Enhancing Protected Area Management with IMET in West Africa

Slide Note
Embed
Share

Experience the Integrated Management Effectiveness Tool (IMET) in the West African region, specifically the Complex WAP (W-Arly-Pendjari) area, a Transboundary Biosphere Reserve comprising five national parks. Explore how IMET assessment by BIOPAMA trained coaches and park managers leads to data collection, analysis, and decision-making for better park management. Discover the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats identified through IMET analysis for effective conservation efforts.


Uploaded on Oct 08, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IMET: THE WEST AFRICAN EXPERIENCE Complex WAP (W-Arly-Pendjari) Dede Dede Amah Amah Technical Technical Assistant BIOPAMA Assistant BIOPAMA An initiative of the ACP Group of States financed by the European Union s 11th EDF

  2. WHAT IS IMET? Diagnostic tool Visual tool Monitoring and evaluation tool Tool for improving management of PAs Tool for comparison Tool for prioritization of interventions and actions Tool for resource mobilization/allocation IMET stands for Integrated management effectiveness tool and is based on six elements: context, planning, inputs, process, outputs, outcomes

  3. COMPLEX WAP (W-Arly-Pendjari) Transboundary Biosphere Reserve Five (5) National parks Parc national W Niger Parc national W Burkina Faso Parc national W Benin Parc national d Arly Parc national de la Pendjari 3 countries (Burkina Faso, Niger, Benin) Area: 10,000 km2

  4. THE IMET ASSESSMENT BIOPAMA trained IMET coaches IMET Coaches trained WAP Park managers Park managers carried out data collection with national actors, Rangers, NGOs, Communities, Traditional authorities, Municipalities, etc and were supported by the IMET coaches Site analysis and presentation of results done in each country WAP result validation and roadmap developed Budget: About $5000 in some cases Partnership: GIZ (data collection and analysis), BIOPAMA (restitution) Logistics: variable (venue, stakeholders, duration, budget, context) Co-funding Pendjari W Niger W Niger W Burkina Faso WAP validation

  5. DATA ANALYSIS: DECISION SUPPPORT SYSTEM Strenghts Status of the park (Biosphere reserve) Up to date management plan coupled with a work plan Park boundaries well demarcated Existence of monitoring tools Capacity to use IMET to analyse data Opportunities Grants (e.g. MIKES) IMET analysis available and validated Technical and financial partners (e.g. GIZ, BIOPAMA) Opportunity for cooperation with some donors Research analysis Threats Insecurity and the threat of terrorism Climate change Illegal activities in the park Uncontroled bush fire Weaknesses Studies by some partners or research institutions not available or accessible Weak accounting of climate change impact in the park management Budget insufficient, lack of capacity to do monitoring Out dated information

  6. .AND PRESENTED score bar score bar Contexte planification intrants processusr sultat effet/impact 2016 38 77 63 62 67 67 2019 69,7 79,5 Comparative Comparative analysis 35,8 41,3 54,4 55,7 analysis radar radar

  7. .AND PRESENTED Recommendations (Parc national W Niger) Recommendations (Parc national W Niger) To the Management Team Short term X Medium term Strengthen cooperation with surrounding communities Sign partnership contract with research institutions and other partners so that research conducted in the park are made available X To the Administrative Authority X To the Ministry in charge of protected areas X X To the Technical and Financial Partners X X X

  8. Lessons learnt Found IMET practical in formulating specific recommendations Easy to visualize PA management efforts and progress, identify challenges, and areas for improvement Useful for PA managers capacity development Useful for elaboration of knowledge products (e.g. State of protected areas, SoPA) Primary data that can feed into local, national, regional, and global database, IUCN green list, WDPA, BIOPAMA Observatories

  9. THANK YOU! THHH

Related


More Related Content