Analyzing Two Passages for Areas of Agreement and Disagreement

Close reading
Comparison Question
 
The Final Question on two passages - what will this question
look like?
Consider the attitude displayed by each writer.
Identify 
key areas of agreement and disagreement 
in
their points of view.
You should support your answer by referring to important
ideas in the passages.
You may present your answer to this question in continuous
prose or in a series of developed bullet points.
Or
 key areas of agreement
Or 
key areas of disagreement
Read the question properly
Agreement?
Disagreement?
Agreement and disagreement?
Agreement or disagreement?
5 marks
How many areas?
Between 4 and 5
You will get marks for correctly identifying the
key areas, and marks for supporting your
answers by referring to the passage
Bullet point the key areas
How to get 5 marks
5 marks
identification of essential areas (4 or 5), with an intelligent use of supporting evidence
(quotations and explanations for each one)
4 marks
identification of essential areas, with sound use of supporting evidence
3 marks
identification of essential areas, with some supporting evidence
2 marks
identification of only one essential area with reasonable supporting evidence
1 mark
identification of only one essential area with minimal or no supporting evidence
0 marks
failure to identify any essential area and/or complete misunderstanding of the task
Rule of thumb: one key area of agreement and one key area of disagreement (if the question asks you
to look at both – otherwise two key areas of one or the other) + reference to the passages = 3 marks
Example bullet point
One key agreement is…
For example, passage one stated that … “…” and
passage two suggested that… “…” From these it is
clear…
Another key agreement is…
However the writers disagree on … For the writer of
passage one states that …. And this is clear when
they say “…” yet the writer of passage two disagrees
and suggests that … “…”
You must…
Know passage 1 really well already
Read passage 2 very carefully
Identify areas on which the two writers agree
and disagree
Refer in detail to both passages to give
evidence supporting these areas of agreement
and diasgreement
You can, or might…
Make notes as you read passage 2
Underline parts of passage 2
Highlight sections of passage 2
Answer in continuous prose or a series of
developed bullet points
5 marks
Look at both passages. The writers disagree
about whether or not 16 and 17-year-olds
should be allowed to vote. Identify 
three key
areas
 on which they 
disagree
. You should
support the points by referring to important
ideas in both passages. You may answer this
question in continuous prose or in a series of
developed bullet points.
Disagreement
Note down 3 areas of disagreement
1.
Intellectual ability
2.
3.
Check your partners list. Can you add any
more
Supporting evidence
Once you have identified the main areas of
agreement and disagreement you are ready to
support these points with detailed reference
to the text
The best way is to set out your point and then
quote your supporting evidence below.
Example
Both writers disagree about the intellectual ability of 16 year olds.
Passage 1 states that teenagers are capable of intellectual
maturity, this is illustrated by “Malala had been the victim of a
terrorist attack in Pakistan as a result of her blog advocating
education for girls, had recovered and continued to campaign
tirelessly for equal educational opportunities for all children”
Passage 2 mentions that young people may have political
knowledge but not the intellectual development of an adult, for
example the writer refers to her daughter: “She’s a child; she
doesn’t have the intellectual and emotional development of an
adult so she doesn’t get to have the rights of adults.”
Therefore the passages disagree over whether  teenagers are
mature enough to be able to decide who to vote for.
Your answer
Look back at the areas of disagreement that
you identified
Select at least 3 points
Create a developed bullet point for each idea.
These answers will need to be handed in at the
end of the lesson.
What is Word Choice?
When we talk about 
word choice
 as a technique,
we mean that certain words have been
deliberately chosen to obtain particular effects or
to suggest particular meanings.
Denotations
 - actual meaning of the word
Connotations
 - the ideas that a word suggests to
us.
What the examiner is looking for
1. Quote the word.
2. Say what the connotations of that word are.
3. Explain how the connotations of the word help achieve a
particular effect.
NOTE
: All WC questions ask you to comment on how a word does a
specific thing.
E.g. Comment on how the WC suggests/gives the
impression/creates 
X
. 
You must focus your answer around X.
 Don’t
just say what the word means on its own.
Examples
Denotation
Connotation
Gobbled
 - desperate
hunger, selfish greed, poor
table manners.
Gobbled
 - to consume food
by putting it in your mouth.
Nibbled
 - to consume
food by putting it in your
mouth.
Nibbled
 - to eat
delicately or nervously.
Example
“One Less Pig Perfect Justice.” Shocking enough by itself as a
slogan to all right thinking people, but half an hour after the
tragic shooting of two female police officers? This is offensive
enough to earn the wearer, Barry Thew, four months in jail.
Some would have liked it to be longer. But this distasteful
incident has sparked the debate over the rights we have in
Britain when it comes to expressing our opinion.
Q. Show how the writer’s word choice indicates that she may agree
with the sentence handed down to the criminal.
Answer
“One Less Pig Perfect Justice.” Shocking enough by itself as a slogan to all
right thinking people, but half an hour after the tragic shooting of two female
police officers? This is offensive enough to earn the wearer, Barry Thew, four
months in jail. Some would have liked it to be longer. But this distasteful
incident has sparked the debate over the rights we have in Britain when it
comes to expressing our opinion.
“tragic” shows how devastating the situation was and therefore
how extreme Thew’s insult was.
“earn” suggests the sentence was fully deserved, he deserved
or intentionally asked for what he got.
“distasteful” - shows the writer disapproves of what Thew did
and suggests he had a lack of sympathy.
Linking Questions
Understanding
What the examiner is looking for
You have to show how one sentence provides a link in the
passage.
The link will join one idea to the next.
The link sentence will often stand at the beginning of a
paragraph.
Usually the first part of the sentence refers back to the previous
topic and another part of the sentence will introduce the new
topic.
Usually worth 2 marks - 1 for each identification of the part of
the sentence and comment on the topic it links to.
Method - 4 parts
1 - Quote the part of the link sentence which
links back to the earlier topic.
2 - State what the topic is that it links back to.
3 - Quote the part that links forward to the next
topic.
4 - State what that next topic is.
If the sentence begins with a word like ‘but’ or ‘however’
which points to a change in topic, you should highlight this
too.
Example
“Around the world William Shakespeare is one of the best loved
of all playwrights. Most people can name at least one of his
plays, and lines from his work are ingrained into our psyche and
language. 
However, despite our familiarity with his work, we
know relatively little of the man himself.
 We do not know when
or why he became an actor, we know nothing of his life in
London, and almost nothing of his personal concerns.”
Q. Show how the third sentence acts as a link in the
paragraph. (2 marks)
Answer
The phrase “our familiarity with his work” looks back at
the topic of how widely known Shakespeare’s work is.
(1
mark)
 The conjunction “however” which begins the
sentence suggests a contrasting idea to follow. The
second part of the sentence, “we know relatively little of
the man himself”, introduces the new topic, namely the
things that are not known about Shakespeare      
(1
mark)
, and a list of these follows this “link” sentence.
Sentence Structure
Analysis
Types of sentence
Statements - ‘John is sitting down.’ - stating fact.
Questions - ‘Is John sitting down?’ - making the reader
question something or if rhetorical, making it clear that no
answer is required.
Exclamations - ‘John is sitting down!’ - used to convey a tone
of amazement, shock or strong emotion.
Command - ‘Sit down, John.’ -  used to persuade
Minor/short sentences - used to create impact, suspense or
urgency.
Lists - used to emphasise the sheer amount of things.
Other things to look 
for
Inversion
 - The change of word order. “Flames leapt up and up.” =
“Up and up leapt the flames.” Used to alter the emphasis in a
sentence
Repetition
 - “We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the
landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the street, we
shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender.” - highlights
determination to never give up their efforts.
Punctuation
A 
colon
 (:) usually introduces a quotation, a list or an
explanation or expansion of the previous statement.
A 
semi-colon
 (;) usually comes between two statements which
are closely connected, or which balance or contrast one
another. Often used in lists, instead of commas.
A 
single dash 
(-) can be used to add an extra piece of
information. It can also indicate the breaking off of a sentence
or a pause in the sentence.
Two dashes
 (-words here-) or ‘parenthesis’ is used to add an
extra piece of information which may not be considered too
important.
1. 
I
dentify
 the feature of sentence structure.
2. Comment on the 
effect
 it has. Why has it
been used?
Depending on how many marks the question is
worth, you must provide one feature/effect for
each mark.
What the examiner is looking for
Example
Q.  Discuss the effectiveness of the sentence structure
in this extract.
Fog everywhere. Fog up the river, where it flows among green
airs and meadows; fog down the river, where it rolls defiled
among the tiers of shipping, and the waterside pollutions of a
great (and dirty) city. Fog on the Essex marshes, fog on the
Kentish heights. Fog creeping into the cabooses of collier-
brigs; fog lying out on the yards, and hovering in the rigging of
great ships; fog drooping on the gunwales of barges and small
boats.
Imagery Questions
Analysis
Similes
Metaphors
To acquire all of the marks in an imagery question
you must ask yourself:
What is being compared to what?
In what respects are the two similar?
How does the comparison help you to visualise the
subject better?
What 
the examiner is looking 
for
Example
“The lake was a silver mirror flawlessly
 reflecting the sky.”
Explain how effective you find this metaphor. (2 marks)
Alliteration
 
- a series of words in which the same letter is
repeated.
Onomatopoeia
 
- a word which imitates the sound it’s describing.
Hyperbole
 
- deliberate over-exaggeration to emphasise the
point.
Other things to 
look for...
Q.  Comment on the effectiveness of...
Litotes
 - deliberate understatement used to take emphasis off
something
Euphemism
 - a milder way of saying something unpleasant (e.g.
He’s passed away)
Oxymoron
 - two opposites placed beside each other to
emphasise the difference (e.g dark light, alone together, painfully
beautiful...)
Juxtaposition
 - placing side by side
Other
 
things to look for...
Tone
Analysis
Serious or Humorous?
1 - Identify the tone.
2 - Quote the words or phrase which helped you
work out the tone.
3 - How did this help you work out the tone? Did they
use any techniques to do this? (metaphor, simile,
hyperbole, repetition, word choice etc...)
What the examiner is looking for
Flippant
 - when the author is shows a careless/disrespectful
attitude towards something which is normally taken seriously
(e.g. some brass and stuff, up at the holy end).
Conversational
 - when the writer is chatty and friendly, as if
confiding in a friend.
Ironic
 - when the author is saying the opposite of what they
mean for either humorous effect or to express their feeling
forcefully.
Serious
 - used for serious purposes - usually uses formal,
pompous or ponderous words.
Different kinds of tone
Tongue-in-cheek
- when the writer sounds serious but is actually
poking fun at the subject.
Satirical
 - when a writer is funny but in a more savage way - they
hold up a subject to ridicule in order to attack it.
Emotive 
- when the writer aims to stir up emotions in the reader
by shocking, angering or disturbing them. This is done by using
words or expressions expressing extreme emotions.
Remember
: A question on tone is asking you what the writer’s
choice of words reveals about his 
feelings
 or his 
attitude
 to his
subject.
Different kinds of tone
Example
Nowhere else on the planet do footballers perform in front
of vast crowds so full of bile, hatred and bigotry. I have yet
to find another place on the planet where a sporting
occasion includes a ritual of singing of some ditty
celebrating a distant battle which took place 307 years ago.
Explain how the writer feels towards the what happened at the
Ranger/Celtic match. How does his tone help convey this? (4
marks)
Answer
The writer uses an 
emotive tone
 here 
(1 mark)
. He clearly
disapproves of the hostility at the football match and struggles to
understand why they are behaving that way 
(1 mark)
. He uses
repetition
 of ‘on the planet’ to hint that they are the only people
who act like that and should be able to control themselves 
(1
mark).
 This is also a 
hyperbole
 as the writer hasn’t actually
searched the whole planet but is 
singling them out
 
(1 mark)
. The
writer also uses emotive language to convey strong emotions like
‘bile’, ‘hatred’ and ‘bigotry’. His 
choice of the  word ‘ditty
’ also
implies a sense of 
contempt
. 
(1 mark)
RUAE skills
Bullet point how you would answer the
following questions
1.
Own words
2.
Link
3.
Imagery
4.
Sentence structure
5.
Context
6.
Evaluation
7.
Comparison
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore how to tackle the final question that involves comparing two passages, focusing on identifying key areas of agreement and disagreement in the writers' viewpoints. Learn about the marking criteria, examples of bullet points, and tips to earn a high score by referencing important ideas from the passages.

  • Comparison
  • Passage Analysis
  • Key Areas
  • Agreement
  • Disagreement

Uploaded on Sep 17, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Close reading Comparison Question

  2. The Final Question on two passages - what will this question look like? Consider the attitude displayed by each writer. Identify key areas of agreement and disagreement in their points of view. You should support your answer by referring to important ideas in the passages. You may present your answer to this question in continuous prose or in a series of developed bullet points. Or key areas of agreement Or key areas of disagreement

  3. Read the question properly Agreement? Disagreement? Agreement and disagreement? Agreement or disagreement? 5 marks

  4. How many areas? Between 4 and 5 You will get marks for correctly identifying the key areas, and marks for supporting your answers by referring to the passage Bullet point the key areas

  5. How to get 5 marks 5 marks identification of essential areas (4 or 5), with an intelligent use of supporting evidence (quotations and explanations for each one) 4 marks identification of essential areas, with sound use of supporting evidence 3 marks identification of essential areas, with some supporting evidence 2 marks identification of only one essential area with reasonable supporting evidence 1 mark identification of only one essential area with minimal or no supporting evidence 0 marks failure to identify any essential area and/or complete misunderstanding of the task Rule of thumb: one key area of agreement and one key area of disagreement (if the question asks you to look at both otherwise two key areas of one or the other) + reference to the passages = 3 marks

  6. Example bullet point One key agreement is For example, passage one stated that and passage two suggested that From these it is clear Another key agreement is However the writers disagree on For the writer of passage one states that . And this is clear when they say yet the writer of passage two disagrees and suggests that

  7. You must Know passage 1 really well already Read passage 2 very carefully Identify areas on which the two writers agree and disagree Refer in detail to both passages to give evidence supporting these areas of agreement and diasgreement

  8. You can, or might Make notes as you read passage 2 Underline parts of passage 2 Highlight sections of passage 2 Answer in continuous prose or a series of developed bullet points

  9. 5 marks Look at both passages. The writers disagree about whether or not 16 and 17-year-olds should be allowed to vote. Identify three key areas on which they disagree. You should support the points by referring to important ideas in both passages. You may answer this question in continuous prose or in a series of developed bullet points.

  10. Disagreement Note down 3 areas of disagreement 1. Intellectual ability 2. 3. Check your partners list. Can you add any more

  11. Supporting evidence Once you have identified the main areas of agreement and disagreement you are ready to support these points with detailed reference to the text The best way is to set out your point and then quote your supporting evidence below.

  12. Example Both writers disagree about the intellectual ability of 16 year olds. Passage 1 states that teenagers are capable of intellectual maturity, this is illustrated by Malala had been the victim of a terrorist attack in Pakistan as a result of her blog advocating education for girls, had recovered and continued to campaign tirelessly for equal educational opportunities for all children Passage 2 mentions that young people may have political knowledge but not the intellectual development of an adult, for example the writer refers to her daughter: She s a child; she doesn t have the intellectual and emotional development of an adult so she doesn t get to have the rights of adults. Therefore the passages disagree over whether mature enough to be able to decide who to vote for. teenagers are

  13. Your answer Look back at the areas of disagreement that you identified Select at least 3 points Create a developed bullet point for each idea. These answers will need to be handed in at the end of the lesson.

  14. What is Word Choice? When we talk about word choice as a technique, we mean that certain words have been deliberately chosen to obtain particular effects or to suggest particular meanings. Denotations - actual meaning of the word Connotations - the ideas that a word suggests to us.

  15. What the examiner is looking for 1. Quote the word. 2. Say what the connotations of that word are. 3. Explain how the connotations of the word help achieve a particular effect. NOTE: All WC questions ask you to comment on how a word does a specific thing. E.g. Comment on how the WC suggests/gives the impression/creates X. You must focus your answer around X.Don t just say what the word means on its own.

  16. Examples Denotation Connotation Gobbled - desperate hunger, selfish greed, poor table manners. Gobbled - to consume food by putting it in your mouth. Nibbled - to consume food by putting it in your mouth. Nibbled - to eat delicately or nervously.

  17. Example One Less Pig Perfect Justice. Shocking enough by itself as a slogan to all right thinking people, but half an hour after the tragic shooting of two female police officers? This is offensive enough to earn the wearer, Barry Thew, four months in jail. Some would have liked it to be longer. But this distasteful incident has sparked the debate over the rights we have in Britain when it comes to expressing our opinion. Q. Show how the writer s word choice indicates that she may agree with the sentence handed down to the criminal.

  18. Answer One Less Pig Perfect Justice. Shocking enough by itself as a slogan to all right thinking people, but half an hour after the tragic shooting of two female police officers? This is offensive enough to earn the wearer, Barry Thew, four months in jail. Some would have liked it to be longer. But this distasteful incident has sparked the debate over the rights we have in Britain when it comes to expressing our opinion. tragic shows how devastating the situation was and therefore how extreme Thew s insult was. earn suggests the sentence was fully deserved, he deserved or intentionally asked for what he got. distasteful - shows the writer disapproves of what Thew did and suggests he had a lack of sympathy.

  19. Linking Questions Understanding

  20. What the examiner is looking for You have to show how one sentence provides a link in the passage. The link will join one idea to the next. The link sentence will often stand at the beginning of a paragraph. Usually the first part of the sentence refers back to the previous topic and another part of the sentence will introduce the new topic. Usually worth 2 marks - 1 for each identification of the part of the sentence and comment on the topic it links to.

  21. Method - 4 parts 1 - Quote the part of the link sentence which links back to the earlier topic. 2 - State what the topic is that it links back to. 3 - Quote the part that links forward to the next topic. 4 - State what that next topic is. If the sentence begins with a word like but or however which points to a change in topic, you should highlight this too.

  22. Example Around the world William Shakespeare is one of the best loved of all playwrights. Most people can name at least one of his plays, and lines from his work are ingrained into our psyche and language. However, despite our familiarity with his work, we know relatively little of the man himself. We do not know when or why he became an actor, we know nothing of his life in London, and almost nothing of his personal concerns. Q. Show how the third sentence acts as a link in the paragraph. (2 marks)

  23. Answer The phrase our familiarity with his work looks back at the topic of how widely known Shakespeare s work is.(1 mark) The conjunction however which begins the sentence suggests a contrasting idea to follow. The second part of the sentence, we know relatively little of the man himself , introduces the new topic, namely the things that are not known about Shakespeare (1 mark), and a list of these follows this link sentence.

  24. Sentence Structure Analysis

  25. Types of sentence Statements - John is sitting down. - stating fact. Questions - Is John sitting down? - making the reader question something or if rhetorical, making it clear that no answer is required. Exclamations - John is sitting down! - used to convey a tone of amazement, shock or strong emotion. Command - Sit down, John. - used to persuade Minor/short sentences - used to create impact, suspense or urgency. Lists - used to emphasise the sheer amount of things.

  26. Other things to look for Inversion - The change of word order. Flames leapt up and up. = Up and up leapt the flames. Used to alter the emphasis in a sentence Repetition - We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the street, we shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender. - highlights determination to never give up their efforts.

  27. Punctuation A colon (:) usually introduces a quotation, a list or an explanation or expansion of the previous statement. A semi-colon (;) usually comes between two statements which are closely connected, or which balance or contrast one another. Often used in lists, instead of commas. A single dash (-) can be used to add an extra piece of information. It can also indicate the breaking off of a sentence or a pause in the sentence. Two dashes (-words here-) or parenthesis is used to add an extra piece of information which may not be considered too important.

  28. What the examiner is looking for 1. Identify the feature of sentence structure. 2. Comment on the effect it has. Why has it been used? Depending on how many marks the question is worth, you must provide one feature/effect for each mark.

  29. Example Fog everywhere. Fog up the river, where it flows among green airs and meadows; fog down the river, where it rolls defiled among the tiers of shipping, and the waterside pollutions of a great (and dirty) city. Fog on the Essex marshes, fog on the Kentish heights. Fog creeping into the cabooses of collier- brigs; fog lying out on the yards, and hovering in the rigging of great ships; fog drooping on the gunwales of barges and small boats. Q. Discuss the effectiveness of the sentence structure in this extract.

  30. Imagery Questions Analysis Similes Metaphors

  31. What the examiner is looking for To acquire all of the marks in an imagery question you must ask yourself: What is being compared to what? In what respects are the two similar? How does the comparison help you to visualise the subject better?

  32. The lake was a silver mirror flawlessly Example reflecting the sky. Explain how effective you find this metaphor. (2 marks)

  33. Other things to look for... Q. Comment on the effectiveness of... Alliteration - a series of words in which the same letter is repeated. Onomatopoeia - a word which imitates the sound it s describing. Hyperbole - deliberate over-exaggeration to emphasise the point.

  34. Other things to look for... Litotes - deliberate understatement used to take emphasis off something Euphemism - a milder way of saying something unpleasant (e.g. He s passed away) Oxymoron - two opposites placed beside each other to emphasise the difference (e.g dark light, alone together, painfully beautiful...) Juxtaposition - placing side by side

  35. Tone Analysis Serious or Humorous?

  36. What the examiner is looking for 1 - Identify the tone. 2 - Quote the words or phrase which helped you work out the tone. 3 - How did this help you work out the tone? Did they use any techniques to do this? (metaphor, simile, hyperbole, repetition, word choice etc...)

  37. Different kinds of tone Flippant - when the author is shows a careless/disrespectful attitude towards something which is normally taken seriously (e.g. some brass and stuff, up at the holy end). Conversational - when the writer is chatty and friendly, as if confiding in a friend. Ironic - when the author is saying the opposite of what they mean for either humorous effect or to express their feeling forcefully. Serious - used for serious purposes - usually uses formal, pompous or ponderous words.

  38. Different kinds of tone Tongue-in-cheek- when the writer sounds serious but is actually poking fun at the subject. Satirical - when a writer is funny but in a more savage way - they hold up a subject to ridicule in order to attack it. Emotive - when the writer aims to stir up emotions in the reader by shocking, angering or disturbing them. This is done by using words or expressions expressing extreme emotions. Remember: A question on tone is asking you what the writer s choice of words reveals about his feelings or his attitude to his subject.

  39. Example Nowhere else on the planet do footballers perform in front of vast crowds so full of bile, hatred and bigotry. I have yet to find another place on the planet where a sporting occasion includes a ritual of singing of some ditty celebrating a distant battle which took place 307 years ago. Explain how the writer feels towards the what happened at the Ranger/Celtic match. How does his tone help convey this? (4 marks)

  40. Answer The writer uses an emotive tone here (1 mark). He clearly disapproves of the hostility at the football match and struggles to understand why they are behaving that way (1 mark). He uses repetition of on the planet to hint that they are the only people who act like that and should be able to control themselves (1 mark). This is also a hyperbole as the writer hasn t actually searched the whole planet but is singling them out (1 mark). The writer also uses emotive language to convey strong emotions like bile , hatred and bigotry . His choice of the word ditty also implies a sense of contempt. (1 mark)

  41. RUAE skills Bullet point how you would answer the following questions 1. Own words 2. Link 3. Imagery 4. Sentence structure 5. Context 6. Evaluation 7. Comparison

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#