Positional Relationship Between CEPC and SPPC for Accelerator Physics

 
Positional relationship between
CEPC and SPPC/ auxiliary tunnel
 
Dou Wang
 
CEPC day, A623, IHEP, June 28
th
 2019.
 
Thanks to the discussions with SPPC
group and CEPC hardware groups.
 
CEPC – inner side of tunnel
 
Large separation between CEPC & SPPC to make sure two
machines can work simultaneously.
 
Proton machine can only bypass from the outside.
 
SPPC is about 20 years later than CEPC
 
- Bypasses are needed both for CEPC and SPPC to avoid the detectors.
 
If CEPC is the outer ring
 
-
Add bypasses in IR and RF 
 new difficulties for the first-stage project
-
CEPC bypasses need to wait the fix of SPPC design
-
Future SPPC’s geometry lose freedom
 
Compatibility with e-P collision
 
Keep the possibility of future e-P collision program.
 
e-P collision prospect needs same circumference for
CEPC and SPPC.
 
The inner ring has to been enlarged in the future.
 
-
Large modification of geometry for SPPC due to hard bending
-
Much easier for e- machine to adjust the circumference (local
modification)
 
SR distribution inside tunnel
 
Lead shielding in all magnets for CEPC collier ring.
 
Little difference of energy deposition and radiation dose
between two sides of tunnel  
(Ref
page 70 of CDR)
 
- SR on the outside is reduced significantly.
 
dipole
 
quadrupole
 
sextupole
 
Position of auxiliary tunnel-case I
 
 CEPC — inner ring, SPPC — outer ring, auxiliary tunnel —
inner side
 
Disadvantage:
 
Inconvenient to enter auxiliary tunnel for person (bridge)
No way to move out/in heavy/large equipments
SPPC’s auxiliary tunnels will be closed (assuming SPPC’s
auxiliary tunnels are on the outer side )
 
Score of case I:
 
1 — comfortable
2 — uncomfortable
3 — not work
 
Position of auxiliary tunnel-case II
 
 CEPC — inner ring, SPPC — outer ring, auxiliary tunnel —
outer side
 
Disadvantage:
 
CEPC’s auxiliary tunnel will be closed after SPPC is finished.
No way to build SPPC’s auxiliary tunnels
Possible solution: bypass tunnel
 
Score of case II:
 
1 — comfortable
2 — uncomfortable
3 — not work
 
Summary
 
Positional relationship between CEPC and SPPC: comprehensive
consideration of construction schedule and accelerator physics.
 
-  CEPC — inner ring, SPPC — outer ring
 
Difficult to make choice for the position of auxiliary tunnel 
trade-off
 
-  Putting  auxiliary tunnel to the outer side is the best
choice at this stage.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

"The positional relationship between the Circular Electron-Positron Collider (CEPC) and the Super Proton-Proton Collider (SPPC) involves careful considerations such as bypass tunnels, compatibility for future e-P collision programs, and shielding in the tunnel. Various scenarios are discussed regarding the placement of auxiliary tunnels in relation to the CEPC and SPPC, taking into account construction schedules and accelerator physics."

  • CEPC
  • SPPC
  • accelerator physics
  • bypass tunnels
  • e-P collision

Uploaded on Sep 13, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Positional relationship between CEPC and SPPC/ auxiliary tunnel Dou Wang Thanks to the discussions with SPPC group and CEPC hardware groups. CEPC day, A623, IHEP, June 28th2019.

  2. CEPC inner side of tunnel Large separation between CEPC & SPPC to make sure two machines can work simultaneously. - Bypasses are needed both for CEPC and SPPC to avoid the detectors. Proton machine can only bypass from the outside. SPPC is about 20 years later than CEPC If CEPC is the outer ring Add bypasses in IR and RF new difficulties for the first-stage project CEPC bypasses need to wait the fix of SPPC design Future SPPC s geometry lose freedom - - -

  3. Compatibility with e-P collision Keep the possibility of future e-P collision program. e-P collision prospect needs same circumference for CEPC and SPPC. The inner ring has to been enlarged in the future. - Large modification of geometry for SPPC due to hard bending - Much easier for e- machine to adjust the circumference (local modification)

  4. SR distribution inside tunnel Lead shielding in all magnets for CEPC collier ring. - SR on the outside is reduced significantly. Little difference of energy deposition and radiation dose between two sides of tunnel (Ref page 70 of CDR) dipole quadrupole sextupole

  5. Position of auxiliary tunnel-case I CEPC inner ring, SPPC outer ring, auxiliary tunnel inner side Disadvantage: Inconvenient to enter auxiliary tunnel for person (bridge) No way to move out/in heavy/large equipments SPPC s auxiliary tunnels will be closed (assuming SPPC s auxiliary tunnels are on the outer side ) Score of case I: 1 comfortable First 20 years 20 years later 2/3 2 uncomfortable CEPC SPPC 2/3 3 3 not work

  6. Position of auxiliary tunnel-case II CEPC inner ring, SPPC outer ring, auxiliary tunnel outer side Disadvantage: CEPC s auxiliary tunnel will be closed after SPPC is finished. No way to build SPPC s auxiliary tunnels Possible solution: bypass tunnel 1 comfortable 2 uncomfortable Score of case II: 3 not work First 20 years 20 years later 1 3 ( 2) 3 ( 2) CEPC SPPC

  7. Summary Positional relationship between CEPC and SPPC: comprehensive consideration of construction schedule and accelerator physics. - CEPC inner ring, SPPC outer ring Difficult to make choice for the position of auxiliary tunnel trade-off - Putting auxiliary tunnel to the outer side is the best choice at this stage.

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#