Innovative Peer Review & Project Evaluation Slides

peer review template slides replace the above n.w
1 / 6
Embed
Share

Dive into creatively named peer review template slides with a Gen Z twist, highlighting project potentials, subproblem importance, nonprofit selection rationale, and strengths/weaknesses analysis.

  • Peer Review
  • Creative Project Evaluation
  • Gen Z Language
  • Nonprofit Analysis
  • Proposal Feedback

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PEER REVIEW TEMPLATE SLIDES Replace the above with a creative name for the other team s project

  2. PUMP THEM UP! Provide a one sentence statement of why this project is going to be great using as much GenZ language as possible.

  3. SUMMARY Provide a short summary of the submission. Include a summary of: What subproblem was described and why it is important What the submission says causes this subproblem The nonprofit selected that addresses this subproblem How GenAI Is part of the problem Will be part of the solution

  4. THREE STRENGTHS Detail three strengths/good parts of the proposal Be specific! Bad: I liked the non-profit the team picked Good: The submission convincingly argued why the non- profit selected was the right one for this problem. It did so by

  5. THREE WEAKNESSES Detail three weaknesses of the proposal and suggestions on how to improve Be specific! Good Feedback is: Critical Constructive Targeted at the content and not the people

  6. THREE QUESTIONS/PROVOCATIONS For everything else: What did this proposal make you think about that you will bring into your own project? What is something weird that you think they might want to look into? .

Related


More Related Content