Indiana State Education Performance Evaluation Data 2015-2016
Performance evaluation results for certificated employees in Indiana's public schools and charter schools for the 2015-2016 academic year are detailed. The report includes data on the distribution of ratings, educator roles, and statewide results. Noteworthy findings include percentages of Highly Effective, Improvement Necessary, and Not Rated individuals in various roles within the education sector.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Staff Performance Evaluation Results Staff Performance Evaluation Results 2015 2015- -16 16 Caitlin Beatson Senior Specialist, Office of Educator Effectiveness cbeatson@doe.in.gov
Background Background
Requirements Requirements Ratings for all certificated employees, including teachers, principals, superintendents, and other school/corporation personnel Educator preparation program institutions reported for first-, second-, and third-year teachers School corporations under unexpired contracts not required to implement
Reporting Totals Reporting Totals Public school corporations and public charter schools 282 corporations 7 unexpired contracts 79 charters 13 career centers/interlocals and special education cooperatives All certificated employees 77,744 educators 16,135 administrators 61,609 non-administrators
Statewide Results Statewide Results
2014-15 2015-16 Highly Effective 46.49% 45.57% Total Distribution Total Distribution Effective 51.46% 52.52% (of total rated) 97.95% 98.09% 1.48%0.29% 7.17% Highly Effective Effective Distribution includes all certificated employees 42.30% Improvement Necessary Ineffective 98% of total rated deemed Highly Effective or Effective 48.75% Not Rated
Not Rated Not Rated 0.56% 3.41%5.48% Deceased 10.22% FMLA Other includes corporations with unexpired contracts Long Term Substitute No longer with Corp/Charter Other More than 1/3 of total not rated were not retained 38.71% 41.62% Retired
Educator Roles Educator Roles Teachers Principals Superintendents 0.31% 0.24% 6.42% 8.67% 1.55% 1.34% 0.12% 17.98% 0.62% 40.02% 48.86% 51.41% 38.33% 51.71% 32.41% Highly Effective Improvement Necessary Not Rated Effective Ineffective
2014-15 2015-16 Highly Effective 44.11% 42.76% Teachers Teachers Effective 53.69% 55.26% (of total rated) 97.80% 98.02% 0.31% 6.42% 1.55% Highly Effective Includes all non- administrators to total 61,609 Effective 40.02% Improvement Necessary Ineffective Less than 7% not rated 98% of total rated deemed Highly Effective or Effective 51.71% Not Rated
2014-15 2015-16 Highly Effective 55.62% 56.29% Principals Principals Effective 42.88% 41.97% (of total rated) 98.50% 98.26% 0.24% Highly Effective 1.34% 8.67% Includes assistants and other school-based administrators to total 13,716 Effective Improvement Necessary Ineffective Less than 9% not rated 51.41% 38.33% 98% of total rated deemed Highly Effective or Effective Not Rated
2014-15 2015-16 Highly Effective 61.73% 59.58% Superintendents Superintendents Effective 37.28% 39.52% (of total rated) 99.01% 99.10% 0.12% Highly Effective 0.62% Includes central office personnel to total 2,419 17.98% Effective Nearly 20% not rated 48.86% Improvement Necessary Ineffective 99% of total rated deemed Highly Effective or Effective 32.41% Not Rated
School Types School Types School Corporations Charter Schools 1.27%0.26%6.68% 21.07% 23.17% 42.76% 1.17% 7.02% 49.03% 47.57% Highly Effective Effective Improvement Necessary Ineffective Not Rated
School Accountability School Accountability 100% 90% Over half Highly Effective in A schools 80% Percentage of Certificated Employees 70% Less than one third Highly Effective in F schools Not Rated 60% Highly Effective 50% Effective 40% Nearly double the percentage not rated in F schools as compared with A schools Improvement Necessary 30% Ineffective 20% 10% 0% A B C D F School Accountability Grade
Years of Experience Years of Experience 100% 90% 80% Percentage of Certificated Employees 70% Highest percentage of Highly Effective in years 21-25 Not Rated 60% Highly Effective 50% Lowest percentage of Highly Effective in years 0-5 Effective 40% Improvement Necessary 30% Ineffective 20% 10% 0% 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31+ Years of Experience
Inexperienced Teachers Inexperienced Teachers Highly Effective 0.80% 11.76% 3.94% First- and second-year non- administrators 17.56% Effective More than half of not rated were not retained Improvement Necessary Ineffective 95% of total rated deemed Highly Effective or Effective 65.93% Not Rated
