Combating and Preventing Organised Vehicle Crime in Belgium

C
O
M
B
A
T
I
N
G
 
A
N
D
 
P
R
E
V
E
N
T
I
N
G
O
R
G
A
N
I
S
E
D
 
V
E
H
I
C
L
E
 
C
R
I
M
E
 
B
Y
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
 
A
 
B
A
R
R
I
E
R
 
M
O
D
E
L
Belgian barrier model
The project is funded
 by 
the 
European Union’s Internal 
Security 
Fund 
 
Police
.
Positioning of Belgium in EU
General decline or stabilization of
MVT in EU
7th position in European Union
Steady decline of MVT in Belgium
Number dropped by 38% since 2018
Shift from general crime to
organised crime
No specific priority in National Safety
Plans
Falls under the General priority:
Property Crime
No specific expertise or devisions in
Belgian law enforcement agencies
Motor vehicle theft in Belgium
Main trends
Belgium is in the top 5 of reporting MVT in EU
There is a general absence of scientific research with regard to MVT in Belgium
Belgium is both a transit and export country for MVT
Hot spots: either big cities (Charleroi and Brussels) or border areas (Henegouwen - France,
Antwerp and Limburg -The Netherlands and Liège – Germany)
Hot brands: Land Rover, Range Rover, SUV’s from Lexus and Toyota RAV4
ICT- related techniques are mostly used:
Track and Tracing
Relay and Replay attacks: interception of information between the key fob and the vehicle through a Man
in the Middle attack
Reprogramming of car keys
Jamming the signal between key fob and vehicle
(Mobile) Organised Crime Groups and Modus Operandi
1.
The Hit & Run MO
Belgian organized crime groups or groups from neighboring countries
Commit the theft and leave immediately
Vehicle gets driven across border
2.
The Eastern European MO
Eastern European crime groups enter and stay for a couple of weeks
More sophisticated methods of target identification
Multiple thefts (2-4 vehicles) by Relay and Replay attacks
Transport by road in container to Eastern Europe
3.
The Central & South African MO
Criminal network resides in Belgium
Theft on demand
More sophisticated methods of target identification
Multiple thefts by Relay and Replay attacks
Transport by sea (Belgian or neighboring countries ports) to Central or South Africa
The Belgian Barrier Model
Blue: the process steps that are being shared by all criminal organizations
and MO’s
Green: the ones shared by Eastern European and African criminals in green
Red: (entry) is reportedly only being used by the Eastern European MO.
Proposed extra steps: preparation of crime and post-crime
S
t
e
p
 
1
:
 
E
n
t
r
y
Opportunities
Open borders Schengen Area
Low cost travel and limited documentation checks
Anonymous travel, public transport and car rental
Limited and old ANPR camera system
Lack of resources for LEA’s
Signals
Limited signs and little ground for checks as the crime has not yet been committed
During random traffic checks: tools in vehicle, criminal record,..
Facilitators & Partners
Telecom companies
Car rental companies
Airports, railways and flix busses
Car manufacturers 
Barriers
Training and resources for LEA
Expanding and renewing ANPR camera network + synchronizing databases in EU
Database for private sector and LEA “the lighthouse project’
 
 
Opportunities
No registration needed with family and criminal network
Campings and AirBnb’s: minimal identification and registration
Cash transactions are still permitted
Little time and resources for community police officers
Signals
Overcrowding and late night activity
License plates on vehicles (changing plates, different plates front/back, multiple foreign plates,..)
Facilitators & Partners
Family and criminal network
Community police officers
Mayor & Municipality
Private sector: AirBnb, campings, hotels
Barriers
Resources for community police officers / changes in organisational structure of LEA
Better regulation and enforcement of registration and identification of guests (AirBnb’s and campings)
Building cooperation and trust between private sector and LEA
S
t
e
p
 
2
:
 
S
t
a
y
 
 
Opportunities
Lack of patrols of LEA
Fast, easy and anonymous movement within EU
ANPR camera system: small amount, bad quality, four different ANPR systems which are not compatible
to each other, faults in system, unevenly distributed
Multiple big ports
Large amount of parking garages and public parking spaces
Signals
Limited signs and little ground for checks as the crime has not yet been committed
During random traffic checks: tools in vehicle, criminal record,..
Facilitators & Partners
LEA
Parking garages and public parking attendants
Barriers
Expansion and upgrade of ANPR camera system  +  EU synchronization
Data sharing tools between private sector and LEA (lighthouse project)
S
t
e
p
 
3
:
 
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
 
 
Opportunities pre-crime
Large amount of luxury
pre-crime
 vehicles and public/private parking spaces (target selection)
Easy access to VPN’s and encrypted apps for communication
Easy access to tracking and jamming devices
Opportunities during theft
Easy access to lock picking devices, relay and replay attack tools, reprogramming tools, jamming devices,..
Easy use of these devices and online tutorials
Standardized cryptography, lack of variation in key codes, slow implementation of new anti-theft
measures and irregular updates of unsecure systems by manufacturers
Opportunities post-crime
 Open borders in Schengen Area
 Easy access to jammers that block the LoJack Frequency Trackers of manufacturers
 Difficult procedural requirements to access data between private sector and LEA (slow detection)
Signals
 Location, time and space principle
 Previous criminal activity/ criminal record/ known locations/ ANPR alerts
S
t
e
p
 
4
:
 
C
r
i
m
e
 
 
Facilitators
 Criminal network
 Malicious car dealerships
 Malicious car repair shops or chop shops
 The dark web/ AliExpress/ Wish
Partners
ICT developers and white hat hackers
Car manufacturers
Internet shops
Civilians and media (awareness)
Car dealerships and repair shops
LEA
Insurance companies
Barriers
Comprehensive cooperation of LEA in EU and private sector
Awareness campaigns for civilians that promote anti-theft measures
Promoting anti-theft measures by all private sector partners (insurance companies, car rental companies,
car dealerships and car manufacturers) in general
Expanding cooperation between car manufacturers and ICT experts/white hat hackers
S
t
e
p
 
4
:
 
C
r
i
m
e
 
 
Opportunities
Large amount of vacant firms, storage facilities and (malicious) car dealerships and repair shops
No ID-checks for rental or squatting of abandoned sites
Signals
Cooling down process: stolen cars in public parking lots or spaces
Nightly activity at car repair shops, car dealerships and storage facilities
Facilitators & Partners
Criminal network
(malicious) car dealerships and car repair shops
Car park operators or public parking attendants
Storage facility owners
LEA
Labor and social inspection services
Barriers
Training and resources for LEA
Awareness campaigns for rental companies, legitimate car repair ships and civilians
Information sharing between car manufacturers, parking attendants and LEA
More control of labor and social inspection services with specific focus on car dealerships and repair shops
S
t
e
p
 
5
:
 
S
t
o
r
a
g
e
 
 
General opportunities
High demand and value of stolen car parts in EU
Cars and car parts are not inherently illegal – difficult identification by customs and shipping companies
No coherent policies of data collection by shipping companies
Easy infiltration of existing legal circuits of transport and trade in vehicle parts
Easy access to VPN’s and encrypted apps for communication
Opportunities for transport by road 
Open borders in Schengen Area
Easy switching of license plates
Poor working conditions in some Eastern European countries and low wages
Opportunities for transport overseas
Massive amount of container shipments everyday and limited resources for customs and expedition offices
Multiple options of ports in Belgium and neighboring countries
Opportunities within the vehicle trade 
Easy infiltration or establishment of car dealerships
Easy access to online secondhand websites with varying levels of security
Limited resources for vehicle registration agencies and lack of Car-Pass multiple VIN control
Car Pass not required in all EU countries
S
t
e
p
 
6
:
 
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
 
&
 
T
r
a
d
e
 
 
Signals
Patterns in registration at expedition offices
False documentation
Refurbished cars at vehicle inspection services
Cheap parts or vehicles on online platforms
Vehicles stacked on lorries and in containers without care
Facilitators and Partners
Expedition offices, truck drivers and scrap yards
Websites or online secondhand platforms
Customs and LEA
Vehicle inspection services and postal services
Barriers
A coherent EU policy on the minimum requirements for data collection in the private sector
A EU initiative to expand the Car-Pass system to all EU countries and a synchronized database
A EU initiative on prohibiting cash transactions within the new and secondhand car market
More EU cooperation projects (example: PARSEC)
More resources for custom agencies and car inspection services and better training for LEAs
Better regulation and minimum requirements for expedition offices
Creating more effective automated programs for document identification
S
t
e
p
 
6
:
 
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
 
&
 
T
r
a
d
e
 
 
Opportunities
Limited checks and balances in the second hand car market abroad
Cars have a lot of value to exchange/barter in the criminal world
Money laundering opportunities
Easy access to encrypted apps and cash transfers (WesternUnion)
Signals
Multiple cash exchanges/ bank transfers/ cash deposits within one family or business
Living standards in comparison to official employment
Facilitators & Partners
Secondhand car dealerships abroad
Criminal network and terrorists
Money transfer services
Financial institutions
Barriers
Better and more automated tracking of money trails
Restriction of cash transactions
Better risk factor analysis by financial institutions
More efficient tracking of cryptocurrency trades
S
t
e
p
 
7
:
 
P
r
o
f
i
t
Discussion & conclusion
Limited research and expertise in Belgium so vulnerable model
Infrastructure of LEA results in no information sharing between regional police, trends
are therefore regionally and not nationally
Model is out of balance because LEA mostly focusses on steps after the crime is
committed
Delineation of the scope to MVT ignores other crimes i.e. fraud and excludes important
partners (i.e. insurance sector)
Some important stakeholders were not willing to cooperate thus there is data missing
Both LEA and private sector advocate for cooperation but there is a noticeable distrust
To be effective, an integrated approach is necessary
MVT and modus operandi are flexible, the barrier model needs to reflect this
Thank you for your attention!
V-BAR seeks to analyse the dynamics of the criminal markets of motor vehicle theft and stolen
vehicle parts in the EU. Based on logistical analyses of these markets in 6 EU Member States, V-BAR
will develop a European barrier model of organised vehicle theft and stolen vehicle parts.
For more information visit 
www.vehiclecrimebarrier.eu
 or our 
LinkedIn page
.
The project is funded
 by 
the 
European Union’s Internal 
Security 
Fund 
 
Police
.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The project in Belgium aims to combat and prevent organised vehicle crime through the development of a barrier model funded by the European Union. Despite a steady decline in motor vehicle theft in Belgium, challenges persist with the absence of specific expertise in law enforcement agencies and hotspots for theft. Organised crime groups employ sophisticated techniques for theft and transportation across borders. Main trends indicate Belgium's position in the top 5 for reporting motor vehicle theft in the EU.

  • Vehicle Crime
  • Belgium
  • Organised Crime
  • European Union
  • Law Enforcement

Uploaded on Oct 11, 2024 | 4 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. COMBATING AND PREVENTING COMBATING AND PREVENTING ORGANISED VEHICLE CRIME BY ORGANISED VEHICLE CRIME BY DEVELOPING A BARRIER MODEL DEVELOPING A BARRIER MODEL Belgian barrier model The project is funded by the European Union s Internal Security Fund Police.

  2. Positioning of Belgium in EU General decline or stabilization of MVT in EU 7th position in European Union

  3. Motor vehicle theft in Belgium Steady decline of MVT in Belgium Number dropped by 38% since 2018 Shift from general crime to organised crime No specific priority in National Safety Plans Falls under the General priority: Property Crime No specific expertise or devisions in Belgian law enforcement agencies

  4. Main trends Belgium is in the top 5 of reporting MVT in EU There is a general absence of scientific research with regard to MVT in Belgium Belgium is both a transit and export country for MVT Hot spots: either big cities (Charleroi and Brussels) or border areas (Henegouwen - France, Antwerp and Limburg -The Netherlands and Li ge Germany) Hot brands: Land Rover, Range Rover, SUV s from Lexus and Toyota RAV4 ICT- related techniques are mostly used: Track and Tracing Relay and Replay attacks: interception of information between the key fob and the vehicle through a Man in the Middle attack Reprogramming of car keys Jamming the signal between key fob and vehicle

  5. (Mobile) Organised Crime Groups and Modus Operandi 1. The Hit & Run MO Belgian organized crime groups or groups from neighboring countries Commit the theft and leave immediately Vehicle gets driven across border The Eastern European MO Eastern European crime groups enter and stay for a couple of weeks More sophisticated methods of target identification Multiple thefts (2-4 vehicles) by Relay and Replay attacks Transport by road in container to Eastern Europe The Central & South African MO Criminal network resides in Belgium Theft on demand More sophisticated methods of target identification Multiple thefts by Relay and Replay attacks Transport by sea (Belgian or neighboring countries ports) to Central or South Africa 2. 3.

  6. The Belgian Barrier Model Blue: the process steps that are being shared by all criminal organizations and MO s Green: the ones shared by Eastern European and African criminals in green Red: (entry) is reportedly only being used by the Eastern European MO. Proposed extra steps: preparation of crime and post-crime

  7. Step 1: Entry Step 1: Entry Opportunities Open borders Schengen Area Low cost travel and limited documentation checks Anonymous travel, public transport and car rental Limited and old ANPR camera system Lack of resources for LEA s Signals Limited signs and little ground for checks as the crime has not yet been committed During random traffic checks: tools in vehicle, criminal record,.. Facilitators & Partners Telecom companies Car rental companies Airports, railways and flix busses Car manufacturers Barriers Training and resources for LEA Expanding and renewing ANPR camera network + synchronizing databases in EU Database for private sector and LEA the lighthouse project

  8. Step 2: Stay Step 2: Stay Opportunities No registration needed with family and criminal network Campings and AirBnb s: minimal identification and registration Cash transactions are still permitted Little time and resources for community police officers Signals Overcrowding and late night activity License plates on vehicles (changing plates, different plates front/back, multiple foreign plates,..) Facilitators & Partners Family and criminal network Community police officers Mayor & Municipality Private sector: AirBnb, campings, hotels Barriers Resources for community police officers / changes in organisational structure of LEA Better regulation and enforcement of registration and identification of guests (AirBnb s and campings) Building cooperation and trust between private sector and LEA

  9. Step 3: Infrastructure Step 3: Infrastructure Opportunities Lack of patrols of LEA Fast, easy and anonymous movement within EU ANPR camera system: small amount, bad quality, four different ANPR systems which are not compatible to each other, faults in system, unevenly distributed Multiple big ports Large amount of parking garages and public parking spaces Signals Limited signs and little ground for checks as the crime has not yet been committed During random traffic checks: tools in vehicle, criminal record,.. Facilitators & Partners LEA Parking garages and public parking attendants Barriers Expansion and upgrade of ANPR camera system + EU synchronization Data sharing tools between private sector and LEA (lighthouse project)

  10. Step 4: Crime Step 4: Crime Opportunities pre-crime Large amount of luxurypre-crime vehicles and public/private parking spaces (target selection) Easy access to VPN s and encrypted apps for communication Easy access to tracking and jamming devices Opportunities during theft Easy access to lock picking devices, relay and replay attack tools, reprogramming tools, jamming devices,.. Easy use of these devices and online tutorials Standardized cryptography, lack of variation in key codes, slow implementation of new anti-theft measures and irregular updates of unsecure systems by manufacturers Opportunities post-crime Open borders in Schengen Area Easy access to jammers that block the LoJack Frequency Trackers of manufacturers Difficult procedural requirements to access data between private sector and LEA (slow detection) Signals Location, time and space principle Previous criminal activity/ criminal record/ known locations/ ANPR alerts

  11. Step 4: Crime Step 4: Crime Facilitators Criminal network Malicious car dealerships Malicious car repair shops or chop shops The dark web/ AliExpress/ Wish Partners ICT developers and white hat hackers Car manufacturers Internet shops Civilians and media (awareness) Car dealerships and repair shops LEA Insurance companies Barriers Comprehensive cooperation of LEA in EU and private sector Awareness campaigns for civilians that promote anti-theft measures Promoting anti-theft measures by all private sector partners (insurance companies, car rental companies, car dealerships and car manufacturers) in general Expanding cooperation between car manufacturers and ICT experts/white hat hackers

  12. Step 5: Storage Step 5: Storage Opportunities Large amount of vacant firms, storage facilities and (malicious) car dealerships and repair shops No ID-checks for rental or squatting of abandoned sites Signals Cooling down process: stolen cars in public parking lots or spaces Nightly activity at car repair shops, car dealerships and storage facilities Facilitators & Partners Criminal network (malicious) car dealerships and car repair shops Car park operators or public parking attendants Storage facility owners LEA Labor and social inspection services Barriers Training and resources for LEA Awareness campaigns for rental companies, legitimate car repair ships and civilians Information sharing between car manufacturers, parking attendants and LEA More control of labor and social inspection services with specific focus on car dealerships and repair shops

  13. Step 6: Transport & Trade Step 6: Transport & Trade General opportunities High demand and value of stolen car parts in EU Cars and car parts are not inherently illegal difficult identification by customs and shipping companies No coherent policies of data collection by shipping companies Easy infiltration of existing legal circuits of transport and trade in vehicle parts Easy access to VPN s and encrypted apps for communication Opportunities for transport by road Open borders in Schengen Area Easy switching of license plates Poor working conditions in some Eastern European countries and low wages Opportunities for transport overseas Massive amount of container shipments everyday and limited resources for customs and expedition offices Multiple options of ports in Belgium and neighboring countries Opportunities within the vehicle trade Easy infiltration or establishment of car dealerships Easy access to online secondhand websites with varying levels of security Limited resources for vehicle registration agencies and lack of Car-Pass multiple VIN control Car Pass not required in all EU countries

  14. Step 6: Transport & Trade Step 6: Transport & Trade Signals Patterns in registration at expedition offices False documentation Refurbished cars at vehicle inspection services Cheap parts or vehicles on online platforms Vehicles stacked on lorries and in containers without care Facilitators and Partners Expedition offices, truck drivers and scrap yards Websites or online secondhand platforms Customs and LEA Vehicle inspection services and postal services Barriers A coherent EU policy on the minimum requirements for data collection in the private sector A EU initiative to expand the Car-Pass system to all EU countries and a synchronized database A EU initiative on prohibiting cash transactions within the new and secondhand car market More EU cooperation projects (example: PARSEC) More resources for custom agencies and car inspection services and better training for LEAs Better regulation and minimum requirements for expedition offices Creating more effective automated programs for document identification

  15. Step 7: Profit Step 7: Profit Opportunities Limited checks and balances in the second hand car market abroad Cars have a lot of value to exchange/barter in the criminal world Money laundering opportunities Easy access to encrypted apps and cash transfers (WesternUnion) Signals Multiple cash exchanges/ bank transfers/ cash deposits within one family or business Living standards in comparison to official employment Facilitators & Partners Secondhand car dealerships abroad Criminal network and terrorists Money transfer services Financial institutions Barriers Better and more automated tracking of money trails Restriction of cash transactions Better risk factor analysis by financial institutions More efficient tracking of cryptocurrency trades

  16. Discussion & conclusion Limited research and expertise in Belgium so vulnerable model Infrastructure of LEA results in no information sharing between regional police, trends are therefore regionally and not nationally Model is out of balance because LEA mostly focusses on steps after the crime is committed Delineation of the scope to MVT ignores other crimes i.e. fraud and excludes important partners (i.e. insurance sector) Some important stakeholders were not willing to cooperate thus there is data missing Both LEA and private sector advocate for cooperation but there is a noticeable distrust To be effective, an integrated approach is necessary MVT and modus operandi are flexible, the barrier model needs to reflect this

  17. Thank you for your attention! V-BAR seeks to analyse the dynamics of the criminal markets of motor vehicle theft and stolen vehicle parts in the EU. Based on logistical analyses of these markets in 6 EU Member States, V-BAR will develop a European barrier model of organised vehicle theft and stolen vehicle parts. For more information visit www.vehiclecrimebarrier.eu or our LinkedIn page. The project is funded by the European Union s Internal Security Fund Police.

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#