Litigation Case History Against EPA: Ellis v. EPA
Filed in 2013 by beekeepers and NGOs against EPA, the Ellis litigation case challenges EPA actions on clothianidin and thiamethoxam registrations. The case includes dismissed claims under APA and FIFRA, with a pending ruling on ESA violations. The litigation schedule involves ongoing Alternative Dispute Resolution with upcoming deadlines for briefings and hearings.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Ellis Litigation Case History Filed on March 21, 2013 against EPA challenging EPA actions related to clothianidin and thiamethoxam Filed in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco) Plaintiffs are bee keepers (Ellis, Doan, Theobold, Rhodes) and NGOs (Center for Food Safety, Sierra Club, Beyond Pesticides, Center for Environmental Health) Syngenta, Bayer, Valent and CropLife intervened on side of EPA - Intervenors are allowed to participate fully 1 Classification: INTERNAL USE ONLY
Ellis Litigation Case History Second Amended Complaint (May 9, 2014) controls the case 6 claims under the APA, FIFRA and ESA Order and Opinion dated May 8, 2017 Judge held that APA and FIFRA claims cannot be pursued further. These claims are dismissed: - Plaintiff s claim that EPA violated the APA in denying their petition that clothianidin poses an imminent hazard - Plaintiff s claim that EPA violated FIFRA and the APA by refusing to suspend clothianidin registration - Plaintiff s claim that EPA violated FIFRA notice requirements for new uses of clothianidin and thiamethoxam 2 Classification: INTERNAL USE ONLY
Ellis Litigation Case History Judge held that EPA violated the ESA by failing to consult with Services before granting certain clothianidin and thiamethoxam registrations Judge has not ruled on the remedy With the parties input, she set a schedule for further deliberations and briefing on an appropriate remedy 3 Classification: INTERNAL USE ONLY
Ellis US registrations involved in the case 59 clothianidin and thiamethoxam-containing end- use/technical product registrations are at issue Not at issue in the case: - registrations that pre-date March 21, 2007 - TMX registrations that post-date filing of complaint on March 21, 2013 4 Classification: INTERNAL USE ONLY
Ellis litigation schedule Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is ongoing Briefing on Remedies: January 5, 2018: deadline for Defendants to file briefs with court arguing why the Court should not issue an order vacating or restricting some or all 59 clothianidin and TMX registrations February 16, 2018: deadline for Plaintiffs to file brief with the Court responding to the briefs filed by Defendant and Defendant-Intervenors March 16, 2018: Court scheduled hearing on the legal remedy briefing District Court could reach a decision on the legal remedy as soon as mid-March 2018 5 Classification: INTERNAL USE ONLY
