Return Bears Class of 2022 and 2023

FY19 Evaluation
Overview
FY19 Final Teacher Evaluation Rating
Components and Weights
(IP) Instructional Practice Rating -    33.4%
(SP) Student Performance Rating -   33.3%
(PG) Professional Growth Rating  -   33.3%
FINAL EVALUATION RATING - 100%
FY19 Final Teacher Evaluation Rating Components
(IP) Instructional Practice – 33.33%
Based on the Palm Beach Model of Instruction
(SPR) Student Performance Rating – 33.33%
Survey 2/3 student match except semester long acceleration courses
Teachers must have 10 students with both pre and post-test scores
Ratings based on local expected score model performance combined
with the District’s overall performance
(PGP) Professional Growth – 33.33%
Deliberate Practice – Professional Growth Plan
FY19 Models, Teachers, and Measures
Local Expected
Score Models
L
o
c
a
l
 
E
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
M
o
d
e
l
s
V
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
s
 
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
i
n
g
 
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
 
s
c
o
r
e
 
Aligned Prior Test Scores
Students with Disabilities (SWD) status
English Language Learner (LY) status
Student Free or Reduced Price Lunch (FRL) status
Gifted status
Student Attendance (% Days)
Difference from modal age in grade
(indicator of retention)
 
The expected score is basically the typical performance of
students who were similar on the variables above.
 
EXPECTED SCORE
ACTUAL SCORE
What does an expected score model look like?
The percent of a teacher’s students who met the expected score was used to rank the
teachers to determine the model rating.  Teachers at or above the 80
th
 percentile were
Highly Effective, 20-79 were Effective, 10-19 Needs Improvement/ Developing, and
below 10 were Unsatisfactory.
Teachers with Multiple Models
Combined Ratings
Student Performance Score Rating - Combination Models 
FY 18 Evaluation Rating Possibilities
Teacher Reports
Teacher reports available in PeopleSoft for Teachers to
access directly.  Reports provided are:
Teacher Evaluation Letter will be posted on PeopleSoft
along with rosters for each applicable model.
Rosters include teacher cohort, rank, and average score
as well as a list of students included in their evaluation.
For the FSA based models, scatter plots depicting
student actual vs expected performance will also be
provided.
These documents will also be posted to the Principals
Resource Center as in prior years.
Cohort Model Teacher Roster Example
RESOURCES AND SUPPORT
FDOE Performance Evaluation
http://www.fldoe.org/teaching/performance-evaluation/
FDOE Student Growth
http://www.fldoe.org/teaching/performance-evaluation/student-growth.stml
Professional Development – Teacher Evaluation
https://www.palmbeachschools.org/staffdev/teacherevaluation/
Deliberate Practice
https://www.palmbeachschools.org/staffdev/deliberatepractice/
JENC Newsletter
https://www.palmbeachschools.org/staffdev/jenc/
Research & Evaluation – Student Performance Resources
https://growth.palmbeachschools.org/
Slide Note

Thank you for taking the time to view this explanation of the 2018 Teacher Evaluation System. This presentation will review the general components of the Evaluation System. If you have specific questions, please feel free to use the link on your teacher letter in PeopleSoft to submit an inquiry.

Embed
Share

The Basha High School Counseling Department is dedicated to providing support and guidance to students for their academic and career pursuits. Explore graduation requirements, career planning, college searches, NCAA registration, scholarship opportunities, and more. Stay informed and prepared for your future endeavors with the valuable resources available through the counseling department.

  • Counseling
  • Career Planning
  • College Search
  • Graduation Requirements
  • Scholarship Opportunities

Uploaded on Mar 03, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FY19 Evaluation Overview Top-performing urban school district in Florida

  2. FY19 Final Teacher Evaluation Rating Components and Weights (IP) Instructional Practice Rating - 33.4% (SP) Student Performance Rating - 33.3% (PG) Professional Growth Rating - 33.3% FINAL EVALUATION RATING - 100% Top-performing urban school district in Florida

  3. FY19 Final Teacher Evaluation Rating Components (IP) Instructional Practice 33.33% Based on the Palm Beach Model of Instruction (SPR) Student Performance Rating 33.33% Survey 2/3 student match except semester long acceleration courses Teachers must have 10 students with both pre and post-test scores Ratings based on local expected score model performance combined with the District s overall performance (PGP) Professional Growth 33.33% Deliberate Practice Professional Growth Plan Highly Effective (4) Needs Improvement / Developing (2) Effective (3) Unsatisfactory (1) Grows 2 Levels Or Rated Innovating Grows 1 Level Or Rated Applying Element Not Rated During Any Observation No Growth

  4. FY19 Models, Teachers, and Measures Model Teachers Prior Achievement Outcome Measure K-2 Reading K-2 Math Gr 3 Reading Gr 3 Math Gr 4-10 ELA Gr 4-8 Math Biology Civics US History Algebra 1 Geometry Gr 5 & 8 Science Gr 11 SAT ELA Gr 11 SAT Math Reading Retakes AP-IB-AICE Industry Certification ELA Standards Model (former nonFSA) K-2 ELA K-2 Math Gr 3 ELA Gr 3 Math Gr 4-10 ELA Gr 4-8 Math HS Biology MS Civics HS US History Algebra 1 Geometry Gr 5 & 8 Science Gr 11 ELA Gr 11 Math Gr 11-12 Int Reading AP-IB-AICE w/ exam IC w/ exam Other Gr K-11 Teachers Assigned 10+ Students Fall iReady Reading Diagnostic Fall iReady Math Diagnostic Fall iReady Reading Diagnostic Fall iReady Math Diagnostic Prior Year FSA ELA Prior Year FSA Math Prior Year FSA ELA Prior Year FSA ELA Prior Year FSA ELA Prior Year FSA Math Prior Year FSA Algebra EOC Prior Year FSA ELA Prior Year PSAT EBRW Prior Year PSAT Math Prior Year FSA ELA Most Recent FSA* Prior Year FSA ELA K-3: Fall iReady Reading Diagnostic 4-10: Prior Year FSA ELA 11: Prior Year PSAT EBRW Spring iReady Reading Diagnostic Spring iReady Math Diagnostic Current Year FSA ELA Current Year FSA Math Current Year FSA ELA Current Year FSA Math Biology EOC Civics EOC US History EOC Algebra 1 EOC Geometry EOC Gr 5 & 8 Science Gr 11 SAT EBRW Gr 11 SAT Math Met ELA Graduation Requirement Passed AP-IB-AICE Exam Passed IC Exam Spring iReady Reading Diagnostic Current Year FSA ELA Gr 11 SAT EBRW School VAM District VAM School Score District Score Teacher <10 Students Other Inst Staff NA NA *ELA, or Math EOC depending on course alignment.

  5. Local Expected Score Models Top-performing urban school district in Florida

  6. Local Expected Score Models Local Expected Score Models Variables determining expected score Variables determining expected score Aligned Prior Test Scores Students with Disabilities (SWD) status English Language Learner (LY) status Student Free or Reduced Price Lunch (FRL) status Gifted status Student Attendance (% Days) Difference from modal age in grade (indicator of retention) The expected score is basically the typical performance of students who were similar on the variables above.

  7. Teachers with Multiple Models Combined Ratings Student Performance Score Rating - Combination Models Rating 1 Rating 2 Rating 3 Average Final Rating Teacher 1 Effective (3) Effective (3) Unsatisfactory (1) 7/3 = 2.3 Needs Improvement Teacher 3 Highly Effective (4) Effective (3) 7/2 = 3.5 Highly Effective Student Performance Score Combination Ratings Average Highly Effective (4) 3.5 4.0 Effective (3) 2.5 - 3.4 Needs Improvement/Dev (2) 1.5 - 2.4 Unsatisfactory (1) 1.0 -1.4 Top-performing urban school district in Florida

  8. FY 18 Evaluation Rating Possibilities HE E NI U 3.2-4.0 2.1-3.1 1.2-2.0 1.0-1.1 Student Performance (33.3%) 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Student Performance (33.3%) 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Inst. Practice (33.4%) Deliberate Practice (33.3%) Overall Score Inst. Practice (33.4%) Deliberate Practice (33.3%) Overall Score 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0

  9. Teacher Reports Teacher reports available in PeopleSoft for Teachers to access directly. Reports provided are: Teacher Evaluation Letter will be posted on PeopleSoft along with rosters for each applicable model. Rosters include teacher cohort, rank, and average score as well as a list of students included in their evaluation. For the FSA based models, scatter plots depicting student actual vs expected performance will also be provided. These documents will also be posted to the Principals Resource Center as in prior years. Top-performing urban school district in Florida

  10. Top-performing urban school district in Florida

  11. Cohort Model Teacher Roster Example Top-performing urban school district in Florida

  12. RESOURCES AND SUPPORT FDOE Performance Evaluation http://www.fldoe.org/teaching/performance-evaluation/ FDOE Student Growth http://www.fldoe.org/teaching/performance-evaluation/student-growth.stml Professional Development Teacher Evaluation https://www.palmbeachschools.org/staffdev/teacherevaluation/ Deliberate Practice https://www.palmbeachschools.org/staffdev/deliberatepractice/ JENC Newsletter https://www.palmbeachschools.org/staffdev/jenc/ Research & Evaluation Student Performance Resources https://growth.palmbeachschools.org/ Top-performing urban school district in Florida

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#