Development Assessment Report Summary

This development assessment report prepared by XXX Co. provides an overview of the existing development as of 11th January 2023. It includes details on the project name, type, architects involved, site area, completion date, and scores summary covering criteria such as design, community wellbeing, environmental sustainability, biodiversity conservation, maintenance, and bonus points. The report also evaluates the design and landscape aspects, integration with architecture, and greenery provision of the development.

• Development
• Assessment
• Report
• Design
• Landscape

sergei Follow

Uploaded on Oct 10, 2024 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Presentation Transcript

1. <Development Name> Prepared by: XXX Co. Assessment Date: 01 January 2021 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 1

2. Project Name: XXX Development Owner: XXX Type: Residential/Commercial/etc. Landscape Architect: XXX Address: XXX Architect: XXX Site Area: XXX Completion Date: XXX existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 2

3. SCORES SUMMARY TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 1 DESIGN & LANDSCAPE 48 X 2 COMMUNITY WELLBEING & ENGAGEMENT 14 X 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY 23 X 4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION 23 X 5 MAINTENANCE 33 X 6 BONUS 5 X TOTAL XXX XXX Certified/Silver/ Gold/Platinum (XX%) existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 3

4. Part 1: Design & Landscape 1.1 Overall Landscape Concept 1.1a Review of site conditions and landscape concept Score Assessors Good Made occasional simple changes to achieve purposeful objectives 1 Very Good Reviewed overall landscape bi-annually, refreshing or implementing enhancements to meet purposeful objectives 2 ExcellentReviewed overall landscape at least annually, refreshing or implementing enhancements to meet purposeful objectives 3 Please include explanations, photos, documentation, statistics, etc. to support self-assessed score for each criteria For documents that are not convenient for including in presentation, please send the separate files You may send additional supporting documents separately too existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 4

5. Part 1: Design & Landscape 1.1 Overall Landscape Concept 1.1b Integration of landscape and architecture Score Assessors Corridors 2 Lobbies 2 Rooftop 2 Ancillary Structures 2 Fa ade 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 5

6. Part 1: Design & Landscape 1.2 Greenery Provision 1.2a Green Plot Ratio (GnPR) Entire Site Score Assessors 1.0 to <2.0 1 2.0 to <3.0 2 3.0 to <5.0 4 5.0 to <6.0 6 6.0 to <7.0 8 >7.0 10 1.2b Green Plot Ratio (GnPR) Green Buffer & Peripheral Planting Verge Score Assessors 10 to <15 1 15 to <20 2 20 to <25 3 25 to <30 4 >30 5 1.2c Percentage of ground-level landscaped area Score Assessors 1 to <20% 1 20 to <30% 2 30 to <40% 4 40 to <50% 6 50 to <60% 8 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 6 >60% 10

7. Part 1: Design & Landscape 1.2 Greenery Provision 1.2d Provision of skyrise greenery (rooftop or vertical) Score Assessors Fair 1 Implemented limited area of rooftop or vertical greenery Average 2 Good 3 Implemented moderate area rooftop or vertical greenery Very Good 4 Excellent Implemented extensive rooftop or vertical greenery 5 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 7

8. Part 1: Design & Landscape 1.3 Additional Buffer Planting 1.3a Green buffer and peripheral planting verge Score Assessors 1 to <5% 1 5 to <10% 2 10 to <15% 3 15 to <20% 4 >20% 5 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 8

9. Part 1: Design & Landscape TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 1.1 Overall Landscape Concept & Layout 13 X 1.2 Greenery Provision 30 X 1.3* Additional Buffer Planting 5 X TOTAL 48 X existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 9

10. Part 2: Community Wellbeing & Engagement 2.1 Wellbeing 2.1a Understanding of users Score Assessors Fair Conducted basic study or survey (e.g. once every 3 years, demographics, feedback from surveys) 1 Conducted frequent and comprehensive survey to understand users' needs (e.g. annual frequency, behaviour and flow) Good 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 10

11. Part 2: Community Wellbeing & Engagement 2.1 Wellbeing 2.1b Biophilic elements Score Assessors Fair Incorporated some biophilic elements 1 Fairly Good Incorporated biophilic elements moderately 2 Very Good Incorporated biophilic elements extensively and purposefully 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 11

12. Part 2: Community Wellbeing & Engagement 2.2 Universal Design 2.2a Universal Design Score Assessors Fair Provided basic and minimal UD features 1 Good Provided comprehensive UD features 2 Provided extensive UD features using integrated approach e.g. involved key stakeholders for feedback, used innovative features to enhance accessibility for all users Excellent 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 12

13. Part 2: Community Wellbeing & Engagement 2.3 Community Engagement 2.3a Frequency of community activities and events (related to landscape) Score Assessors Fair Occasional frequency (e.g. once a year) 1 Good Moderate frequency (e.g. every 6 months) 2 Excellent Frequent (e.g. at least once every 3 months) 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 13

14. Part 2: Community Wellbeing & Engagement 2.3 Community Engagement 2.3b Variety of activities (related to landscape) Score Assessors Fair Ad-hoc events or short programmes offered to engage community 1 Good Long term or in-depth programmes available e.g. volunteer guiding, regular sports classes 2 Variety of events and programmes engaging different user groups e.g. volunteer groups, educational trails, family events Excellent 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 14

15. PART 2: COMMUNITY WELLBEING AND ENGAGEMENT TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 5 X 2.1 Wellbeing 2.2 Universal Design 3 X 2.3* Community Engagement 6 X TOTAL 14 X existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 15

16. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.1 Management of Resources 3.1a Percentage of horticultural waste recycled Score Assessors >10% to 30% 1 >30% to 70% 2 >70% 3 3.1b On-site recycling of horticultural waste Score Assessors Fair Recycles some horticultural waste on-site 1 Good Recycles significant amount of horticultural waste on-site 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 16

17. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.1 Management of Resources 3.1c Percentage of non-potable water used for irrigation Score Assessors 10 to <50% non-potable water for irrigation 1 50% non-potable water for irrigation 2 50% non-potable water for irrigation, and requires minimal irrigation for plants to thrive 3 3.1d Source of non-potable water Score Assessors Fair Collects some non-potable water on-site 1 Good Collects significant amount of non-potable water on-site 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 17

18. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.2 Source of Materials 3.2a Score Assessors Acquired plants from nurseries under NParks Nursery Accreditation Scheme (NAS) 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 18

19. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.2 Source of Materials 3.2b Sustainable source for construction and landscaping materials Score Assessors <10% of materials of applicable usage 1 10 to 50% of materials of applicable usage 2 >50% of materials of applicable usage 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 19

20. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.3 Stormwater Management 3.3a Treatment of run-off through natural hydrological features Score Assessors <10% of total site area 1 10% to 25% of total site area 2 >25% of total site area, or if attained ABC Certified Gold 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 20

21. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.3 Stormwater Management 3.3b Design of natural hydrological features Score Assessors Fair Requires high maintenance, choice of plants can be improved 1 Good Requires moderate maintenance 2 Excellent Designed for low maintenance, good functionality and choice of plants. 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 21

22. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.3 Stormwater Management 3.3c Quality of natural features Score Assessors Fair Features are functional 1 Good Features are well-maintained and serve purposeful objectives 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 22

23. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 10 X 3.1 Management of Resources 3.2 Source of Materials 5 X 3.3* Stormwater Management 8 X TOTAL 23 X existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 23

24. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.1 Native Plants 4.1a Number of planted species that are native to Southeast Asia region Score Assessors 5% to <20% 1 20% to <40% 2 40% to <60% 3 >60% 4 4.1b Quantity of planted species that are native to Southeast Asia region Score Assessors 5% to <20% 1 20% to <40% 2 40% to <60% 3 >60% 4 4.1c Efforts to manage invasive species Score Assessors Demonstrated basic efforts to manage use of and impact of invasive species Fair 1 Demonstrated comprehensive efforts to manage use of and impact of invasive species Good 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 24

25. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.2 Biodiversity-sensitive Planting & Design 4.2a Understanding of existing habitats, ecological processes and nearby environments Score Assessors Fair Identified site conditions and features 1 Demonstrated understanding of existing site conditions, ecological networks beyond site and impact of development on it Good 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 25

26. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.2 Biodiversity-sensitive Planting & Design 4.2b Habitat creation through planting design Score Assessors Fair 1 Incorporated small themed trails and plots based on existing planting. e.g. butterfly-attracting shrubs, bee trails Fairly Good 2 Good 3 Either enhanced existing habitats or created new moderately-sized habitats. e.g. grasslands, riverine, dragonfly ponds Very Good 4 Emulated native landscapes with flora and fauna demonstrated to create habitat, linkage of different landscape areas in development and to surrounding habitats Excellent 5 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 26

27. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.2 Biodiversity-sensitive Planting & Design 4.2c Management of glass facades and lighting for wildlife Score Assessors Fair Design is able to minimise impact 1 Good Executed retrofitting and lighting management purposefully 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 27

28. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.3 Conservation of Habitats 4.3a Efforts to monitor changes in flora and fauna species composition and numbers Score Assessors Fair Conducted ad-hoc surveys or findings 1 Good Conducted consistent surveys to monitor changes 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 28

29. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.4 Conservation of Habitats 4.3b Mitigations for maintenance works to lessen impact on biodiversity Score Assessors Fair Some efforts implemented 1 Good Consistent and comprehensive efforts 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 29

30. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 10 X 4.1 Native Plants 4.2 Biodiversity-sensitive Planting & Design 9 X 4.3* Conservation of Habitats 4 X TOTAL 23 X existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 30

31. Part 5: Maintenance 5.1 Design for Landscape Maintainability 5.1a Plant species selection and placement Score Assessors Fair 1 Requires high frequency of softscape maintenance due to placement and choice of plant species Fairly Good 2 Good 3 Requires moderate frequency of softscape maintenance due to placement and choice of plant species Very Good 4 Requires minimal softscape maintenance across different weather conditions due to placement and choice of plant species Excellent 5 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 31

32. Part 5: Maintenance 5.1 Design for Landscape Maintainability 5.1b Hardscape elements Score Assessors Low Impact Requires high frequency of hardscape maintenance due to choice or design of hardscape elements 1 Moderate Impact Requires moderate frequency of hardscape maintenance due to choice or design of hardscape elements 2 High Impact Requires minimal hardscape maintenance due to choice or design of hardscape elements 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 32

33. Part 5: Maintenance 5.1 Design for Landscape Maintainability 5.1c Ease of landscape maintenance access Score Assessors Low Impact Some landscaped areas can be easily accessed for inspection and maintenance 1 Moderate Impact Moderate amount of landscaped areas can be easily accessed for inspection and maintenance 2 High Impact Most landscaped areas can be easily accessed for inspection and maintenance 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 33

34. Part 5: Maintenance 5.1 Design for Landscape Maintainability 5.1d Irrigation efficiency Score Assessors Implemented auto-irrigation for <10% of landscape 1 Implemented auto-irrigation for 10% to <50% of landscape 2 Either 50% of auto-irrigated landscape, or minimal to no irrigation is required 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 34

35. Part 5: Maintenance 5.2 Maintenance Plans and Operations 5.2a Management plans for softscape and hardscape Score Assessors Fair Provided basic documentation 1 Provided comprehensive plans and documentation that cover various aspects with clear objectives stated and implemented with feedback channel Good 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 35

36. Part 5: Maintenance 5.2 Maintenance Plans and Operations 5.2b Inspection and monitoring of hardscape and softscape Score Assessors Fair Provided basic inspection reports 1 Good Provided reports of inspections conducted in moderate frequency (e.g. annually) 2 Provided reports of inspections conducted frequently (e.g. every 6 months) and demonstrated efforts to rectify areas of concern Excellent 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 36

37. Part 5: Maintenance 5.2 Maintenance Plans and Operations 5.2c Smart operations Score Assessors Fair Implemented simple smart operations features 1 Good Implemented smart operations features extensively 2 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 37

38. Part 5: Maintenance 5.2 Maintenance Plans and Operations 5.2d Score Assessors Employs a Certified Practising Horticulturist (CPH) with currently valid certification in maintenance operations 1 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 38

39. Part 5: Maintenance 5.3 Softscape Quality 5.3a Softscape Quality Score Assessors Fair Minimal patches are well-maintained 1 Fairly Good Some areas are well-maintained, numerous areas require immediate attention (e.g. safety concerns) 2 Good Some areas require attention (e.g. waterlogging, bald patches) 3 Very Good Most of softscape is lush, very minimal patches to be improved 4 Excellent Softscape is lush, healthy and well-maintained with no apparent issues. 5 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 39

40. Part 5: Maintenance 5.4 Design for Skyrise Greenery Maintenance 5.4a Maintainability of skyrise greenery Score Assessors Fair Requires high frequency of maintenance 1 Requires moderate maintenance frequency, or implemented strategies to reduce maintenance needs Good 2 Excellent Requires minimal maintenance 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 40

41. Part 5: Maintenance 5.4 Design for Skyrise Greenery Maintenance 5.4b Safety of skyrise greenery Score Assessors Fair Considered safety minimally during maintenance, or design and selection of plants 1 Good Considered safety moderately during maintenance, or design and selection of plants 2 Excellent Can be maintained safely, considered safety for design and selection of plants 3 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 41

42. Part 5: Maintenance SELF-ASSESSED SCORE S/N CRITERIA TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE 5.1 Design for Landscape Maintainability 14 X 5.2 Maintenance Plans and Operations 8 X 5.3 Softscape Quality 5 X Design for Skyrise Greenery Maintenance 5.4* 6 X TOTAL 33 X existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 42

43. Bonus 6. Bonus Score Assessors Any special efforts within below categories that were not scored for in criteria? - Design and landscape - Community wellbeing & engagement - Environmental sustainability - Biodiversity conservation - Maintenance 1 Low impact 2 3 Moderate impact 4 High impact 5 existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 43

44. SCORES SUMMARY TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 1 DESIGN & LANDSCAPE 48 X 2 COMMUNITY WELLBEING & ENGAGEMENT 14 X 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY 23 X 4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION 23 X 5 MAINTENANCE 33 X 6 BONUS 5 X TOTAL XXX XXX Certified/Silver/ Gold/Platinum (XX%) existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 44

45. Thank you existing development updated 11 Jan 2023 45