Lessons Learned from Newburgh's Drinking Water Crisis

S
o
u
r
c
e
 
W
a
t
e
r
 
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
 
S
c
o
r
e
c
a
r
d
A
p
p
l
y
i
n
g
 
t
h
e
 
l
e
s
s
o
n
s
 
l
e
a
r
n
e
d
 
f
r
o
m
 
N
e
w
b
u
r
g
h
s
d
r
i
n
k
i
n
g
 
w
a
t
e
r
 
c
r
i
s
i
s
D
a
n
 
S
h
a
p
l
e
y
W
a
t
e
r
 
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
 
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
 
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
 
 
#
5
0
o
n
H
u
d
s
o
n
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
D
e
f
e
n
d
 
t
h
e
 
H
u
d
s
o
n
 
R
i
v
e
r
 
a
n
d
 
i
t
s
 
t
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
i
e
s
Restore
 polluted waterways
Enrich
 communities
 
W
h
a
t
 
i
s
 
g
o
i
n
g
 
o
n
 
i
n
 
N
e
w
b
u
r
g
h
?
 
2
9
,
0
0
0
 
p
e
o
p
l
e
 
e
x
p
o
s
e
d
 
t
o
 
t
o
x
i
c
 
c
h
e
m
i
c
a
l
 
f
o
r
y
e
a
r
s
 
 
p
r
o
b
a
b
l
y
 
d
e
c
a
d
e
s
 
Washington Lake reservoir remains contaminated
 
Long-term and expensive remediation, treatment
and health programs starting
 
Commitment to new Source Water Assessment
 
N
e
w
b
u
r
g
h
s
 
D
r
i
n
k
i
n
g
 
W
a
t
e
r
 
S
u
p
p
l
y
N
e
w
b
u
r
g
h
s
 
D
r
i
n
k
i
n
g
 
W
a
t
e
r
 
S
u
p
p
l
y
N
e
w
b
u
r
g
h
s
 
D
r
i
n
k
i
n
g
 
W
a
t
e
r
 
S
u
p
p
l
y
H
o
w
 
c
o
u
l
d
 
t
h
i
s
 
h
a
p
p
e
n
?
 
Discharges regulated to Class C and D standards 
(Clean Water Act)
 
Firefighting foam discharges prohibited but not monitored 
(CWA)
 
Source Water Assessment didn’t accurately map watershed or identify
threats 
(Safe Drinking Water Act)
 
No Source Water Protection Program 
(Safe Drinking Water Act)
 
Wetlands not designated for protection 
(Environmental Conservation Law)
 
Open lands not identified for protection 
(ECL)
 
Newburgh lacks jurisdiction to protect its drinking water 
(Public Health Law)
 
 
N
e
w
b
u
r
g
h
s
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
 
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
(
D
R
A
F
T
)
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
(
D
R
A
F
T
)
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
 
S
o
u
r
c
e
 
W
a
t
e
r
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
 
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
 
This assessment found an elevated susceptibility to contamination for
this source of drinking water. The amount of pasture in the
assessment area results in a high potential for protozoa
contamination. Non-sanitary wastewater discharges may also
contribute to contamination. There is also noteworthy contamination
susceptibility associated with other discrete contaminant sources,
and these facility types include: mines and landfills. Finally, it should
be noted that relatively high flow velocities make river drinking water
supplies highly sensitive to existing and new sources of microbial
contamination.
T
o
w
n
 
o
f
 
R
e
d
 
H
o
o
k
 
S
o
u
r
c
e
 
W
a
t
e
r
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
 
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
 
The source water assessment has rated our water source as having
an elevated susceptibility to microbial, nitrates, industrial solvents
and other industrial contaminates. These ratings are due primarily to
the close proximity of the wells to permitted discharge facilities
(industrial/commercial facilities that discharge wastewater into the
environment and are regulated by the state and/or federal
government) and the residential and agricultural land use and related
activities in the assessment area. In addition, the wells draw from a
gravel water bearing soil and overlying soils may not provide
adequate protection from potential contamination due to flooding.
 
The county and state health departments will use this information to
direct future source water protection activities. The source water
assessment summary for your system is available by calling the
Water Department office at 845-758-4608 and requesting a copy.
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
(
D
R
A
F
T
)
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
(
D
R
A
F
T
)
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
(
D
R
A
F
T
)
 
(
D
R
A
F
T
)
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
(
D
R
A
F
T
)
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
(
D
R
A
F
T
)
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
(
D
R
A
F
T
)
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
(
D
R
A
F
T
)
N
e
x
t
 
S
t
e
p
s
 
?
 
Thoroughly complete Scorecard for Bard 
(SKWC?)
 
Complete sub-watershed Scorecards for Red Hook Village, Water
District No. 1, Red Hook Residential Center, Mountain View Mobile
Estates, and/or others 
(SKWA, CAC?)
 
Seek technical advice from Estuary Program, DEC, DOH etc.
 
Report results widely – especially to state and federal representatives
(SKWA, Red Hook Village/Town, Riverkeeper)
 
Lobby for more resources for Source Water Protection 
(Riverkeeper and a
coalition of the willing)
W
a
t
e
r
 
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
 
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
 
t
e
a
m
 
John Lipscomb , Dan Shapley, Jen Epstein
Riverkeeper
 
Dr. Greg O’Mullan
CUNY Queens College
 
Dr. Andrew Juhl, Carol Knudson
Columbia University Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory
 
Jason West, Beckett Lansbury
Part time, grant-funded
 
 
 
2
0
1
6
 
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
 
T
h
e
 
A
s
h
o
k
a
n
 
C
e
n
t
e
r
,
 
B
a
r
d
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
,
 
B
r
o
o
k
l
y
n
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
,
 
C
o
l
u
m
b
i
a
 
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
s
 
L
a
m
o
n
t
-
D
o
h
e
r
t
y
 
E
a
r
t
h
O
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
o
r
y
,
 
C
o
l
u
m
b
i
a
-
G
r
e
e
n
e
 
T
r
o
u
t
 
U
n
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
,
 
C
o
r
n
e
l
l
 
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
,
 
C
U
N
Y
 
Q
u
e
e
n
s
,
 
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
 
F
u
n
d
 
 
(
H
u
d
s
o
n
 
R
i
v
e
r
 
E
s
t
u
a
r
y
 
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
 
a
n
d
 
M
o
h
a
w
k
 
B
a
s
i
n
 
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
)
,
 
G
r
o
u
n
d
w
o
r
k
H
u
d
s
o
n
 
V
a
l
l
e
y
,
 
H
S
B
C
,
 
H
u
d
s
o
n
 
R
i
v
e
r
 
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
 
F
u
n
d
,
 
H
u
d
s
o
n
 
R
i
v
e
r
 
M
a
r
i
t
i
m
e
 
M
u
s
e
u
m
,
 
I
D
E
X
X
,
J
a
r
r
e
t
t
 
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
,
 
J
o
h
n
 
J
a
y
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
,
 
J
S
A
 
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
,
 
L
a
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
 
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
,
 
L
e
o
n
L
o
w
e
n
s
t
e
i
n
 
F
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
,
 
M
a
d
i
s
o
n
-
O
n
e
i
d
a
 
B
O
C
E
S
,
 
M
i
d
d
l
e
b
u
r
g
h
 
H
i
g
h
 
S
c
h
o
o
l
,
 
M
o
n
t
g
o
m
e
r
y
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
 
A
d
v
i
s
o
r
y
 
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
,
 
N
e
w
 
Y
o
r
k
 
C
i
t
y
 
W
a
t
e
r
 
T
r
a
i
l
 
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
 
a
n
d
 
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
,
 
N
e
w
 
Y
o
r
k
 
S
e
a
G
r
a
n
t
,
 
O
s
s
i
n
i
n
g
 
H
i
g
h
 
S
c
h
o
o
l
,
 
P
h
i
l
i
p
p
 
F
a
m
i
l
y
 
F
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
,
 
P
l
e
a
s
a
n
t
v
i
l
l
e
 
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
 
A
d
v
i
s
o
r
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
,
 
P
o
c
a
n
t
i
c
o
 
R
i
v
e
r
 
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
 
A
l
l
i
a
n
c
e
,
 
R
o
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
 
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
 
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
 
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
,
R
o
c
k
i
n
g
 
t
h
e
 
B
o
a
t
,
 
R
o
e
 
J
a
n
 
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
 
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
,
 
R
o
s
e
n
d
a
l
e
 
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
 
f
o
r
 
t
h
e
 
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
t
h
e
 
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
,
 
S
a
r
a
h
 
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
 
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
 
C
e
n
t
e
r
 
f
o
r
 
t
h
e
 
U
r
b
a
n
 
R
i
v
e
r
 
a
t
 
B
e
c
z
a
k
,
 
S
a
w
 
K
i
l
l
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
 
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
 
S
a
w
 
M
i
l
l
 
R
i
v
e
r
 
C
o
a
l
i
t
i
o
n
,
 
S
p
a
r
k
i
l
l
 
C
r
e
e
k
 
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
 
A
l
l
i
a
n
c
e
,
 
S
U
N
Y
C
o
b
l
e
s
k
i
l
l
,
 
T
h
e
 
R
i
v
e
r
 
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
,
 
U
.
S
.
 
G
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
 
S
u
r
v
e
y
,
 
U
.
S
.
 
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
 
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
 
A
g
e
n
c
y
 
O
f
f
i
c
e
o
f
 
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
 
a
n
d
 
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
 
W
a
l
l
k
i
l
l
 
R
i
v
e
r
 
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
 
A
l
l
i
a
n
c
e
,
 
W
a
w
a
r
s
i
n
g
 
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
 
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
,
 
W
e
s
t
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
 
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
 
F
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
,
 
Y
o
n
k
e
r
s
 
P
a
d
d
l
i
n
g
 
a
n
d
 
R
o
w
i
n
g
C
l
u
b
,
 
a
n
d
 
m
a
n
y
 
R
i
v
e
r
k
e
e
p
e
r
 
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
 
D
a
n
 
S
h
a
p
l
e
y
dshapley@riverkeeper.org
914-478-4501 x226
 
riverkeeper.org
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The drinking water crisis in Newburgh, involving the exposure of 29,000 people to toxic chemicals for potentially decades, highlights the importance of source water protection. The contamination of the Washington Lake reservoir, inadequate source water assessments, and the lack of protection programs contributed to this crisis. The images and information provided shed light on the failures that led to the situation and emphasize the need for stringent regulations and proactive measures to safeguard drinking water sources.

  • Water quality
  • Newburgh
  • Drinking water crisis
  • Source water protection
  • Contamination

Uploaded on Sep 19, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Source Water Protection Scorecard Applying the lessons learned from Newburgh s drinking water crisis Dan Shapley Water Quality Program Manager

  2. #50onHudson Defend the Hudson River and its tributaries Restore polluted waterways Enrich communities

  3. What is going on in Newburgh? 29,000people exposed to toxic chemical for years probably decades Washington Lake reservoir remains contaminated Long-term and expensive remediation, treatment and health programs starting Commitment to new Source Water Assessment

  4. Newburghs Drinking Water Supply

  5. Newburghs Drinking Water Supply

  6. Newburghs Drinking Water Supply

  7. How could this happen? Discharges regulated to Class C and D standards (Clean Water Act) Firefighting foam discharges prohibited but not monitored (CWA) Source Water Assessment didn t accurately map watershed or identify threats (Safe Drinking Water Act) No Source Water Protection Program (Safe Drinking Water Act) Wetlands not designated for protection (Environmental Conservation Law) Open lands not identified for protection (ECL) Newburgh lacks jurisdiction to protect its drinking water (Public Health Law)

  8. Newburghs Score

  9. Bard Colleges Score (DRAFT)

  10. Bard Colleges Score (DRAFT)

  11. Bard Colleges Source Water Assessment Summary This assessment found an elevated susceptibility to contamination for this source of drinking water. The amount of pasture in the assessment area results in a high potential for protozoa contamination. Non-sanitary wastewater discharges may also contribute to contamination. There is also noteworthy contamination susceptibility associated with other discrete contaminant sources, and these facility types include: mines and landfills. Finally, it should be noted that relatively high flow velocities make river drinking water supplies highly sensitive to existing and new sources of microbial contamination.

  12. Town of Red Hook Source Water Assessment Summary The source water assessment has rated our water source as having an elevated susceptibility to microbial, nitrates, industrial solvents and other industrial contaminates. These ratings are due primarily to the close proximity of the wells to permitted discharge facilities (industrial/commercial facilities that discharge wastewater into the environment and are regulated by the state and/or federal government) and the residential and agricultural land use and related activities in the assessment area. In addition, the wells draw from a gravel water bearing soil and overlying soils may not provide adequate protection from potential contamination due to flooding. The county and state health departments will use this information to direct future source water protection activities. The source water assessment summary for your system is available by calling the Water Department office at 845-758-4608 and requesting a copy.

  13. Bard Colleges Score (DRAFT)

  14. Bard Colleges Score (DRAFT)

  15. Bard Colleges Score (DRAFT)

  16. Bard Colleges Score (DRAFT) (DRAFT)

  17. Bard Colleges Score (DRAFT)

  18. Bard Colleges Score (DRAFT)

  19. Bard Colleges Score (DRAFT)

  20. Next Steps ? Thoroughly complete Scorecard for Bard (SKWC?) Complete sub-watershed Scorecards for Red Hook Village, Water District No. 1, Red Hook Residential Center, Mountain View Mobile Estates, and/or others (SKWA, CAC?) Seek technical advice from Estuary Program, DEC, DOH etc. Report results widely especially to state and federal representatives (SKWA, Red Hook Village/Town, Riverkeeper) Lobby for more resources for Source Water Protection (Riverkeeper and a coalition of the willing)

  21. Water quality monitoring team John Lipscomb , Dan Shapley, Jen Epstein Riverkeeper Dr. Greg O Mullan CUNY Queens College Dr. Andrew Juhl, Carol Knudson Columbia University Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Jason West, Beckett Lansbury Part time, grant-funded

  22. 2016 Partners The Ashokan Center, Bard College, Brooklyn College, Columbia University s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia-Greene Trout Unlimited, Cornell University, CUNY Queens, Environmental Protection Fund (Hudson River Estuary Program and Mohawk Basin Program), Groundwork Hudson Valley, HSBC, Hudson River Improvement Fund, Hudson River Maritime Museum, IDEXX, Jarrett Engineers, John Jay College, JSA Financial, LaGuardia Community College, Leon Lowenstein Foundation, Madison-Oneida BOCES, Middleburgh High School, Montgomery Conservation Advisory Council, New York City Water Trail Association and partners, New York Sea Grant, Ossining High School, Philipp Family Foundation, Pleasantville Conservation Advisory Council, Pocantico River Watershed Alliance, Rochester Environmental Conservation Commission, Rocking the Boat, Roe Jan Watershed Association, Rosendale Commission for the Conservation of the Environment, Sarah Lawrence College Center for the Urban River at Beczak, Saw Kill Watershed Community, Saw Mill River Coalition, Sparkill Creek Watershed Alliance, SUNY Cobleskill, The River Project, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Wallkill River Watershed Alliance, Wawarsing Environmental Conservation Commission, Westchester Community Foundation, Yonkers Paddling and Rowing Club, and many Riverkeeper members

  23. Dan Shapley dshapley@riverkeeper.org 914-478-4501 x226 riverkeeper.org

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#