Applying European Criminal Law: Mutual Recognition and Transfer of Judgements

Explore the process of better applying European criminal law through staff training and mutual recognition, with a focus on the transfer of judgements and enforcement of foreign judgements. Understand the aspects of continued enforcement, anticipating transfer for EU-nationals, implications for non-nationals in sentencing, and uncertainties surrounding the decision-making process.

• European Criminal Law
• Mutual Recognition
• Transfer of Judgements
• Enforcement
• Foreign Judgements

dona_273 Follow

Uploaded on Oct 01, 2024 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Presentation Transcript

1. Better applying European Criminal Law ERA Court staff training Mutual recognition I FD 2008/909 1

2. Transfer of judgements FD 2008/909 replaces Council of Europe Convention 1983 Goal: facilitating social rehabilitation of the sentenced person (art.3) No consent necessary, unless (art.6) Recognition, unless application of grounds for refusal (art.8), NB: no conversion anymore! Introduction of grounds for refusal Legislation MS execution governs enforcement, including early release, amnesty and pardon (art. 17) (C-554/14, cpa Ognyanov) 2

3. Aspects of Enforcement of Foreign Judgements Continued enforcement Adapted sentence (art. 8 FD): incompatibility with maximum penalty (para. 2) modality is incompatible (para. 2) threshold: the adapted sentence shall not aggravate the sentence passed in terms of its nature or duration (para. 3) Nominal sentence early release penitentiary regime 3

4. Anticipating Transfer of Judgements EU-nationals standing trial in another MS Chance to be transferred is high Wide variety of detention facilities Wide variety of rules on early release Consequences differ for MS and for sentenced persons depending on the combination of cooperating MS => longer penalties/shorter penalties 4

5. Again: anticipation required Even more: non-nationals more often receive unconditional sentences than nationals In sentencing hearings: the possibility of transferring the supervision must be discussed 5

6. Uncertainties Will the sentencing MS offer the decision for transfer? If so, when will it do so? Which rules on enforcement and early release apply? 6