National Land Exchange Oversight and Management

NLAT and BLM National
NLAT and BLM National
Land Exchange Oversight
Land Exchange Oversight
 
 
 
 
 
 
National Land Exchange Reviews
National Land Exchange Reviews
 
Who
What
Why
When
Where
How
  
  
Land Exchanges are a common sense
tool that enables the BLM and FS to:
Improve land management
Consolidate ownership
Protect environmentally sensitive areas
Transfer lands that are difficult and
uneconomical to manage
Acquire lands with important resource
attributes
 
Land Exchange Program Roles
Land Exchange Program Roles
and Responsibilities
and Responsibilities
 
State & Field Office
 Program Administration
WO Lands & Realty Program Management
 Assistance & Oversight
FS Regional Office Assistance and Oversight
NLAT Oversight as needed.
 
BLM Washington Office
Responsibilities
 
National  Management
Oversight/Concurrence
A resource to the Director and
WO program management
Assist State Directors and Field
Managers as requested
Case specific issues
Complex or high profile situations
SD Oversight
Help respond to concerns
BLM  Why do we have
National oversight?
FS Level of Oversight
The Regional Lands Directors retain
primary responsibility for oversight.
NLAT will conduct periodic Regional
Reviews and also reserve the right to
review cases where there may be national
implications.
 
Audits and Public Interest
 
Government
Accountability Office
(GAO) works for Congress
and evaluates federal
programs, audits federal
expenditures, and issues
legal opinions.
Office of Inspector
General (OIG) conducts
audits and investigations.
 
HISTORICAL
HIGHLIGHTS
 
  1987 – 2003 Series of 7 OIG/GAO Audits
  Primary issues: appraisal, financial or land
     exchange process
  National Television & News Media Attention
  2002 Appraisal Foundation Report.
  2009 GAO Follow-up on June 2000 report
 
Summary of Audits/Reports
 
July 1996-Nevada Land Exchange Activities (OIG Report
96-I-1025)
March 1998-Del Webb Land Exchange (OIG Report 98-I-
363)
September 1998-Followup of Nevada Land Exchange
Activities (OIG Report 98-I-689)
June 2000-Land Exchanges Need to Reflect Appropriate
Value and Serve the Public Interest (GAO Report RCED-
00-73)
July 2001-Land Exchanges and Acquisitions, Utah (OIG
Report 2001-I-413)
October 2002-Appraisal Foundation Report
June 2009 – Federal Land Management, BLM and the
Forest Service Have Improved Oversight of the Land
Exchange Process, but Additional Actions Are Needed
(GAO-09-611)
 
BLM Response:
 
State Director and Washington Office
State Director and Washington Office
(WO-350 & WO-300) review and BLM
(WO-350 & WO-300) review and BLM
Director concurrence at Feasibility
Director concurrence at Feasibility
and Decision Stages
and Decision Stages
 
Workgroup Report/Recommendations
Workgroup Report/Recommendations
 
FS Response:
 
Developed an agency wide format for
Developed an agency wide format for
Feasibility Analysis
Feasibility Analysis
Revised and Standard ATI Schedule
Revised and Standard ATI Schedule
New Manual and Handbook for LEX
New Manual and Handbook for LEX
NLAT Review
NLAT Review
Expanded Training Opportunities
Expanded Training Opportunities
 
Reviewers look at:
 
Public Interest Factors
Land Sales vs. Exchange
Cost Sharing
Appraisal/Valuation
Congressional Notification,
State/County/local Support or
Opposition, Office of Solicitor
input, etc.
Compliance with NEPA and
other laws, regulations and
policies
Conformance with land use
plans
 
Review Procedures & Improvements
 
Discussion of Review Process
Discussion of Review Process
Review Checklist*
Review Checklist*
Coordination, Visits and State Workshops
Coordination, Visits and State Workshops
Implement Workgroup Recommendations
Implement Workgroup Recommendations
Review Land Exchange Training
Review Land Exchange Training
Land Exchange Handbook (H-2200-1)
Land Exchange Handbook (H-2200-1)
Land Exchange Directory
Land Exchange Directory
         
         
\\blm\dfs\wo\pub\Land Exchange
\\blm\dfs\wo\pub\Land Exchange
BLM National Level Issues
Phased
Phased
Exchanges/Ledgers
Exchanges/Ledgers
Appraisals
Appraisals
Solicitor Role in
Solicitor Role in
Reviews
Reviews
Exchange vs. Sale
Exchange vs. Sale
All Appropriate Inquiry
All Appropriate Inquiry
Congressional
Congressional
Notification
Notification
Constructed Assets
Assumption of
Cost/Compensation
Split Estate (reserving
mineral interest)
Improving Review
Packages
FS National Level Issues
Phased Exchanges
Phased Exchanges
New DOJ Title
New DOJ Title
Regulations
Regulations
Congressional
Congressional
Notification
Notification
Assumption of
Cost/Compensation
Split Estate
Exchanges with high
visibility.
 
SURVIVAL TIPS
 
Demonstrate that you involved
interested and affected parties
Build and document local
support for the exchange
Develop a good proposal
Do a thorough feasibility analysis
Manage the process
Maintain accurate and complete records
Oversight is critical at all levels
Questions and Discussion
Questions and Discussion
Slide Note
Embed
Share

National Land Exchange Oversight involves the BLM and FS utilizing land exchanges to improve land management, consolidate ownership, protect environmentally sensitive areas, and acquire lands with important resource attributes. Roles and responsibilities vary across State & Field Offices, Regional Offices, and the Washington Office. National oversight ensures effective program administration and assistance, especially in complex or high-profile situations. Audits by GAO and OIG help maintain accountability in federal land exchange processes.

  • Land Exchange
  • Oversight
  • Management
  • BLM
  • FS

Uploaded on Mar 09, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NLAT and BLM National Land Exchange Oversight

  2. National Land Exchange Reviews Who What Why When Where How

  3. Land Exchanges are a common sense tool that enables the BLM and FS to: Improve land management Consolidate ownership Protect environmentally sensitive areas Transfer lands that are difficult and uneconomical to manage Acquire lands with important resource attributes

  4. Land Exchange Program Roles and Responsibilities State & Field Office Program Administration WO Lands & Realty Program Management Assistance & Oversight FS Regional Office Assistance and Oversight NLAT Oversight as needed.

  5. BLM Washington Office Responsibilities National Management Oversight/Concurrence A resource to the Director and WO program management Assist State Directors and Field Managers as requested Case specific issues Complex or high profile situations SD Oversight Help respond to concerns

  6. BLM Why do we have National oversight?

  7. FS Level of Oversight The Regional Lands Directors retain primary responsibility for oversight. NLAT will conduct periodic Regional Reviews and also reserve the right to review cases where there may be national implications.

  8. Welcome to the Fleecing of America. Tonight s focus is on Federal land exchanges.

  9. Audits and Public Interest Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and evaluates federal programs, audits federal expenditures, and issues legal opinions. Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducts audits and investigations.

  10. HISTORICAL HIGHLIGHTS 1987 2003 Series of 7 OIG/GAO Audits Primary issues: appraisal, financial or land exchange process National Television & News Media Attention 2002 Appraisal Foundation Report. 2009 GAO Follow-up on June 2000 report

  11. Summary of Audits/Reports July 1996-Nevada Land Exchange Activities (OIG Report 96-I-1025) March 1998-Del Webb Land Exchange (OIG Report 98-I- 363) September 1998-Followup of Nevada Land Exchange Activities (OIG Report 98-I-689) June 2000-Land Exchanges Need to Reflect Appropriate Value and Serve the Public Interest (GAO Report RCED- 00-73) July 2001-Land Exchanges and Acquisitions, Utah (OIG Report 2001-I-413) October 2002-Appraisal Foundation Report June 2009 Federal Land Management, BLM and the Forest Service Have Improved Oversight of the Land Exchange Process, but Additional Actions Are Needed (GAO-09-611)

  12. BLM Response: State Director and Washington Office (WO-350 & WO-300) review and BLM Director concurrence at Feasibility and Decision Stages Workgroup Report/Recommendations

  13. FS Response: Developed an agency wide format for Feasibility Analysis Revised and Standard ATI Schedule New Manual and Handbook for LEX NLAT Review Expanded Training Opportunities

  14. Reviewers look at: Public Interest Factors Land Sales vs. Exchange Cost Sharing Appraisal/Valuation Congressional Notification, State/County/local Support or Opposition, Office of Solicitor input, etc. Compliance with NEPA and other laws, regulations and policies Conformance with land use plans

  15. Review Procedures & Improvements Discussion of Review Process Review Checklist* Coordination, Visits and State Workshops Implement Workgroup Recommendations Review Land Exchange Training Land Exchange Handbook (H-2200-1) Land Exchange Directory \\blm\dfs\wo\pub\Land Exchange

  16. BLM National Level Issues Phased Exchanges/Ledgers Appraisals Solicitor Role in Reviews Exchange vs. Sale All Appropriate Inquiry Congressional Notification Constructed Assets Assumption of Cost/Compensation Split Estate (reserving mineral interest) Improving Review Packages

  17. FS National Level Issues Phased Exchanges New DOJ Title Regulations Congressional Notification Assumption of Cost/Compensation Split Estate Exchanges with high visibility.

  18. SURVIVAL TIPS Demonstrate that you involved interested and affected parties Build and document local support for the exchange Develop a good proposal Do a thorough feasibility analysis Manage the process Maintain accurate and complete records Oversight is critical at all levels

  19. Questions and Discussion

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#