Socio-Economic Impacts of Prosopis-Related Charcoal Trade in Gewane Woreda, Afar Region

undefined
 
Outline
 
Context of Prosopis charcoal trade
Organization of trade and actors involved
Cost and benefits of charcoal trade
Aspects of governmental regulation
Conclusion and recommendations
 
 
 
Context of Prosopis charcoal trade
 
Charcoal business started in 1997ec
Established by FRAM Africa
 
Objectives:
Clearing of Prosopis invaded land
Production of charcoal
Cleared land shall be used for crop production
 
In 2000ec charcoal business became illegal
undefined
 
Organization of trade and actors
involved
 
Charcaol owner
 
Mostly young Afar men and highlander
Own the produced charcoal
Employ workers and control production process
Cover costs for workers until charcoal is produced
Sell charcoal in different ways
undefined
 
Transportation of charcoal
 
Charcoal transported by ISUZU
truck for long distance
 
Charcoal transported by donkey
cart for short distance
 
Charcoal Makers
 
Migrants from SNNP, Oromiya and
Amhara
Produce charcoal in the forest
Employed by charcoal owners
Paid by sack of charcoal produced
undefined
 
Charcoal makers at production site
 
During production process
 
Charcoal sacks ready to be
picked up by ISUZU
 
Local community involved
 
Young afar men as guards for charcoal makers
Receive small payment from charcoal owners
Illegal taxers at the road side
 
 
Benefits of charcoal business
 
Income generation for involved Afar
20-25 ISUZUs bought by owners
(2000-2005ec)
55-60 houses built in Galaeladora by
owners
Capital accumulation for agricultural
investments
Access to transportation
 
Women raped and killed by charcoal makers
Increasing incidences of people killed by lions
High corruption due to illegality of the charcoal trade
Monetarization of society and change of values,
weakening of indigenous NRM institutions, Afar Madaa
Woreda loses tax income through illegality
 estimate:
60,000-80,000 Birr per day
Cutting of indigenous trees
 
Costs of charcoal business
undefined
 
Aspects of governmental regulation
 
Existing rules and regulations not implemented
Lack of political commitment
Governmental individuals indirectly involved in
charcoal business: partly beneficaries
 
Recommendations
 
Increased political commitment: Implementation of
rules and regulations
Legalize charcoal trade from Prosopis and
facilitate distribution of trade licenses to individuals
Create awareness on alternative use of Prosopis
and environmental costs of cutting indigenous
trees
undefined
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The study explores the socio-economic impacts of the charcoal trade related to Prosopis in Gewane Woreda, Afar Region. It delves into the context of the charcoal trade, the organization of trade and actors involved, costs and benefits, governmental regulations, and provides conclusions and recommendations based on the findings. Various aspects such as charcoal production, transportation, involvement of local communities, and the economic benefits generated are highlighted.

  • Socio-economic impacts
  • Charcoal trade
  • Prosopis
  • Gewane Woreda
  • Afar Region

Uploaded on Oct 07, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF PROSOPIS RELATED CHARCOAL TRADE IN GEWANE WOREDA, AFAR REGION MOHAMMED DETONA, MOHAMMED DETONA, ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY MAY, 2014 MAY, 2014

  2. Outline Context of Prosopis charcoal trade Organization of trade and actors involved Cost and benefits of charcoal trade Aspects of governmental regulation Conclusion and recommendations

  3. Context of Prosopis charcoal trade Charcoal business started in 1997ec Established by FRAM Africa Objectives: Clearing of Prosopis invaded land Production of charcoal Cleared land shall be used for crop production In 2000ec charcoal business became illegal

  4. Organization of trade and actors involved

  5. Charcaol owner Mostly young Afar men and highlander Own the produced charcoal Employ workers and control production process Cover costs for workers until charcoal is produced Sell charcoal in different ways

  6. Transportation of charcoal Charcoal transported by ISUZU truck for long distance Charcoal transported by donkey cart for short distance

  7. Charcoal Makers Migrants from SNNP, Oromiya and Amhara Produce charcoal in the forest Employed by charcoal owners Paid by sack of charcoal produced

  8. Charcoal makers at production site During production process Charcoal sacks ready to be picked up by ISUZU

  9. Local community involved Young afar men as guards for charcoal makers Receive small payment from charcoal owners Illegal taxers at the road side

  10. Benefits of charcoal business Income generation for involved Afar 20-25 ISUZUs bought by owners (2000-2005ec) 55-60 houses built in Galaeladora by owners Capital accumulation for agricultural investments Access to transportation

  11. Costs of charcoal business Women raped and killed by charcoal makers Increasing incidences of people killed by lions High corruption due to illegality of the charcoal trade Monetarization of society and change of values, weakening of indigenous NRM institutions, Afar Madaa Woreda loses tax income through illegality estimate: 60,000-80,000 Birr per day Cutting of indigenous trees

  12. Aspects of governmental regulation Existing rules and regulations not implemented Lack of political commitment Governmental individuals indirectly involved in charcoal business: partly beneficaries

  13. Recommendations Increased political commitment: Implementation of rules and regulations Legalize charcoal trade from Prosopis and facilitate distribution of trade licenses to individuals Create awareness on alternative use of Prosopis and environmental costs of cutting indigenous trees

  14. Thank you Thank you

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#