Supporting Services Professional Growth System Evaluation Highlights
Explore the key components of the Supporting Services Professional Growth System Evaluation, including the seven core competencies, CEI writing format, and MCPS Form 430-90. Learn how to assess employee performance effectively through examples and impact statements for each competency.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Supporting Services Professional Growth System Evaluation Highlights
Topics/Points to Consider Seven Core Competencies The C.E.I. writing format Evaluations due dates The evaluation submission process
MCPS Form 430-90 Evaluation Form: Supporting Services Professional Growth System Use the most recent MCPS Form 430-90, dated June 2018. https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/forms/ pdf/430-90.pdf Each section of the form must be completed.
Seven Core Competencies 1. Commitment to Students 2. Knowledge of Job 3. Professionalism 4. Interpersonal 5. Communication 6. Organization 7. Problem Solving Performance criteria for all seven of the core competencies can be found on pages 15 - 21 within the Supporting Services Professional Growth System (SSPGS) Handbook.
C.E.I. Writing format Claim A general statement that describes the employee s performance in that core competency. Examples/Evidence A quote or literal description of something said or done along with the date and type of documentation collected which reflects the specific action. There should be at least three-five different examples per core competency. Impact An impact statement describing the results of the employee s performance in that core competency.
C.E.I. Paragraph Example Click on the link below for additional examples contained within the Tools for Evaluators section. https://www.montgomerysch oolsmd.org/departments/pro fessionalgrowth/default.aspx ?id=451115 Professionalism Cafeteria Worker Meets Competency Ms. Yu is extremely dependable and regularly demonstrates her abilities in treating all people equitably. She arrives to work on time and is ready to begin her job duties. She completes her work efficiently and thoroughly (observations 1/18/XX and 5/4/XX). She regularly takes initiative to help colleagues complete their duties when necessary to make sure that all students are fed each day on time (e-mails 10/10/XX and 3/23/XX). On several occasions Ms. Yu assisted upset students who had no money in their lunch accounts to problem solve their issue and to get them fed without causing them embarrassment (Records of Conference 11/12/XX and 12/16/XX, and 2/10/XX). Ms. Yu also remains calm in high stress situations, which helps coworkers and ensures that the work flow is maintained. As a result of her efforts, both students and staff feel respected and willingly come to her for assistance. Ms. Yu meets competency in Professionalism.
Evaluator: Roles and The person who is the direct supervisor of the employee. When possible, the evaluator should be one supervisory level above the employee. Responsibilities: Evaluator For example: A building service manager would be the evaluator for a building service worker. A paraeducator would be evaluated by the school principal or assistant principal. Note: Montgomery County Education Association (MCEA) employees do not write evaluations and are not evaluators or reviewers but may provide indirect feedback.
Reviewer: The person who is ultimately responsible for the overall operations and performance of a division, department, or facility/school. When possible, the reviewer should be two supervisory levels above the employee. Roles and Responsibilities: Reviewer For example: The building service manager would ask a principal or designee to be the reviewer for a building service worker. In addition, the reviewer is responsible for ensuring that the evaluation accurately reflects an employee s job performance. Note: In schools where there are no assistant principals, the roles of evaluator and reviewer may be performed by the principal. In this case, no reviewer signature is required on the evaluation form.
Permanent Status Evaluation- Employee in their probationary period For employees in their probationary period, evaluation submission can be accepted by the Office of Human Resources and Development when the employee has worked in the new position at a school/worksite for 5 - 6 months. Evaluations must be completed, signed, and submitted by all parties no later than the established due date. Note: Employees obtain permanent status following a meet competency evaluation or the day following the six month date of hire.
Regular Evaluations-Meets Competency For a meets competency evaluation submission, ensure the examples/evidence statements reflect the employee s performance during the time period noted for the evaluation. Evaluations need to be submitted by June 16, 2023.
Regular Evaluations-Does Not Meet Competency For a does not meets competency evaluation submission, ensure the examples/evidence statements reflect the employee s performance during the time period noted for the evaluation. Evaluations need to be submitted by March 3, 2023.
How To Submit All evaluations marked as Does Not Does Not Meet Competency are to be Meet submitted electronically by emailing: Competency Andrea Gates @ Evaluations (Andrea_M_Gates@mcpsmd.org) Yolanda Stanislaus @ (Yolanda_Stanislaus@mcpsmd.org)
How All evaluations marked as To Meet Competency are to be Submit submitted through the PONY Mail to: Meet Andrea Gates Competency Evaluations OHRD/DPGS, Suite 2100
Evaluation Writing Format: Carlene Butt-Pruitt @ (Carlene_M_Butt-Pruitt@mcpsmd.org) Questions? Ryan Forkert @ (RForkert@mcaapmd.org) If you have additional questions, please contact the staff members indicated. Evaluations due dates and submission process: Andrea Gates @ (Andrea_M_Gates@mcpsmd.org) Yolanda Stanislaus @ (Yolanda_Stanislaus@mcpsmd.org)
Department of Professional Growth Systems 301-217-5123
