Enhancing WWD Event Handling Functionality

wwd event handling 4700 l.w
1 / 14
Embed
Share

"Explore proposed changes to improve WWD event handling, including automatic response plans, event type identification, and auditing comments. Addressing identified issues and refining event creation processes for better efficiency."

  • WWD Events
  • Event Handling
  • Proposed Changes
  • Event Auditing
  • Efficiency

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WWD Event Handling (4700) Tucker Brown SSUG 1

  2. Current Functionality SG allows a user to create WWD event from the Map directly and that will automatically activate a response plan. SG allows a user to create an event as another datatype and then change it to a WWD event type. No response plan is automatic in this case SG allows a user to create an event from an alert No response plan is automatic in this case SG automatically creates an event and activates a response plan based on an incoming alert Suggested and pre-defined plans supported 2 SSUG

  3. Issues Identified Events that result in a crash are later found to be related to Wrong Way Driving but still maintain a crash event type This includes other event types where you also need to signify a WWD event occurred. Events that really are WWD events but don t need automatic response plans. 3 SSUG

  4. Proposed Changes (Previously discussed) Have a checkbox (similar to Fire, HAZMAT, etc) to flag the event as WWD related Would be set automatically for event with a WWD event type Manually set for all other event types Make the automatic response plan optional for Event created as WWD Events 4 SSUG

  5. QUESTIONS? 5 SSUG

  6. Modify Comments through Audit (4679) Tucker Brown SSUG 6

  7. Modifying Comments Auditing allows adding new comments but not editing existing comments Proposed change would allow existing comments to be editable Would still have a Audit line added in the Event Chronology JIRA issue says Operator comments, but would it be an issue if all comments were editable? 7 SSUG

  8. QUESTIONS? 8 SSUG

  9. Remove County Boundaries from Reporting (4677) Tucker Brown SSUG 9

  10. Current Functionality When running a report between 2 points, the user is required to select the County, Roadway, and Direction before selecting the 2 points. This prevents a user from selecting points in different counties Also note, there is no current path for traversing EM locations along a roadway. This is currently done by giving all the locations defined for the county, roadway, and directions between the sort orders of the selected endpoints. 10 SSUG

  11. Option 1: Easiest Have user configure the sort order of points along the roadway so that even across the county boundary, they are consecutive. More time consuming for configuration but could be implemented with report template changes. 11 SSUG

  12. Option 2: Medium Using a combination of sort orders and shape files, have the system figure out the order of the points on the roadway. Updated for each configuration change Less configuration, less user interaction Possibility of errors in the generation 12 SSUG

  13. Option 3: Expensive (Long Term) Change the Event Location schema to directly reference shape file data to tie it specifically to points Pros Easier to traverse a roadway Easier to configure system initially (or add new roadways) Would make this particular issue trivial Cons How to tie historical data to new locations Less flexibility in the placement of locations 3rd Party Changes (FLATIS, other local software) 13 SSUG

  14. QUESTIONS? 14 SSUG

Related


More Related Content