Multi-State Process Discussion: Wyoming Corporations & Elections

undefined
 
Multi-State Process Discussion
Wyoming Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Committee
May 21, 2018
 
M
u
l
t
i
-
S
t
a
t
e
 
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
 
(
M
S
P
)
 
PacifiCorp serves 6 states with 
common
generation and transmission assets.
Local distribution facilities are specific to
each state
Allocation agreements are established
among the states to assign cost
responsibility for common facilities.
The most recent agreement is
known as the 2017 Protocol
Wyoming’s share is approximately
15%
States are responsible for the cost they
impose on the system, whether it is
customer usage or state policies such
as renewable portfolio standards (RPS).
 
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
 
a
n
d
 
C
o
s
t
 
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
 
$
4
.
7
b
W
y
o
m
i
n
g
 
$
6
8
1
m
 
15%
 
M
u
l
t
i
-
S
t
a
t
e
 
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
 
(
M
S
P
)
 
5
 
S
t
a
t
e
s
1
0
 
P
l
a
n
t
s
2
4
 
U
n
i
t
s
5
,
9
2
3
 
M
W
s
 
D
i
v
e
r
g
i
n
g
 
S
t
a
t
e
 
E
n
e
r
g
y
 
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
M
S
P
 
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
Pacific Power States
Post-Realignment (2020)
 
Pre-realignment Generation
Resources
(States Share Proportionately)
 
Pacific Power States
Post-2029
 
Gas
 
Renewable
 
Coal
 
Replacement
resources
 
Rocky Mountain Power
States Post-Realignment
(2020)
 
Rocky Mountain Power
States Post-2029
 
T
i
m
e
l
i
n
e
 
a
n
d
 
M
a
j
o
r
 
I
s
s
u
e
s
 
T
i
m
e
l
i
n
e
Q2/Q4 2018 – Negotiations with
all parties from 6 states
Q1 2019 – Allocation agreement
filed with state commissions
Q1/Q4 2019 – Review of filings
and hearings underway before
state commissions
Q4 2019 – Commission rulings
Jan. 1, 2020 – Agreement
effective
Jan 2020 to Dec 2029 Transition
Period
 
M
a
j
o
r
 
I
s
s
u
e
s
 
/
 
C
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
Coal plant investments uncertainty
Valuation of coal plants to determine the state
trades
Carbon risk impacts to valuation
Location Marginal Pricing (Nodal Pricing Method)
for generation
Changes to Integrated Resource Planning
State load and resource balance / resource
adequacy test by state to prevent “leaning” or
free-riders
Final reclamation responsibility
Transmission gird impacts and ancillary services
issues
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Wyoming is part of the Multi-State Process (MSP) managed by PacifiCorp, involving 5 states and 10 plants. The states have specific allocations and cost responsibilities, with Wyoming holding a 15% share. Diverging energy policies, coal plant investments, and transition periods post-2029 are key issues discussed among the states involved.

  • Multi-State Process
  • Wyoming
  • Energy Policies
  • PacifiCorp
  • Allocation Agreements

Uploaded on Aug 15, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Multi-State Process Discussion Wyoming Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Committee May 21, 2018

  2. Multi-State Process (MSP) PacifiCorp serves 6 states with common generation and transmission assets. Local distribution facilities are specific to each state Allocation agreements are established among the states to assign cost responsibility for common facilities. The most recent agreement is known as the 2017 Protocol Wyoming s share is approximately 15% States are responsible for the cost they impose on the system, whether it is customer usage or state policies such as renewable portfolio standards (RPS).

  3. Allocations and Cost Responsibilities State Allocations (MSP) Total Cost of Service California 2% Wyoming 15% Taxes OMAG Oregon 26% Idaho 6% Depreciation Return Washington 8% Wages Fuel Utah 43% $4.7b Wyoming $681m

  4. Multi-State Process (MSP) 5 States 10 Plants 24 Units 5,923 MWs

  5. Diverging State Energy Policies MSP Proposal Pacific Power States Post-2029 Pacific Power States Post-Realignment (2020) Pre-realignment Generation Resources (States Share Proportionately) Rocky Mountain Power States Post-Realignment (2020) Rocky Mountain Power States Post-2029 Coal Replacement resources Gas Renewable

  6. Timeline and Major Issues Major Issues / Challenges Timeline Coal plant investments uncertainty Q2/Q4 2018 Negotiations with all parties from 6 states Valuation of coal plants to determine the state trades Q1 2019 Allocation agreement filed with state commissions Carbon risk impacts to valuation Q1/Q4 2019 Review of filings and hearings underway before state commissions Location Marginal Pricing (Nodal Pricing Method) for generation Changes to Integrated Resource Planning Q4 2019 Commission rulings State load and resource balance / resource adequacy test by state to prevent leaning or free-riders Jan. 1, 2020 Agreement effective Jan 2020 to Dec 2029 Transition Period Final reclamation responsibility Transmission gird impacts and ancillary services issues

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#