Return Bears Class of 2022 and 2023
The Basha High School Counseling Department is dedicated to providing support and guidance to students for their academic and career pursuits. Explore graduation requirements, career planning, college searches, NCAA registration, scholarship opportunities, and more. Stay informed and prepared for your future endeavors with the valuable resources available through the counseling department.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
FY19 Evaluation Overview Top-performing urban school district in Florida
FY19 Final Teacher Evaluation Rating Components and Weights (IP) Instructional Practice Rating - 33.4% (SP) Student Performance Rating - 33.3% (PG) Professional Growth Rating - 33.3% FINAL EVALUATION RATING - 100% Top-performing urban school district in Florida
FY19 Final Teacher Evaluation Rating Components (IP) Instructional Practice 33.33% Based on the Palm Beach Model of Instruction (SPR) Student Performance Rating 33.33% Survey 2/3 student match except semester long acceleration courses Teachers must have 10 students with both pre and post-test scores Ratings based on local expected score model performance combined with the District s overall performance (PGP) Professional Growth 33.33% Deliberate Practice Professional Growth Plan Highly Effective (4) Needs Improvement / Developing (2) Effective (3) Unsatisfactory (1) Grows 2 Levels Or Rated Innovating Grows 1 Level Or Rated Applying Element Not Rated During Any Observation No Growth
FY19 Models, Teachers, and Measures Model Teachers Prior Achievement Outcome Measure K-2 Reading K-2 Math Gr 3 Reading Gr 3 Math Gr 4-10 ELA Gr 4-8 Math Biology Civics US History Algebra 1 Geometry Gr 5 & 8 Science Gr 11 SAT ELA Gr 11 SAT Math Reading Retakes AP-IB-AICE Industry Certification ELA Standards Model (former nonFSA) K-2 ELA K-2 Math Gr 3 ELA Gr 3 Math Gr 4-10 ELA Gr 4-8 Math HS Biology MS Civics HS US History Algebra 1 Geometry Gr 5 & 8 Science Gr 11 ELA Gr 11 Math Gr 11-12 Int Reading AP-IB-AICE w/ exam IC w/ exam Other Gr K-11 Teachers Assigned 10+ Students Fall iReady Reading Diagnostic Fall iReady Math Diagnostic Fall iReady Reading Diagnostic Fall iReady Math Diagnostic Prior Year FSA ELA Prior Year FSA Math Prior Year FSA ELA Prior Year FSA ELA Prior Year FSA ELA Prior Year FSA Math Prior Year FSA Algebra EOC Prior Year FSA ELA Prior Year PSAT EBRW Prior Year PSAT Math Prior Year FSA ELA Most Recent FSA* Prior Year FSA ELA K-3: Fall iReady Reading Diagnostic 4-10: Prior Year FSA ELA 11: Prior Year PSAT EBRW Spring iReady Reading Diagnostic Spring iReady Math Diagnostic Current Year FSA ELA Current Year FSA Math Current Year FSA ELA Current Year FSA Math Biology EOC Civics EOC US History EOC Algebra 1 EOC Geometry EOC Gr 5 & 8 Science Gr 11 SAT EBRW Gr 11 SAT Math Met ELA Graduation Requirement Passed AP-IB-AICE Exam Passed IC Exam Spring iReady Reading Diagnostic Current Year FSA ELA Gr 11 SAT EBRW School VAM District VAM School Score District Score Teacher <10 Students Other Inst Staff NA NA *ELA, or Math EOC depending on course alignment.
Local Expected Score Models Top-performing urban school district in Florida
Local Expected Score Models Local Expected Score Models Variables determining expected score Variables determining expected score Aligned Prior Test Scores Students with Disabilities (SWD) status English Language Learner (LY) status Student Free or Reduced Price Lunch (FRL) status Gifted status Student Attendance (% Days) Difference from modal age in grade (indicator of retention) The expected score is basically the typical performance of students who were similar on the variables above.
Teachers with Multiple Models Combined Ratings Student Performance Score Rating - Combination Models Rating 1 Rating 2 Rating 3 Average Final Rating Teacher 1 Effective (3) Effective (3) Unsatisfactory (1) 7/3 = 2.3 Needs Improvement Teacher 3 Highly Effective (4) Effective (3) 7/2 = 3.5 Highly Effective Student Performance Score Combination Ratings Average Highly Effective (4) 3.5 4.0 Effective (3) 2.5 - 3.4 Needs Improvement/Dev (2) 1.5 - 2.4 Unsatisfactory (1) 1.0 -1.4 Top-performing urban school district in Florida
FY 18 Evaluation Rating Possibilities HE E NI U 3.2-4.0 2.1-3.1 1.2-2.0 1.0-1.1 Student Performance (33.3%) 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Student Performance (33.3%) 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Inst. Practice (33.4%) Deliberate Practice (33.3%) Overall Score Inst. Practice (33.4%) Deliberate Practice (33.3%) Overall Score 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0
Teacher Reports Teacher reports available in PeopleSoft for Teachers to access directly. Reports provided are: Teacher Evaluation Letter will be posted on PeopleSoft along with rosters for each applicable model. Rosters include teacher cohort, rank, and average score as well as a list of students included in their evaluation. For the FSA based models, scatter plots depicting student actual vs expected performance will also be provided. These documents will also be posted to the Principals Resource Center as in prior years. Top-performing urban school district in Florida
Cohort Model Teacher Roster Example Top-performing urban school district in Florida
RESOURCES AND SUPPORT FDOE Performance Evaluation http://www.fldoe.org/teaching/performance-evaluation/ FDOE Student Growth http://www.fldoe.org/teaching/performance-evaluation/student-growth.stml Professional Development Teacher Evaluation https://www.palmbeachschools.org/staffdev/teacherevaluation/ Deliberate Practice https://www.palmbeachschools.org/staffdev/deliberatepractice/ JENC Newsletter https://www.palmbeachschools.org/staffdev/jenc/ Research & Evaluation Student Performance Resources https://growth.palmbeachschools.org/ Top-performing urban school district in Florida