes
“operation or use.”
M
V
A
C
l
a
i
m
s
U
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
T
T
C
A
A
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
u
n
i
t
i
s
l
i
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
“
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
i
n
j
u
r
y
a
n
d
d
e
a
t
h
s
o
c
a
u
s
e
d
b
y
a
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
r
u
s
e
o
f
t
a
n
g
i
b
l
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
o
r
r
e
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
i
f
t
h
e
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
u
n
i
t
w
o
u
l
d
,
w
e
r
e
i
t
a
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
,
b
e
l
i
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
e
c
l
a
i
m
a
n
t
a
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
T
e
x
a
s
l
a
w
.
”
T
e
x
.
C
P
R
C
§
1
0
1
.
0
2
1
Some common TTCA premises claims include:
•
Slip-and-falls or tripping hazards
•
Falling tree branches
•
Building defects (
e.g.,
roof collapse)
•
Road hazards
Damages limited to personal injury
•
No property damages allowed for premises claim under
TTCA.
P
r
e
m
i
s
e
s
L
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
C
l
a
i
m
s
U
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
T
T
C
A
Duty Owed to Claimant
: Claimant is treated as a “licensee”
under the TTCA unless claimant paid for use of
governmental unit’s premises. Tex. CPRC
§
101.022.
•
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
s
t
a
t
u
s
:
I
f
a
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
u
n
i
t
h
a
s
a
c
t
u
a
l
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
o
f
d
a
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
i
t
h
a
s
a
d
u
t
y
t
o
e
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
o
r
d
i
n
a
r
y
c
a
r
e
t
o
e
i
t
h
e
r
w
a
r
n
t
h
e
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
r
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
r
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
y
s
a
f
e
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
e
n
t
o
n
v
.
P
a
p
e
r
,
3
7
6
S
.
W
.
3
d
7
6
2
,
7
6
6
(
T
e
x
.
2
0
1
2
)
•
I
n
v
i
t
e
e
s
t
a
t
u
s
:
T
h
e
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
u
n
i
t
h
a
s
a
d
u
t
y
t
o
m
a
k
e
s
a
f
e
o
r
w
a
r
n
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
a
n
y
c
o
n
c
e
a
l
e
d
,
u
n
r
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
y
d
a
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
i
t
i
s
o
r
r
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
w
a
r
e
o
f
b
u
t
t
h
e
i
n
v
i
t
e
e
i
s
n
o
t
.
A
u
s
t
i
n
v
.
K
r
o
g
e
r
T
e
x
a
s
,
L
.
P
.
,
4
6
5
S
.
W
.
3
d
1
9
3
,
2
0
3
(
T
e
x
.
2
0
1
5
)
.
Lack of knowledge about dangerous condition is not
a defense if the Claimant is an invitee.
P
r
e
m
i
s
e
s
L
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
C
l
a
i
m
s
U
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
T
T
C
A
A
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
u
n
i
t
i
s
l
i
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
“
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
i
n
j
u
r
y
a
n
d
d
e
a
t
h
s
o
c
a
u
s
e
d
b
y
a
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
r
u
s
e
o
f
t
a
n
g
i
b
l
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
o
r
r
e
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
i
f
t
h
e
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
u
n
i
t
w
o
u
l
d
,
w
e
r
e
i
t
a
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
,
b
e
l
i
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
e
c
l
a
i
m
a
n
t
a
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
T
e
x
a
s
l
a
w
.
”
T
e
x
.
C
P
R
C
§
1
0
1
.
0
2
1
Commonly invoked in health care liability claims against
government units, but could apply in other cases as well
involving use of tangible personal property.
Actual use required, and “nonuse of property” tort claim not
sufficient to waive immunity.
•
There is no “woulda, coulda, shoulda” claims.
U
s
e
o
f
T
a
n
g
i
b
l
e
P
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
C
l
a
i
m
Issue in tangible personal property case: Does the claim
involve negligence as to the tangible personal property, or is
it really about the judgment of the employee?
Key case:
Texas Dep't of Criminal Justice v. Rangel
, 581
S.W.3d 313, 316 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, pet.
granted)
•
Was a guard’s use of a gun enough to fall under the
“use” waiver of TTCA?
•
Currently pending before Texas Supreme Court.
U
s
e
o
f
T
a
n
g
i
b
l
e
P
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
C
l
a
i
m
Emergency Exception
: No TTCA claim for “action of
employee responding to emergency call, or reaction to
emergency situation if the action is in compliance with the
laws and ordinances applicable to emergency action, or in
the absence of such a law or ordinance, if the action is not
taken with conscious indifference or reckless disregard for
the safety of others.” Tex. CPRC
§
101.055(2)
•
Typically applies to drivers who are law enforcement,
such as DPS Troopers or Game Wardens with Parks
and Wildlife.
C
o
m
m
o
n
D
e
f
e
n
s
e
s
:
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
E
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
Official Immunity
: Precludes suit against officials for
performing (1) discretionary duties (2) in good faith as long
as they are (3) acting within the scope of their authority.
•
Employee is immune if:
The claim arises from the employee’s
“discretionary act” which means the act required
personal deliberation, decision, and judgment;
The act is performed in “good faith” if a
reasonably prudent official under similar
circumstances could have believed the act was
justified; and
Within the scope of employment.
C
o
m
m
o
n
D
e
f
e
n
s
e
s
:
O
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
I
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Recreational Use Statute
: Tex. CPRC
§
75.001,
et. seq.
•
Limits liability of all landowners, including Governmental
entities, who permit others to use their property for
“recreation.”
•
Landowners are effectively immunized from ordinary
negligence claims.
•
Claimant must show landowner injured them through
“gross negligence, malicious intent, or bad faith.”
•
Typically arises as defense to premises liability claims,
but can apply to any claim under the TTCA.
•
Key case: Univ. of Texas v. Garner
, 18-0740, 2019 WL
5275579 (Tex. Oct. 18, 2019)
Recreational use defense applied when Claimant
who was hit by vehicle by agency employee on
agency’s premises.
C
o
m
m
o
n
D
e
f
e
n
s
e
s
:
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
J
.
P
a
t
t
e
r
s
o
n
D
e
p
u
t
y
C
h
i
e
f
,
T
o
r
t
L
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
(
5
1
2
)
4
7
5
-
1
6
5
5
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
.
P
a
t
t
e
r
s
o
n
@
o
a
g
.
t
e
x
a
s
.
g
o
v
C
o
n
t
a
c
t
The Texas Tort Claims Act (TTCA) outlines the scope of tort liability for State entities and employees during their state employment. State entities are represented by the Office of the Attorney General, and specific provisions apply to state entities separate from municipalities. This overview covers important aspects such as bringing suits under the TTCA, notice requirements, damages caps, proper parties, and election of remedies.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
An Overview of the Texas Tort Claims Act for State Agencies Michael J. Patterson Deputy Division Chief Tort Litigation Division Views expressed are those of the presenters, do not constitute legal advice, and are not official opinions of the Office of the Texas Attorney General.
Texas Tort Claims Act: General Background Chapter 101, Civil Practice and Remedies Code Sets out the scope of tort liability for State entities and employees in course and scope of their state employment. If the tort isn t provided for under the TTCA, then there is not a waiver of the State s sovereign immunity. Provisions applying to State entities are separate from those applying to Municipalities. State entities are represented by the Office of the Attorney General.
Bringing Suit Under the TTCA Suit under this chapter shall be brought in state court in the county in which the cause of action arose or a part of the cause of action arises. Unless the State entity has a venue provision providing otherwise, suit can only be brought where the tort arises. Unless the State entity consents, suit cannot be brought in federal court, even if there are also federal claims (i.e., 1983) Key case: Sherwinski v. Peterson, 98 F.3d 849, 851 (5th Cir. 1996)
Bringing Suit Under the TTCA Notice requirement: Tex. CRPC 101.101(a) Claimants must generally give written notice of their claim within six months of the date that incident giving rise to claim occurs. TTCA s written notice requirement does not apply when the governmental unit has actual notice : knowledge of death or injury; its alleged or possible fault in producing or contributing to death or injury; and identity of the parties involved.
Damages Cap under the TTCA Personal injuries award: $250,000.00 per person $500,000.00 per occurrence. Property damages award: $100,000.00 per occurrence Tex. CPRC 101.023(a)
Proper Parties and Election of Remedies Tex. CPRC 101.106: Precludes suit against officials for any tort claims that occur while they are paid and acting within the course and scope of their authority. These claims will be dismissed against the official as they are truly claims against the State agency, who is the true defendant under the TTCA. Key case: Franka v. Velasquez, 332 S.W.3d 367, 381 (Tex. 2011) Texas Supreme Court interpreted CPRC 101.106 to find that tort claim may not be maintained against government employee in his/her individual capacity for acts taken within the scope of employment. Even if there is no waiver of State s immunity, dismissal of employee is required.
Type of Claims the TTCA Waives Immunity There are only three kinds of tort claims that a party may bring against the State: Motor vehicle accidents Use of tangible personal property Premises liability No waiver of immunity for any other kind of tort claim Intentional tort claims are expressly disallowed by the TTCA
MVA Claims Under the TTCA A governmental unit is liable when (1) property damage, personal injury, or death arises from the operation or use of a motor-driven vehicle or motor-driven equipment; and (2) the employee would be personally liable to the claimant according to Texas law. If employee s negligence resulted in collision with another person or their property, there is exposure under the TTCA. Operation or use is typically, but not always, the driving of the vehicle. Key case: PHI, Inc. v. Texas Juvenile Justice Dep't, 18- 0099, 2019 WL 1873431, at *2 (Tex. Apr. 26, 2019) The failure to set an emergency brake, causing unoccupied van to collide with helicopter, constitutes operation or use.
Premises Liability Claims Under the TTCA A governmental unit is liable for personal injury and death so caused by a condition or use of tangible personal or real property if the governmental unit would, were it a private person, be liable to the claimant according to Texas law. Tex. CPRC 101.021 Some common TTCA premises claims include: Slip-and-falls or tripping hazards Falling tree branches Building defects (e.g., roof collapse) Road hazards Damages limited to personal injury No property damages allowed for premises claim under TTCA.
Premises Liability Claims Under the TTCA Duty Owed to Claimant: Claimant is treated as a licensee under the TTCA unless claimant paid for use of governmental unit s premises. Tex. CPRC 101.022. Licensee status: If a governmental unit has actual knowledge of dangerous condition, it has a duty to exercise ordinary care to either warn the licensee of the condition or make the condition reasonably safe. City of Denton v. Paper, 376 S.W.3d 762, 766 (Tex.2012) Invitee status: The governmental unit has a duty to make safe or warn against any concealed, unreasonably dangerous conditions it is or reasonably should be aware of but the invitee is not. Austin v. Kroger Texas, L.P., 465 S.W.3d 193, 203 (Tex. 2015). Lack of knowledge about dangerous condition is not a defense if the Claimant is an invitee.
Use of Tangible Personal Property Claim A governmental unit is liable for personal injury and death so caused by a condition or use of tangible personal or real property if the governmental unit would, were it a private person, be liable to the claimant according to Texas law. Tex. CPRC 101.021 Commonly invoked in health care liability claims against government units, but could apply in other cases as well involving use of tangible personal property. Actual use required, and nonuse of property tort claim not sufficient to waive immunity. There is no woulda, coulda, shoulda claims.
Use of Tangible Personal Property Claim Issue in tangible personal property case: Does the claim involve negligence as to the tangible personal property, or is it really about the judgment of the employee? Key case: Texas Dep't of Criminal Justice v. Rangel, 581 S.W.3d 313, 316 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, pet. granted) Was a guard s use of a gun enough to fall under the use waiver of TTCA? Currently pending before Texas Supreme Court.
Common Defenses: Emergency Exception Emergency Exception: No TTCA claim for action of employee responding to emergency call, or reaction to emergency situation if the action is in compliance with the laws and ordinances applicable to emergency action, or in the absence of such a law or ordinance, if the action is not taken with conscious indifference or reckless disregard for the safety of others. Tex. CPRC 101.055(2) Typically applies to drivers who are law enforcement, such as DPS Troopers or Game Wardens with Parks and Wildlife.
Common Defenses: Official Immunity Official Immunity: Precludes suit against officials for performing (1) discretionary duties (2) in good faith as long as they are (3) acting within the scope of their authority. Employee is immune if: The claim arises from the employee s discretionary act which means the act required personal deliberation, decision, and judgment; The act is performed in good faith if a reasonably prudent official under similar circumstances could have believed the act was justified; and Within the scope of employment.
Common Defenses: Recreational Use Recreational Use Statute: Tex. CPRC 75.001, et. seq. Limits liability of all landowners, including Governmental entities, who permit others to use their property for recreation. Landowners are effectively immunized from ordinary negligence claims. Claimant must show landowner injured them through gross negligence, malicious intent, or bad faith. Typically arises as defense to premises liability claims, but can apply to any claim under the TTCA. Key case: Univ. of Texas v. Garner, 18-0740, 2019 WL 5275579 (Tex. Oct. 18, 2019) Recreational use defense applied when Claimant who was hit by vehicle by agency employee on agency s premises.
Contact Michael J. Patterson Deputy Chief, Tort Litigation Division (512) 475-1655 Michael.Patterson@oag.texas.gov
