Enhancing Code Status Discussions in End-of-Life Care: A Quality Improvement Project

 
C
o
d
e
 
S
t
a
t
u
s
 
Q
I
 
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
 
1
 
John Rutkowski, MD
Hospice & Palliative Medicine Fellow
FSU College of Medicine at SMH
 
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
 
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
 
A
i
m
 
 
J
u
l
y
 
2
0
2
1
 
2
 
Reduce inappropriate interventions on patient’s requesting a
DNR or MODIFIED CODE STATUS.
 
P
rovide an updated code status 
order 
along with a note
reflecting the conversation that took place.
 
 
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
 
P
l
a
n
 
3
 
Once a code status order is selected, providers will be 
prompted to
fill out a 
brief
 note by checking the appropriate boxes as to what was
discussed, what decisions were made, who made the decision
(patient, HCS/HCP, PoA) etc. A note will be prompted with all code
status updates.
Code Blue note/Withdrawal of Care note; similarly, you would check boxes
and a note would be generated, located under documents for all medical staff
to see.
There would be an [Additional Info] text box for any pertinent info as
well.
 
 
C
o
d
e
 
S
t
a
t
u
s
 
D
a
t
a
 
4
 
We pulled data over a 6mo period and found:
Total discharges: 28,946
Code status entered by time of discharge: 5,608
No code status entered by time of discharge: 23,335
Less than 20% of patients have a codes status at time of discharge.
 
 
 
 
R
epresents 6 months: Feb - July 2021; sample size: 28,946 patient admissions
 
S
u
r
v
e
y
 
5
 
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
 
6
 
Literature review: 
CODE – a code status improvement framework.
1
 
Code status
preference is frequently ignored, misunderstood, or improperly documented,
which represents a real patient safety issue resulting in preventable harm.
Failures in code status discussions (CSD) can result from choice complexity,
order entry errors, delayed discussion, and lack of formalized training to
conduct these difficult conversations.
 
The 
CODE
 framework provides insights and actionable guidance to improve End
of Life (EOL) conversations of all types and to reduce code status error.
1
 
C - Choice Simplification
O - Order Entry Standardization
D - Do Not Delay; Eliminate Deferred Discussions
E - Educate the Workforce
 
I
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
 
7
 
Redesigning the EHR code status order to help with ‘order entry
standardization’ and ‘choice simplification’ as well as potentially adding a
“screen alert”
 
Changing the hospital culture around EOL discussions and CSDs as well as
reforming hospital policies on DNR discussions and mandating provider
communication skills training to assist with ‘do not defer’ and ‘educating the
workforce’.
 
These strategies provide ways to overcome existing barriers to proper CSDs
and align the use of DNR orders closer to their intended purpose of
supporting patient self-determination and avoiding non-beneficial
interventions at the end of life.
2
 More concerted efforts from all health care
professionals and decision makers are warranted to improve EOL care.
3
 
M
u
l
t
i
-
P
h
a
s
e
 
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
 
8
 
This will allow for staff to adjust to one change at a time.
 
 
Phase I
: Updated code status order/note with staff education.
 
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
 
C
o
d
e
 
S
t
a
t
u
s
 
O
r
d
e
r
 
9
 
F
U
L
L
 
C
O
D
E
 
10
 
D
N
R
 
11
 
C
a
n
a
r
y
 
Y
e
l
l
o
w
 
D
N
R
 
12
 
 
1. changes to “Code Status” order
 
2. new “Code Status Note”
 
 
proposed go-live: week of 9/19/2022
 
C
o
d
e
 
S
t
a
t
u
s
 
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
 
i
n
 
S
C
M
 
13
 
C
o
d
e
 
S
t
a
t
u
s
 
o
r
d
e
r
 
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
 
14
 
The current order has these code status and intervention choices available:
 
Modifications to EXISTING orders will continue to look like above.  NEW orders will look like below:
New, required 
Obtained From 
drop down list
Moved 
State of FL DNR Order 
from 
Code Status
 to 
Obtained From
New free-text 
Med Decision Maker Name, Ph#, Role/Rel
 box – only visible/required if 
Obtained From 
=
Medical decision maker
 
Intervention choices: Modified Code can pick all above, DNR can pick from 3 on the right only if
Obtained From = Patient or Medical decision maker, FULL CODE and DNR Obtained From = State of FL
DNR can’t pick any
.
 
Intervention choices: Modified Code can pick all above, DNR can pick from 3 on the right, FULL CODE and
State of FL DNR can’t pick any.
 
N
e
w
 
C
o
d
e
 
S
t
a
t
u
s
 
N
o
t
e
 
15
 
SCM will automatically create a new “Code Status Note” each time a “Code Status” order is entered or modified, pulling
from the order details. 
The note can’t be edited, canceled, or appended because it should always match th
e order
.  If note
update is needed, modify the order and a new note will be created
.
 
The note will display on the SCM Documents tab under the
Patient Rights heading and it will be added to the “15.
Advance Directive” filter.  It will not require cosignature.
 
Sample note:
 
The changes to the “Code Status” order will only apply to
NEW orders 
; if you modify an older order, it will still look like
it does now.  The 
“Code Status Note” 
will start getting created
for 
all orders
, whether new or older modified ones.
 
N
e
x
t
 
s
t
e
p
s
 
16
 
Phase II:
 Proposal for a screen alert to target patients who are
‘Inpatient’ status after a selected period of time. Notifying
primary 
team only.
 
Nurse education to recognize patents without a code status after
several days so it can be addressed on rounds; e
specially patients
in critical areas such as ICU.
 
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
?
 
17
 
References:
1
. CODE: A practical 
framework for advancing patient-centered code status discussions. A Petersen, JA Tulsky, M
Mendu. BMJ Quality & Safety, April 2020. DOI 
10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010791
. PMID 
32350129
.
2. Hospital do-not-resuscitate orders: why they have failed and how to fix them. JK Yuen, MC Reid, MD Fetters
Review J Gen Intern Med. 
2011 Jul;26(7):791-7. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1632-x. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
3. 
Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. DK Heyland, 
D
Barwich
, 
D Pichora
, 
P Dodek
, 
F Lamontagne, 
JJ You, 
C Tayler, 
P Porterfield, 
T Sinuff
, 
J Simon, 
for the ACCEPT
(Advance Care Planning Evaluation in Elderly Patients) Study Team and the Canadian Researchers at the End of
Life Network (CARENET) JAMA Intern Med.
 
2013;173(9):778-787. DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.180.
 
18
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This project led by Dr. John Rutkowski aims to reduce inappropriate interventions for patients with DNR or Modified Code Status by implementing an improved code status documentation system. Data analysis reveals a need for better documentation practices, and survey responses highlight various challenges and recommendations for improvement in code status discussions. The proposed plan includes prompts for detailed notes on code status updates to enhance patient care and safety.

  • Quality Improvement
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Code Status
  • Documentation System
  • Patient Safety

Uploaded on Sep 07, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Code Status QI Project John Rutkowski, MD Hospice & Palliative Medicine Fellow FSU College of Medicine at SMH 1

  2. Initial Project Aim July 2021 Reduce inappropriate interventions on patient s requesting a DNR or MODIFIED CODE STATUS. Provide an updated code status order along with a note reflecting the conversation that took place. 2

  3. Proposed Plan Once a code status order is selected, providers will be prompted to fill out a brief note by checking the appropriate boxes as to what was discussed, what decisions were made, who made the decision (patient, HCS/HCP, PoA) etc. A note will be prompted with all code status updates. Code Blue note/Withdrawal of Care note; similarly, you would check boxes and a note would be generated, located under documents for all medical staff to see. There would be an [Additional Info] text box for any pertinent info as well. 3

  4. Code Status Data We pulled data over a 6mo period and found: Total discharges: 28,946 Code status entered by time of discharge: 5,608 No code status entered by time of discharge: 23,335 Less than 20% of patients have a codes status at time of discharge. Represents 6 months: Feb - July 2021; sample size: 28,946 patient admissions Code Status Total Do Not Resuscitate 2681 (9%) FULL CODE 2576 (8%) Modified Code, Check all desired interventions 276 (0.9%) State of FL DNR (Canary Yellow) 75 (0.2%) (blank) 23,335 (80.6%) Grand Total 28,946 4

  5. Survey Question Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Q1 Prior to admission, obtaining the code status for each patient is essential. 0 2.7% 72.7% 25% Q2 The current code status system is effective. 13.6% 0 34.09 % 11.36% 45.45 % 56.82 % 47.73 % 22.73% Q3 It is too time-consuming to obtain a code status for each admission. 0 31.82 % 40.91 % 0 Q4 Code status is not essential for every admission. 0 11.36% Q5 A screen alert would be an effective reminder for code status updates. 29.55 % 0 43.18 % 40.91 % 25% Q6 Patients and/or their families are not comfortable discussing their code status. 11.36% 47.73 % 61.36 % 20.45% Q7 Clinical staff are not comfortable discussing code status with patients and/or families. 2.27% 11.36% Q8 The inability to locate a code status in the EHR results in a Full Code error. 2.27% 29.55 % Physician 6.98% 47.73 % Resident Physician 93.02% ARNP 0 Other 0 Q9 Select your position / title. 5

  6. Recommendations Literature review: CODE a code status improvement framework.1Code status preference is frequently ignored, misunderstood, or improperly documented, which represents a real patient safety issue resulting in preventable harm. Failures in code status discussions (CSD) can result from choice complexity, order entry errors, delayed discussion, and lack of formalized training to conduct these difficult conversations. The CODE framework provides insights and actionable guidance to improve End of Life (EOL) conversations of all types and to reduce code status error.1 C - Choice Simplification O - Order Entry Standardization D - Do Not Delay; Eliminate Deferred Discussions E - Educate the Workforce 6

  7. Interventions Redesigning the EHR code status order to help with order entry standardization and choice simplification as well as potentially adding a screen alert Changing the hospital culture around EOL discussions and CSDs as well as reforming hospital policies on DNR discussions and mandating provider communication skills training to assist with do not defer and educating the workforce . These strategies provide ways to overcome existing barriers to proper CSDs and align the use of DNR orders closer to their intended purpose of supporting patient self-determination and avoiding non-beneficial interventions at the end of life.2 More concerted efforts from all health care professionals and decision makers are warranted to improve EOL care.3 7

  8. Multi-Phase Approach This will allow for staff to adjust to one change at a time. Phase I: Updated code status order/note with staff education. 8

  9. Current Code Status Order 9

  10. FULL CODE 10

  11. DNR 11

  12. Canary Yellow DNR 12

  13. Code Status changes in SCM 1. changes to Code Status order 2. new Code Status Note proposed go-live: week of 9/19/2022 13

  14. Code Status order changes The current order has these code status and intervention choices available: Intervention choices: Modified Code can pick all above, DNR can pick from 3 on the right, FULL CODE and State of FL DNR can t pick any. Modifications to EXISTING orders will continue to look like above. NEW orders will look like below: New, required Obtained From drop down list Moved State of FL DNR Order from Code Status to Obtained From New free-text Med Decision Maker Name, Ph#, Role/Rel box only visible/required if Obtained From = Medical decision maker Intervention choices: Modified Code can pick all above, DNR can pick from 3 on the right only if Obtained From = Patient or Medical decision maker, FULL CODE and DNR Obtained From = State of FL DNR can t pick any. 14

  15. New Code Status Note SCM will automatically create a new Code Status Note each time a Code Status order is entered or modified, pulling from the order details. The note can t be edited, canceled, or appended because it should always match the order. If note update is needed, modify the order and a new note will be created. Sample note: The note will display on the SCM Documents tab under the Patient Rights heading and it will be added to the 15. Advance Directive filter. It will not require cosignature. The changes to the Code Status order will only apply to NEW orders ; if you modify an older order, it will still look like it does now. The Code Status Note will start getting created for all orders, whether new or older modified ones. 15

  16. Next steps Phase II: Proposal for a screen alert to target patients who are Inpatient status after a selected period of time. Notifying primary team only. Nurse education to recognize patents without a code status after several days so it can be addressed on rounds; especially patients in critical areas such as ICU. 16

  17. Questions? 17

  18. References: 1. CODE: A practical framework for advancing patient-centered code status discussions. A Petersen, JA Tulsky, M Mendu. BMJ Quality & Safety, April 2020. DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010791. PMID 32350129. 2. Hospital do-not-resuscitate orders: why they have failed and how to fix them. JK Yuen, MC Reid, MD Fetters Review J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):791-7. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1632-x. Epub 2011 Feb 1. 3. Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. DK Heyland, D Barwich, D Pichora, P Dodek, F Lamontagne, JJ You, C Tayler, P Porterfield, T Sinuff, J Simon, for the ACCEPT (Advance Care Planning Evaluation in Elderly Patients) Study Team and the Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET) JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(9):778-787. DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.180. 18

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#