Refining Peer Review Skills for Accreditation Process
Enhance your peer review skills for the accreditation process with insights on philosophy, quality evaluation, strategic management, desirable review member characteristics, team dynamics, and objectives of review visits.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
REFINING YOUR PEER REVIEW SKILLS Trainers Dr. Shahid Mir Dr. Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi
OVERVIEW Philosophy of Accreditation Process Flow & Steps Leadership & Engagement The Team of Accreditation Means not an End! Golden Rules
PHILOSOPHY OF ACCREDITATION Understanding the Quality Continuous Improvement Parameters and Evaluation Assurance and Commitment
Process Flow for Accreditation 1. Formal Application Received by NBEAC Secretariat 2. Pre-Eligibility Mentorship -Selection of Advisor After Mutual Consensus of Business School and Secretariat (Optional Visit) 3. Eligibility Screening Committee (ESC) meeting 4. Pre-Review Mentoring 5. Self Assessment Process (Preparation of SAR) 6. Peer Review Process 7. Accreditation Award Committee (Acceptance/Rejection) for a period 8. Continuous review (Re-accreditation or Revisit)
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP & ENGAGEMENT Leadership Engagement Faculty & Staff Stakeholders Understanding Commitment Departments Dean & HOD Support Empowerment
DESIRABLE CHARACTERISTICS OF A PEER REVIEW MEMBER Reputation of Integrity Understand Process Understand Philosophy Leadership Potential Experienced Academics Unbiased Communication Skills Team Player
PEER REVIEW TEAM Dedicated Team Set Targets Share Information Monitor Progress Ownership
OBJECTIVES OF PEER REVIEW VISIT Objective Assessment Against the Established Criteria Consensus based flexibility Consultancy Role Understanding Relevant Context Suggestions for Quality Improvement Confirmation and Evaluation Confirmation of Claims in SAR Evaluation of Soft Factors Data Handling Accumulation of Data Cross Referencing of Data Consensus Based Decision Convince Others or be convinced!
LIFE CYCLE OF A PEER REVIEW VISIT No Conflict of Interest Dedicated Schedule Invitation Full Commitment Dispatch of SAR Thorough Reading Areas of Interest Highlight, Make Notes Write Questions (Rubric) Preliminary Meeting Briefing by the Chair Team Orientation Assignment of Particular Areas Discuss SAR Humility & Patience Avoid Actual Visit Facilitator Evaluator Argumentation Decisions Making Debate on Conflicting Scores Independent Scoring First Supporting Arguments Own the Decision Feedback Session One Way Communication Polite Balanced Report Writing Focus on key AFIs Constructive Report Facts
PENTA P MODEL PROVOCATIVE PASSIONATE PREPARED PUNCTUAL PATIENT
FEW WORDS OF WISDOM Chair Should be the Master of Clock Don t Kill the Subjectivity at all Give Respect and Earn it back! Not Every Glitter is Gold, Neither Every Black is Coal! Must be able to see the Grey Area!
