Personal Information Retrieval Behavior

undefined
 
Jaime Teevan
Microsoft Research
 
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
 
a
n
d
 
R
e
-
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
P
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
 
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
H
o
w
 
Y
O
U
 
F
i
n
d
 
a
n
d
 
R
e
-
F
i
n
d
 
Email
What’s the last email you read?  Did you file it?
Have you gone back to an email you read before?
Web
What’s the last Web page you (re-)visited?
Have you looked for anything on the Web?
Files
What’s the last file you accessed?  How did you?
Have you looked for a file?
W
h
a
t
 
i
s
 
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
 
a
b
o
u
t
 
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
P
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
 
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
?
 
Target is often clearly defined
A lot of re-finding
Know lots of meta-data
Know target exists
Searcher decided how information was kept
 
S
t
u
d
y
 
o
f
 
H
o
w
 
P
e
o
p
l
e
 
F
i
n
d
 
P
I
 
 
Teevan, J., C. Alvarado, M. S. Ackerman, and D. R.
Karger (2004).  
The Perfect Search Engine is Not
Enough: A Study of Orienteering Behavior in Directed
Search.  
In Proceedings of CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria.
S
t
u
d
y
 
o
f
 
H
o
w
 
P
e
o
p
l
e
 
F
i
n
d
 
P
I
Modified diary study of finding behavior
Ten interviews each (2/day x 5 days)
Two question types
Last email/file/Web page looked at
Last email/file/Web page looked for
Supplemented with direct observation and an
hour-long semi-structured interview
Subjects: 15 CS graduate students
D
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
 
S
e
a
r
c
h
:
 
E
x
p
e
c
t
a
t
i
o
n
Target: Connie Monroe’s office number
 
 
Type into a search engine:
    
 
Connie Monroe, office number
D
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
 
S
e
a
r
c
h
:
 
O
b
s
e
r
v
e
d
 
Interviewer: 
Have you looked for anything on the Web today?
 
Jim: 
I had to look for the office number of the Harvard professor.
 
 
I: 
So how did you go about doing that?
 
J: 
I went to the homepage of the Math department at Harvard
D
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
 
S
e
a
r
c
h
:
 
O
b
s
e
r
v
e
d
 
I:
 
So you went to the Math department, and then what did you do
over there?
 
J:
 
It had a place where you can find people and I went to that page
and they had a dropdown list of visiting faculty, and so I went to
that link and I looked for her name and there it was.
D
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
 
S
e
a
r
c
h
:
 
O
b
s
e
r
v
e
d
 
J:
 
I knew that she had a very small Web page saying, “I’m here at
Harvard.  Here’s my contact information.”
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
 
L
o
o
k
i
n
g
 
f
o
r
 
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
 
Teleporting
 
Orienteering
W
h
y
 
D
o
 
P
e
o
p
l
e
 
O
r
i
e
n
t
e
e
r
?
 
 
Easier than saying what you want
You know where you are
You know what you find
 
Teleporting tools don’t work
E
a
s
i
e
r
 
T
h
a
n
 
S
a
y
i
n
g
 
W
h
a
t
 
Y
o
u
 
W
a
n
t
 
Habit
Whichever way I remember first.
Describing the target is hard
Can’t
Prefer not to
Search for source
E.g., Your last email search
E
a
s
i
e
r
 
T
h
a
n
 
S
a
y
i
n
g
 
W
h
a
t
 
Y
o
u
 
W
a
n
t
 
People know a lot of meta-data
Commonly used meta-data in PIM
People
Time
Document type
Meta-data often conceptual
Person v. email address
Time v. last modified time
Y
o
u
 
K
n
o
w
 
W
h
e
r
e
 
Y
o
u
 
A
r
e
 
Stay in known space
URL manipulation
Bookmarks
History
Backtracking
Following an information scent
Never end up at a dead end
Y
o
u
 
K
n
o
w
 
W
h
a
t
 
Y
o
u
 
F
i
n
d
 
Context gives understanding of answer
 
I was looking for a specific file.  But even when I saw
its name, I wouldn’t have known that that was the file I
wanted until I saw all of the other names in the same
directory…
Understanding negative results
 
I basically clicked on every single button until I was
convinced…  I don’t think that it exists…
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
 
F
a
c
t
o
r
s
 
A
f
f
e
c
t
 
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
Search expertise
Domain expertise
Learning style
Organizational style
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
 
a
n
d
 
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
 
Categorize based on email usage
 
 
 
 
 
People who 
pile 
information take small steps
People who 
file
 information take big steps
 
Filers
 
Pilers
H
o
w
 
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
 
S
e
a
r
c
h
 
F
o
r
 
F
i
l
e
s
 
Filers
 
Pilers
 
Big steps
 
Small steps
 
S
e
a
r
c
h
i
n
g
 
t
o
 
E
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
 
P
I
M
 
Organizing and finding behavior related
Future value of information hard to predict
Post-valued recall
Will better search make PIM unnecessary?
Keyword search engines alone won’t!
Provide orienteering benefits (recognition, context)
Support reminding
What value do we get from organizing?
 
Multi-stepped finding
You know where you are
You know where you are
You know what you find
Individual differences
Step size varies
Target often well defined
A
p
p
l
y
i
n
g
 
W
h
a
t
 
W
e
 
L
e
a
r
n
e
d
 
Make search process interactive
 
Integrate different tools used for different steps
 
Support exhaustive search
 
Support different step sizes
 
Highlight sources that contain target type
R
e
-
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
 
I
n
v
o
l
v
e
s
 
E
x
p
e
c
t
a
t
i
o
n
 
All must be the same to re-find
the information!
 
                          
.. But new
information can be valuable.
 
Solution: Preserve what user expects
Supports orienteering for re-finding
Allows access to new information
 
R
e
-
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
 
I
n
v
o
l
v
e
s
 
E
x
p
e
c
t
a
t
i
o
n
 
P
i
c
k
 
a
 
c
a
r
d
,
 
a
n
y
 
c
a
r
d
!
Case 1
 
Case 2
 
Case 3
 
Case 4
 
Case 5
 
Case 6
 
Y
o
u
r
 
C
a
r
d
 
i
s
 
G
o
n
e
!
P
e
o
p
l
e
 
F
o
r
g
e
t
 
a
 
L
o
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
 
B
l
i
n
d
n
e
s
s
C
h
a
n
g
e
 
B
l
i
n
d
n
e
s
s
E.g., example changed during presentation
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
 
W
h
a
t
 
U
s
e
r
 
R
e
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
 
Personal Information searches unique
Lots of re-finding
Lots of meta-data
Lots of directed search
Lots of orienteering
Individual differences matter
Finding and organizing related
Important to match people’s expectations
 
T
H
A
N
K
 
Y
O
U
 
Jaime Teevan, teevan@microsoft.com
Slide Note

Lecture at INSC 598a (Spring 2008)

Topic: Finding and re-finding PIM

Length: 20 to 40 minutes

Location: MGH 253

Date: April 15 at 2pm

Embed
Share

This collection of images and excerpts explores the process of finding and re-finding personal information, focusing on methods such as email search, web browsing, and file retrieval. Insights from studies on orienteering behavior in directed search shed light on how individuals locate specific information, with examples illustrating strategies like directed search expectations and observed search behaviors.

  • Personal Information Retrieval
  • Information Search Behavior
  • Directed Search
  • Finding Strategies
  • Orienteering Behavior

Uploaded on Oct 05, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Finding and Re-Finding Personal Information Jaime Teevan Microsoft Research

  2. How YOU Find and Re-Find Email What s the last email you read? Did you file it? Have you gone back to an email you read before? Web What s the last Web page you (re-)visited? Have you looked for anything on the Web? Files What s the last file you accessed? How did you? Have you looked for a file?

  3. What is Different about Finding Personal Information? Target is often clearly defined A lot of re-finding Know lots of meta-data Know target exists Searcher decided how information was kept

  4. Study of How People Find PI Teevan, J., C. Alvarado, M. S. Ackerman, and D. R. Karger (2004). The Perfect Search Engine is Not Enough: A Study of Orienteering Behavior in Directed Search. In Proceedings of CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria.

  5. Study of How People Find PI Modified diary study of finding behavior Ten interviews each (2/day x 5 days) Two question types Last email/file/Web page looked at Last email/file/Web page looked for Supplemented with direct observation and an hour-long semi-structured interview Subjects: 15 CS graduate students

  6. Directed Search: Expectation Target: Connie Monroe s office number Type into a search engine: Connie Monroe, office number

  7. Directed Search: Observed Interviewer: Have you looked for anything on the Web today? Jim: I had to look for the office number of the Harvard professor. I: So how did you go about doing that? J: I went to the homepage of the Math department at Harvard

  8. Directed Search: Observed I: So you went to the Math department, and then what did you do over there? J: It had a place where you can find people and I went to that page and they had a dropdown list of visiting faculty, and so I went to that link and I looked for her name and there it was.

  9. Directed Search: Observed J:I knew that she had a very small Web page saying, I m here at Harvard. Here s my contact information.

  10. Strategies Looking for Information Teleporting Orienteering

  11. Why Do People Orienteer? Teleporting tools don t work Easier than saying what you want You know where you are You know what you find

  12. Easier Than Saying What You Want Habit Whichever way I remember first. Describing the target is hard Can t Prefer not to Search for source E.g., Your last email search

  13. Easier Than Saying What You Want People know a lot of meta-data Commonly used meta-data in PIM People Time Document type Meta-data often conceptual Person v. email address Time v. last modified time

  14. You Know Where You Are Stay in known space URL manipulation Bookmarks History Backtracking Following an information scent Never end up at a dead end

  15. You Know What You Find Context gives understanding of answer I was looking for a specific file. But even when I saw its name, I wouldn t have known that that was the file I wanted until I saw all of the other names in the same directory Understanding negative results I basically clicked on every single button until I was convinced I don t think that it exists

  16. Individual Factors Affect Finding Search expertise Domain expertise Learning style Organizational style

  17. Organization and Finding Categorize based on email usage 8 Filers 7 6 # of searches 5 4 3 Pilers 2 1 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 % found in Inbox People who pile information take small steps People who file information take big steps

  18. How Individuals Search For Files Keyword Search Other A B C D E F G H Filers Big steps I J K L M Pilers Small steps 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

  19. Searching to Eliminate PIM Organizing and finding behavior related Future value of information hard to predict Post-valued recall Will better search make PIM unnecessary? Keyword search engines alone won t! Provide orienteering benefits (recognition, context) Support reminding What value do we get from organizing?

  20. Applying What We Learned Multi-stepped finding You know where you are You know where you are You know what you find Individual differences Step size varies Target often well defined Highlight sources that contain target type Make search process interactive Integrate different tools used for different steps Support exhaustive search Support different step sizes

  21. Re-Finding Involves Expectation All must be the same to re-find the information! .. But new information can be valuable.

  22. Re-Finding Involves Expectation Solution: Preserve what user expects Supports orienteering for re-finding Allows access to new information

  23. Pick a card, any card!

  24. Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6

  25. Your Card is Gone!

  26. People Forget a Lot

  27. Change Blindness

  28. Change Blindness

  29. Preserve What User Remembers E.g., example changed during presentation

  30. Summary Personal Information searches unique Lots of re-finding Lots of meta-data Lots of directed search Lots of orienteering Individual differences matter Finding and organizing related Important to match people s expectations

  31. Jaime Teevan, teevan@microsoft.com THANK YOU

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#