Assessment Report Summary Fall 2014
Data gathered from Fall 2012 to Spring 2014 show significant assessment points reached across terms, with goals met for student grades and evaluations. Results indicate the impact of small class sizes on achieving objectives. Questions and action points focus on balancing evaluations, assignment appropriateness, and instructional strategies requiring refinement. The action items target specific areas for improvement in teaching and assessment processes to enhance student learning outcomes.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
CMHC ASSESSMENT REPORT Fall 2014
Data Gathered data from Fall of 2012 to Spring of 2014 (2 academic years ~ 9 terms) 61 CACREP Standards (for the track) 145 assessment points Data came from assignments in 10 different courses All standards assessed at least twice Goals: 100% of students graded 83% or above 100% of students at Acceptable or above (for site supervisor evaluations)
Results Across all terms: 49 assessment points (out of 145) reached our goal in every term 71 assessment points (out of 145) reached 93% or better of students getting a B or better across all terms Small class sizes impact results significantly
Questions B:2: Applying mental health policy: do current event presentation and supervisor evaluations balance each other out? C: 1 Is program development an appropriate assignment for 507 which occurs very early on? Not observed option on site supervisor evaluations? L:2 (Diagnosis) critical item- what to do about not observed? Our assessment is not developmental in nature- how to assess students improvement on certain standards?
Action Points: Teaching A:6 More instruction needed re co-occurring disorders, emphasize in 523 instead of 543 C:8 Split up teaching of Diagnosis from Treatment H:3 (Screening for addiction, aggression, danger to self or others) critical item- must get 100% I:1 (Critically evaluate research) critical item- assess later in class? 545 Research being redesigned: make sure standards covered Move Advocacy Project to Internship I Operationalize client feedback and program evaluation assignments in Internship I
Action Points: Assessment Need to look at each standard, how we did, not just assessment points Move target from 100% to 93% except those standards deemed critical (ethics, assessing for self harm) Remove not observed from final internship supervisor evaluations Assessment in 507 and 543 needs to be more precise: use exam questions instead of exams
