Overview of Compensation Funds in France and Germany

 
Compensation Funds
in France and Germany
 
Prof Dr Jonas Knetsch, LLM
University of Reunion Island (France)
 
University of Antwerp
7 June 2016
Introduction
 
- still a “Cinderella subject” for many tort law scholars
 
- despite a compensation fund “boom” over the last 25
years
Compensation Funds
in France and Germany
 
IV. Practical issues
 
V. Organizational issues
 
III. Procedural issues
 
II. Dogmatic issues
 
I. Diversity of compensation funds
I. Diversity of Funds
 
- more than 25 compensation funds in France and Germany
 
 Fonds de garantie des
victimes d’actes de terrorisme
et d’autres infractions (FGTI)
(1977/1990)
 
 
Fonds de garantie
automobile (1951)
 
- 
1
st
 group:
 traffic accident and crime victims
 
-> FGAO
 
 
Verein Verkehrsopfer-
hilfe e.V. (1965)
I. Diversity of Funds
- more than 25 compensation funds in France and Germany
 
 ONIAM (2002)
 
 
Fonds d’indemnisation
des transfusés et hémophiles
(1991)
 
- 
2
nd
 group:
 medical and public health-related accidents
 
 
Thalidomide Fund (1970)
 
 
HIV-Hilfe-Gesetz (1995)
 
 
Dopingopfer-Hilfegesetz
(2002)
 
2004
 
 
Fonds d’indemnisation
des transfusés et hémophiles
(1991)
I. Diversity of Funds
- more than 25 compensation funds in France and Germany
 
- 
3
rd
 group:
 environmental harms
 
 
IOPC Fund (1971/1992)
 
 
Sewage-sludge fund
 
 
Agricultural damages caused by wild animals and
natural disasters ; mining damages
 
 
F : Asbestos fund (> public health)
 
- 
4
th
 group:
 financial services
 
 
Failure of a bank or an
insurance company
 
 D : 
Notary fraud
I. Diversity of Funds
- Classification of compensation funds
 
 
funds replacing civil liability (
Haftungsersetzung
) vs. funds
completing civil liability (
Haftungsergänzung
)
 
 
subsidiary compensation vs. primary compensation
 
 
retrospective vs. prospective compensation funds
 
Past
 
Present
 
Future
 
Fund
 
Public health
scandal
 
Gaps in Civil
Liability
 
Compensation Funds
in France and Germany
 
IV. Practical issues
 
V. Organizational issues
 
III. Procedural issues
 
II. Doctrinal issues
 
I. Diversity of compensation funds
II. Doctrinal issues
 
Q: What exactly is a Compensation Fund?
 
 compensation funds = private insurance?
 
Insurer
 
Policyholder
Insured Person
 
Beneficiary
Insured Person
 
Premium
 
Guarantee
 
~ 
Fund
 
~ Contributor
 
~ Fund Benefits
 
~ Contributions
II. Doctrinal issues
Q: What exactly is a Compensation Fund?
 compensation funds = private insurance?
 
 compensation funds = social security/welfare?
 
 similarities
 
 differences
 
Compensation Funds
in France and Germany
 
IV. Practical issues
 
V. Organizational issues
 
III. Procedural issues
 
II. Doctrinal issues
 
I. Diversity of compensation funds
III. Procedural Issues
Q: 
What is the Difference between a Civil Liability
Action and Compensation by a Fund?
 
- fund compensation
 
 advantages: timeliness, simplicity
 
 comprehensive information on website
 
 quasi-administrative procedure
 
III. Procedural Issues
 
Application form (French asbestos fund)
III. Procedural Issues
Q: 
What is the Difference between a Civil Liability
Action and Compensation by a Fund?
 
- acceptance of compensation procedure
 
 victimological studies
 
 procedural guarantees (independance, impartiality)
 
 role of lawyers
 
Compensation Funds
in France and Germany
 
IV. Practical issues
 
V. Organizational issues
 
III. Procedural issues
 
II. Doctrinal issues
 
I. Diversity of compensation funds
IV. Practical Issues
Q: 
Are Fund Benefits Equal to Full Compensation
under Tort Law?
 
- 
1
st
 point of criticism:
 variety in the level of compensation
 
 full compensation (
réparation intégrale
) vs. partial
compensation or lump-sum
 
 more favourable treatment of physical injuries
 
 liability of a third-party?
IV. Practical Issues
Q: 
Are Fund Benefits Equal to Full Compensation
under Tort Law?
 
- 
2
nd
 point of criticism:
 minimalist view of full compensation
 
 non-pecuniary damages under French tort law
 
 compensation guidelines (ONIAM, reform of civil
liability)
 
 arbitrary assessment of 
préjudice moral
 
IV. Practical issues
 
V. Organizational issues
 
III. Procedural issues
 
II. Doctrinal issues
 
I. Diversity of compensation funds
 
Compensation Funds
in France and Germany
V. Organizational Issues
Q: 
How should Compensation Funds be Coordinated
with Tort Law?
 
- problem of 
cumul d’indemnités
 
 1990’s: Council of State vs. Court of cassation
 
 legislator: acceptation of compensation offer = out
of court settlement (
transaction
)
 
 csq: no additional compensation for same heads of
damages
V. Organizational Issues
Q: 
How should Compensation Funds be Coordinated
with Tort Law?
 
- consolidation of existing compensation funds
(“super-fund”)
 
 D: environmental compensation fund (project)
 
 F: compensation fund for personal injuries (project)
 
 critical assessment
 
 alternative : single-window approach
Conclusion
 
Law of Compensation
(
Entschädigungsrecht
)
 
Civil and
state liability
 
Private
insurance
 
Social security
and welfare
 
Compensation
Funds
 
Thank you for your attention!
 
University of Antwerp
7 June 2016
 
Prof Dr Jonas Knetsch, LLM
University of Reunion Island (France)
jonas.knetsch@univ-reunion.fr
 
… and see you in Reunion Island!
 
Prof Dr Jonas Knetsch, LLM
University of Reunion Island (France)
jonas.knetsch@univ-reunion.fr
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Prof. Dr. Jonas Knetsch from the University of Reunion Island explores the topic of compensation funds in France and Germany, highlighting the diversity and classification of these funds. The presentation covers various groups of compensation funds, including those for traffic accidents, medical incidents, environmental harms, and financial services. The analysis delves into the dogmatic, procedural, practical, and organizational aspects of these funds, shedding light on their importance in the realms of civil liability and public health.

  • Compensation Funds
  • France
  • Germany
  • Civil Liability
  • Public Health

Uploaded on Sep 23, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Prof Dr Jonas Knetsch, LLM University of Reunion Island (France) jonas.knetsch@univ-reunion.fr Compensation Funds in France and Germany University of Antwerp 7 June 2016

  2. Introduction - still a Cinderella subject for many tort law scholars - despite a compensation fund boom over the last 25 years

  3. Compensation Funds in France and Germany I. Diversity of compensation funds II. Dogmatic issues III. Procedural issues IV. Practical issues V. Organizational issues

  4. I. Diversity of Funds - more than 25 compensation funds in France and Germany - 1st group: traffic accident and crime victims Verein Verkehrsopfer- hilfe e.V. (1965) Fonds de garantie automobile (1951) -> FGAO Fonds de garantie des victimes d actes de terrorisme et d autres infractions (FGTI) (1977/1990)

  5. I. Diversity of Funds - more than 25 compensation funds in France and Germany - 2nd group: medical and public health-related accidents Fonds d indemnisation des transfus s et h mophiles (1991) (1991) Fonds d indemnisation des transfus s et h mophiles Thalidomide Fund (1970) HIV-Hilfe-Gesetz (1995) Dopingopfer-Hilfegesetz (2002) 2004 ONIAM (2002)

  6. I. Diversity of Funds - more than 25 compensation funds in France and Germany - 3rd group: environmental harms IOPC Fund (1971/1992) Sewage-sludge fund Agricultural damages caused by wild animals and natural disasters ; mining damages F : Asbestos fund (> public health) - 4th group: financial services Failure of a bank or an insurance company D : Notary fraud

  7. I. Diversity of Funds - Classification of compensation funds funds replacing civil liability (Haftungsersetzung) vs. funds completing civil liability (Haftungserg nzung) subsidiary compensation vs. primary compensation retrospective vs. prospective compensation funds Gaps in Civil Liability Public health scandal Fund Past Future Present

  8. Compensation Funds in France and Germany I. Diversity of compensation funds II. Doctrinal issues III. Procedural issues IV. Practical issues V. Organizational issues

  9. II. Doctrinal issues Q: What exactly is a Compensation Fund? compensation funds = private insurance? ~ Fund Benefits Policyholder Insured Person ~ Contributor Guarantee Premium Insurer ~ Fund Beneficiary Insured Person ~ Contributions

  10. II. Doctrinal issues Q: What exactly is a Compensation Fund? compensation funds = private insurance? compensation funds = social security/welfare? similarities differences

  11. Compensation Funds in France and Germany I. Diversity of compensation funds II. Doctrinal issues III. Procedural issues IV. Practical issues V. Organizational issues

  12. III. Procedural Issues Q: What is the Difference between a Civil Liability Action and Compensation by a Fund? - fund compensation advantages: timeliness, simplicity comprehensive information on website quasi-administrative procedure

  13. III. Procedural Issues Application form (French asbestos fund)

  14. III. Procedural Issues Q: What is the Difference between a Civil Liability Action and Compensation by a Fund? - acceptance of compensation procedure victimological studies procedural guarantees (independance, impartiality) role of lawyers

  15. Compensation Funds in France and Germany I. Diversity of compensation funds II. Doctrinal issues III. Procedural issues IV. Practical issues V. Organizational issues

  16. IV. Practical Issues Q: Are Fund Benefits Equal to Full Compensation under Tort Law? - 1st point of criticism: variety in the level of compensation full compensation (r paration int grale) vs. partial compensation or lump-sum liability of a third-party? more favourable treatment of physical injuries

  17. IV. Practical Issues Q: Are Fund Benefits Equal to Full Compensation under Tort Law? - 2nd point of criticism: minimalist view of full compensation non-pecuniary damages under French tort law arbitrary assessment of pr judice moral compensation guidelines (ONIAM, reform of civil liability)

  18. Compensation Funds in France and Germany I. Diversity of compensation funds II. Doctrinal issues III. Procedural issues IV. Practical issues V. Organizational issues

  19. V. Organizational Issues Q: How should Compensation Funds be Coordinated with Tort Law? - problem of cumul d indemnit s 1990 s: Council of State vs. Court of cassation legislator: acceptation of compensation offer = out of court settlement (transaction) csq: no additional compensation for same heads of damages

  20. V. Organizational Issues Q: How should Compensation Funds be Coordinated with Tort Law? - consolidation of existing compensation funds ( super-fund ) D: environmental compensation fund (project) F: compensation fund for personal injuries (project) critical assessment alternative : single-window approach

  21. Conclusion Law of Compensation (Entsch digungsrecht) Social security and welfare insurance Private Civil and state liability Compensation Funds

  22. Prof Dr Jonas Knetsch, LLM University of Reunion Island (France) jonas.knetsch@univ-reunion.fr Thank you for your attention! University of Antwerp 7 June 2016

  23. Prof Dr Jonas Knetsch, LLM University of Reunion Island (France) jonas.knetsch@univ-reunion.fr and see you in Reunion Island!

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#