Exploring the Significance of Law: Lessons on Equality and Justice
Delve into the essence of law through the poignant story of Loving v. Virginia, examining how laws shape society and influence individual freedoms. Reflect on the impact of legal systems, affirmative action, moral values, and societal goals. Engage in discussions about laws, rules, and regulations at home and in school to understand the importance of upholding justice and equality in society.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
LESSON 1: WHAT IS LAW? Street Law University of Houston Law Center Spring 2017
Introduction Say your name. Share a fun fact about yourself. Tell us about something you really care about.
How is this relevant to law? I woke up this morning at 6am. I ate breakfast, took a shower and then got ready to come teach this class. Once I am done with my day, I will cook dinner and go to sleep.
Questions What is law? Can you tell me any rules and regulation you might have at home or at school? What is a legal system? What are the goals for a legal system and law in a society? What is affirmative action? What are moral values? Any questions?
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) Facts: Mr. and Ms. Loving are an interracial couple and married in DC. They moved to Virginia, where their marriage was invalid because of the Racial Integrity Act. Some people believed that God had meant for whites and blacks to mix, he would not have placed them on different continents. Issue: Is the Racial Integrity Act constitutional? Supreme Court Holding: Unanimous decision Justice Warren, writes that the law violates the Constitution equal protection clause. We have consistently denied the constitutionality of measures which restrict the rights of citizens on account of race.
Now its up to you! Why did this Racial Integrity Law exist? Why did this couple fight to change it? Can you think of another law that should be changed, or another law that changed for the better ? What do you think law is now?
