Reading Instruction and Intervention Grant - California Dept of Education 2021

reading instruction and intervention grant l.w
1 / 76
Embed
Share

Explore the Reading Instruction and Intervention Grant initiative by the California Department of Education, aimed at enhancing literacy skills and providing professional learning opportunities for educators. This grant, authorized by Assembly Bill 130, allocates $9.8 million to selected local educational agencies. Learn about the grant funding, duration, and evaluation process for this impactful program.

  • Education
  • Grant
  • Literacy
  • California
  • Professional Learning

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reading Instruction and Intervention Grant Request for Applications December 1, 2021 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tony Thurmond, State Superintendent of Public Instruction

  2. Housekeeping All webinar participants have been placed on mute. Please hold questions until the end. The slides and webinar recording will be available on the California Department of Education (CDE) Reading Instruction and Intervention (RII) Request for Application (RFA) web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/fo/r12/rii21rfa.asp 2

  3. Welcome Eve Fabiaschi Education Programs Consultant Professional Learning Innovations Office Educator Excellence and Equity Division CDE 3

  4. Overview 4

  5. Authorizing Statute (1) Assembly Bill 130, Section 145 (Statutes of 2021) of the Education Omnibus Trailer Bill authorized $10 million to the RII grant program to generate and disseminate professional learning opportunities for educators in the areas of evidence-based literacy, intensive literacy interventions, and support of pupils executive functioning skills. 5

  6. Authorizing Statute (2) Funds appropriated for the RII grant are available through the 2025 26 fiscal year. The grantee shall participate in an evaluation process coordinated by the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence (CCEE) and the CCEE may withhold no more than $200 thousand for this purpose. 6

  7. Authorizing Statute (3) The CDE, in consultation with the CCEE, will award the sum of $9.8 million to one or more local educational agencies (LEAs) with expertise in developing and providing professional learning to educators in public schools serving kindergarten through grade twelve (K 12), to strengthen reading instruction for all pupils and in a manner that aligns with the Statewide System of Support (SoS). 7

  8. Grant Funding and Duration One Lead Applicant One grant of $9.8 million Grant period: April 1, 2022, through March 30, 2026 Deadline for Applications: January 28, 2022, before 4 p.m. 8

  9. Alignment The work of the RII grant program will align with: The Statewide SoS The California Comprehensive State Literacy Plan (SLP) Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) Statewide Literacy Initiatives The Quality Professional Learning Standards (QPLS) 9

  10. Statewide System of Support (1) The work of the RII grant program will align with and contribute resources to California s Statewide SoS. The Statewide SoS brings together California s improvement networks and resources to assist LEAs in meeting the state s priorities and is made up of numerous support providers. The Statewide SoS is designed to build local capacity and assist LEAs in identifying and addressing inequities, as part of the continuous improvement process. 10

  11. Statewide System of Support (2) The purpose of California s Statewide SoS is articulated to build the capacity of LEAs in each of the following areas: Support the continuous improvement of student performance in the state priority areas Address the gaps in achievement between student groups Improve outreach and collaboration The SoS focuses on collaboration with interested parties to ensure that goals, actions, and services described in school district and county office of education (COE) local control and accountability plans reflect the needs of students and the community, especially for historically underrepresented or low-achieving student groups. 11

  12. Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (1) MTSS is an integrated, comprehensive framework that focuses on the California Common Core State Standards (CCSS), core instruction, differentiated learning, student-centered learning, individualized student needs, and the alignment of systems necessary for all students academic, behavioral, and social success. 12

  13. Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (2) Professional learning through the RII grant program should be aligned to the following CDE resources that support literacy in strong MTSS first instruction (Tier 1): The California CCSS for English Language Arts (ELA)/ Literacy The California English Language Development (ELD) Standards The ELA/ELD Framework, including the five key themes of meaning making, language development, effective expression, content knowledge, and foundational skills 13

  14. Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (3) The California Dyslexia Guidelines Improving Education for Multilingual and English Learner (EL) Students The California Practitioners Guide for Educating ELs with Disabilities 14

  15. Family Engagement Families are integral to student literacy development and achievement. The California Family Engagement Framework and accompanying toolkit provide direction for the grantee(s) in working with families and communities to plan, implement, and evaluate family engagement practices. 15

  16. Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy Culturally sustaining pedagogies require educators to be aware of classroom materials, structure, and culture to ensure a safe and relevant learning environment. The guidance documents, the CDE s EL Roadmap and Improving Education for Multilingual and EL Students, provide insight on supporting multilingual students in a culturally sustaining way. 16

  17. Whole Child School climate strongly influences students' motivation to learn and a positive school climate can improve academic achievement. When school members feel safe, valued, cared for, respected, and engaged, learning increases. 17

  18. Social and Emotional Learning The CDE collaborated with a Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) state team to develop Transformative SEL Competencies and Conditions for Thriving resources to support the field with implementing a whole child approach through: SEL; trauma-informed practices; and culturally relevant, affirming, and sustaining practices with a focus on equity. 18

  19. Executive Functioning Skills According to the National Center for Education Research s paper, Executive Function: Implications for Education, executive functioning skills are required for reading and oral language comprehension, fluency, and phonemic awareness. 19

  20. Quality Professional Learning Standards Rooted in student and educator needs demonstrated through data; focused on content and pedagogy; designed to ensure equitable outcomes; designed and structured to be ongoing, intensive, and embedded in practice; collaborative with an emphasis on shared accountability; supported by adequate resources; and coherent and aligned with other standards, policies, and programs. 20

  21. Disciplinary Literacy The strands of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language are imperative across all disciplines. As such, the California CCSS literacy standards set an interdisciplinary expectation that the development of each student s literacy skills is a shared responsibility with teachers across the content areas, each supporting disciplinary literacy in their subject. Professional learning funded through the RII grant must prepare all educators across all disciplines to support literacy. 21

  22. Data-Informed Interventions Professional learning through the RII grant must prepare teachers to effectively collect, analyze, and respond to data. LEAs should be prepared to implement a full range of assessment cycles, including the use of formative assessments. In response to the data, a structured MTSS should be in place with clearly defined evidence-based Tier II interventions and Tier III systems for intensifying interventions with data-based individualization. 22

  23. Continuous Learning Process The grantee will use the SLP s continuous learning process to improve literacy outcomes for all students. This process includes setting direction and purpose, assessing local needs to determine causal factors of greatest need, planning for improvement, implementing and monitoring work, and reflecting and adjusting course. 23

  24. Pandemic-Related Literacy Acceleration Through the continuous learning process, professional learning provided through the RII grant must support educators in specifically addressing pandemic-related literacy learning acceleration, distance and hybrid learning contexts, and the related digital divide. 24

  25. Alignment to State Literacy Initiatives (1) The CDE and the CCEE shall, to the greatest extent practicable, facilitate coordination among the grantee(s) and other literacy initiatives, including, but not limited to, the following: The California Subject Matter Projects Grantees of the 21st Century California School Leadership Academy Grantees of the Comprehensive Literacy State Development Grant Grantees of the Educator Workforce Investment Grant (EWIG) for EL Roadmap Policy implementation Grantees of the EWIG Special Education Grant Grantees of the California Dyslexia Initiative The Early Literacy Support Block Grant Expert Lead in Literacy 25

  26. Alignment to State Literacy Initiatives (2) In the fall of 2021, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tony Thurmond announced a campaign to ensure that every California student will learn to read by third grade by the year 2026. The effort also includes a biliteracy milestone for dual-language learners. Achievement of this vision requires the alignment of literacy initiatives and guidance across the state. The RII grant will be key to reaching this goal. 26

  27. Program Description 27

  28. Grant Eligibility (1) LEAs The CDE shall allocate grant funding to one or more eligible LEAs, including COEs, school districts, charter schools, or a consortium of multiple LEAs. 28

  29. Grant Eligibility (2) Consortia Positive consideration will be given to applicants working in consortium with an Institution of Higher Education (IHE) or a nonprofit organization. Consortia with other LEAs is encouraged. One LEA must be identified as the Lead Applicant. 29

  30. Grant Eligibility (3) Ability and Capacity Demonstrated abilities and expertise developing, implementing, and supporting LEAs in the area of literacy and executive functioning skills. Demonstrated capacity to create professional learning networks as part of the Statewide SoS to help build statewide capacity among LEAs in implementing effective literacy instruction and support programs, with a focus on executive functioning skills, across school sites. 30

  31. Grant Eligibility (4) Impact on Classroom Instruction Direct support for teachers in providing best first instruction: - collecting and analyzing student data, - making instructional adjustments, - identifying students needing interventions and providing those interventions promptly, and - monitoring student progress ongoing. Differentiated opportunities to meet local urban, suburban, and rural needs. 31

  32. Target Audience (1) Professional learning opportunities under the RII grant program may include, but are not limited to, all of the following: School leaders, including principals and teacher leaders, to lead evidence-based reading instruction for diverse learners, including early learners, EL students, pupils with disabilities, and pupils with dyslexia. Educators, including teachers and paraprofessionals, to develop knowledge and skills for appropriate use of screening strategies and evidence-based literacy instruction for diverse learners. 32

  33. Target Audience (2) Educators, including teachers and paraprofessionals, to implement intensive intervention strategies for pupils struggling with literacy, including tutoring and small group strategies, and strategies for target pupil groups. All educators, including support staff, to support the development of pupils executive functioning skills. 33

  34. Responsibilities of Grantees (1) The grantee(s) shall be responsible for: Generating and disseminating professional learning opportunities for educators across the state in the areas of reading instruction, reading intervention, and executive functioning skills. Effecting changes in educator instructional practices in alignment with the Statewide SoS and the SLP by strengthening content, pedagogical, and collective knowledge, as well as instructional leadership skills. 34

  35. Responsibilities of Grantees (2) Coordinating with other literacy initiatives to ensure cohesion. Monitoring the performance of any services provided through funds awarded under this grant by partners, consultants, or other organizations. Ensuring that any new instructional and professional learning materials developed as a result of this grant are available as open educational resources. Receiving and administering the grant funds and submitting the required reports to account for the use of grant funds. 35

  36. Allowable and Non-Allowable Activities and Costs (1) Generally, all expenditures must contribute to the goals and objectives outlined in the RFA. Funds may not be used for rental of a venue to provide professional development unless the expense is determined by the CDE to be a necessary and reasonable expense. Budgets will be reviewed by the CDE grant reviewers and any items that are deemed non-allowable, excessive, or inappropriate will be rejected and will impact an applicant s final score. 36

  37. Allowable and Non-Allowable Activities and Costs (2) Funds provided under this grant may not be used for the following purposes: Supplanting of existing funding and efforts; Acquisition of equipment for administrative or personal use; Acquisition of furniture (e.g., bookcases, chairs, desks, file cabinets, tables), unless an integral part of an equipment workstation or to provide reasonable accommodations to students with disabilities; Food services, refreshments, banquets, meals 37

  38. Allowable and Non-Allowable Activities and Costs (3) Purchase of space; Payment for memberships in professional organizations; Purchase of promotional favors, such as bumper stickers, pencils, pens, or T-shirts; Subscriptions to journals or magazines; Travel outside the United States, or Travel to states included in AB 1887 s travel prohibition list. 38

  39. Reporting Requirements (1) The following requirements will be adhered to: Participate in regular meetings with the CDE and the CCEE and participate in all required evaluation activities as requested by the CCEE. Provide a written quarterly expenditure and progress report to the CDE demonstrating expenditures are consistent with the agreed- upon budget. 39

  40. Reporting Requirements (2) Provide an annual report to the CDE. - Proposed multiple measures to evaluate progress towards the program goals that evaluate the increased capacity of the grantee(s) and partner(s) to provide quality professional learning to LEAs; - Evidence of coordination and collaboration with other agencies of the Statewide SoS, including but not limited to the CDE, the CCEE, lead agencies, grantees of other literacy initiatives (as described in the RFA overview), COEs, and districts; and - Number of activities accomplished; the impact of these activities; and the number of teachers, paraprofessionals, school leaders, districts, counties, and regions impacted by these activities. 40

  41. Reporting Requirements (3) If the grantee(s) does not provide the required reports to the CDE and the CCEE, program activities are not completed, there is a lack of participation in meetings, or there is a negative trend in the dissemination of technical assistance, the CDE may halt funding at any time. 41

  42. The Application Process 42

  43. Application Process (1) The application will consist of four general types of information: 1. Applicant Information 2. Application Narrative 3. Budget Information 4. Attachments Applicants must submit the application by 4 p.m. on January 28, 2022, through the online application system. 43

  44. Application Process (2) The Lead Applicant will receive email confirmation of the information submitted. If changes need to be made, the Lead Applicant must resubmit the entire application prior to the submission deadline. The last submitted application will be the one considered for review. The CDE is not able to modify the application information after it is submitted. Incomplete or late applications will not be considered. 44

  45. Review Process Only fully completed applications will be considered eligible for consideration and advanced to the Readers Conference. A panel of readers selected for their expertise will read, review, and score each eligible application using the scoring rubric. Readers will be instructed to read each proposal in its entirety to get an overall impression of the project and whether it makes sense overall. Points will be awarded based on completeness and responsiveness of the application to each of the required application components. Interviews with potential grantees may be conducted. 45

  46. The Application 46

  47. Application Timeline Activity Date Applications Due January 28, 2022, before 4:00 p.m. Intent to Award Posted March 4, 2022 Last Day for Appeals to be Received by the CDE Final Awards Posted Project Start Date March 11, 2022, before 4:00 p.m. March 18, 2022 April 1, 2022 47

  48. Scoring Rubric (1) Example: Requirement Not Addressed Requirement Partially Addressed Requirement Met Requirement Exceeded Part 3: Alignment Clearly and convincingly describes how this project will align with the other state literacy initiatives described in Section 1, Part C. 0 1 2 3 Requirement Not Addressed Requirement Partially Addressed Requirement Met Requirement Exceeded 48

  49. Scoring Rubric (2) Rubric Section Point Value Capacity and Program Facilitation 12 Project Plan 18 Alignment 12 Expanding Capacity Priority Points IHE/Nonprofit Consortium Collaboration Budget Total Points 9 4 5 60 49

  50. Application Narrative (1) Successful applicants must be able to demonstrate that their proposed project is: Conceptually clear Technically feasible Sustainable Scalable Leads or contributes to a culture of continuous improvement after the grant period. 50

Related


More Related Content