Sociology of Terrorism: Understanding the Dynamics and Impacts

undefined
 
Sociology of Terrorism
 
March 24, 2017
Presented by Rebecca Lawton,
M.S.
 
 
“While nothing is easier than to denounce the evildoer, nothing
is more difficult than to understand them.”
--Dostoevsky
 
Terrorism and the US
 
Incidents before 9/11
Terror since 9/11
Reactive nature
Difficulty of compilation and analysis of intel
Look to outside for sources of hostility
Unsure of enemy
Focus on religious extremism
 
Terrorism Analysis
 
Top-down vs. bottom-up
Justification
Justifiable when aimed at “bad” people
Dehumanization
Crazies, criminals, crusader
Crazies—emotionally disturbed individuals
Criminals—perform acts for personal gain
Crusaders—prestige and power
undefined
 
Identifying Terrorism
 
 
Terrorism Defined
 
“unlawful use of force or violence against person
and property to intimidate or coerce a
government, the civilian population or any
segment thereof, in furtherance of political or
social objectives.” (FBI)
May publicize, dramatize, and further political
and religiously motivated and justified political
and social agendas
 
Who? What?
 
Social Construction
Perception
Terrorism as Political Violence
Relative affluence
History of colonialist exploitation
Terrorism as Communication
Media may determine legitimacy
Socializing Terrorists
Acceptance of actions
Exposure=commitment
 
Stages leading to Terrorism
 
Crisis of confidence
Conflict of legitimization
Crisis of legitimacy
Grievances turn into intense hate of the enemy—
dehumanization
“once an enemy had been declared and made
into the absolute moral evil, the world became
simple, and any means were justified for fighting
this evil…”
undefined
 
 
“Understanding the individual who commits terrorism is
vital, not only for humanitarian reasons but also to decide
how best to deal with those individuals while they are
engaged in planning or carrying out terrorist acts.”  
--
Combs
 
Terrorist Mindset
 
May sway how they interpret and respond to
situations
Can be drivers and products of psychological
propensities
May increase receptivity to extremist ideology or
justification for violence
May not cause terrorism
Can create or enable vulnerabilities and
propensities for affiliation
 
Worldview Affect Mindset
 
Authoritarian
Submission to authority
Staunch conventionalism
Anger and aggression towards out-groups
Dogmatism
Affect person’s appraisal of injustice
Closed cognitive system of beliefs about reality
Apocalyticism
Belief in approaching confrontation or cataclysmic
event
Threaten populace and encourage people to take up
arms against enemy
 
Fundamentalism
 
Five primary characteristics
Dualistic thinking
—tendency to form absolutist ideas about the
nature of right and wrong and how people and events fall into one
category or the other
Paranoia
—group context.  Extreme and unwarranted
suspiciousness associated with hypersensitivity to humiliation
and other threats to self-esteem
Apocalyptic orientation
—narrative of personal and global history
Relationship with charismatic leadership
—group centers on a
leader with a powerful presence, who is often paranoid, but shows
complete self-assurance and intense conviction of his or her ideas
Totalized conversion experience
—new self forms and the old is
discarded as despised
 
Changing face of Terror
 
Previously seen as external enemy
Religious motivation
Small scale and outside US
Attack military installations
Increase in domestic terrorism
Changing American population
Mass media and social media
undefined
 
Analyzing the Terrorist
 
Psychological Vulnerabilities
 
Understanding Vulnerability
 
Factors point to some having a greater openness
to increased engagement
Makes them more vulnerable than others to
engaging in terrorism
Situational and contextual factors affect whether
and how psychological characteristics or
propensities manifest
 
Need for Meaning/Identity
 
Quest for meaning is driven by four needs
Sense of purpose
—comes from believing that one’s actions and activities
make a difference and affect the outcomes of future events
Efficacy
—feelings of efficacy comes from ones sense of control over the
basic directions and outcomes of one’s life
Value
—a sense of value comes from a belief that one’s actions are good
or correct in a moral sense
Self-worth
—self-worth comes from a sense that the person is
fundamentally good and possesses desirable characteristics
Fulfilling these needs is a foundation for a sense of personal
identity—a stable sense of who one is and one’s values in key
domains
People gravitate toward an existing, structured set of beliefs and
adopt them with little critical thought or personal reflection
Extremist ideology is often attractive to those who feel overwhelmed
by the complexity and stress of finding meaning
 
Need for Belonging
 
Quest for meaning needs sens
e of belonging
If a person has been rejected or excluded
more likely to endorse ideas about the futility of,
and lack of meaning in life
Creates a psychological vulnerability to
exploitation
“Social process”
Initial attraction is often to the group, or
community of believers, rather than to an
abstract ideology or to violence
 
Perceptions of Injustice or Humiliation
 
Perceived injustice and humiliation as central factors in
understanding violence generally and terrorism
specifically
Three features of injustice as accelerator
People are naturally included to view injustice as an
intentional act
“just world”—people get what they deserve and deserve what
they get
If people find themselves a victim of injustice, then they
assume someone else is at fault for that condition
Attributing blame, now has a target
Ways in which people process social information largely
drives the clarity and strength of injustice sentiments
 
Power of Perception
 
Power comes from sensitivity to detecting
injustices
how much that person rehearses, ruminates and
fuels them
Perceptions of injustice can prompt powerful,
moral emotions that potentiate a drive to punish
the offender
P
articularly moral outrage
Moral emotions can mobilize and drive a strong
and sometimes irrational desire to punish the
wrongdoer
undefined
 
Psychological Propensities
 
 
Motivational Propensities
 
Needs, wants, interests and desires
Approach-avoidance dynamic
Push/pull factors
Motivational clusters
Status-related
Identity-related
Thrill-related
Revenge-related
Material-related
 
Attributional Propensities
 
Explanations people generate regarding causes of
positive and negative events in their lives
Attribute causes to themselves, to others or to
situational factors
Grievances often push a person toward terrorism
Biases
Externalizing
Personalizing
Hostile Attribution
Confirmation
 
Volitional Propensities
 
Nature and degree of control that persons have
to achieve functional goals
Involve implementing intentions
Tied to self-concept and identity
Symbolic self completion theory
Deficits in volitional competence
 
Attitudinal Propensities
 
Comprises a person’s internal appraisals that
predispose them to respond favorably or
unfavorably
Proviolence attitudes
Grievances
External threat
Sensation-seeking
Disinhibition=low capacity for empathy
Low-restraint or self-control
undefined
 
Sociological Perspectives
 
Sociological theories emphasize
factors influencing the behavior of
an entire group
 
Relative Deprivation Theory
 
Develop high expectations and aspirations and
hopes for upward mobility
Frustrated achievers
Absence of opportunities to meet heightened
expectations
Geographic proximity to Europe
Wealthy Middle Eastern countries
 
Effects of Globalization
 
Proposed that economic disparities cause terrorism
Dissastisfaction with one’s situation comes from applying
subjective standards
A feeling of injustice that would not have been evoked
had they not made the comparison
Rebellions occur when people cannot bear the misery of
their status
Sociological link between poverty and terrorism
Increasing differences between the material welfare have
provoked a new era of political violence
Accelerated globalization and the news media
facilitates communication between globalization’s victims
Hamas and Hezbollah
 
Social Identity Theory
 
Suggests that the identity of individuals who
engage in terrorism derives from three different
sources—personal, social and group/collective
Explains roles of individuals within the
organizations, as well as the role of the
organizations within the culture
 
Social Learning Theory
 
Suggests that violence follows observation and
imitation of an aggressive model
E
xplain terrorist behaviors not as the
consequence of innate aggressivity but of
cognitive reconstrual of moral imperatives
Learn from culture’s public glorification of
terrorists
Acceptability of terrorist violence takes didactic
form—madrasas
 
Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis
 
V
iolence as a result of a real or imagined
underprivileged, disadvantaged status and an
aggressive response arising from a failure to have
their grievances resolved
Includes a gap between rising expectations and need
satisfaction
Terrorist behavior 
a
s a response to the frustration of
various political, economic and personal needs or
objectives
Final expression of the terrorist impulse to
desperation in the face of oppression
Violence is always a response to frustration (Davies)
 
Oppression Theory
 
Oppression provokes political violence
Actors often cite the injustice of their treatment
by governments that rob them of identity,
dignity, security, and freedom as the motive for
their joining a terrorist group
Perceived oppression
 
National-Cultural Theory
 
Terrorism expresses itself different in collectivist versus
individualist cultures
Collectivist cultures--a person’s identity is primarily
derived from the social system
Dividing the world strictly according to in-groups and out-
groups and linking their personal well-being to the well-
being of their group
Individualist cultures—identity is derived from personal
goals
Collectivist—more likely to carry out terrorist attacks on
out-groups including foreigners
3
rd
 world countries
Individualist—less inhibited in attacking one of their
own
undefined
 
Religion and Terrorism
 
 
Religion and Terrorism
 
Religiously Motivated Terrorism
Divine duty of believer
Unconstrained by political, moral or practical
Religious vs. secular terrorism
Apocalyptic—most dangerous
Sacrifice to reach objective
Religious Identity
Cognitive and emotional value of membership
Social functions
Religious Extremism
Perceive threat to religion
 
Fundamentalism
 
From Fundamentalism to Radicalization
Insistence that the faith represents the sole absolute
truth
Tenet that its believers have been chosen by a supreme
being
Conviction that divinely inspired religious law
outranks secular law
Stages of Fundamentalism
Passive
Assertive
Impositional
 
Islam and Terrorism
 
Main components of current religious crisis
Failure to thrive on its on terms
Loss of connection to the global mainstream
Fundamentalist
Reject democratic values and contemporary Western
culture
Modernist
Want the Islamic world to become part of global modernity
Secularist
Believe that religious customs must be in conformity with
the law of the land and human rights
Traditionalist
Suspicious of modernity, innovation and change
undefined
 
21
st
 Century Education
 
New era of terrorism
 
Terrorism Investigations
 
Evaluate how we discern
Recognize potential enemy before attack
committed
Example—visas
Attempt to educate population and law
enforcement
Reduce hostility in our country and outside
Prepare for inevitability
Respond, Repair and Rebuild
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Delve into the intricate world of terrorism with a focus on analysis, identification, and stages leading to radical actions. Explore the social, political, and historical context behind terrorism, emphasizing the importance of understanding individual perpetrators. Uncover the complexities of justifications, motives, and societal perceptions associated with acts of terror.

  • Terrorism
  • Sociology
  • Analysis
  • Radicalization
  • Perpetrators

Uploaded on Sep 16, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sociology of Terrorism March 24, 2017 Presented by Rebecca Lawton, M.S.

  2. While nothing is easier than to denounce the evildoer, nothing is more difficult than to understand them. --Dostoevsky

  3. Terrorism and the US Incidents before 9/11 Terror since 9/11 Reactive nature Difficulty of compilation and analysis of intel Look to outside for sources of hostility Unsure of enemy Focus on religious extremism

  4. Terrorism Analysis Top-down vs. bottom-up Justification Justifiable when aimed at bad people Dehumanization Crazies, criminals, crusader Crazies emotionally disturbed individuals Criminals perform acts for personal gain Crusaders prestige and power

  5. Identifying Terrorism

  6. Terrorism Defined unlawful use of force or violence against person and property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. (FBI) May publicize, dramatize, and further political and religiously motivated and justified political and social agendas

  7. Who? What? Social Construction Perception Terrorism as Political Violence Relative affluence History of colonialist exploitation Terrorism as Communication Media may determine legitimacy Socializing Terrorists Acceptance of actions Exposure=commitment

  8. Stages leading to Terrorism Crisis of confidence Conflict of legitimization Crisis of legitimacy Grievances turn into intense hate of the enemy dehumanization once an enemy had been declared and made into the absolute moral evil, the world became simple, and any means were justified for fighting this evil

  9. Understanding the individual who commits terrorism is vital, not only for humanitarian reasons but also to decide how best to deal with those individuals while they are engaged in planning or carrying out terrorist acts. -- Combs

  10. Terrorist Mindset May sway how they interpret and respond to situations Can be drivers and products of psychological propensities May increase receptivity to extremist ideology or justification for violence May not cause terrorism Can create or enable vulnerabilities and propensities for affiliation

  11. Worldview Affect Mindset Authoritarian Submission to authority Staunch conventionalism Anger and aggression towards out-groups Dogmatism Affect person s appraisal of injustice Closed cognitive system of beliefs about reality Apocalyticism Belief in approaching confrontation or cataclysmic event Threaten populace and encourage people to take up arms against enemy

  12. Fundamentalism Five primary characteristics Dualistic thinking tendency to form absolutist ideas about the nature of right and wrong and how people and events fall into one category or the other Paranoia group context. Extreme and unwarranted suspiciousness associated with hypersensitivity to humiliation and other threats to self-esteem Apocalyptic orientation narrative of personal and global history Relationship with charismatic leadership group centers on a leader with a powerful presence, who is often paranoid, but shows complete self-assurance and intense conviction of his or her ideas Totalized conversion experience new self forms and the old is discarded as despised

  13. Changing face of Terror Previously seen as external enemy Religious motivation Small scale and outside US Attack military installations Increase in domestic terrorism Changing American population Mass media and social media

  14. Analyzing the Terrorist Psychological Vulnerabilities

  15. Understanding Vulnerability Factors point to some having a greater openness to increased engagement Makes them more vulnerable than others to engaging in terrorism Situational and contextual factors affect whether and how psychological characteristics or propensities manifest

  16. Need for Meaning/Identity Quest for meaning is driven by four needs Sense of purpose comes from believing that one s actions and activities make a difference and affect the outcomes of future events Efficacy feelings of efficacy comes from ones sense of control over the basic directions and outcomes of one s life Value a sense of value comes from a belief that one s actions are good or correct in a moral sense Self-worth self-worth comes from a sense that the person is fundamentally good and possesses desirable characteristics Fulfilling these needs is a foundation for a sense of personal identity a stable sense of who one is and one s values in key domains People gravitate toward an existing, structured set of beliefs and adopt them with little critical thought or personal reflection Extremist ideology is often attractive to those who feel overwhelmed by the complexity and stress of finding meaning

  17. Need for Belonging Quest for meaning needs sense of belonging If a person has been rejected or excluded more likely to endorse ideas about the futility of, and lack of meaning in life Creates a psychological vulnerability to exploitation Social process Initial attraction is often to the group, or community of believers, rather than to an abstract ideology or to violence

  18. Perceptions of Injustice or Humiliation Perceived injustice and humiliation as central factors in understanding violence generally and terrorism specifically Three features of injustice as accelerator People are naturally included to view injustice as an intentional act just world people get what they deserve and deserve what they get If people find themselves a victim of injustice, then they assume someone else is at fault for that condition Attributing blame, now has a target Ways in which people process social information largely drives the clarity and strength of injustice sentiments

  19. Power of Perception Power comes from sensitivity to detecting injustices how much that person rehearses, ruminates and fuels them Perceptions of injustice can prompt powerful, moral emotions that potentiate a drive to punish the offender Particularly moral outrage Moral emotions can mobilize and drive a strong and sometimes irrational desire to punish the wrongdoer

  20. Psychological Propensities

  21. Motivational Propensities Needs, wants, interests and desires Approach-avoidance dynamic Push/pull factors Motivational clusters Status-related Identity-related Thrill-related Revenge-related Material-related

  22. Attributional Propensities Explanations people generate regarding causes of positive and negative events in their lives Attribute causes to themselves, to others or to situational factors Grievances often push a person toward terrorism Biases Externalizing Personalizing Hostile Attribution Confirmation

  23. Volitional Propensities Nature and degree of control that persons have to achieve functional goals Involve implementing intentions Tied to self-concept and identity Symbolic self completion theory Deficits in volitional competence

  24. Attitudinal Propensities Comprises a person s internal appraisals that predispose them to respond favorably or unfavorably Proviolence attitudes Grievances External threat Sensation-seeking Disinhibition=low capacity for empathy Low-restraint or self-control

  25. Sociological Perspectives Sociological theories emphasize factors influencing the behavior of an entire group

  26. Relative Deprivation Theory Develop high expectations and aspirations and hopes for upward mobility Frustrated achievers Absence of opportunities to meet heightened expectations Geographic proximity to Europe Wealthy Middle Eastern countries

  27. Effects of Globalization Proposed that economic disparities cause terrorism Dissastisfaction with one s situation comes from applying subjective standards A feeling of injustice that would not have been evoked had they not made the comparison Rebellions occur when people cannot bear the misery of their status Sociological link between poverty and terrorism Increasing differences between the material welfare have provoked a new era of political violence Accelerated globalization and the news media facilitates communication between globalization s victims Hamas and Hezbollah

  28. Social Identity Theory Suggests that the identity of individuals who engage in terrorism derives from three different sources personal, social and group/collective Explains roles of individuals within the organizations, as well as the role of the organizations within the culture

  29. Social Learning Theory Suggests that violence follows observation and imitation of an aggressive model Explain terrorist behaviors not as the consequence of innate aggressivity but of cognitive reconstrual of moral imperatives Learn from culture s public glorification of terrorists Acceptability of terrorist violence takes didactic form madrasas

  30. Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis Violence as a result of a real or imagined underprivileged, disadvantaged status and an aggressive response arising from a failure to have their grievances resolved Includes a gap between rising expectations and need satisfaction Terrorist behavior as a response to the frustration of various political, economic and personal needs or objectives Final expression of the terrorist impulse to desperation in the face of oppression Violence is always a response to frustration (Davies)

  31. Oppression Theory Oppression provokes political violence Actors often cite the injustice of their treatment by governments that rob them of identity, dignity, security, and freedom as the motive for their joining a terrorist group Perceived oppression

  32. National-Cultural Theory Terrorism expresses itself different in collectivist versus individualist cultures Collectivist cultures--a person s identity is primarily derived from the social system Dividing the world strictly according to in-groups and out- groups and linking their personal well-being to the well- being of their group Individualist cultures identity is derived from personal goals Collectivist more likely to carry out terrorist attacks on out-groups including foreigners 3rdworld countries Individualist less inhibited in attacking one of their own

  33. Religion and Terrorism

  34. Religion and Terrorism Religiously Motivated Terrorism Divine duty of believer Unconstrained by political, moral or practical Religious vs. secular terrorism Apocalyptic most dangerous Sacrifice to reach objective Religious Identity Cognitive and emotional value of membership Social functions Religious Extremism Perceive threat to religion

  35. Fundamentalism From Fundamentalism to Radicalization Insistence that the faith represents the sole absolute truth Tenet that its believers have been chosen by a supreme being Conviction that divinely inspired religious law outranks secular law Stages of Fundamentalism Passive Assertive Impositional

  36. Islam and Terrorism Main components of current religious crisis Failure to thrive on its on terms Loss of connection to the global mainstream Fundamentalist Reject democratic values and contemporary Western culture Modernist Want the Islamic world to become part of global modernity Secularist Believe that religious customs must be in conformity with the law of the land and human rights Traditionalist Suspicious of modernity, innovation and change

  37. 21stCentury Education New era of terrorism

  38. Terrorism Investigations Evaluate how we discern Recognize potential enemy before attack committed Example visas Attempt to educate population and law enforcement Reduce hostility in our country and outside Prepare for inevitability Respond, Repair and Rebuild

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#