Distribution and Density of Population.
Distribution and
Density of
Population
The concepts of distribution and density of population, though not
identical, are so intimately related to each other that there is a
genuine reason to discuss them together.
First of all, a distinction must be made between population
distribution and population density.
The distribution of population is more locational, while the density is
more proportional.
The former refers to the spatial pattern in which the population finds
its location such as linear, dispersed, nucleated, agglomerated, etc.
and the latter is concerned with the ratio between the size of
population and the area.
Thus, when one is dealing with distribution, the concern is more for
the pattern of spread of population and when one is dealing with
density, the concern more for man-land ratio.
Factors Affecting Population Distribution
and Density
The spread of population in the world is not ubiquitous.
There are wide regional contrasts in the degree of concentration of
population giving highly variable densities to different parts of the
world.
Many approximations have been made by scholars like Trewartha,
Clarke and others about the proportions of area and proportions of
population to highlight the fact of regional contrasts in the degree
of population concentration at macro level.
It has been estimated that about 80 percent of the world’s
population was concentrated in only about 20 percent of the
world’s total land area.
At micro level, these contrasts in population distribution and
concentration are perhaps sharper.
These regional contrasts in the population distribution and density
are governed by a variety of factors.
All the factors affecting the population distribution and density may
broadly be classified into three major categories of physical, socio-
cultural and demographic factors.
Physical Factors
Landforms
Soils
Energy Resources and Minerals
Accessibility
Socio-cultural Factors
Demographic Factor
World Population Distribution
The most conspicuous feature of the world’s population distribution was its
unevenness and highly irregular spatial distribution.
Such an unevenness has been established through various kinds of estimates
and approximations.
It has been pointed that more than 90 percent of the world’s population is
confined to the northern hemisphere, while the continents of the southern
hemisphere account for only one-tenth of the total population in the world.
Within the northern hemisphere the latitudinal distribution of population offers
sharp differences in concentration.
For instance, 0-20°N latitudes account for about 10 percent of population of the
world mainly in Asia,
20-40°N zone claims more than 50 per cent of the world’s population of the
world again mainly in Asia,
40-60°N latitudes have about 30 percent of the world’s population again mainly
in Europe
and only less than 1 percent population lives in region north of 60°N latitude.
Trewartha (1969) estimated that about half of the word’s population occupied
less than 5 percent of the total area and the remaining half was spread over 50-
60 percent area.
Another salient feature of the distributional pattern of population in the
world was that the rimlands of all the continents accounted for the major
population concentrations, while the interiors were comparatively empty.
Clarke (1965) pointed out three-fourths of the world’s population lived
within 1000 kms of sea, and two-thirds within 500 kms.
Factors of climate and accessibility may have accounted for such an
insularity of population concentration.
Similarly, inequalities have been observed in vertical distribution of
population also.
Trewartha found that mean level of vertical distribution of population
was highest in South America (644 metres) and lowest in Australia (95
metres).
Broadly speaking, about four-fifths of the world’s population lived within
500 metres from the sea level.
At the regional level too, the distribution of population is intriguing.
The population of the world reached 7.06 billion in 2012.
Of these only 17.6 per cent was confined to more developed
regions including North America, Europe, Japan, Australia, New
Zealand and CIS countries.
The less developed regions comprising Africa, Latin America, Asia,
Melanesia and Micronesia-Polynesia, thus, accounted for over
three-fourths (82.4 per cent) of the world’s total population in 2012.
Of all the continents, Asia alone contributed more than half the
world’s total population (4.26 billion) and had the distinction of
being the most crowded continent of the world.
Africa with 944 million inhabitants was the second largest
contributor to the world’s population.
It was followed by Europe (740 million), Latin America (599 million),
North America (349 million) and Oceania (37 million).
It is interesting to note that the share of less developed regions in the
world’s total population is increasing largely due to the population
explosion being experienced by the countries of these regions
associated with their second stage of demographic transition.
While in 1950, the developing regions accounted for about 70
percent of the world’s total population, in 2012, the corresponding
figure was 82.4 % of the total world’s population.
On the contrary the share of the more developed countries has
been declining as most of them have reached the final stage of
demographic transition and are experiencing either stagnation or
slow growth in their population. In 1950, these regions accounted for
30 percent of the world’s population and by 2012 it had been
further reduced to 17.6 percent.
Population distribution and density are closely related concepts that describe the spatial patterns and proportional relationships of human populations across the world. Factors such as physical landscapes, socio-cultural influences, and demographic trends contribute to the regional disparities in population concentration. This uneven distribution is evident globally, with significant population clusters in certain latitudinal zones. Exploring these dynamics can shed light on the complexities of human settlement patterns and resource utilization.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Distribution and Density of Population
The concepts of distribution and density of population, though not identical, are so intimately related to each other that there is a genuine reason to discuss them together. First of all, a distinction must be made between population distribution and population density. The distribution of population is more locational, while the density is more proportional. The former refers to the spatial pattern in which the population finds its location such as linear, dispersed, nucleated, agglomerated, etc. and the latter is concerned with the ratio between the size of population and the area. Thus, when one is dealing with distribution, the concern is more for the pattern of spread of population and when one is dealing with density, the concern more for man-land ratio.
Factors Affecting Population Distribution and Density The spread of population in the world is not ubiquitous. There are wide regional contrasts in the degree of concentration of population giving highly variable densities to different parts of the world. Many approximations have been made by scholars like Trewartha, Clarke and others about the proportions of area and proportions of population to highlight the fact of regional contrasts in the degree of population concentration at macro level. It has been estimated that about 80 percent of the world s population was concentrated in only about 20 percent of the world s total land area. At micro level, these contrasts in population distribution and concentration are perhaps sharper.
These regional contrasts in the population distribution and density are governed by a variety of factors. All the factors affecting the population distribution and density may broadly be classified into three major categories of physical, socio- cultural and demographic factors. Physical Factors Landforms Soils Energy Resources and Minerals Accessibility Socio-cultural Factors Demographic Factor
The most conspicuous feature of the worlds population distribution was its unevenness and highly irregular spatial distribution. Such an unevenness has been established through various kinds of estimates and approximations. It has been pointed that more than 90 percent of the world s population is confined to the northern hemisphere, while the continents of the southern hemisphere account for only one-tenth of the total population in the world. Within the northern hemisphere the latitudinal distribution of population offers sharp differences in concentration. For instance, 0-20 N latitudes account for about 10 percent of population of the world mainly in Asia, 20-40 N zone claims more than 50 per cent of the world s population of the world again mainly in Asia, 40-60 N latitudes have about 30 percent of the world s population again mainly in Europe and only less than 1 percent population lives in region north of 60 N latitude. Trewartha (1969) estimated that about half of the word s population occupied less than 5 percent of the total area and the remaining half was spread over 50- 60 percent area.
Another salient feature of the distributional pattern of population in the world was that the rimlands of all the continents accounted for the major population concentrations, while the interiors were comparatively empty. Clarke (1965) pointed out three-fourths of the world s population lived within 1000 kms of sea, and two-thirds within 500 kms. Factors of climate and accessibility may have accounted for such an insularity of population concentration. Similarly, inequalities have been observed in vertical distribution of population also. Trewartha found that mean level of vertical distribution of population was highest in South America (644 metres) and lowest in Australia (95 metres). Broadly speaking, about four-fifths of the world s population lived within 500 metres from the sea level.
At the regional level too, the distribution of population is intriguing. The population of the world reached 7.06 billion in 2012. Of these only 17.6 per cent was confined to more developed regions including North America, Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and CIS countries. The less developed regions comprising Africa, Latin America, Asia, Melanesia and Micronesia-Polynesia, thus, accounted for over three-fourths (82.4 per cent) of the world s total population in 2012. Of all the continents, Asia alone contributed more than half the world s total population (4.26 billion) and had the distinction of being the most crowded continent of the world. Africa with 944 million inhabitants contributor to the world s population. was the second largest It was followed by Europe (740 million), Latin America (599 million), North America (349 million) and Oceania (37 million).
It is interesting to note that the share of less developed regions in the world s total population is increasing largely due to the population explosion being experienced by the countries of these regions associated with their second stage of demographic transition. While in 1950, the developing regions accounted for about 70 percent of the world s total population, in 2012, the corresponding figure was 82.4 % of the total world s population. On the contrary the share of the more developed countries has been declining as most of them have reached the final stage of demographic transition and are experiencing either stagnation or slow growth in their population. In 1950, these regions accounted for 30 percent of the world s population and by 2012 it had been further reduced to 17.6 percent.
