Presentation for Judges
Presentation for Judges
What is this Competition?
•
Simulation of a criminal jury trial
•
Students portray attorneys and witnesses
•
Fictitious jurisdiction of Midlands
–
Midlands has its own case law
–
Midlands has its own statutes
–
Midlands has its own rules of evidence (that
closely mirror the FREs)
This Year’s Case:
State v. Bancroft
or
State v. Covington
•
Summary
: Officers arrested Chase Covington, the
chair of the Midlands Gambling Commission, and
Avery Bancroft, a local casino owner, on suspicion that
Bancroft
bribed
Covington to procure Covington’s
support for a new casino license.
•
If you have heard this case before, be aware that you
may see a very different round this time because:
–
Students select only
one
defendant to prosecute.
–
One defendant denies the bribe ever happened; the other
defendant claims entrapment.
–
Witness selection varies from round to round.
What is your role?
•
You are here to “judge” the competition.
You will do so in panels of two or more
individuals.
•
Judges fill three roles:
–
Preside over the trial (one person per round)
–
Score the trial (two people per round)
–
Provide feedback (everyone)
–
Reach a verdict
Your Role:
Presiding Over the Trial
•
One judge will preside over the trial and act
as judge in the courtroom—ruling on
objections and keeping the trial moving.
•
Trial consists of:
•
Pre-Trial Matters (including introductions)
•
Opening statements
•
Plaintiff case-in-chief (three witnesses)
•
Customary break
•
Defense case-in-chief (three witnesses)
•
Customary break
•
Closing Arguments (including rebuttal)
Your Role:
Presiding Over the Trial
•
Differences from Real-World trials:
–
Both teams must:
•
Present opening statements at the start of trial
•
Call three witnesses
•
Cross-examine all witnesses called
–
There are:
•
NO objections to openings or closings
•
NO motions in limine, for a directed verdict, or mistrial
•
NO side bars
•
NO objections or questions from the judges
•
NO scope limitations on cross-examination (but scope is
limited on re-direct and re-cross examination)
•
NO requirements that expert witnesses be tendered
Your Role:
Scoring the Trial
•
Two judges will score
the trial using this
blue (carbon paper)
ballot.
Your Role:
Scoring the Trial
•
Left =
plaintiff/prosecution
•
Right = defense
•
Score 1-10
–
10 is high score
–
Use whole numbers
(fractions/decimals
will be disregarded)
Your Role:
Scoring the Trial
•
Score on the blue
ballot as the trial
proceeds.
–
Please do not wait
until the end of the
round to decide on
scores.
•
Score on your own.
–
Please do not
collaborate with
other judges on
scores.
Your Role:
Scoring the Trial
•
Score differences
between teams.
–
Scale doesn’t
matter, just be
internally
consistent.
–
Point differential is
what matters.
Your Role:
Scoring the Trial
•
There are SEPARATE scores
for:
–
Opening statements
–
Direct examinations
–
Cross examinations
–
Closing arguments
–
Witnesses on direct and cross.
•
There are NO SEPARATE
scores for:
–
Pre-trial matters
–
Re-direct examinations
–
Re-cross examinations
–
Rebuttal
–
Objection arguments.
Your Role:
Scoring the Trial
•
At the end of the
round, please rank
the top four
attorneys and
witnesses from the
round.
Your Role:
Scoring the Trial
•
Differences from other competitions:
–
Witnesses are scored
•
On both direct-examination and cross-examination
–
Witnesses are allowed to costume
–
Attorneys and witnesses are allowed to use
demonstrative aids (subject to objection)
Your Role:
Scoring the Trial
•
Differences from other competitions:
–
This competition has NO “invention of fact”
objection, but the rules do allow for impeachment if
there is an invention of fact.
•
Teams may NOT invent a material fact on direct-
examination—such inventions are subject to impeachment.
•
If you believe a successful impeachment has occurred, you
should reflect that in your score by penalizing the the
violating team, rewarding the impeaching team, or both.
•
All witnesses except the Defendants have affidavits or
reports. These witnesses swear to include all relevant facts in
their statements. The Defendants did not prepare a statement
in which they were instructed to include all relevant facts.
Your Role:
Commenting
•
All scoring judges
should receive FOUR
comment sheets (more
carbon paper):
–
Students will fill
out their names,
roles, and team
code.
Your Role:
Commenting
•
There are blanks to
write comments on
all parts.
•
Non-shaded boxes
are for plaintiff or
prosecution parts.
•
Shaded boxes are
for defense parts.
Your Role:
Commenting
•
Students will get
copies of written
comments.
•
After the trial is
complete, please
provide a few
minutes of verbal
feedback as well.
Roles of Others:
Students
•
Students act as competitors in the trial.
–
Students’ school identity should remain anonymous
until after the round.
•
Note that all trials are public. Do not assume the identity of
the teams based on who enters the courtroom.
•
Students act as timekeepers.
–
The trial has a three-hour time limit and each part of
the trial has time limits.
–
The students will keep you informed of time limits.
–
Please enforce time limits when you are informed of
them.
Roles of Others:
AMTA Representatives
•
AMTA Representatives ensure that all
rules are followed.
•
AMTA Representatives may enter the
courtroom to inform you of time limit
issues, please follow their instructions.
•
AMTA Representatives may enter the
courtroom to resolve a conflict brought to
their attention by students, please follow
their instructions.
Summarizing:
The Big Things to Take Away
•
Presiding:
–
Let students argue, but listen to any time limitations
students bring to your attention.
•
Scoring:
–
Score on performance, not merits of the case.
–
Score as the trial proceeds, not at the end of the
round.
–
Fill in all blanks on blue score sheet legibly.
•
Commenting:
–
Students will get copies of all written comments.
–
Provide verbal feedback, but keep it to 10 minutes or
less for the entire judging panel combined.
What happens next?
•
You will be assigned to a judging panel.
–
Each panel will be at least two people.
•
You will be assigned to a room.
–
If you have already judged a team in that room
at
this tournament
, then please do not begin the trial
and let us know of the potential conflict.
–
If you are somehow affiliated with a team in that
room (e.g. your child is on the team), then please
do not begin the trial and let us know of the
potential conflict.
Thank You
In this competition, participants simulate a criminal jury trial in the fictional jurisdiction of Midlands. Students take on roles of attorneys and witnesses, dealing with a case involving bribery allegations. Judges play key roles in presiding over the trial, scoring, providing feedback, and reaching a verdict. The trial process includes pre-trial matters, opening statements, case presentations, customary breaks, and closing arguments. Key differences from real-world trials are outlined, emphasizing the unique structure and rules of this simulation.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
What is this Competition? Simulation of a criminal jury trial Students portray attorneys and witnesses Fictitious jurisdiction of Midlands Midlands has its own case law Midlands has its own statutes Midlands has its own rules of evidence (that closely mirror the FREs)
This Years Case: State v. Bancroft or State v. Covington Summary: Officers arrested Chase Covington, the chair of the Midlands Gambling Commission, and Avery Bancroft, a local casino owner, on suspicion that Bancroft bribed Covington to procure Covington s support for a new casino license. If you have heard this case before, be aware that you may see a very different round this time because: Students select only one defendant to prosecute. One defendant denies the bribe ever happened; the other defendant claims entrapment. Witness selection varies from round to round.
What is your role? You are here to judge the competition. You will do so in panels of two or more individuals. Judges fill three roles: Preside over the trial (one person per round) Score the trial (two people per round) Provide feedback (everyone) Reach a verdict
Your Role: Presiding Over the Trial One judge will preside over the trial and act as judge in the courtroom ruling on objections and keeping the trial moving. Trial consists of: Pre-Trial Matters (including introductions) Opening statements Plaintiff case-in-chief (three witnesses) Customary break Defense case-in-chief (three witnesses) Customary break Closing Arguments (including rebuttal)
Your Role: Presiding Over the Trial Differences from Real-World trials: Both teams must: Present opening statements at the start of trial Call three witnesses Cross-examine all witnesses called There are: NO objections to openings or closings NO motions in limine, for a directed verdict, or mistrial NO side bars NO objections or questions from the judges NO scope limitations on cross-examination (but scope is limited on re-direct and re-cross examination) NO requirements that expert witnesses be tendered
Your Role: Scoring the Trial Two judges will score the trial using this blue (carbon paper) ballot.
Your Role: Scoring the Trial Left = plaintiff/prosecution Right = defense Score 1-10 10 is high score Use whole numbers (fractions/decimals will be disregarded)
Your Role: Scoring the Trial Score on the blue ballot as the trial proceeds. Please do not wait until the end of the round to decide on scores. Score on your own. Please do not collaborate with other judges on scores.
Your Role: Scoring the Trial Score differences between teams. Scale doesn t matter, just be internally consistent. Point differential is what matters.
Your Role: Scoring the Trial There are SEPARATE scores for: Opening statements Direct examinations Cross examinations Closing arguments Witnesses on direct and cross. There are NO SEPARATE scores for: Pre-trial matters Re-direct examinations Re-cross examinations Rebuttal Objection arguments.
Your Role: Scoring the Trial At the end of the round, please rank the top four attorneys and witnesses from the round.
Your Role: Scoring the Trial Differences from other competitions: Witnesses are scored On both direct-examination and cross-examination Witnesses are allowed to costume Attorneys and witnesses are allowed to use demonstrative aids (subject to objection)
Your Role: Scoring the Trial Differences from other competitions: This competition has NO invention of fact objection, but the rules do allow for impeachment if there is an invention of fact. Teams may NOT invent a material fact on direct- examination such inventions are subject to impeachment. If you believe a successful impeachment has occurred, you should reflect that in your score by penalizing the the violating team, rewarding the impeaching team, or both. All witnesses except the Defendants have affidavits or reports. These witnesses swear to include all relevant facts in their statements. The Defendants did not prepare a statement in which they were instructed to include all relevant facts.
Your Role: Commenting All scoring judges should receive FOUR comment sheets (more carbon paper): Students will fill out their names, roles, and team code.
Your Role: Commenting There are blanks to write comments on all parts. Non-shaded boxes are for plaintiff or prosecution parts. Shaded boxes are for defense parts.
Your Role: Commenting Students will get copies of written comments. After the trial is complete, please provide a few minutes of verbal feedback as well.
Roles of Others: Students Students act as competitors in the trial. Students school identity should remain anonymous until after the round. Note that all trials are public. Do not assume the identity of the teams based on who enters the courtroom. Students act as timekeepers. The trial has a three-hour time limit and each part of the trial has time limits. The students will keep you informed of time limits. Please enforce time limits when you are informed of them.
Roles of Others: AMTA Representatives AMTA Representatives ensure that all rules are followed. AMTA Representatives may enter the courtroom to inform you of time limit issues, please follow their instructions. AMTA Representatives may enter the courtroom to resolve a conflict brought to their attention by students, please follow their instructions.
Summarizing: The Big Things to Take Away Presiding: Let students argue, but listen to any time limitations students bring to your attention. Scoring: Score on performance, not merits of the case. Score as the trial proceeds, not at the end of the round. Fill in all blanks on blue score sheet legibly. Commenting: Students will get copies of all written comments. Provide verbal feedback, but keep it to 10 minutes or less for the entire judging panel combined.
What happens next? You will be assigned to a judging panel. Each panel will be at least two people. You will be assigned to a room. If you have already judged a team in that room at this tournament, then please do not begin the trial and let us know of the potential conflict. If you are somehow affiliated with a team in that room (e.g. your child is on the team), then please do not begin the trial and let us know of the potential conflict.
