
Progression to Higher Education in London Insights
Explore the progression to higher education in London through in-depth analysis of young participation, understanding the concept of progress, and the exceptional educational attainment in the capital. Discover key data landscapes and initiatives contributing to widening participation in higher education.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Progression to Higher Education in London Dr. Graeme Atherton, Head AccessHE & Director National Education Opportunities Network (NEON)
Aim today Detailed look at young participation in London Explore what progress really means and importance of local understanding Identity thematic areas where we need more understanding
The London Miracle We were looking for communities, schools, programmes or business sectors that could be said to buck the trend of poor social mobility in Britain. Time and again, that search led back to London, so the project morphed into one looking at London s exceptionalism, in terms of educational attainment and social mobility. Why does the capital outperform? What could be learned and, ideally, copied? SOCIAL MOBILITY GOLDSPOTS: Capital Mobility The all-party parliamentary group on social mobility December 2013
Widening Participation: The Data Landscape Data Type of data Department of Education Destinations of key stage 4 and key stage 5 students BIS Widening Participation in Higher Education (FSM at 15) UCAS UCAS End of Cycle Report (POLAR/FSM/Gender/Ethnicity) HESA HESA Performance Indicators (POLAR/NS- SEC/disability/ethnicity) (by institution) HEFCE POLAR 3 OFFA Students receiving full state support (by institution)
POLAR POLAR is a classification of small areas according to rates of young participation in higher education. Assigns wards into one of five groups or quintiles . Quintile 1 contains areas with the lowest participation rates. Quintile 5 contains areas with the highest. Designed by HEFCE
London leads the way (1) http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2013/201328/
London leads the way (2) http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2013/201328/
London leads the way (3) 2009/10 estimated % entered HE 2010/11 estimated % entered HE FSM [2] 2011/12 estimated % entered HE 2012/13 estimated % entered HE 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Local Authority [1] North East FSM [2] FSM [2] 10% FSM [2]FSM [2] 11% FSM [2] 15% FSM [2] 15% 9% 11% 13% North West 12% 13% 14% 16% 16% 18% 20% Yorkshire and the Humber 11% 11% 13% 13% 15% 15% 17% East Midlands 10% 11% 13% 13% 14% 15% 15% West Midlands 14% 15% 17% 18% 19% 19% 22% East of England 10% 13% 14% 14% 16% 16% 18% London 24% 27% 31% 33% 35% 37% 39% South East 10% 11% 12% 12% 13% 14% 15% South West Total England 9% 14% 9% 15% 10% 17% 11% 18% 13% 20% 13% 21% 15% 23% https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/widening-participation-in-higher-education- 2015
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/a nalysis/yp/POLAR/
London leads the way (4) UK higher education institution Russell Group (incl. Ox. and Cam.) Top third of HEIs12 Other HE providers13 All other HEIs Code Local authority NATENGLAND - Total state-funded mainstream NENorth East NWNorth West YHYorkshire and the Humber EMEast Midlands WMWest Midlands EEEast of England ILInner London OLOuter London SESouth East SWSouth West Region FSM 44% 38% 42% 41% 37% 42% 37% 57% 55% 33% 31% FSM 9% 6% 7% 5% 7% 9% 8% 13% 15% 9% 7% FSM 5% 5% 5% 5% 4% 5% 4% 6% 7% 4% 4% FSM 32% 27% 32% 32% 27% 31% 28% 43% 40% 22% 21% FSM 2% 5% 3% 4% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/destinations-of-ks4-and-ks5-pupils-2013-to-2014
Young participation rate and IDACI http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2014/201401/
Young Participation and FSM pupils http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2014/201401/
POLAR quintile and FSM pupils http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2014/201401/
FSM participation vs FSM achievement Higher Education Participation by Local Authority for learners from FSM backgrounds at age 15 in 2008/09 and % of learners from FSM backgrounds in that authority achieving 5 A*-C at GCSE including English and Maths 80.0 70.0 % FSM learners achieving 5 A*-C GCSE 09-14 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 % HE participation in 11/12 and 12/13 by FSM learners aged 15 in 08/09 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/widening-participation-in-higher-education-2015 and https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/gcse-and-equivalent-attainment-by-pupil-characteristics-2012-to-2013
But do all benefit Participation by LA Higher Education Participation by Local Authority for learners from FSM backgrounds at age 15 in 2008/09 and % of learners from FSM backgrounds in that authority achieving 5 A*-C at GCSE including English and Maths % HE participation in 11/12 or 12/13 by FSM learners aged 15 in 90 90.0 % FSM learners achieving 5 A*-C grades 09-14 80 80.0 70 70.0 60 60.0 50 50.0 08/09 40 40.0 30 30.0 20 20.0 10 10.0 0 0.0 Local Authority www.gov.uk/government/statistics/widening-participation-in-higher-education-2015 and https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/gcse-and-equivalent-attainment-by-pupil-characteristics-2012-to-2013
FSM participation at 15 vs FSM participation at 19 Higher Education Participation by Local Authority for learners from FSM backgrounds at age 15 in 08/09 and % of FSM learners from that Local Authority who entered a level 3 qualification in 12/13 going to HE in 13/14 90 % FSM learners at level 3 in 12/13 going to HE in 13/14 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 % HE participation bin 11/12 and 12/13 by FSM learners aged 15 in 08/09 www.gov.uk/government/statistics/widening-participation-in-higher-education-2015 & https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/destinations-of-key-stage-4-and-key-stage-5-pupils-2012-to-2013
FSM Participation by LA at 15 and 19 Higher Education Participation by Local Authority for learners from FSM backgrounds at age 15 and % of FSM learners from that Local Authority who entered a level 3 qualification in 12/13 going to HE in 13/14 % HE participation in 11/12 and 12/13 by FSM learners aged 15 in 90 90 % FSM learners at level 3 in 12/13 going to HE in 13/14 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 08/09 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 Local Authority Estimated % FSM learners from state-funded schools aged 15 in 08/09 who entered HE aged 18 in 11/12 or aged 19 12/13 % of FSM Learners who entered an A Level or other level 4 qualification in 12/13 going to UK HE in 13/14 www.gov.uk/government/statistics/widening-participation-in-higher-education-2015 & https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/destinations-of-key-stage-4-and-key-stage-5-pupils-2012-to-2013
Who are best performing authorities(3)? Estimated % of FSM pupils from state funded schools aged 15 in 08/09 who entered HE in aged 18 in 11/12 or 19 in 12/13 Young London residents' progression to in HE in 12/13 London Borough Barnet Croydon Ealing Redbridge Brent Enfield Newham Harrow Bromley Lambeth http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/our-key-themes/children-and-young-people/14-19-young-people-education-and- skills/publications/higher 3,068 2,774 2,758 2,631 2,583 2,575 2,535 2,422 2,079 2,014 38 35 43 49 46 36 44 45 21 38
Participation by ethnic background http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/our-key-themes/children-and-young-people/14-19-young-people- education-and-skills/publications/higher
The 180m per year Access Investment for London Student Opportunity Funding 57,192,399 Fee waivers 20,822,000 Bursaries and Scholarships 66,335,000 Student success 18,329,000 Outreach 20,324,000 0 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 60,000,000 70,000,000 https://www.offa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/2013-04-Access-agreements-2014-15.pdf
Key points Key points Data landscape complex London leads way BUT London is unique London has access challenges London has access need
Where are knowledge gaps? How Access Agreement investment is used Why there are local differences in HE progression? How to accurately portray progression of young disadvantaged learners in London? What widening participation activities have greatest impact in London? What is interaction between gender/ethnicity/socio-economic group is understanding localised progression patterns? How do you extend progression knowledge across student lifecycle?