Materials Sector Analysis Overview

 
Materials Sector Analysis
Ally Hornstein, Xuejing Huang, Stephen Hill
Autumn 2021
 
Materials Agenda
 
 
Material Sector: 2.49%
 
Material Sector: 3.28%
 
The Materials Sector Represents 2.49% of the S&P 500
Current SIM holding is 3.28% of total (overweight)
 
S&P 500 vs. SIM
 
Industry Overview
 
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
 
C
o
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
 
i
n
 
S
&
P
5
0
0
 
Y
T
D
 
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
 
S
e
c
t
o
r
 
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
 
V
s
.
 
S
&
P
 
5
0
0
T
h
e
 
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
 
S
e
c
t
o
r
 
h
a
s
 
o
u
t
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
 
t
h
e
 
S
&
P
 
5
0
0
 
t
h
i
s
 
y
e
a
r
 
Sector Performance
 
S&P500
 
Materials
 
Source: Fidelity.com
 
Materials sector is HIGHLY
cyclical
 
Currently in the early stage
 
Demand to rebound as
economy begins to recover
 
Business Cycle
 
E
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
 
F
a
c
t
o
r
s
 
 
COVID-19
 
Economy
 
CPI
 
Interest Rates
 
Unemployment
 
Supply Chain
 
E
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
 
F
a
c
t
o
r
s
 
Due to COVID-19, the materials sector has been hard hit with supply
chain issues
One interesting sub sector of the Metals & Mining Industry to
evaluate is the Steel Industry
"
At one point, steel prices were 300% above their pre-pandemic
levels at more than $1,900 per ton. Before the pandemic, steel priced
between 
$500 per ton and $800 per ton
." (CNBC)
This has led several analysts to question if we are currently in a steel
market bubble
 
Source: 
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/07/how-a-us-steel-shortage-created-a-market-bubble.html
 
U
s
e
r
 
&
 
G
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
y
 
 
Industry Focus: Metals & Mining
 
 
End Users Include:
Energy
Non-Energy (Pipe & Tube)
Construction
Automotive
Manufacturing Markets
Jewlery-Making
 
S
u
p
p
l
y
 
a
n
d
 
D
e
m
a
n
d
 
 
 
Supply for materials is in high
demand, but supply chain issues
has created a shortage
 
 
Materials is #1 reason for project
disruptions
 
 
 
 
 
Industries such as Construction
and Manufacturing effected the
most from materials shortage
 
 
Demand for materials at all time
highs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
u
p
p
l
y
 
a
n
d
 
D
e
m
a
n
d
 
 
S
u
p
p
l
y
 
a
n
d
 
D
e
m
a
n
d
 
https://disruptivnation.com/2019/11/17/porters-five-forces/
 
P
o
t
e
r
'
s
 
F
i
v
e
 
F
o
r
c
e
s
 
 
The Materials Sector Requires:
Large Capital Needs
Quality products, that require the greatest efficiency and effectiveness as
possible
Government Regulations
Patents
Large Human Capital
Expensive Technology
 
Threat of Entry: 
Low
 
https://graduateway.com/chemical-industry-analysis-using-porters-five-force-model/
 
T
h
r
e
a
t
 
o
f
 
E
n
t
r
y
 
 
 
Suppliers of goods such as lumber, steel, and stone have moderate
power
Suppliers of rare materials such as chemicals and precious minerals
have significant power
Due to the materials sector being broadly diversified, supplier power
is mixed
 
Supplier Power: 
Moderate
 
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
r
 
P
o
w
e
r
 
 
Buyer Power is generally low in the Materials Sector
The government can step in and place price ceilings on raw materials
if necessary
Most materials companies sell directly to their user industries
through their own distribution networks
 
Buyer Power: 
Low
 
https://www.equitymaster.com/detail.asp?date=12/29/2008&story=4&title=Steel-Five-force-analysis
 
B
u
y
e
r
 
P
o
w
e
r
 
 
 
 
Difficult to substitute since many of these companies produce
specialized materials
Chemicals and minerals are not readily available to be replaced
 
T
h
r
e
a
t
 
o
f
 
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
:
 
L
o
w
 
T
h
r
e
a
t
 
o
f
 
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
 
 
Moderate Competition
Metals & Mining
High Competition
Chemicals
Containers & Packaging
Construction Materials
 
C
o
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
 
R
i
v
a
l
r
y
:
 
M
o
d
e
r
a
t
e
 
t
o
 
H
i
g
h
 
C
o
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
 
R
i
v
a
l
r
y
 
 
Materials vs. GDP
 
 
Materials vs. PPI
 
 
 Construction Materials vs. S&P500
 
Financial Analysis
 
Sector & Industry
 
Financial Analysis
 
Companies
 
Financial Analysis
 
S&P500 vs. Materials: Profit Margin
 
Financial Analysis
 
Future Profit Margins vs. Current
 
Valuation Analysis
 
Sector & Industry
 
Companies
 
 
 
Valuation Analysis
 
Historical Analysis – Materials Sector
 
 
 
Valuation Analysis
 
Historical Analysis – MOS
 
 
 
Valuation Analysis
 
YTD Material Stocks Performance
 
 
 
RATIO ANALYSIS
 
P/E
S&P 500: 25.92
Materials Sector: 20.54
Undervalued: Current Materials P/E is lower than the S&P 500
P/E by 29.2%
P/S
S&P 500: 3.46
Materials Sector: 2.83
Undervalued: 
Current Materials P/S is lower than the S&P 500
P/S by 10.2%
P/B
S&P 500: 4.77
Materials Sector: 3.26
Undervalued: 
Current Materials P/B is lower than the S&P
500 P/B by 33.6%
P/FCF
S&P 500: 16.99
Materials Sector: 12.31
Undervalued: 
Current Materials P/B is lower than the
S&P 500 P/B by 27.5%
 
 
 
TREND ANALYSIS
 
P/E Forecasts significantly increased for 2020 A, but seem to be leveling
out per analyst estimates
COVID-19
This increase is apparent in the  recent Valuation Analysis
of MOS
P/S, P/B, P/FCF have generally increased for the Materials Sector
Spotlight:
Materials Sector Stocks have generally reported  substantial gains
YTD
Profit Margins, Return on Assets, and Return on Equity are worth
notable mention as they have greatly increased
 
 
 
 
Valuation Analysis vs. S&P 500
 
Recommendation
 
Currently the SIM
portfolio has
materials weighted
higher than the
S&P500 (Overweight)
 
 
Materials is second
lowest weighted in
the S&P500 while it's
third lowest in the
SIM portfolio
 
Recommendation
 
Recommendation: Keep Position
In the future, lower position to S&P500
 
Positives
Future growth projections high for the sector
Several industries and companies valued low
compared to projected earnings
Historically, materials sector does significantly
well after a recession
 
 
 
Risks
Supply chains will prolong
economic recovery
Highly cyclical and dependent on
US economy
Future economic outlook is
uncertain with Covid-19 causing
disruptions
 
 
 
Questions
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This analysis delves into the performance, trends, and external factors affecting the Materials Sector, focusing on S&P 500 comparison, industry overview, business analysis, business cycle, and external impacts like COVID-19 and supply chain disruptions

  • Materials Sector
  • Analysis
  • S&P 500
  • Business Cycle
  • External Factors

Uploaded on Feb 15, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Materials Sector Analysis Ally Hornstein, Xuejing Huang, Stephen Hill Autumn 2021

  2. Materials Agenda Overview Business Analysis Economic Analysis Financial Analysis Valuation Analysis Recomendation

  3. Overview

  4. S&P 500 vs. SIM The Materials Sector Represents 2.49% of the S&P 500 Current SIM holding is 3.28% of total (overweight) Material Sector: 3.28% Material Sector: 2.49%

  5. Industry Overview

  6. Material Companies in S&P500 Material Companies in S&P500

  7. Sector Performance YTD Materials Sector Performance Vs. S&P 500 YTD Materials Sector Performance Vs. S&P 500 The Materials Sector has outperformed the S&P 500 this year Materials S&P500

  8. Business Analysis

  9. Business Cycle Materials sector is HIGHLY cyclical Currently in the early stage Demand to rebound as economy begins to recover Source: Fidelity.com

  10. External Factors External Factors CPI COVID-19 Economy Unemployment Interest Rates Supply Chain

  11. External Factors External Factors Due to COVID-19, the materials sector has been hard hit with supply chain issues One interesting sub sector of the Metals & Mining Industry to evaluate is the Steel Industry "At one point, steel prices were 300% above their pre-pandemic levels at more than $1,900 per ton. Before the pandemic, steel priced between $500 per ton and $800 per ton." (CNBC) This has led several analysts to question if we are currently in a steel market bubble Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/07/how-a-us-steel-shortage-created-a-market-bubble.html

  12. User & Geography User & Geography Industry Focus: Metals & Mining End Users Include: Energy Non-Energy (Pipe & Tube) Construction Automotive Manufacturing Markets Jewlery-Making

  13. Supply and Demand Supply and Demand Supply for materials is in high demand, but supply chain issues has created a shortage Materials is #1 reason for project disruptions

  14. Supply and Demand Supply and Demand Industries such as Construction and Manufacturing effected the most from materials shortage Demand for materials at all time highs

  15. Supply and Demand Supply and Demand

  16. Poter's Five Forces Poter's Five Forces https://disruptivnation.com/2019/11/17/porters-five-forces/

  17. Threat of Entry Threat of Entry Threat of Entry: Low The Materials Sector Requires: Large Capital Needs Quality products, that require the greatest efficiency and effectiveness as possible Government Regulations Patents Large Human Capital Expensive Technology https://graduateway.com/chemical-industry-analysis-using-porters-five-force-model/

  18. Supplier Power Supplier Power Supplier Power: Moderate Suppliers of goods such as lumber, steel, and stone have moderate power Suppliers of rare materials such as chemicals and precious minerals have significant power Due to the materials sector being broadly diversified, supplier power is mixed

  19. Buyer Power Buyer Power Buyer Power: Low Buyer Power is generally low in the Materials Sector The government can step in and place price ceilings on raw materials if necessary Most materials companies sell directly to their user industries through their own distribution networks https://www.equitymaster.com/detail.asp?date=12/29/2008&story=4&title=Steel-Five-force-analysis

  20. Threat of Substitution Threat of Substitution Threat of Substitution: Threat of Substitution: Low Difficult to substitute since many of these companies produce specialized materials Chemicals and minerals are not readily available to be replaced

  21. Competitive Rivalry Competitive Rivalry Competitive Rivalry: Competitive Rivalry: Moderate to High Moderate Competition Metals & Mining High Competition Chemicals Containers & Packaging Construction Materials

  22. Economic Analysis

  23. Materials vs. GDP

  24. Materials vs. PPI

  25. Construction Materials vs. S&P500

  26. Financial Analysis

  27. Financial Analysis Sector & Industry

  28. Financial Analysis Companies

  29. Financial Analysis S&P500 vs. Materials: Profit Margin

  30. Financial Analysis Future Profit Margins vs. Current

  31. Valuation Analysis

  32. Valuation Analysis Sector & Industry Companies

  33. Valuation Analysis Historical Analysis Materials Sector

  34. Valuation Analysis Historical Analysis MOS

  35. Valuation Analysis YTD Material Stocks Performance

  36. Valuation Analysis vs. S&P 500 RATIO ANALYSIS TREND ANALYSIS P/E Forecasts significantly increased for 2020 A, but seem to be leveling out per analyst estimates COVID-19 This increase is apparent in the recent Valuation Analysis of MOS P/E S&P 500: 25.92 Materials Sector: 20.54 Undervalued: Current Materials P/E is lower than the S&P 500 P/E by 29.2% P/S, P/B, P/FCF have generally increased for the Materials Sector P/S Spotlight: S&P 500: 3.46 Materials Sector Stocks have generally reported substantial gains YTD Materials Sector: 2.83 Undervalued: Current Materials P/S is lower than the S&P 500 P/S by 10.2% Profit Margins, Return on Assets, and Return on Equity are worth notable mention as they have greatly increased P/B S&P 500: 4.77 Materials Sector: 3.26 Undervalued: Current Materials P/B is lower than the S&P 500 P/B by 33.6% P/FCF S&P 500: 16.99 Materials Sector: 12.31 Undervalued: Current Materials P/B is lower than the S&P 500 P/B by 27.5%

  37. Recommendation

  38. Recommendation Currently the SIM portfolio has materials weighted higher than the S&P500 (Overweight) Materials is second lowest weighted in the S&P500 while it's third lowest in the SIM portfolio

  39. Recommendation Recommendation: Keep Position In the future, lower position to S&P500 Positives Future growth projections high for the sector Several industries and companies valued low compared to projected earnings Historically, materials sector does significantly well after a recession Risks Supply chains will prolong economic recovery Highly cyclical and dependent on US economy Future economic outlook is uncertain with Covid-19 causing disruptions

  40. Questions

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#