Enhancing Student Group Work with Online Peer Evaluation Tools

 
Getting runs on the board with
student group work
 
The affordances of Online Peer Evaluation tools
 
Tim Allen (no relation to the Tool Man)
Educational Developer at the School of Mining
UNSW
Career Highlights:
5 years at the Learning and Teaching units at
Macquarie and UNSW
ESL/EFL teacher in Sydney and Asia for 10
years
Education: MAppLing(TESOL), BLitt (English),
BBSc (Psych)
Introduction
 
Peer teaching – students learn from each other
Develop important interpersonal skills: cooperation,
communication, leadership, negotiation, conflict
resolution, etc.
Student-centred learning: taking more responsibility
Passive knowledge is activated by testing it against
other’s understandings and collaborative activities
To prepare them for skills and qualities required in
their future careers and lives
Why Use Group Projects?
 
UNSW Graduate Attributes
 
 
Students don't understand what they should do even
after it has been explained
Students complain about their groups or make
groups with their friends only
Some groups are very active and cooperative while
some are very passive and quiet
Difficult for the instructor to know what is really
happening within the group
Students complain about their group members' effort
Students complain that their group grade is unfair
they are being penalised by weaker team members
Group work: common challenges
 
Provide a handout with an overview schedule
and detailed instructions
Require students to hand in a project plan and
regular progress reports
Explain why group work is important and point
out learning objectives and graduate attributes
Try to resolve interpersonal problems quickly
Explain the grading rationale and method
 
Strategies to manage challenges
 
The problem of group grading:
Online Peer Evaluation tools
 
1
Create a rubric (assessment criteria and standards) for
students to use
2
Create an assessment and schedule its opening and closing
times
3
Towards the end of the project, students login and
anonymously
 peer-assess and (optionally) self-assess each
other; the teacher also gives each group a mark
4
From these self-assessment marks, each student gets a
peer-assessment 
weighting, 
e.g. 1.1
5
The weighting is multiplied by the group mark to produce
each student's final grade for the group project
6
Optionally students can login and review their anonymous
feedback
Online Peer Evaluation: How It
Works
 
Group projects are common
Diverse international student body
SPARK PLUS
WebPA
 
Case Study: Trialling a New Tool at
Mining UNSW
 
Problems:
o
Complicated
interface
o
No integration with
LMS: no SSO, manual
user enrolment, manual
grading
o
Time-consuming
and fiddly
SPARK PLUS
 
Advantages:
Integrated with the
UNSW LMS (Moodle):
SSO, automatic
enrolment & grade
publishing
More intuitive
interface
Open source software:
can be customised
locally
WebPA
Q&A
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the benefits of utilizing Online Peer Evaluation tools to address challenges in group projects, such as grading fairness and team dynamics. Learn effective strategies for managing group work challenges and promoting collaborative learning. Discover how Online Peer Evaluation works and its role in enhancing student engagement and accountability.

  • Group projects
  • Peer evaluation
  • Collaborative learning
  • Student engagement
  • Online tools

Uploaded on Oct 01, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Getting runs on the board with student group work The affordances of Online Peer Evaluation tools

  2. Introduction Tim Allen (no relation to the Tool Man) Educational Developer at the School of Mining UNSW Career Highlights: 5 years at the Learning and Teaching units at Macquarie and UNSW ESL/EFL teacher in Sydney and Asia for 10 years Education: MAppLing(TESOL), BLitt (English), BBSc (Psych)

  3. Why Use Group Projects? Peer teaching students learn from each other Develop important interpersonal skills: cooperation, communication, leadership, negotiation, conflict resolution, etc. Student-centred learning: taking more responsibility Passive knowledge is activated by testing it against other s understandings and collaborative activities To prepare them for skills and qualities required in their future careers and lives

  4. UNSW Graduate Attributes

  5. Group work: common challenges Students don't understand what they should do even after it has been explained Students complain about their groups or make groups with their friends only Some groups are very active and cooperative while some are very passive and quiet Difficult for the instructor to know what is really happening within the group Students complain about their group members' effort Students complain that their group grade is unfair they are being penalised by weaker team members

  6. Strategies to manage challenges Provide a handout with an overview schedule and detailed instructions Require students to hand in a project plan and regular progress reports Explain why group work is important and point out learning objectives and graduate attributes Try to resolve interpersonal problems quickly Explain the grading rationale and method

  7. The problem of group grading: Online Peer Evaluation tools

  8. Online Peer Evaluation: How It Works 1 Create a rubric (assessment criteria and standards) for students to use 2 Create an assessment and schedule its opening and closing times 3 Towards the end of the project, students login and anonymously peer-assess and (optionally) self-assess each other; the teacher also gives each group a mark 4 From these self-assessment marks, each student gets a peer-assessment weighting, e.g. 1.1 5 The weighting is multiplied by the group mark to produce each student's final grade for the group project 6 Optionally students can login and review their anonymous feedback

  9. Case Study: Trialling a New Tool at Mining UNSW Group projects are common Diverse international student body SPARK PLUS WebPA

  10. SPARK PLUS Problems: o Complicated interface o No integration with LMS: no SSO, manual user enrolment, manual grading o Time-consuming and fiddly

  11. WebPA Advantages: Integrated with the UNSW LMS (Moodle): SSO, automatic enrolment & grade publishing More intuitive interface Open source software: can be customised locally 34bb2d38839b70594218942ed2690116.png

  12. Q&A Any Questions?

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#