States' Rights and Nullification: Key Factors Leading to the Civil War

undefined
 
a. Explain the importance of key
issues and events that led to the
Civil War; include states’ rights and
nullification
 
If a state disagrees with a law made by the
national government, do you think the state
has a right to refuse it?
 
One of the major conflicts in the history of
the United States, from its creation to the
present, is the issue of 
states’ rights.
 
Rights guaranteed to the states under the
principle of federalism. Under the
Constitution, states have considerable
independence to pass, enforce, and
interpret their own laws and to pursue their
own public policy programs. Supporters of
states' rights argue that the states should
be governed with a minimum of
interference from the federal government.
 
Can you name some examples of
where states and the federal
government have fought over the
issue of states rights in modern
times?
Hint… the states would be
challenging the national government
over an issue.
 
Immigration Laws
Legalization of Marijuana
National Healthcare
 
 
There are cases in recent
history where the federal
government threatened to cut
off highway funding to states
if they did not pass laws…
National speed limit
Drinking age
 
 
Early in the United States’ history, the
Articles of Confederation gave the
individual states too much power and the
nation could not even tax the states for
revenue.
All of the signers of the U.S. Constitution
knew that the federal government needed
to have more power than it did during the
Articles of Confederation to run the
country effectively.
 
How did Georgia
demonstrate their
belief in States’ Rights
during our last unit?
 
Georgia lost the 
Worcester v. Georgia 
case
but refused to release the missionaries or
stop pushing for Cherokee removal.
 
This test of states’ rights proved that a
state could do as it pleased if there was
not a unified attempt to by the federal
government or other states to stop them.
 
Northern states believed that, in order for the
United States to function as one Union,
political decisions should be made that would
benefit the entire country. They believed that
all states should abide by all laws made by
Congress, signed by the president, or decreed
by the courts.
Northern states had a larger population and
controlled the House of Representatives.
Southern states believed deeply in the idea of
states’ rights. They thought that states had
the right to govern themselves and to decide
what would be best for their own needs and
situation. They believed that politicians from a
state like New York could not possibly
understand or care about Georgia or South
Carolina.
 
$4.00   
 
    $3.50
 
Tariffs are taxes that the government puts on imported
goods (Goods brought in from other countries).
 
Tariff
40%
 
$2.50 to
produce in
Britain
 
$3.00 to
produce in
U.S.
 
$1.00
Profit
 
$1.00
Profit
 
$3.50
 
$4.00
 
$4.00
 
$4.90
 
The states'-rights belief that
a state can refuse to recognize
or to enforce a federal law
passed by the United States
Congress.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6mHHg-rw34
 
The South had a mostly
agricultural based economy. It
grew products such as tobacco,
rice, and COTTON.
The North had an economy based
on industry. Factories produced a
wide variety of products
throughout the region.
 
Read Document and
Answer Questions
Tariff of 1828.
 
Take a look at the wording of the
actual tariff. What type of products
does this tariff affect?
What part of the country makes these
goods and would benefit from this
tariff?
What part of the country will find this
tariff harmful to its economy and why?
Predict the responses to the tariff.
 
The North supported high tariffs to
subsidize their fledgling manufacturing
industry against the cheaper products that
could be sent to the United States by
Great Britain.
The South was opposed to this tariff
because it took away profits from cotton
farmers based on Great Britain’s
retaliatory tariff on cotton.
 
Read Document and
Answer Questions
South Carolina’s
Ordinance of
Nullification
 
What did South Carolina accuse
Congress of doing?
How did South Carolina use the
Constitution to back up their argument
against the tariffs?
What did South Carolina declare in
response to the tariffs?
What did South Carolina threaten to
do if the U.S. government tried to
force them to pay the tariffs?
 
Read and Respond to the
Nullification Crisis Scenario Card.
Your response should be a full
paragraph.
Your response should not only say what
you would do, but also include the
reason for doing so.
 
President Jackson claimed secession would
be considered treason.
Defended the federal government’s power to
impose tariffs and chastised South Carolina
for violating federal law because a state had
no right to declare any national law null and
void.
 
Jackson asked Congress to grant him the
ability to use military force to compel South
Carolina to accept and follow the law  -- The
Force Bill
Meanwhile Henry Clay of Kentucky proposed
another tariff in Congress that would reduce
tariffs significantly over the next ten years
– Compromise Tariff
Both of these passed in 1833, and South
Carolina repealed its ordinance.
 
Both sides claimed victory
Nationalists said they won because they
showed that no state is more powerful than
the federal government.
South Carolina said that the nullification
process allowed them to get what they
wanted.
What do you think?
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Exploring the significance of states' rights and nullification in the context of the events that culminated in the Civil War. Examines the historical conflicts between state and federal powers, showcasing modern examples and implications. Explores the delicate balance of power between states and the national government.

  • States Rights
  • Nullification
  • Civil War
  • Federalism
  • Modern Challenges

Uploaded on Sep 30, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STATES RIGHTS AND NULLIFICATION a. Explain the importance of key issues and events that led to the Civil War; include states rights and nullification

  2. QUESTION If a state disagrees with a law made by the national government, do you think the state has a right to refuse it?

  3. STATES RIGHTS

  4. Royalty-Free (RF) states Clipart Illustration #1092516 Royalty-Free (RF) states Clipart Illustration #1092534 Royalty-Free (RF) states Clipart Illustration #1092518 STATES RIGHTS One of the major conflicts in the history of the United States, from its creation to the present, is the issue of states rights. Royalty-Free (RF) states Clipart Illustration #1092521 Royalty-Free (RF) states Clipart Illustration #1092504 Rights guaranteed to the states under the principle of federalism. Under the Constitution, states have considerable independence to pass, enforce, and interpret their own laws and to pursue their own public policy programs. Supporters of states' rights argue that the states should be governed with a minimum of interference from the federal government. Royalty-Free (RF) United States Clipart Illustration #42662

  5. STATES RIGHTS TODAY Can you name some examples of where states and the federal government have fought over the issue of states rights in modern times? Hint the states would be challenging the national government over an issue.

  6. MODERN CASES Immigration Laws Legalization of Marijuana National Healthcare

  7. WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TELLS THEM TO DO EVEN IF THEY DO NOT AGREE TO WITH IT?

  8. LEVERAGE There are cases in recent history where the federal government threatened to cut off highway funding to states if they did not pass laws National speed limit Drinking age

  9. STATES RIGHTS IN EARLY UNITED STATES HISTORY Early in the United States history, the Articles of Confederation gave the individual states too much power and the nation could not even tax the states for revenue. All of the signers of the U.S. Constitution knew that the federal government needed to have more power than it did during the Articles of Confederation to run the country effectively.

  10. QUESTION? How did Georgia demonstrate their belief in States Rights during our last unit?

  11. LAST UNIT EXAMPLE Georgia lost the Worcester v. Georgia case but refused to release the missionaries or stop pushing for Cherokee removal. This test of states rights proved that a state could do as it pleased if there was not a unified attempt to by the federal government or other states to stop them.

  12. STATES RIGHTS Northern states believed that, in order for the United States to function as one Union, political decisions should be made that would benefit the entire country. They believed that all states should abide by all laws made by Congress, signed by the president, or decreed by the courts. Northern states had a larger population and controlled the House of Representatives. Southern states believed deeply in the idea of states rights. They thought that states had the right to govern themselves and to decide what would be best for their own needs and situation. They believed that politicians from a state like New York could not possibly understand or care about Georgia or South Carolina.

  13. NULLIFICATION

  14. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING WOULD YOU BUY? $4.00 $3.50

  15. WHAT IS A TARIFF? Tariffs are taxes that the government puts on imported goods (Goods brought in from other countries). $3.00 to produce in U.S. $1.00 Profit $4.00 $2.50 to produce in Britain $4.90 $1.00 Profit Tariff 40%

  16. NULLIFICATION The states'-rights belief that a state can refuse to recognize or to enforce a federal law passed by the United States Congress.

  17. NULLIFICATION IN YOUR TERMS WHO S YOUR DADDY? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6mHHg-rw34

  18. NORTH VS. SOUTH The South had a mostly agricultural based economy. It grew products such as tobacco, rice, and COTTON. The North had an economy based on industry. Factories produced a wide variety of products throughout the region.

  19. DIRECTIONS Read Document and Answer Questions Tariff of 1828.

  20. Take a look at the wording of the actual tariff. What type of products does this tariff affect? What part of the country makes these goods and would benefit from this tariff? What part of the country will find this tariff harmful to its economy and why? Predict the responses to the tariff.

  21. NORTH VS. SOUTH The North supported high tariffs to subsidize their fledgling manufacturing industry against the cheaper products that could be sent to the United States by Great Britain. The South was opposed to this tariff because it took away profits from cotton farmers based on Great Britain s retaliatory tariff on cotton.

  22. DIRECTIONS Read Document and Answer Questions South Carolina s Ordinance of Nullification

  23. What did South Carolina accuse Congress of doing? How did South Carolina use the Constitution to back up their argument against the tariffs? What did South Carolina declare in response to the tariffs? What did South Carolina threaten to do if the U.S. government tried to force them to pay the tariffs?

  24. DIRECTIONS Read and Respond to the Nullification Crisis Scenario Card. Your response should be a full paragraph. Your response should not only say what you would do, but also include the reason for doing so.

  25. PRESIDENT JACKSONS RESPONSE TO SOUTH CAROLINA President Jackson claimed secession would be considered treason. Defended the federal government s power to impose tariffs and chastised South Carolina for violating federal law because a state had no right to declare any national law null and void.

  26. FORCE BILL Jackson asked Congress to grant him the ability to use military force to compel South Carolina to accept and follow the law -- The Force Bill Meanwhile Henry Clay of Kentucky proposed another tariff in Congress that would reduce tariffs significantly over the next ten years Compromise Tariff Both of these passed in 1833, and South Carolina repealed its ordinance.

  27. WHO WON? Both sides claimed victory Nationalists said they won because they showed that no state is more powerful than the federal government. South Carolina said that the nullification process allowed them to get what they wanted. What do you think?

  28. HTTP://WWW.YOUTUBE.CO M/WATCH?V=VNGIUUD7I-A

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#