Advisory Opinion v. Declaratory Judgement
The distinctions between advisory opinions and declaratory judgments in legal contexts, alongside the complexities of challenging rules in court and determining the timing of judicial actions based on agency decisions. Understand the significance of final agency actions and the criteria defining agency actions within the legal framework.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Advisory Opinion v. Declaratory Judgement Advisory opinions are opinions on what the law is, outside of a case and controversy. Some state courts can give them, but the feds cannot. Declaratory judgements - OK There is a case and controversy, and you are asking the court for the law. Your client has been told not to testify by the White House, but has been subpoenaed by the House. 1
NB Old Cases Involving Rule Challanges In the modern world the courts looks so hard at the record in rulemaking that almost every challenge has a component of the rule being void because it is not supported by the record. In some of the old cases, the only question was the pure legal one of authority under the statute, which makes the challenge look more like a challenge to a statute. 2
Problems of Timing Doctrine of Finality Is there a final agency action, i.e., one that affects your client s rights? Doctrine of Exhaustion Have you done everything that agency requires? Doctrine of Ripeness Is the conflict ripe, i.e., is there a case and controversy? Often hard to separate from final agency action. 3
5 U.S.C. 704. Actions reviewable Agency action made reviewable by statute and final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court are subject to judicial review. A preliminary, procedural, or intermediate agency action or ruling not directly reviewable is subject to review on the review of the final agency action. 4
Is There a Final Agency Action? It must be the consummation of the agency process It must affect legal rights or have legal consequences Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154, 177-178 (1997) 5
What is the Agency Action? The APA defines agency action as includ[ing] the whole or a part of an agency rule, order, license, sanction, relief, or the equivalent or denial thereof, or failure to act. 5 U.S.C. 551(13). failure to act means the failure to take one of the discrete actions listed in the definition of agency action. Failure to act is only an agency action if the agency has no discretion to not act. Think mandamus 6
Federal Trade Commn. v. Standard Oil Co. of California, 449 U.S. 232 (1980) FTC finds that Standard Oil is engaging in anticompetitive practices Standard wants to appeal this Can be used in private antitrust actions Court says this alone does not have legal consequences Standard must wait until the agency brings an enforcement action 7
National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. Shultz, 443 F.2d 689 (D.C. Cir. 1971) Agency opinion letters - are they just restating the law, or do they change substantive rights? Who are they final for? This was to an association explaining how the agency would interpret a new law Detailed explanation From the secretary's office Not based on individualized facts In this case, the court found that the opinion was sufficiently specific and from a high enough level to affect the plaintiff's rights. Should this have been a rule? 8
Western Ill. Home Health Care, Inc. v. Herman, 150 F.3d 659 (7th Cir. 1998) This was an opinion letter to two specific parties about whether they were subject to the joint employer doctrine The letter said they were, and that they were now on notice so they would be subject to the penalties for a willful violation The court found this was a final agency action as to the parties because it required an immediate change in behavior This was influenced by the harsh results 9
Taylor-Callahan-Coleman Counties v. Dole, 948 F.2d 953 (5th Cir. 1991) This is a classic question - even if an opinion is final action as to the requestor, does it apply to others? The opinion was to an individual party, based on that party's specific facts. These are like IRS letter rulings and OIG opinions The plaintiff was a third party who wanted to challenge the opinion. The court found that this was not a final agency action, at least as to other parties. 10
Franklin v. Massachusetts, 505 U.S. 788 (1992) MA wants to contest the method the Department of Commerce used to correct the census numbers Why does this matter? The President is charged with determining the final count, and Congress does the reallocation of representatives The court found that the report from Commerce was only a recommendation to the President Still an issue: who do you count? 11
What about Compliance Orders? An order to a specific party to obey the law Based on the agency's view that the party is not in compliance with the law If the party thinks it is obeying the law, it can ignore the compliance order without peril. Not self-enforcing - the agency must bring a separate enforcement action to force compliance (Like the FTC Standard Oil case) Is this an appealable final action? Is it ripe? 12
Sackett v. U.S. EPA, 132 S. Ct. 1367 (2012) Are EPA Clean Water Act compliance orders final, appealable orders? The EPA starts the penalty clock from the issuance of the compliance order. There is an ever increasing penalty for delay in complying. How would this change your analysis? 13
US Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 1807 (2016) Section 404 of the CWA limits the dredging and filling of wetlands, which makes it costly or impossible to do development. The Corps makes a jurisdictional determination (JD) that your client s property is covered by 404. Is this going to change your client s rights? Until Hawkes, these were treated as compliance orders and thus not appealable. 14
Finality Wrap-up Is the agency action directed to your client? If not, what is your argument as to why it affects your client s interests? Is it complete, or an intermediate action? Does it have legal consequences, i.e., will it require your client to change its behavior? Does it require an immediate change? 15
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies When is the agency done with you? 16
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Does the plaintiff have to go through the agency process before going to court? Does the plaintiff have to present the same issues to the agency as will be challenged later in court? This is a source of significant malpractice Some of the Katrina levee cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs did not exhaust their remedies before filing suit. 17
APA - 5 U.S.C. 704 . . . Except as otherwise expressly required by statute, agency action otherwise final is final for purposes of this section , unless the agency otherwise requires by rule and provides that the action meanwhile is inoperative, for an appeal to superior agency authority. Can the agency enforce an order and still require exhaustion of agency appeals process? Why would this be logically inconsistent? (There is a common law exhaustion discussed later for non-APA cases.) 18
Is Exhaustion Required by Statute or Regulation? The key question under the APA is whether the enabling act or an agency regulation requires exhaustion If exhaustion is not required, then the party may go to court directly However, if there is an agency process available, and you lose in court, you may have waived your agency appeal Does the rule have to say exhaustion, or is it implied by having the process? 19
Example: HUD Regulations HUD regulations allow, but do not require that an administrative appeal be filed. The granting of the appeal is discretionary with the secretary The ruling of the ALJ becomes final in 30 days and is not stayed by a request for a hearing Must you request an administrative appeal before going to court? Remember 704 20
Common Law Exhaustion: Portela- Gonzalez, 109 F.3d 74 (1st Cir. 1997) Plaintiff is fired from a civilian Navy job The APA does not apply by statute Plaintiff appeals through 3 levels, but skips last level. Firing is in force during appeal What is the common law of exhaustion? Is the APA narrower? Do you have a final ruling if there is agency process left? Just knowing that you are going to lose through the agency process is not enough. 21
Exceptions to Common Law Exhaustion Will requiring exhaustion prevent the court from properly reviewing the action? Is the agency enforcing its ruling and will this cause the plaintiff suffer irreparable harm? Can the agency process provide the requested relief? Can you prove the agency is so biased or prejudiced that it cannot give a fair review? Practice note make sure you are not subject to common law exhaustion before you go to court. 22
What if You Screw Up Your Administrative Appeal? Assume that a person tried to exhaust the administrative appeals, but makes a procedural error such as missing a deadline, and the appeal is dismissed by the agency Since there is no further process available at the agency, has he exhausted the agency remedies? Has he gotten a final judgment from the agency on the merits? Can you go to court without a final ruling from the agency? Can you get to the Supreme Court in an Article III case if you screw up the appeal to the Circuit Court? 23
Administrative Issue Exhaustion Must each issue that will be appealed to the courts be raised at the agency level? What about in a regular trial: If you do not present an issue to the trial court - other than a jurisdictional issue - can you raise it at the first time on appeal? What if you raise some issues with the agency, but not others - can you then appeal the ones you raised? 24
Sims v. Apfel, 530 U.S. 103 (2000) Social Security disability benefits The court held that the general rule is that plaintiffs who are subject to exhaustion of remedies must also present the issues they want to appeal to the agency In the specific case, the court found that the special nature of SS mitigated against preclusion Informal, and applicants seldom have counsel 25
Issue Exhaustion in Rulemaking When do parties have a chance to object to provisions in a rulemaking? Should they be required to make their objections during the comment period if they plan to challenge the rule later in court? Is this analogous to an administrative appeal of an order? What if the party did not raise the issue in a comment, but someone else did? This is an evolving doctrine 26
Is the Case Ripe? Warning Ripeness and Finality Can Blend Together 27
Ripeness "The problem is best seen in a twofold aspect, requiring us to evaluate both the fitness of the issues for judicial decision and the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration." If the case is not ripe, you do not have a case and controversy Ripeness is not codified in the APA, so it remains a jurisprudential doctrine Ripeness is jurisdictional, so it can be raised at any time 28
When is Review Appropriate? (Prelude to the later ripeness discussion) When should the plaintiff be able to get review of an agency regulation before the agency takes enforcement action? What is a facial review of a statute? What is the traditional constitutional law standard for a facial review? 29
"As Applied" (Post-Enforcement) Review Why does the agency prefer post-enforcement review? What do you have to balance in deciding whether to violate the statute and then challenge it? What additional information does the court get when it requires the plaintiff to wait until there is enforcement? What if the penalties are so Draconian that no one will risk enforcement? 30
Abbott Round II The FDA drug labeling case. The only question was whether the statute allowed the agency action. 31
Was Abbott "Ripe"? In a facial challenge, the court does not need to see how the rule is applied In this case, the rule required the product labels to be changed without further agency action What is the impact of this regulation? What is the risk of enforcement? Is this a final agency action? 32
The Abbott Policy on Injunctions While review is favored, there is no right to review before the agency brings an enforcement action Plaintiffs asked for an injunction They claimed they could not risk enforcement An injunction prevents the agency from acting Prevents important health and safety measures Enmeshes the court in agency policy making 33
What are the Equitable Factors? (Think injunction standards) Since there is no right to pre-enforcement review, the plaintiff must show the court an equitable basis for granting review, which resembles the factors for granting an injunction Is there an immediate effect of the agency action on the plaintiff's activities? What is the risk of waiting for enforcement? Does the court have enough information to determine the issue? What are the special factors in the drug business? 34
Abbott Rule Where the legal issue presented is fit for judicial resolution, and where a regulation requires an immediate and significant change in the plaintiffs conduct of their affairs with serious penalties attached to noncompliance, access to the courts under the [APA] must be permitted, absent a statutory bar or some other unusual circumstance. . . 35
Toilet Goods Assn. v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 158 (1967) Companion case to Abbott FDA promulgated a rule allowing them to inspect toilet good manufacturers to assure compliance with FDA regulations How is a rule allowing inspections different from the rule in Abbott? How are the equities different? 36
Example: EPA Smoke Spotters The credible evidence rule allowed visual observation of smoke from a smokestack to be used as evidence that a person was violating its Clean Air Act requirements Plaintiffs contest the action, saying it was beyond agency authority Is this more like Toilet Goods or Abbott Labs? Do plaintiffs have to change their behavior? 37
Was the Dispute Ripe in National Automatic Laundry? The court found that the dispute in National Automatic Laundry was ripe because the opinion included detailed factual hypotheticals on the application of the doctrine in different situations This gave the court the necessary factual information to review the application Without this detail, the court would have required the plaintiff to wait for enforcement so there would be facts to evaluate With this detail, should it be a rule? 38
What if You Benefit from a Policy that is Being Changed? FDA regulates contamination in foods These are impossible to completely remove The agency issues allowable (action) levels This is a safe harbor, it is not necessarily the safety limit that would trigger sanctions if exceeded 39
Whose Claim is Ripe? You represent consumers who believe that the new (higher) action levels are dangerous Is the action ripe as to your claim? Can it get riper? What about manufacturers who think the level is too low? How are they different from consumers? What new info might the court get by waiting until enforcement? 40
What if the Agency Changes a Permit Process to Your Detriment? The NRC says it is loosening up the permit process for dumping low level waste Is this ripe? What has to happen before any waste is dumped under this rule? What if the forest service loosens up the permit process for clear cutting, but there must be a timber sale with public input before the timber can be cut? 41
Ripeness Recap Enforcement actions, permits, and other affirmative agency actions against your client If you have done everything the agency requires, then you have exhausted agency remedies Your case is ripe Ripeness and finality can blur together. 42
APA - When Can You Go to Court Without Exhausting Agency Actions? 43
The agency action is unconstitutional or exceeds the agency's legal authority Rulemaking - Facial Challenge How does this differ from a challenge that the record is not adequate? You have to convince the court that the rule does not have a legal application You have to convince the court that your client will suffer significant harm if it must wait for enforcement If you fail, then you have to wait until the agency acts against your client Agency enforcement actions let you go for an injunction or other attack on the agency authority 44
Impossibility of Agency Remedy The agency does not offer the remedy you seek You want money damages and the agency remedies only offer that the agency will stop enforcement actions Congress can require you to exhaust your agency remedy anyway. The agency is biased against your client Just showing that you are going to lose is not enough Remember from previous chapters how hard this is to prove. 45
Next Slide - Not in todays reading, but we will cover it since it is simple, and you can read the text before next class 46
Primary Jurisdiction In these disputes there is a issue which meets the standard for judicial review No exhaustion required. The primary jurisdiction question is whether the courts should let the agency resolve the problem first This is important when national uniformity is important, such as automobile emissions standards The court gives the agency the chance to rule for the country before hearing an individual dispute Often resolves the dispute, so no judicial remedy is necessary 47