Approaches to Gender Studies in Anthropology

 
Quantitative and Qualitative
Views on Gender
 
An overview of different approaches to gender in Anthropology
 
This Presentation
 
Explore examples of qualitative and quantitative anthropological research in
the field of Gender Studies
Qualitative: 
Brothers as Men: Masculinity, Homosociality, and Violence Among Fraternity Men
Quantitative: 
Gendered Space
Investigate the pros/cons for these types of research
Discuss future topics for each of these methodologies
 
Gender Studies
 
Interdisciplinary field
Includes people from throughout the social sciences and humanities
Topics
Constructions of gender
Gender performance
Gender ideology
Gender status/hegemonies
Gender Studies and Anthropology
Anthro has a long history of being on the forefront of research into gender
 
Brothers as Men 
- Introduction
 
My own independent research
Served as the research for my Honors Thesis, my University Scholar Project, and my IDEA
Grant Project
Conducted Fall 2019
Research was conducted in the Fall
Analysis and write-up were done the next semester
Research questions:
How do fraternity men construct, perform, and understand gender and masculinity?
How does this affect their interactions with other men and other people in general?
 
Brothers as Men 
- Methodology
 
Interviews with 55 fraternity men
Self-selected sample
Recruited through flyers, word of mouth, etc.
Compensated with gift cards
Semi-structured interviews
Interviews loosely following an interview schedule
There were also other elements such as using Likert Scales and Cultural Domain Analysis
Qualitative analysis
Required transcription of all interviews
Transcripts are then gone through with a fine toothed comb to look for
patterns/commonalities
 
Brothers as Men 
- Conclusions
 
Findings
Men seemed to emphasize hybrid masculinity
Men also acknowledged that gender was constructed and stressed that gender expression was
an individual choice
Men stressed that homosocial spheres (fraternities) were a necessary refuge for them
Conclusions
Contextualize these findings into gender/feminist theory
Gain insights/refine into those theories through highly detailed data
However this is constrained by the small scale of the research
 
Gendered Space
 - Introduction
 
Feminist cross-cultural research
Conducted by Daphne Spain
Published in 1992
How does the partitioning of different spaces by gender affect women’s
status/power in various areas?
Types of spatial separation
Partitioning in dwellings
Men’s huts/ceremonial houses/clubhouses
Separation while working
Types of women’s status
Power in kin networks
Preference for women in inheritance
Control over labor and property
 
Gendered Space
 - Methodology
 
Sampling
Standard Cross-Cultural Sample
186 cultures
Selected to be geographically representative, but also independent
Only uses half of the sample
Coding
Determine women’s status and spatial separation variables in each culture
Uses variables that were already coded by other researchers
Quantitative Analysis
Run statistical tests on these coded and quantified values
Uses gamma
 
Gendered Space
 - Conclusions
 
Findings
Supported:
Partitioning of space in dwellings and spatially separated labor divided by gender are
both negatively associated with women’s power in kin networks
Partially supported:
Men’s huts are negatively associated with power in kinship, women’s preference in
inheritance, and control of labor and property
Partitioning of space in dwellings is negatively associated with women’s preference in
inheritance
Conclusions
Space that is divided by gender contributes to the subordination of women cross-culturally
Larger scale conclusions that are generalizable
However, little detail is gained
 
Strengths and Weaknesses
 
Question:
Qualitative: General, thematic, less measurable
Quantitative: Specific, quantifiable, measurable
Methodology
Qualitative: Time consuming, resource intensive, sampling issues
Quantitative: More predictable, better sampling, relying on other researcher’s data
Findings
Qualitative: Detailed, multi-faceted, amorphous
Quantitative: Specific, generalizable, lacking detail
 
Conclusions
 
Two methods, one discipline
Many different ways of investigating the same questions
Emblematic of the diverse field that is Anthropology
Why not both?
Each methodology has strengths and weakness, using both could strengthen research
Future Research
Qualitative: Understand more about homosociality and constructions of masculinity among
men
Quantitative: Investigate the effect of the intensity of masculinity and male institutions on
women’s status cross-culturally
 
QUESTIONS?
 
THANK YOU!
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This presentation provides an overview of qualitative and quantitative research methodologies in Anthropology focusing on Gender Studies. It explores topics like masculinity, homosociality, and gendered spaces, reflecting on the concepts of gender construction and performance. The research on fraternity men's perceptions of masculinity sheds light on hybrid masculinity, individual gender expression, and the role of homosocial spheres in shaping identity. The findings contribute to gender/feminist theories, emphasizing the need for detailed data analysis despite the limitations of small-scale research.

  • Gender Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Masculinity
  • Qualitative Research
  • Quantitative Research

Uploaded on Oct 05, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quantitative and Qualitative Views on Gender An overview of different approaches to gender in Anthropology

  2. This Presentation Explore examples of qualitative and quantitative anthropological research in the field of Gender Studies Qualitative: Brothers as Men: Masculinity, Homosociality, and Violence Among Fraternity Men Quantitative: Gendered Space Investigate the pros/cons for these types of research Discuss future topics for each of these methodologies

  3. Gender Studies Interdisciplinary field Includes people from throughout the social sciences and humanities Topics Constructions of gender Gender performance Gender ideology Gender status/hegemonies Gender Studies and Anthropology Anthro has a long history of being on the forefront of research into gender

  4. Brothers as Men - Introduction My own independent research Served as the research for my Honors Thesis, my University Scholar Project, and my IDEA Grant Project Conducted Fall 2019 Research was conducted in the Fall Analysis and write-up were done the next semester Research questions: How do fraternity men construct, perform, and understand gender and masculinity? How does this affect their interactions with other men and other people in general?

  5. Brothers as Men - Methodology Interviews with 55 fraternity men Self-selected sample Recruited through flyers, word of mouth, etc. Compensated with gift cards Semi-structured interviews Interviews loosely following an interview schedule There were also other elements such as using Likert Scales and Cultural Domain Analysis Qualitative analysis Required transcription of all interviews Transcripts are then gone through with a fine toothed comb to look for patterns/commonalities

  6. Brothers as Men - Conclusions Findings Men seemed to emphasize hybrid masculinity Men also acknowledged that gender was constructed and stressed that gender expression was an individual choice Men stressed that homosocial spheres (fraternities) were a necessary refuge for them Conclusions Contextualize these findings into gender/feminist theory Gain insights/refine into those theories through highly detailed data However this is constrained by the small scale of the research

  7. Gendered Space - Introduction Feminist cross-cultural research Conducted by Daphne Spain Published in 1992 How does the partitioning of different spaces by gender affect women s status/power in various areas? Types of spatial separation Partitioning in dwellings Men s huts/ceremonial houses/clubhouses Separation while working Types of women s status Power in kin networks Preference for women in inheritance Control over labor and property

  8. Gendered Space - Methodology Sampling Standard Cross-Cultural Sample 186 cultures Selected to be geographically representative, but also independent Only uses half of the sample Coding Determine women s status and spatial separation variables in each culture Uses variables that were already coded by other researchers Quantitative Analysis Run statistical tests on these coded and quantified values Uses gamma

  9. Gendered Space - Conclusions Findings Supported: Partitioning of space in dwellings and spatially separated labor divided by gender are both negatively associated with women s power in kin networks Partially supported: Men s huts are negatively associated with power in kinship, women s preference in inheritance, and control of labor and property Partitioning of space in dwellings is negatively associated with women s preference in inheritance Conclusions Space that is divided by gender contributes to the subordination of women cross-culturally Larger scale conclusions that are generalizable However, little detail is gained

  10. Strengths and Weaknesses Question: Qualitative: General, thematic, less measurable Quantitative: Specific, quantifiable, measurable Methodology Qualitative: Time consuming, resource intensive, sampling issues Quantitative: More predictable, better sampling, relying on other researcher s data Findings Qualitative: Detailed, multi-faceted, amorphous Quantitative: Specific, generalizable, lacking detail

  11. Conclusions Two methods, one discipline Many different ways of investigating the same questions Emblematic of the diverse field that is Anthropology Why not both? Each methodology has strengths and weakness, using both could strengthen research Future Research Qualitative: Understand more about homosociality and constructions of masculinity among men Quantitative: Investigate the effect of the intensity of masculinity and male institutions on women s status cross-culturally

  12. QUESTIONS?

  13. THANK YOU!

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#