Smart Watch User Preferences

 
Seminar  1
Project Outline and Research Goals
 
Principal Investigator:
Kyle Johnson
 
    
Project Supervisors:
      Prof. Hannah Thinyane
   Mrs. Ingrid Siebörger
 
Problem Overview
 
Smart watches, can they be a successful alternative
interface to established mobile interfaces for human-
computer  interaction?
 
Can user data needs be met by such an interface if they
chose to use it instead of established mobile
interfaces?
 
Assess the user preference between data access on
current mobile platforms and the smart watch
interface.
 
Problem Overview
 
Previous smart watches did not fully utilise open
source solutions. Their manufacturers determined the
applications to be used on their devices.
 
 
Standardization of API’s for such devices and the
dominance of Android enables new possibilities for
user driven data needs. (More dynamic environment
for application deployment)
 
 
 
 
 
Pebble smart watch
 
 Used for this study
 
 Simplicity
 Minimalistic e-paper display
 
 Not a stand-alone device, must be
  paired with a host smart phone via
  Bluetooth.
 
 Acts as a peripheral to that device,
  all data gets processed on the
  paired smart phone.
  (Differs from Samsung Galaxy Gear + Gear 2)
 
Paired Pebble smart watch
 
Research
 
Data needs of university students for the Pebble smart
watch, this will be the user sample.
 
Information acquired from the users via a survey:
Would  they  want  a  Pebble  to  access  data?
 What  data  would  they  access  on  it?
 
Develop  applications  for Android based  on  above
through the use of PebbleKit SDK.
 
Research
 
Allow users to test the applications once developed
(Do they satisfy their requirements?).
 
Comparisons to be made between the smart watch
interface and the existing smart phone interface in
terms of data access (Similar applications on smart
phones?).
 
Aims
 
Will users select a smart watch over a smart phone
interface? Perhaps in certain situations? (Migration from
using only the smart phone interface)
 
Survey: Demographics of users ? Male or female? age?
 
Multi-functionality (smart phone) vs. Convenience (smart
watch).
 
Can the smart watch interface provide a convenient display
interface while still satisfying user data requirements?
 
Questions?
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Investigating the viability of smart watches as an alternative interface for human-computer interaction, focusing on user data needs and preferences compared to traditional mobile platforms. The study utilizes the Pebble smart watch to analyze data needs of university students, develop applications, and compare user satisfaction between smart watch and smartphone interfaces.

  • Smart Watch
  • User Preferences
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Data Needs
  • Mobile Platforms

Uploaded on Feb 21, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Seminar 1 Project Outline and Research Goals Principal Investigator: Kyle Johnson Project Supervisors: Prof. Hannah Thinyane Mrs. Ingrid Sieb rger

  2. Problem Overview Smart watches, can they be a successful alternative interface to established mobile interfaces for human- computer interaction? Can user data needs be met by such an interface if they chose to use it instead of established mobile interfaces? Assess the user preference between data access on current mobile platforms and the smart watch interface.

  3. Problem Overview Previous smart watches did not fully utilise open source solutions. Their manufacturers determined the applications to be used on their devices. Standardization of API s for such devices and the dominance of Android enables new possibilities for user driven data needs. (More dynamic environment for application deployment)

  4. Pebble smart watch Used for this study Simplicity Minimalistic e-paper display Not a stand-alone device, must be paired with a host smart phone via Bluetooth. Acts as a peripheral to that device, all data gets processed on the paired smart phone. (Differs from Samsung Galaxy Gear + Gear 2)

  5. Paired Pebble smart watch

  6. Research Data needs of university students for the Pebble smart watch, this will be the user sample. Information acquired from the users via a survey: Would they want a Pebble to access data? What data would they access on it? Develop applications for Android based on above through the use of PebbleKit SDK.

  7. Research Allow users to test the applications once developed (Do they satisfy their requirements?). Comparisons to be made between the smart watch interface and the existing smart phone interface in terms of data access (Similar applications on smart phones?).

  8. Aims Will users select a smart watch over a smart phone interface? Perhaps in certain situations? (Migration from using only the smart phone interface) Survey: Demographics of users ? Male or female? age? Multi-functionality (smart phone) vs. Convenience (smart watch). Can the smart watch interface provide a convenient display interface while still satisfying user data requirements?

  9. Questions?

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#