Determining Household Obesity Status Using Scanner Data

 
Determining Household Obesity Status Using
Scanner Data
 
Elina T. Page
Sabrina K. Young
Megan Sweitzer
Abigail Okrent
Economic Research Service
 
November 2
, 2021
2021 
FCSM Research and Policy Conference
 
The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any
official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. The 
analysis, findings, and conclusions expressed in this
presentation should also not be attributed to IRI.
 
Diet is the Primary Contributor to Poor Health in the US
 
 
Source: US Burden of Disease Collaborators. 
The State of US Health, 1990-2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Among US States
. JAMA 2018.
 
Obesity in the United States
 
Current rate of obesity: 
 
40% 
of adults
  
21%
 
of youth
Obesity linked to increased risk of morbidity and mortality.
Economic burden of disease: 
$1.7 trillion
 
$480.7 billion 
in direct expenditures
 
$1.24 trillion 
in lost productivity
 
 
 
Sources: 
 
Ogden et al. (2020)
 
Waters and Graf (2018)
 
Scanner Data
 
Household Scanner Data:
 
IRI Consumer Network
Itemized food purchase data for 120,000 households
Household demographics and survey weights
IRI Medprofiler
Opt-in survey on health and medical conditions
Includes self-reported height and weight
 
 
Issue and Research Objective
 
Issue:
 
Medprofiler height and weight are self-reported and may be biased.
 
Objective:
 
Validate Medprofiler BMI distributions by comparing to
self-reported 
and
 measured BMI distributions from NHANES
and test methods of adjustment.
 
 
Methods of Adjustment
 
Remove outliers:
based on interquartile range
based on range of values reported in NHANES
Correct misreporting using self-reported and measured
BMI in NHANES and percentile ranking regressions.
Percentile rank self-reported NHANES BMI
Regress measured weight on cubic splines of the percentile ranks
Apply estimated coefficients to self-reported Medprofiler BMI
 
Source: Courtemanche et al. (2015)
 
Composition of NHANES and IRI MedProfiler Samples
 
Self-Reported (MedProfiler) and Measured (NHANES) BMI
for Adults (20+)
 
Results: A Comparison of Methods
 
Results: A Comparison of Methods
 
Predicted BMI Using Percentile Ranking Regressions:
Hispanic Adults
 
Predicted BMI Using Percentile Ranking Regressions:
Non-Hispanic White Adults
 
Predicted BMI Using Percentile Ranking Regressions:
Non-Hispanic Black Adults
 
Predicted BMI Using Percentile Ranking Regressions:
Non-Hispanic Asian Adults
 
Next Steps
 
Finalize guidance for researchers:
For adjusting BMI.
For defining household obesity.
Analyze household food purchases by household obesity
status.
 
Thank you!
 
elina.t.page@usda.gov
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Utilizing scanner data and household demographics to assess obesity status, this study investigates the impact of diet on health, particularly in the United States. The research aims to validate BMI distributions and adjust for biases in self-reported data.

  • Obesity
  • Scanner Data
  • Household
  • Health Research
  • BMI

Uploaded on Feb 20, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Determining Household Obesity Status Using Scanner Data Elina T. Page Sabrina K. Young Megan Sweitzer Abigail Okrent Economic Research Service November 2, 2021 2021 FCSM Research and Policy Conference The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. The analysis, findings, and conclusions expressed in this presentation should also not be attributed to IRI.

  2. Diet is the Primary Contributor to Poor Health in the US Diet is the Primary Contributor to Poor Health in the US Source: US Burden of Disease Collaborators. The State of US Health, 1990-2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Among US States.JAMA 2018. 2

  3. Obesity in the United States Current rate of obesity: 40% of adults Obesity linked to increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Economic burden of disease: $1.7 trillion $480.7 billion in direct expenditures $1.24 trillion in lost productivity 21% of youth Sources: Ogden et al. (2020) Waters and Graf (2018) 3

  4. Scanner Data Household Scanner Data: IRI Consumer Network Itemized food purchase data for 120,000 households Household demographics and survey weights IRI Medprofiler Opt-in survey on health and medical conditions Includes self-reported height and weight 4

  5. Issue and Research Objective Issue: Medprofiler height and weight are self-reported and may be biased. Objective: Validate Medprofiler BMI distributions by comparing to self-reported and measured BMI distributions from NHANES and test methods of adjustment. 5

  6. Methods of Adjustment Remove outliers: based on interquartile range based on range of values reported in NHANES Correct misreporting using self-reported and measured BMI in NHANES and percentile ranking regressions. Percentile rank self-reported NHANES BMI Regress measured weight on cubic splines of the percentile ranks Apply estimated coefficients to self-reported Medprofiler BMI Source: Courtemanche et al. (2015) 6

  7. Composition of NHANES and IRI MedProfiler Samples Ages 20+ NHANES 20,409 14 66 11 06 03 49 MedProfiler 320,682 13 70 11 04 02 45 Sample size Hispanic (%) Non-Hispanic White (%) Non-Hispanic Black (%) Non-Hispanic Asian (%) Other (%) Male (%) Actual measurements Mean BMI (kg/m2) Proportion underweight (%) Proportion normal weight (%) Proportion overweight (%) Proportion obese (%) Self-reported measurements Mean BMI (kg/m2) Proportion underweight (%) Proportion normal weight (%) Proportion overweight (%) Proportion obese (%) 29.23 02 27 32 39 -- -- -- -- -- 28.49 02 31 34 34 28.86 02 30 33 35 7

  8. Self-Reported (MedProfiler) and Measured (NHANES) BMI for Adults (20+) Hispanic Non-Hispanic Asian .1 .1 Density Density .05 .05 0 0 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 BMI (kg/m^2) BMI (kg/m^2) Non-Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Black .1 .1 Density Density .05 .05 0 0 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 BMI (kg/m^2) BMI (kg/m^2) MedProfiler Female Measured NHANES Female MedProfiler Male Measured NHANES Male 8

  9. Hispanic .08 .06 Density .04 .02 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 BMI (kg/m^2) MedProfiler Female MedProfiler Male Measured NHANES Female Measured NHANES Male 9

  10. Non-Hispanic White .08 .06 Density .04 .02 0 0 50 100 150 BMI (kg/m^2) MedProfiler Female MedProfiler Male Measured NHANES Female Measured NHANES Male 10

  11. Non-Hispanic Black .08 .06 Density .04 .02 0 0 50 100 150 BMI (kg/m^2) MedProfiler Female MedProfiler Male Measured NHANES Female Measured NHANES Male 11

  12. Non-Hispanic Asian .1 Density .05 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 BMI (kg/m^2) MedProfiler Female MedProfiler Male Measured NHANES Female Measured NHANES Male 12

  13. Results: A Comparison of Methods Adult (Age 20+) 100% 90% 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.39 0.39 80% 70% 60% 50% 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.32 40% 30% 20% 0.31 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.27 0.28 10% 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0% NHANES Measured NHANES Self- Reported MedProfiler (All) MedProfiler (NHANES Outliers Excluded) MedProfiler (IQR Outliers Excluded) MedProfiler (Percentile Ranking Regressions) Underweight Normal Weight Overweight Obese 13

  14. Results: A Comparison of Methods Mean BMI (kg/m2) Underweight (%) Normal weight (%) Overweight (%) Obese (%) NHANES (Measured) 29.23 02 27 32 39 NHANES (Self-Reported) 28.49 02 31 34 34 MedProfiler (Unadjusted) 28.86 02 30 33 35 MedProfiler (NHANES Outliers Excluded) MedProfiler (IQR Outliers Excluded) MedProfiler (Percentile Ranking Regressions) 28.81 02 30 33 35 28.18 02 31 34 33 29.26 01 28 32 39 14

  15. Predicted BMI Using Percentile Ranking Regressions: Hispanic Adults 15

  16. Predicted BMI Using Percentile Ranking Regressions: Non-Hispanic White Adults 16

  17. Predicted BMI Using Percentile Ranking Regressions: Non-Hispanic Black Adults 17

  18. Predicted BMI Using Percentile Ranking Regressions: Non-Hispanic Asian Adults 18

  19. Next Steps Finalize guidance for researchers: For adjusting BMI. For defining household obesity. Analyze household food purchases by household obesity status. 19

  20. Thank you! elina.t.page@usda.gov 20

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#