Insights on Money, Gambling, and Decision-Making
Peter J. Adams
School of Population Health
P
R
O
F
I
T
N
N
O
O
T
T
M
M
U
U
C
C
H
H
H
H
E
E
A
A
P
P
S
S
NUMBER OF CONSUMERS
L
L
O
O
W
W
H
H
I
I
G
G
H
H
A
A
D
D
D
D
I
I
C
C
T
T
I
I
V
V
E
E
N
N
O
O
N
N
-
-
A
A
D
D
D
D
I
I
C
C
T
T
I
I
V
V
E
E
Hard to resist
Money exchange
establishes
expectations &
obligations
Reinforced by
multiple exchanges
“I didn’t really see
“I didn’t really see
that!”
that!”
“We’ve done so much
“We’ve done so much
work already”
work already”
“Let’s just pretend”
“Let’s just pretend”
“Maybe it’s not that
bad”
“Gambling has its
positive sides”
“Only a small number
have problems”
“Money is sitting
“Money is sitting
there”
there”
“This funding will
“This funding will
save lives”
save lives”
“If we don’t get it,
“If we don’t get it,
somebody else less
somebody else less
deserving will”
deserving will”
“Be realistic”
“To get things done
you need to make
some unpopular
choices”
“You have to be in
to win”
Messages favoured
my ambitions
Ethical perspective
minimised
Need an outside
reference point to
gauge my views
SIMPLE
SIMPLE
TRANSACTION
TRANSACTION
FUNCTIONS
FUNCTIONS
IN A WIDER
IN A WIDER
ARENA
ARENA
Political Chain of Engagement
Political Chain of Engagement
Public
Public
communication
communication
strategies
strategies
Lobbying
Lobbying
& PR
& PR
companies
companies
Producer
Producer
& retail
& retail
associations
associations
Relationship
Relationship
building
building
activities
activities
Politicians
Politicians
Public Good Chain of Engagement
Public Good Chain of Engagement
Corporate social
responsibility
Health &
community
programs
Social aspects &
public relations
organisations
Media
coverage
Public
consultation
Knowledge Chain of Engagement
Knowledge Chain of Engagement
Priority setting
processes
Researchers &
research
organizations
Funding &
commissioning
processes
Communication
& dissemination
Government
officials
Knowledge Chain
Knowledge Chain
Public Good Chain
Public Good Chain
Political Chain
Political Chain
Politicians
Politicians
Public
Public
Consultation
Consultation
Government
Government
Officials
Officials
B
B
e
e
n
n
e
e
f
f
i
i
t
t
i
i
n
n
g
g
f
f
r
r
o
o
m
m
D
D
e
e
p
p
r
r
i
i
v
v
e
e
d
d
&
&
A
A
d
d
d
d
i
i
c
c
t
t
e
e
d
d
E
E
x
x
p
p
l
l
o
o
i
i
t
t
i
i
n
n
g
g
V
V
u
u
l
l
n
n
e
e
r
r
a
a
b
b
l
l
e
e
G
G
r
r
o
o
u
u
p
p
s
s
M
M
o
o
n
n
e
e
y
y
D
D
e
e
r
r
i
i
v
v
e
e
d
d
F
F
r
r
o
o
m
m
H
H
a
a
r
r
m
m
2
2
Contributory
Contributory
Risk
Risk
C
C
o
o
n
n
t
t
r
r
i
i
b
b
u
u
t
t
i
i
n
n
g
g
t
t
o
o
S
S
a
a
l
l
e
e
s
s
I
I
m
m
p
p
r
r
o
o
v
v
i
i
n
n
g
g
P
P
u
u
b
b
l
l
i
i
c
c
P
P
r
r
o
o
f
f
i
i
l
l
e
e
P
P
o
o
s
s
i
i
t
t
i
i
v
v
e
e
v
v
i
i
e
e
w
w
o
o
f
f
P
P
o
o
l
l
i
i
c
c
y
y
M
M
a
a
k
k
e
e
r
r
s
s
3
3
Reputational
Reputational
Risks
Risks
J
J
u
u
d
d
g
g
e
e
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
o
o
f
f
C
C
o
o
l
l
l
l
e
e
a
a
g
g
u
u
e
e
s
s
J
J
u
u
d
d
g
g
e
e
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
o
o
f
f
F
F
u
u
n
n
d
d
e
e
r
r
s
s
J
J
u
u
d
d
g
g
e
e
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
o
o
f
f
S
S
t
t
a
a
k
k
e
e
h
h
o
o
l
l
d
d
e
e
r
r
s
s
4
4
Governance
Governance
Risks
Risks
C
C
r
r
e
e
e
e
p
p
i
i
n
n
g
g
F
F
u
u
n
n
d
d
i
i
n
n
g
g
R
R
e
e
l
l
i
i
a
a
n
n
c
c
e
e
P
P
e
e
r
r
c
c
e
e
i
i
v
v
e
e
d
d
D
D
e
e
p
p
e
e
n
n
d
d
e
e
n
n
c
c
e
e
I
I
n
n
c
c
r
r
e
e
a
a
s
s
i
i
n
n
g
g
S
S
i
i
l
l
e
e
n
n
c
c
e
e
&
&
C
C
o
o
m
m
p
p
l
l
i
i
a
a
n
n
c
c
e
e
5
5
Relationship
Relationship
Risks
Risks
C
C
o
o
n
n
f
f
l
l
i
i
c
c
t
t
b
b
e
e
t
t
w
w
e
e
e
e
n
n
C
C
o
o
l
l
l
l
e
e
a
a
g
g
u
u
e
e
s
s
C
C
o
o
n
n
f
f
l
l
i
i
c
c
t
t
b
b
e
e
t
t
w
w
e
e
e
e
n
n
S
S
e
e
c
c
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
s
s
S
S
i
i
l
l
e
e
n
n
c
c
i
i
n
n
g
g
&
&
L
L
e
e
a
a
v
v
i
i
n
n
g
g
Intensity of Relationship
Intensity of Relationship
Continuum of Moral Jeopardy
Continuum of Moral Jeopardy
OIL
LOTTERIES
ALCOHOL
TOBACCO
ARMAMENTS
SLOTS
PORN
PHARMACEUTICALS
P
P
urpose
urpose
E
E
xtent
xtent
R
R
elevant-harm
elevant-harm
I
I
dentifiers
dentifiers
L
L
ink
ink
Degree to which purposes
between funder and
recipient diverge
How do purposes match?
E.g. smoking cessation
researcher funded by
tobacco company
Degree to which the
recipient is reliant on this
source
What percentage of
funding?
E.g. Genetics researcher
unwilling to question
source when funding
increases
Degree of harm
associated with this form
of consumption
Some products are less
harmful than others
E.g. researcher accepts
money from lotteries but
not slots
Degree to which the
recipient is visibly
identified with the funder
Branding using names,
logos, advertising & other
promotional linkages
E.g. new laboratory with
sign acknowledging
brewery funding
Nature and directness of
the link between
recipient & funder
Use of mediating bodies
or contracts?
E.g. Earmarked alcohol
funding channelled
through government
departmen
Group 1:
Group 1:
A public health
A public health
researcher receiving funds
researcher receiving funds
directly from a tobacco company
directly from a tobacco company
in publicly visible way
in publicly visible way
Group 2:
Group 2:
A genetics project
A genetics project
receiving half its funds from a
receiving half its funds from a
brewery
brewery
Group 3:
Group 3:
Research equipment
Research equipment
funded partially from donations
funded partially from donations
from a gambling machine trust
from a gambling machine trust
Group 4:
Group 4:
A symposium funded by
A symposium funded by
a small grant anonymously from
a small grant anonymously from
lotteries
lotteries
Class C
Class C
Pornography, Plastic Surgery, Oil
Pornography, Plastic Surgery, Oil
Class B
Class B
Psychotropics, Lotteries, Fast Food
Psychotropics, Lotteries, Fast Food
Class A
Class A
Tobacco, Armaments, Slots, Alcohol
Tobacco, Armaments, Slots, Alcohol
Learnt much from tobacco
Easy to plug-in without realizing
wider consequences
Promoting open dialogue about
sources is key
Need ethical benchmarks &
codes of practice
Explore a collection of visual insights delving into themes of money, gambling, and decision-making. Topics include the impact of money on behavior, the complexities of gambling, the necessity of making tough choices, and the influence of outside perspectives. These thought-provoking images provoke reflection on personal values, ethical considerations, and societal dynamics.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Peter J. Adams School of Population Health
HEAPS ADDICTIVE P R O F I T NON-ADDICTIVE NOT MUCH LOW HIGH
Hard to resist Money exchange establishes expectations & obligations Reinforced by multiple exchanges
I didnt really see that! We ve done so much work already Let s just pretend See full size image
Maybe its not that bad Gambling has its positive sides Only a small number have problems
Money is sitting there This funding will save lives If we don t get it, somebody else less deserving will
Be realistic To get things done you need to make some unpopular choices You have to be in to win
Messages favoured my ambitions Ethical perspective minimised Need an outside reference point to gauge my views
FUNCTIONS IN A WIDER ARENA SIMPLE TRANSACTION
Political Chain of Engagement Tobacco Alcohol Gambling Industries POLICY MAKERS Lobbying & PR companies Public communication strategies Politicians Relationship building activities Producer & retail associations
Public Good Chain of Engagement Tobacco Alcohol Gambling Industries POLICY MAKERS Health & community programs Corporate social responsibility Public consultation Social aspects & public relations organisations Media coverage
Knowledge Chain of Engagement Tobacco Alcohol Gambling Industries POLICY MAKERS Researchers & research organizations Priority setting processes Government officials Funding & commissioning processes Communication & dissemination
Politicians Public Consultation Public Good Chain Tobacco Alcohol Gambling Industries Government Officials
2 1 Ethical Risks Contributory Risks 3 Reputational Receiving Industry Funds? Risks 4 5 Governance Risks Relationship Risks
Trying to do Good from sources that do Harm 1 Ethical Risks Exploiting Vulnerable Groups Benefiting from Deprived & Addicted Money Derived From Harm
How Industry Benefits from the Relationship 2 Contributory Risk Improving Public Profile Contributing to Sales Positive view of Policy Makers
How Others will Judge the Relationship 3 Reputational Risks Judgement of Funders Judgement of Colleagues Judgement of Stakeholders
Threats to Independence & Sovereignty 4 Governance Risks Perceived Dependence Creeping Funding Reliance Increasing Silence & Compliance
Conflict from Differences in Viewpoint 5 Relationship Risks Conflict between Sections Conflict between Colleagues Silencing & Leaving
Continuum of Moral Jeopardy Intensity of Relationship
PHARMACEUTICALS ALCOHOL OIL PORN ARMAMENTS SLOTS LOTTERIES TOBACCO
Primary Concern Moderate Risk Extremely High Risk High Risk Low Risk
Purpose Extent Relevant-harm Identifiers Link
Degree to which purposes between funder and recipient diverge How do purposes match? E.g. smoking cessation researcher funded by tobacco company
Degree to which the recipient is reliant on this source What percentage of funding? E.g. Genetics researcher unwilling to question source when funding increases
Degree of harm associated with this form of consumption Some products are less harmful than others E.g. researcher accepts money from lotteries but not slots
Degree to which the recipient is visibly identified with the funder Branding using names, logos, advertising & other promotional linkages E.g. new laboratory with sign acknowledging brewery funding
Nature and directness of the link between recipient & funder Use of mediating bodies or contracts? E.g. Earmarked alcohol funding channelled through government departmen
Purpose Extent Relevant-harm Identifiers Links Group 1: A public health researcher receiving funds directly from a tobacco company in publicly visible way Group 2: A genetics project receiving half its funds from a brewery Group 3: Research equipment funded partially from donations from a gambling machine trust Group 4: A symposium funded by a small grant anonymously from lotteries MOD RISK HIGH RISK EXTR. H. RISK LOW RISK
Class A https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSdKei7IK_x39XdabvgNK9H4ztvyrlhcP9HlwuTXrUkji4WfAvZMg Tobacco, Armaments, Slots, Alcohol Class B Psychotropics, Lotteries, Fast Food Class C Pornography, Plastic Surgery, Oil
Learnt much from tobacco Easy to plug-in without realizing wider consequences Promoting open dialogue about sources is key Need ethical benchmarks & codes of practice
